Blandin on Broadband

News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends

Blandin on Broadband

OPPORTUNITY: Join the Minnesota Cybersecurity Task Force 2026

Here’s an opportunity for readers to apply to become a member of the Minnesota Cybersecurity Task Force…

Minnesota Cybersecurity Task Force 2026
Vacancies: 6 Seats — County, City, Town, or Tribal Government Member
Vacancies: 2 Seats — Critical Infrastructure Representatives
Vacancies: 1 Seat — Minnesota National Guard Representative
Vacancies: 2 Seats — Private Sector IT Representatives
Vacancies: 1 Seat — Public Education Representative
Vacancies: 1 Seat — Public Health Representative
Vacancies: 2 Seats — State Planning Representatives

Data centers come up in another debate (District 3) between Hauschild and Zupancich

Duluth News Tribune reports…

Candidates in a rematch of one of Minnesota’s most hotly contested State Senate races sparred over fraud, data centers and tariffs at a forum Monday night.

Incumbent District 3 Sen. Grant Hauschild, DFL-Hermantown, repeatedly described himself as an independent-minded legislator unafraid to buck his party. …

But his Republican challenger, Babbitt Mayor Andrea Zupancich, said Hauschild has voted with the DFL about 95% of the time. She contended the state needs a change in direction.

Here’s what was said about data centers…

Zupancich admitted she’s “still learning about data centers,” as that hasn’t been an issue to date in her rural area. But she stressed that it’s important that the community be “fully informed” and for “everyone to have a seat at the table.”

Hauschild, likewise, said it is important that “local communities have a say,” while noting Minnesota has already passed some of the strongest regulations in the country. That includes monitoring of water usage and ensuring the companies pay for their energy, he said.

But Zupancich criticized her opponent for co-authoring a bill to give data centers what she described as a “free-ride” tax break for 35 years.

Hauschild responded by saying that was an initial proposal, but the final legislation actually raised taxes for the companies “by tens of millions of dollars.” He also noted his efforts to ban elected officials from signing non-disclosure agreements.

Candidates running in District 8 debate, data center comes up

Duluth News Tribune reports…

In a forum hosted Monday night, incumbent Sen. Jen McEwen and Republican candidate Darrick Law answered some of the biggest questions facing constituents, from data centers and copper-nickel mining to protecting taxpayers from fraud.

Data centers were part of the discussion…

On data centers, Law agreed with McEwen on removing NDAs that bar communication between local government and the community.

“Data centers are a pretty functional part of our society right now,” Law said. “However, communities should have a voice on data centers being put in their neighborhoods.”

 

Inver Grove Heights approves data center site plan (Dakota County)

KARE11 reports…

The Inver Grove Heights City Council approved the major site plan Monday for a 55,000-square-foot data center.

The plan includes a framework for construction, including the architecture, landscaping, light output, and parking.

The vote comes two weeks after the council let the project continue, despite a moratorium on data centers in the city. The developer sued, saying they started the process well before the moratorium took effect. That one-year moratorium is in effect for any other data center projects there.

SpaceX suggests the FCC end rural subsidies

Doug Dawson from CCG Consulting reports…

SpaceX has now told the FCC multiple times that the agency should begin the process of phasing down and eliminating all rural high-cost subsidies from the Universal Service Fund. The company filed comments asking for the end of subsidies in FCC Docket 26-96, which is looking at reforming the High-cost fund for an all IP Future, and in Docket 10-90 that was looking at Universal Service Fund reform. In both filings, SpaceX says that its proliferation of low-orbit satellites means that rural subsidies are obsolete and are no longer needed. The company characterizes anybody who disagrees with it as a “subsidy-dependent incumbent”. SpaceX goes on to argue that the money currently spent on rural subsidies should be redirected to programs that lower the cost of broadband for low-income families.

Doug looks at many aspects of the issue, I’ll just add one…

I think the SpaceX request raises multiple policy questions. First, is satellite really providing broadband? Earlier this decade the FCC declared that Starlink was not providing broadband when the agency canceled the $885 million award Starlink had won in the RDOF reverse auction. At the beginning of this year, Ookla said that only 45% of Starlink customers were meeting the FCC’s definition of broadband at 100/20 Mbps. But Starlink’s speeds have been slowly improving, and will be boosted over the next five years as the company replaces the current V2 satellites with the new V3 satellites that provide 10 times more download capacity and 22 times more upload capacity.

