EVENT May 19 (today): BEAD Non-Deployment Funds Could Fund Precision Ag, and more from Fiber Connect byBroadband Breakfast

From Broadband Breakfast

Broadband Breakfast Live Online at Fiber Connect

Broadband Breakfast is planning to host online events at Fiber Connect from May 18-May 20 – on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday.

Panelists

  • Rebecca Denman, President of Business Development, UniTek Global Services
  • Greg Bathrick,Area Vice President of Commercial Development, Calix
  • Donald Ray, Chief Development Officer, BAM Broadband
  • Lindsay Randazzo, Senior Director of Marketing, Innovative Systems
  • Anis Khemakhem, Chief Commercial Officer, Clearfield
  • Drew Clark (moderator), CEO and Publisher, Broadband Breakfast

Fiber Broadband says Precision Agriculture needs fiber

Fiber Broadband Association releases a report that outlines the benefits of fiber for precision agriculture…

Precision Ag depends on data and broadband networks. Farming is transforming into a highly connected, data-driven industry and this shift fundamentally changes the broadband requirements of rural America.

Current 100/20 Mbps thresholds do not reflect these realities and risk prematurely classifying agricultural communities as “served,” but a symmetrical baseline of at least 100/100 Mbps better reflects the operational demands of Precision Ag today and the technologies emerging over the next decade. Among broadband technologies, fiber remains uniquely positioned to meet these requirements due to its symmetric capacity, extremely low latency, and virtually unlimited scalability.

To ensure U.S. agriculture remains competitive and resilient, broadband policy must evolve past minimum speed thresholds and “good enough” infrastructure to reflect the realities of data-driven farming. Investing in scalable fiber infrastructure ensures that rural America and the nation’s food supply remain competitive in a rapidly evolving agricultural economy.

It makes sense that the Fiber Broadband Association would feel that way. They also list some increased needs they predict will happen as a result of AI…

Practically, technology advancements and AI integration push networks toward the following requirements:
• More upstream throughput (moving raw/processed data to models)
• Lower-latency access (interactive recommendations and control)
• More reliability (automation cannot “pause” for a flaky link or bad weather)
• Edge computing architectures (local processing plus cloud synchronization)
• Scalability (more devices and higher data rates over time)
• Security (critical operational data, ransomware risks, supply chain access)

Should the data center conversation also include broadband expansion?

An Op-Ed from Next City wonders why municipalities aren’t looking at broadband expansion as a talking point for data centers…

As data centers pop up across the country, communities are asking hard questions about their true value: megawatts of electricity used, gallons of water absorbed, tax abatements for developers, and the true number of jobs created.

The current debate positions data centers as a tradeoff between growth and strain, pitting economic development versus environmental and infrastructure impact.

These are important questions. They deserve scrutiny. But they are not the whole picture. …

For communities — especially in rural areas — who may still be working to install broadband networks, the data center debate is an opportunity for a structured and thoughtful broadband infrastructure transformation.

While discussions on water and power define where a data center will locate, it is the connectivity that will define what impact it will have on a community.

I have wondered why this hasn’t come up earlier in this current chapter of data centers. Around 2014, Eagan made very purposeful strides to connect broadband to data centers as an economic development strategy. And I remember (in 2011), when Duluth was trying to become a Google Fiber Community that the cold as an asset to data centers and the recent addition of the Involta data center was a plus. Clearly, this is a decade before the arrival hyperscale data center in Minnesota and hyperscale is a game changer. But this article got me looking at what happened years ago. I cannot say whether data centers are a good or bad idea for you community, but the advice I saw 10 years ago looks similar to the first step given in this article…

To create a robust plan for local connectivity, all stakeholders must be involved. That includes broadband providers that lay the fiber and build the infrastructure that connect our businesses, schools, and hospitals to the modern economy. These companies are core stakeholders, not background infrastructure.

However, these providers are often noticeably absent from such conversation. At a recent Columbus City Council hearing about data center development, for example, not a single internet provider or broadband expert was among the presentations. The room was filled, the news was filming, strong opinions were shared – and yet, broadband was not represented.

Not having all stakeholders at the table means that decisions about data centers are being made with incomplete information as to the whole picture of the costs and benefits of development.

How do job-seeking kids feel about AI? Not great

Axios reports

America, we have a problem: Young adults are scared and unprepared for the AI revolution upending their early career choices and prospects.

  • They tell pollsters they’re frightened, even angry, about AI’s fast arrival. They’re rightly unnerved by a tough job market for college grads. And most aren’t remotely equipped by schools to be AI-savvy.

Why it matters: This is a growing problem for just about everyone — kids, educators, employers and politicians.

  • The youngest, most technologically native age group should be among the biggest cheerleaders and beneficiaries of AI. They aren’t. If anything, their feelings are growing more sour.

