Blandin on Broadband

News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends

Blandin on Broadband

City of Eagan sues data center company over “temporary chillers” ( Dakota County)

CBS News reports…

The City of Eagan is suing Eagan Capital, a data center company in business along Pilot Knob Road, alleging they’ve been operating “temporary chillers” without proper permits. This comes months after Eagan Capital sued the city over a data center moratorium, calling it “unlawful.”

This latest lawsuit focuses on “chillers,” which cool the data center and prevent overheating. During a city council meeting on Nov. 2, Mayor Mike Maguire announced the legal action and claimed the company was operating “without the required permits and approvals”. The court document shows aerial pictures from 2025 showing no chillers on the property and from 2026 showing the chillers in place.

In May, a representative for Eagan Capital told the council the company didn’t think they needed a permit for installing the chillers but applied for one as soon as they were notified. The representative also said Eagan Capital designed a sound barrier around them.

The city denied an interim use permit and later denied an application for a mechanical permit for permanent chillers in part because “data centers are not a permitted principal use in the Research and Development zoning district,” the lawsuit explains.

Minneapolis City Council to consider data center regulations ordinance on Nov 12 (Hennepin County)

CBS News reports…

The Minneapolis City Council is scheduled to consider a data center regulations ordinance on Thursday.

According to the city’s website, the ordinance would amend “regulations for certain uses associated with distribution and use of electric power, including data centers, electric or gas substations, backup generators, utility boxes, and battery energy storage systems.”

The Minneapolis Committee of the Whole discussed the proposed ordinance for over two hours on Monday before voting to forward it to the full council.

On June 25, the City Council approved a five-month pause on data center development, temporarily halting new data center projects to allow city staff to study regulations and examine concerns about environmental impacts, energy use and public safety. The moratorium expires on Nov. 21, according to city officials.

The proposal, in part, says a new data center may only be established in a building existing on Jan. 1, 2027, and that the floor area of a facility “shall be limited to no more than (50,000) square feet on any zoning lot.”

Harmony City Council prepares final language for proposed data center ordinance for Nov 10 (Fillmore County)

KTTC reports…

The Harmony City Council is preparing to consider final language on its proposed data center ordinance at its meeting Tuesday at 7 p.m. at the community center.

The review follows months of discussions among councilmembers and the community about how to address a possible data center in the region. According to the city, the goal is to protect public health and welfare, as well as the environment around the town.

The proposed ordinance would limit data centers to a new industrial technology zone in the city and limit each data center to 55 megawatts of power. Any building would have to sit at least 500 feet from residential areas. Evaporative cooling, which uses large amounts of water, would also be banned.

Unlike the planned Google data center development in Pine Island, there has been no public announcement about a specific project in Harmony. However, the city website says there has been interest from developers.

Aaron Brown gives a front-row, local view of a national topic: data centers in communities

The MN Star Tribune posts a piece from Iron Range columnists Aaron Brown…

Voters across the nation rebuked data centers in last Tuesday’s election, vaporizing paper billions on Wall Street. But this isn’t just a national story about money. It’s an extremely local story about human beings.

One tumultuous week in Hermantown, Minn., reminded us how quickly political fortunes can change when the public loses trust in their leaders. Politicians, take warning. Transparency is not negotiable in projects so consequential to the economic lives of your constituents.

The full article is worth checking out!

Benton Institute for Broadband and Society creates a roadmap for communities looking at data centers

The Benton Institute for Broadband and Society partnered with Duke University to look at communities with data centers in North Carolina and came up with a roadmap for dealing with data centers for other communities. The study uses good examples and more. I’ve just pulled out the high level steps…

Step 1: Engage Independent Expertise at the Start of Negotiations

At the beginning stages of negotiations for a large digital infrastructure project, local governments should consult with independent, unbiased experts who can assess the technical, environmental, and economic impacts. This may require maintaining pre-approved consultant lists or establishing accountability mechanisms for developers. In the Apex case, this step may have reduced concern that the developer was misrepresenting the energy use associated with the facility by providing a trusted evaluation for all stakeholders to review.

