The Urban Institute has released a new report, Broadband Access in Indian Country. They set the stage…
According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as of 2024, 93 percent of all US residents had access to internet services with “advanced telecommunications capability”—that is, 100 megabits per second of download speed and 20 megabits per second of upload speed (represented as 100/20 Mbps)—compared with only 76 percent of people living on tribal lands (FCC 2024). And 76 percent may be an overestimate—FCC data have been criticized for overstating broadband access on tribal lands (GAO 2018).
And provide recommendations…
In this report, we provide an overview of the major federal programs aimed at supporting broadband infrastructure and share findings and best practices from 15 interviews conducted with individuals working to expand access to high-speed internet in Native communities. Interviewees represented tribal broadband providers, tribal governments, state governments, technical assistance providers, nonprofit and philanthropic organizations, and other advocates supporting tribal broadband access and sovereignty, defined as the right of tribes to govern their communities without interference (Klingbeil et al. 2023). Informed by these interviews and a review of federal funding opportunities, we find the following:
◼ Federal investments have significantly expanded internet access in many Native communities, but others are still left out.
◼ Some tribal governments that received these initial broadband infrastructure investments may face challenges maintaining and operating service into the future because of limited administrative, financial, or technical capacity.
◼ To overcome unfavorable relationships with private internet providers and to sustain adequate internet service in the long run, many tribal governments, tribal broadband providers, and other stakeholders are prioritizing tribal ownership of broadband infrastructure.
Based on these conversations, we identify best practices for tribal governments and tribal broadband providers seeking to access federal broadband funding, build necessary infrastructure, and maintain reliable broadband access. These include the following:
◼ When applying for federal grant opportunities, plan early, leverage technical assistance and partnerships, and prepare applications that can be adapted for other programs.
◼ Develop business, operations, and maintenance plans early in the application process to ensure the proposed broadband project will be financially, technically, and statutorily viable for the community.
◼ Invest in workforce development and build external partnerships to boost local technical capacity without compromising sovereignty.
These conversations also elevated recommendations for other stakeholders seeking to expand and maintain broadband infrastructure in Native communities:
◼ Federal agencies could refine funding opportunities to be more responsive to community needs by providing technical assistance throughout the grant application process, prioritizing tribal ownership of broadband infrastructure, and waiving matching requirements. To make investments more effective in the long run, agencies could provide technical assistance or additional financial support for infrastructure maintenance (not only for construction).
◼ State and local governments could offer more direct technical assistance and provide alternative funding sources to tribal governments and tribal broadband providers.
◼ Philanthropic organizations can increase their support by focusing investments on Capacity building, training, and technical assistance, while organizations with the financial capacity can contribute directly to infrastructure deployment and operations






