By the numbers: Gen Z’s excitement about AI dropped 14 points over the last year to just 22%, according to Gallup polling released last week. Hopefulness about the technology fell nine points to 18%, while anger rose nine points to 31%.

AI’s impact on unemployment rate is real but minimal and mixed

Axios reports

The impact of AI on the job market is starting to show up in the data analyzed by Wall Street firms — so far it’s pretty modest, but certainly real.

What they found: AI has both created and destroyed jobs over the past year.

  • It reduced employment in occupations that are easily substituted by AI, translating to a slight 0.16 percentage point increase in the unemployment rate.
  • At the same time, AI decreased unemployment by 0.06 point in jobs that are “augmented” by AI — roles that rely on things that machines cannot replace, like human judgment, interpersonal interaction and accountability.

Zoom out: Overall, AI raised the unemployment rate by just 0.1 percentage point, they find.

The article goes on to explain that there are two sides to AI. It was help some professions and eliminate others…

The bottom line: AI’s impact on the labor market is small so far, and it’s more complicated than the doomers want you to think.

New MN Bill: End the state’s tax exemption for digital advertising, sales and services HF4343

The Minnesota House reports

Once upon a time, the main place you’d find advertising was in a newspaper. But then billboards became ubiquitous, followed by commercials on radio, then television. Today, it’s an inescapable element of your online experience.

But did you know that no taxes are collected when digital ads are bought in Minnesota? Nor are they for billboards. Sponsored by Rep. Liz Lee (DFL-St. Paul), HF4343 would end the state’s tax exemption for digital advertising, sales and services, and do the same for billboards. And it would lower the state’s sales tax rate by 0.125%.

On Wednesday, the House Taxes Committee laid the bill over, as amended, for possible omnibus bill inclusion.

They looked at

 HF4343 would end the state’s tax exemption for digital advertising, sales and services, and do the same for billboards. And it would lower the state’s sales tax rate by 0.125%.

 

MinnPost gives a current overview of Data Center issues at the MN Legislature

MinnPost reports

A coalition of Minnesotans opposed to the development of data centers has a wishlist for the current legislative session with a hierarchy of priorities.

Banning local officials from signing non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs, would be nice, they say. Ditto for requiring public hearings and disclosures prior to the approval of data center permits.

What the group wants above all, though, is a moratorium on proposed projects in Hermantown, Pine Island, Monticello, Farmington, North Mankato and other cities.

“We’re begging, urging the state to pause,” said Rebecca Gilbertson, who lives about a half-mile from a planned Google data center in Hermantown.

There’s a discussion about NDAs…

NDAs are common tools — too common in the eyes of those advocating against them — used in economic development. They allow plans to simmer behind the scenes before any public scrutiny can boil over at public meetings. The normalization of NDAs prompted a St. Louis County commissioner to propose a ban on them last year.

Business groups, however, argue that NDA bans would stymie development.

“Without some level of confidentiality during those early conversations, companies may be unwilling to explore potential projects in Minnesota while evaluating investments across multiple states or competing communities within the same region,” wrote a group of economic organizations in a letter submitted to the Legislature.

And discussion on proposed moratorium on data centers…

A moratorium bill introduced by Sen. Jennifer McEwen, DFL-Duluth, would halt local permits for data centers until the state’s Public Utilities Commission submits a report  to the Legislature on energy usage, water usage and other impacts. The bill would delay development until at least a year after the report’s submission, theoretically pushing back local approvals into 2029.

Press Conference: MN Lawmakers Introduce Legislation to Regulate Artificial Intelligence

Earlier today, Senator Erin Maye Quade, DFL-Apple Valley, legislators, and supporters held a press conference to introduce bills intended to regulate artificial intelligence for consumer protection and public safety. It’s a great peek at what might be happening later today and for the rest of the session. Reporters asked questions that many of us might ask – such as what does that mean in the real world.

Here are some of the sessions that will be happening today. You can watch in real time or view the archive later:

S.F. 1120 Maye QuadeGovernment entities prohibition from requesting or obtaining reverse-location information

scs1120a-1.pdf

ACLU-MN-Letter-of-Support-Reverse-Warrants-SF-1120.pdf

BCA-Opposition-to-SF1120-3-5-26-Signed-3-5-26.pdf

ILCM-SF1120-Pro.pdf

MCPA-_SF1120_Letter-of-Opposition.pdf

Reverse-Warrant-Flyer-SF-1120.pdf

20260302134430681_25-112-Google-Chatrie-Amicusfinal.pdf

S.F. 1856 Maye QuadeUsage of artificial intelligence in the utilization review process prohibition provision

scs1856a-1.pdf

S.F. 1857 Maye QuadeMinor access to chatbots for recreational purposes by persons prohibition provision

scs1857a-2.pdf

MFC-SF1857-Pro-Senate-Judiciary-and-Public-Safety-Committee-03092026.pdf

S.F. 1886 Maye QuadeIndividual communication with artificial intelligence disclosure requirement provision