County Commission candidates in Fergus Falls talk about data centers (Otter Tail County)

The Fergus Falls Daily Journal reports…

County Commission District 2 incumbent Wayne Johnson and challenger Jeff Gontarek participated in a forum Saturday, Sept. 26, sponsored by the League of Women Voters of East Otter Tail County and the National Organization for Women Fergus Falls chapter at the Otter Room in Ottertail.

In the wide-ranging forum, Johnson and Gontarek addressed multiple topics including property taxes, emergency services, their top three priorities and their thoughts on data centers.

Here’s what they said about data centers…

Johnson said county-wide zoning faces resident push back over land rights and recommended that townships adopt their own zoning ordinances to prevent unregulated development outside city limits. He said data center construction would damage local roads through heavy truck traffic. He would require decommissioning plans and bonds for large developments, similar to proposals for solar and wind farms, so land can be restored and money is available if a company abandons a site. He said wind and solar farms are acceptable in the right locations, and that rural Minnesota may currently be less attractive to data center developers than North Dakota.

Gontarek said he opposes data centers in Otter Tail County at this time. He cited about 25 hours of research and said he found they do not create significant numbers of jobs. He also questioned the return on investment for the tax base and raised concerns about water use, noting that local river levels are low. He said existing problems such as roads and taxes should be addressed before new developments are considered.

Data center supporters in Pine Island ask MCEA to drop its lawsuit (Rice County)

Post Bulletin reports...

A letter to the environmental advocacy group states, “Your lawsuit is an unasked for disruption of our democratic process that threatens many amazing benefits for our city, school, county and state,”

A group of data center supporters is asking a Twin Cities environmental group to get out of Pine Island’s business.

A letter sent to the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy — the St. Paul-based group that is suing both the city of Pine Island and developer Ryan Companies, LLC, over the proposed data center in Pine Island — “respectfully request that you drop the lawsuit so that partnerships between Pine Island, Google and Ryan Companies can move forward.”
The letter, addressed to MCEA Executive Director Kathryn Hoffman, has been signed by 183 “residents, business leaders and educators” from Pine Island.

You can read more on the lawsuit in an earlier post.

Pine Island anti-data center group hosts info session (Goodhue County)

KAAL TV reports…

Southern Minnesotans came together to learn more about health concerns and state law related to data centers in Goodhue this Saturday.

With a data center project in the works in Pine Island and other cities, attendees came with plenty of questions for the experts featured in this event.

There’s lots and lots of more information that the city council and the citizens need to be made aware of,” Randolph resident, Ann Bezdichak-Boselmeier said.

Ava Corey-Gruenes, an organizer and outreach coordinator with Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate, said that water pollution caused by data centers has been linked to cancer, miscarriages and kidney conditions.

She said the purpose of the event was to help the public make informed decisions about data centers.

The article proceeds to share various views from attendees and planners and give a quick update…

The data center in Pine Island is paused under a court order after the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy filed a legal challenge questioning the environmental impacts of the data center.

The next hearing is set for Nov. 16.

Faribault city council candidates talk data center (Rice County)

Faribault Daily News reports on a candidate forum between City Council candidates Paul Wunderlich, John Rowan, and Katie Howard…

All three city council candidates present during Wednesday night’s candidate forum at Harvest Church said they did not support the Archer data center development, while two said they use artificial intelligence daily. Other topics of conversation included the difficulty in keeping tax levies low, and whether Faribault should loosen density regulations and embrace smaller homes.

A crowd of elected officials, candidates, and about 8 members of the public gathered to hear what candidates Paul Wunderlich, Councilor John Rowan, and Katie Howard had to say. Candidates Natalie Halverson, Lexi Temple and Kameron Gustafson had scheduling issues and could not attend, organizer Linda Cross said.