RMAI-Memorandum-in-Opposition-to-SF1886-03-09-2026.pdf

S.F. 3098 Maye QuadeProhibition from using artificial intelligence to dynamically set product prices

scs3098a-1.pdf

MN for Open Government AI Regulation Presentation

MN_for_Open_Government_AI_regulation_presentation.pdf

New MN Bill introduced: Data centers excluded from gross annual retail energy sales for energy conservation and optimization purposes (HF3296)

I am going to try to at least track the bills that get introduced that are at all related to broadband and/or broadband use. I may not follow all closely. Click the bill number for more info and updates:

The MN House reports

That’s why he came to St. Paul to testify in favor of HF3296, a bill sponsored by Rep. Dawn Gillman (R-Dassel) that would allow utility sales of electricity to certain data centers to be excluded from the state’s definition of “gross annual retail energy sales,” and, thus, not required to meet the ECO plan’s annual energy savings goal of 1.5% for a cooperative or municipal utility.

On Thursday, the House Energy Finance and Policy Committee approved a delete-all amendment and laid the bill over for possible omnibus bill inclusion.

New MN Bill introduced: Funding for a digital platform to provide youth with info on internships and job opportunities (HF3004)

I am going to try to at least track the bills that get introduced that are at all related to broadband and/or broadband use. I may not follow all closely. Click the bill number for more info and updates:

From the MN House...

Sponsored by Rep. Samakab Hussein (DFL-St. Paul), HF3004as amended, would appropriate $1.3 million in Fiscal Year 2027 for a central digital platform to provide youth with information on internships, mentorships and job opportunities across the state.

Opinion Piece in Star Tribune: Slow down the rapid growth of data centers

Last year, I noticed a number of local discussion and event seminars on data centers looking to set up iin various Minnestoa towns. With the legislature in session, I suspect we’ll see a few more opinions shared in the near future. The following is an Opinion piece written to the Minnesota Star Tribune

Put simply, data center proposals are moving faster than policy in Minnesota. The speed of AI investments in data centers is outstripping the ability of the state and communities to protect themselves from their rapacious demands. We need a pause. We are calling on the Legislature to pass a two-year moratorium on data centers so that policymakers can catch up with this fast-moving industry. In those two years, the state should develop recommendations on policies to protect our natural resources and communities. They should look at the potential cumulative impacts of multiple proposed data centers, and they should develop a statewide strategy on where and how we will allow this industry to develop in our state.

Our organizations are tracking at least 21 potential data center proposals. Minnesotans from around the state are calling our organizations daily, concerned about known or suspected data center proposals in their communities. We say “suspected” because, in many cases, it is quite hard to know what is actually being proposed. These projects are moving forward under a cloak of secrecy, often described in vague terms such as “technology park” or “light industrial development.” Even when city officials state that it is a data center, it’s often hard to get details beyond that basic fact.

The letter was submitted by the following…

Organizations that are signatories to this article include the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, Minnesota Interfaith Power and Light, CURE, the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Mississippi River, Stop the Hermantown Data Center, the Coalition for Responsible Data Center Development, Vote Solar, WaterLegacy and Clean Water Action.

EVENT March 26: Ignite Cup 2026 – Live Pitch Night in Red Wing MN

An invitation for investors and entrepreneurs from Red Wing Ignite…

🔥 Ignite Cup 2026 – Live Pitch Night
Thursday, March 26 • 6:00–9:00pm • Red Wing, MN

Get ready for an electrifying evening of innovation, inspiration, and real-time business breakthroughs at the Ignite Cup—SE Minnesota’s premier pitch competition! This is your front-row seat to witness bold ideas come to life as local entrepreneurs and startup founders take the stage to pitch their ventures to a panel of expert judges.

Whether you’re a seasoned business builder, aspiring founder, investor, or community supporter, this event offers something for everyone:

High-impact pitches from emerging companies across industries
🤝 Networking opportunities with innovators, mentors, and regional leaders
💡 Inspiration & insights into the next generation of ventures thriving in our region
🏆 Live competition — watch finalists compete for cash prizes, mentorship, community recognition, and even a seat in the statewide MN Cup competition.

Be there to cheer on the finalists, connect with driven entrepreneurs, and be part of a community that’s building the future of business in southeastern Minnesota. Don’t miss your chance to experience where creativity meets opportunity!

👉 Reserve your spot today and join us for an unforgettable night of innovation!