The article outlines their various views, including the following…

All three candidates said they opposed the Archer data center, but acknowledged it was too late to just say no to it. Howard said she, Wunderlich, and Jacob Reed, who did not advance past the primary election, worked to develop a plan of what regulations and limits they’d like to see for any data center development coming into Faribault. …

Rowan, the only incumbent in the race, said in his introduction that he was not on council when the data center was initially approved. Rowan called the developer a speculator, saying the ultimate goal was to flip the data center to a buyer to make an easy profit. That process is already in motion, he said. …

Wunderlich agreed with Rowan and said he believed the developer was treating Faribault as a commodity, not a town. He was also concerned with the current council’s plan to vote on datacenter standards in November. Wunderlich said he was concerned the standards would not go far enough.

Winona County Board considers temporary data center ban

Winona Post reports…

As communities across the country debate how to address the rise of AI and the data centers that back the technology, the Winona County Board earlier this month took its first step toward analyzing whether to block or allow data centers in this area. The board voted unanimously for the Planning Commission to study the issue and consider a moratorium of up to one year.

Winona County Planning and Environmental Services Director Ross Dunsmoor highlighted at the County Board’s September 9 meeting some concerns that have come up nationwide about data centers, from their use of water, electricity, and land, to the noise they generate. On the other hand, he also said some municipalities have received investments in their infrastructure from data center developers.

Dunsmoor explained that locally, under current zoning regulations, the county would only allow data centers in general industry zones. However, he added that townships control the zoning regulations for a number of these areas, leaving just one zone subject to the county — New Hartford Township.

The article highlights diverse opinions from Commissioners. And mentioned plans…

The Planning Commission will next study a potential moratorium. Community members will then have a chance to provide input during a public hearing, Dunsmoor explained, and then the County Board will discuss the topic again.

Duluth resident says there’s still a place for landlines in rural Minnesota

Duluth News tribune reports…

Rural Minnesota is often overlooked. Many people in our region, especially seniors and older adults, rely on their landline phone service. Many still do not have cell service due to the increased cost or simply the unavailability of adequate broadband in their area. Frontier, a major provider in these areas, plans to discontinue its traditional landline service and has made that proposal to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.

AARP wants to ensure that consumers are not left without dependable and affordable access to essential phone service. We hope the commission requires strong consumer protections before allowing a discontinuation of landlines. Reliable and affordable phone service is too important to tinker with without making sure everyone has that protection.

Follow up on Castle Rock data center lawsuit dismissal (Dakota County)

Hometown Source reports…

Castle Rock Township’s lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice in Dakota County District Court, according to a stipulation order, on Sept. 15 against the city of Farmington, MNLCO Farmington LLC and Farmington School District 192.

The lawsuit filed in February 2025 claimed the city of Farmington violated the orderly annexation agreement when the Farmington City Council approved rezoning for a 2.5 million-square-foot data center concept.

The court said the township and the defendants each seek dismissal with prejudice, which means the case can’t be refiled in court.

The parties also agreed that the defendants will waive all costs, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees that the defendants would otherwise have sought to recover from the township.

It was reported last week that Castle Rock has been working on a settlement agreement with the defendants, but no further information has been released regarding terms from the township, the city or the Colorado-based data center concept developer Tract.

The article gives a nice history of activity related to the project.

EVENT Sep 26: Stop the Pine Island Data Center conversation (Goodhue County)

Post Bulletin reports…

A conversation around data centers, health and policy will take place in Goodhue this weekend.

The two-hour event, organized by Stop the Pine Island Data Center, starts at 4 p.m. Saturday, Sept. 26, at St. Luke Lutheran church in Goodhue. Attendees can RSVP through an online form.

The event comes roughly one month after Google held a community event in Pine Island, the town its proposed technology campus, Project Skyway, would be. A Goodhue County judge has temporarily blocked the development from proceeding.

Southeast Minnesota lawmakers listen as residents weigh regulations amid data center talk

KTTC reports…

As talks for data centers continue to expand across Minnesota, communities in the southeast corner of the state are grappling with how to balance technological growth with local oversight.

On Thursday, DFL state lawmakers Sen. Liz Boldon and Rep. Tina Liebling hosted a virtual town hall to hear directly from Rochester-area constituents regarding potential policies and regulations surrounding large-scale data center facilities.

During the forum, residents raised concerns over data privacy, long-term environmental impacts, and skepticism regarding promised local economic benefits. Similar pushback has already placed a planned data center development in Pine Island on hold amid an ongoing lawsuit.

Lawmakers noted that the public’s unease is part of a broader national trend. A recent survey conducted by the Pew Research Center found that more than half of Americans believe data centers are mostly bad for the environment, while 6 in 10 respondents said they would not feel comfortable having a data center built in their own community.

They spoke about data center in past legislative sessions…

Over the past few legislative sessions, Minnesota lawmakers have taken steps to rein in industry incentives and impose stricter environmental guardrails. Recent legislation eliminated a $140 million state sales tax exemption on electricity for data centers and instituted requirements that facilities using more than 100 million gallons of water coordinate directly with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.

They spoke about sticky issues…

Another major policy point under discussion is the prohibition of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) in municipal negotiations with developers. Local governments are already moving in that direction; the city of Harmony included an NDA ban in the latest draft of its data center ordinance, which is currently before its planning and zoning committee.

Attorney General Ellison calls on Congress to protect Americans from unchecked AI development

Attorney General Ellison announces...

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison today joined a bipartisan coalition of 26 attorneys general in calling on Congress to immediately regulate the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. In a letter to congressional leaders — House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — Attorney General Ellison and the coalition warn that reports of recent incidents demonstrate that unchecked AI development endangers Americans and poses a potential threat to our financial system, critical infrastructure, and national security. The coalition urges Congress to quickly pass substantive legislation to regulate the AI industry to ensure that development occurs at an intentional pace, incorporates safety and transparency by design, and maintains states’ ability to oversee the industry.

“To protect public health, our government regulates everything from aircraft to aspirin to aircraft. It is past time Congress do the same with artificial intelligence,” said Attorney General Ellison. “This new technology has the potential to cause big problems or to help solve them, and which route it takes may well depend on what we do now to shape and guide it. We will be doing the American people a tremendous disservice if we allow the frontier of AI development to remain a wild west of near-misses and chilling failures. That’s why I’m calling on Congress to responsibly regulate artificial intelligence, to not preempt state-level rules and regulations, and to give state attorneys general full authority to enforce federal law regulating AI.”

On July 16, Hugging Face, an open-source library and repository, reported that it was being attacked by an unknown third party. Within a week, OpenAI admitted that the attack was waged by its AI agents, which escaped a testing environment and infiltrated Hugging Face using stolen credentials. OpenAI was aware of the agents’ capabilities and failed to monitor their activity or stop their exploits. The agents’ actions, if perpetrated by a human, would have constituted criminal conduct.

Following the Hugging Face incident, Anthropic and Meta also acknowledged their AI agents had also entered the open web and performed dangerous and unlawful actions. This agent behavior has been known to the industry for years and is a direct result of their training. Through a practice called “reinforcement learning,” AI labs reward models’ achievement of goals and penalize unsuccessful attempts, leading models to take reckless measures to complete the tasks they are given.

These reports have led to some of the AI industry’s leading developers calling for regulation. OpenAI’s Chief Global Affairs Officer called for “mandatory, capability-based national AI safety regulation.” Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei urged the United States to lead international coordination of AI model development because this effort “will require government support.”

Attorney General Ellison and the coalition are calling on Congress to take immediate action to ensure AI development does not lead to irreversible damage or further illegal behavior. In their letter, Attorney General Ellison and the coalition emphasize that any AI regulatory scheme considered by Congress must include:

  • Federal oversight of safety testing and standards, led by experts in the field of AI model safety and backed by consistent performance benchmarks;
  • Uniform and transparent government-led incident response with public findings that allow the industry to rapidly evolve in response;
  • Safety infrastructure and experienced leaders to make critical safety decisions unburdened by profit maximization;
  • International cooperation to pace AI advancement and prevent the development of harmful superintelligence; and
  • A prohibition on preemption of state laws and full authority for state officials to enforce federal protections.

Joining Attorney General Ellison in sending the letter to Congress are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, the District of Columbia, and American Samoa.