 

Why Microsoft’s “Community-First” AI Data Center Promise Isn’t the Full Story

AI data centers have been a big topic for many rural communities in Minnesota, such as Farmington, Hermantown, North Mankato and more. I was interested when I came across a podcast on AI data center in black neighborhoods from The Miseducation of Technology. The issues sound similar to those I’ve heard in rural Minnesota. The recommendations are also similar. But sometimes it’s easier to see the issues and recommendations more clearly when we’re not talking about our park or our water bills.

Here’s a description from and link to the podcast itself

In this episode of The Miseducation of Technology, Attorney Danielle A. Davis breaks down what’s really behind Microsoft’s new “community-first” promise on AI data centers—and why that announcement didn’t come out of nowhere.

The conversation starts where most tech policy discussions don’t: with culture.

In 2025, R&B singer SZA publicly questioned the environmental cost of AI—calling out energy use, pollution, and why Black cities like Memphis keep ending up on the receiving end. What sounded like a celebrity tweet was actually a warning rooted in lived experience.

Because while AI is often sold as “cloud-based” and abstract, for many Black communities it is physical, loud, and permanent—arriving in the form of massive data centers that consume enormous amounts of power and water, strain local grids, and reshape land use with little community input.

So why did Microsoft suddenly promise to:

• Cover electricity costs
• Reduce and replenish water use
• Stop asking for tax breaks
• Invest in local training and education

And more importantly—what does that actually solve… and what does it leave untouched?

How mobile use and data could redefine boundaries – starting with Wadena County

The University of Minnesota Extension has an article on AI, mobile data and boundaries…

Today, with paved roads, remote work, and a highly mobile population, she [DeeDee LeMier} explains the limited data available to rural communities often obscures the real story of how they are functioning. But new mobile data tools are beginning to change this — offering a clearer picture of how people move, work, and connect across regions.

This shift is playing out in rural Minnesota where LeMier, an Extension community development educator, has been working with Placer.ai, a location analytics platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze anonymous mobile device data.

She talked about Wadena County as an example…

In Wadena County, community leaders asked Extension to help blur the lines between counties for an annual planning effort. The request reflected a growing recognition that people’s lives — and local economies — don’t stop at jurisdictional borders.

Ben Winchester, a rural sociologist with Extension, frames the issue as “living in the middle of everywhere,” explaining that since 2018 a majority of Minnesotans now leave their home county to work every day. “People move for regional assets surrounding quality of life rather than solely job opportunities. That is, they find a home in the middle of their desired social and economic life,” he says, challenging long-standing economic development strategies focused solely on industrial attraction.

Using Placer.ai, Extension analyzed three key dimensions of community life: resident activity, visitor patterns, and commuting behavior. The results offered insight that traditional surveys often miss. “For many small communities, especially those in rural areas, there is no detailed information available without spending huge amounts of money to do in-person surveys,” says LeMier. “By having real-time data, we can share local information with county leadership that would otherwise not be available.”

Wadena community leaders found the results immediately useful. “The most valuable insight was seeing how people actually move through, into, and out of the community — where they are coming from, how long they stay, and which destinations are most connected to Wadena,” says Hope Williams, executive director of the Economic Alliance, Wadena County’s economic development agency. “This provided a more accurate picture of regional relationships and economic activity than traditional data sources alone.”

Mobile data, for example, revealed that Wadena is a net importer of workers, meaning a larger number of employees work in the county than those who cross county lines for outside work. Nearly one-third of workers came from regional zip codes, most commonly from the Fargo, North Dakota, metropolitan area.

Williams says one of the most surprising findings was the extent to which Wadena functions as a hub for the surrounding area. “The data showed stronger and more frequent connections with neighboring communities than expected,” she says, “reinforcing the idea that Wadena plays a regional role in services, employment, and daily travel.”

Which jobs and workers are most and least able to thrive with AI?

Brookings Institute talks about research that looks at workers’ ability to adapt if job loss does occur…

In short, the new analysis asks: If AI does cause job displacement, who is best positioned to adapt, and who will struggle most? In asking those questions, this analysis intends to help policymakers focused on AI’s labor market impacts better target their attention and resources.

I thought this might be of interest to policymakers, anyone with workforce development and anyone with a job…

Overall, this analysis offers a more nuanced picture of AI’s possible impacts on workers than AI exposure measures can on their own.

Specifically, the analysis focuses on understanding the degree to which workers in different highly exposed occupations could manage a job transition after involuntary displacement. In doing so, it makes clear the existence of both large zones of strong resilience to job loss across the workforce as well as concentrated pockets of heightened vulnerability if displacement were to occur.

Given this, the report likely has practical use for workforce and employment development practitioners because understanding where workers are most and least resilient to AI-driven labor market change may help inform the optimal use of public funding for workforce adjustment programs.

The research is interesting and can be highlighted in the graphics below…

Visit the article for access to the interactive maps of communities with the largest share of jobs in high vulnerability occupations.