Step 2: Inform the Community and Gather Their Priorities Early

Local governments should establish formal processes for gathering community input on the proposed data center infrastructure, such as through public forums. Community engagement should begin as early as possible—ideally before plans are officially filed—and continue consistently and transparently throughout all stages of zoning and approval. We also recommend that local leaders proactively seek input on the areas of resource use, pollution, financial investments, transparency, and governance. Current practices that shroud data center negotiations in secrecy produce distrust in the community; opening the process to the community offers greater opportunity for residents’ participation and to gain buy-in.

Step 3: Consider the Full Range of Policy Tools

Local governments should evaluate multiple policy mechanisms, drawing from existing toolkits and best practices like MediaJustice’s Site Fight Guide.[7] Policy interventions include but are not limited to community benefits agreements (CBAs), moratoriums, conditional use permits, zoning ordinances, and strict water and energy use regulations. There is not necessarily one solution for all communities when it comes to data centers: consider those protections that assuage community concerns. While the Apex case ended in a withdrawn proposal, a set of policy interventions may have created conditions that residents could live with.

Step 4: Tailor Policy Tools to Local Context

Once a policy choice is identified, the choice should then be carefully tailored to reflect the specific priorities identified through community engagement. Any regulatory framework should directly incorporate local preferences into concrete demands and requirements. This step was not part of the Apex case, where it would have allowed local officials to bridge the gap between abstract community feedback and enforceable zoning regulations.

Step 5: Use Community Priorities to Evaluate and Choose From Policy Options

Local governments should make their ultimate decision by evaluating all policy options in the context of the community’s biggest priorities. This can be done by referring back to each of the top priorities identified in Step 2 and deciding—such as through explicit criteria—whether they are reflected by the policy. Where feasible, governments can conduct a full cost-benefit analysis that reflects the local harms and benefits to the community. In the Apex Case, this approach would have provided a structured mechanism to weigh the project’s projected economic benefits against the community’s concerns.

A Second lawsuit filed against Hermantown over data center environmental review (St Louis County)

FOX21 reports...

The City of Hermantown may have given the green light to build a Google data center, but that’s not stopping another lawsuit from being filed.

The groups behind the lawsuit are the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy (MCEA) and the Stop The Hermantown Data Center (SHDC). The groups claim the city’s environmental review process violated the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act because they say the process was done before enough was known about the project and its impacts.

The groups filed an appeal over the type of environmental review used for this project. It’s called an “alternative urban area-wide review” (AUAR), and the city adopted it in October 2026.

City leaders and citizens chime in on new AI data center coming to Glencoe (McLeod County)

KSTP TV reports...

A new artificial intelligence data center is under construction in Glencoe, with city leaders calling it an economic opportunity and some residents questioning its impact on the community.

The facility is being built at 670 11th St. W. on Glencoe’s western edge. According to Revolve Labs, the project spans about 6.25 acres and nearly 94,100 square feet across three buildings.

According to Revolve Labs, the facility will support artificial intelligence computing. The company says the data center will handle AI “inference,” the computing that happens when artificial intelligence systems generate responses. In project materials, the company compares that work to technology used by tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude.

One resident, who asked not to be identified, said he believes residents should have had more say before the project moved forward.

“That was just terrible. We should have been able to vote on it,” he said. “Everybody that I’ve talked to, they’re all up in arms about it.”

Meta pulls down controversial terms of service that gave permission to Google to scrap websites of Meta Business users

Nieman Lab reports news that might be of interest to business owners large, but specifically small…

Meta has indefinitely delayed its proposed commercial terms of service, which would have permitted the company to scrape the websites of Meta Business account users.

On Thursday, the company took down the preview link to the proposed terms and published an update to its Business Help Center that reads: “We recently shared that we were updating the Meta Commercial Terms, Product Catalog Terms, Self-Serve Ad Terms, and Ad Creative Generative AI Terms. These updates are now paused and will not take effect on November 20, 2026. We are continuing to consult with stakeholders and will provide a further update when we have more to share. In the meantime, our existing terms remain in effect.”

Meta confirmed the indefinite delay in a statement to Nieman Lab. “We’re pausing the changes as we continue to engage with stakeholders and take our time to get this right,” said a spokesperson for the company.

Hutchinson drafts regulations for future data center proposals: public meeting planned for Nov 10

KSN reports…

Hutchinson is taking steps to regulate data centers before one is proposed in the city.

The drafted rules would limit where the facilities can be built and address their potential impact.

City leaders explained that data centers can bring economic investment, but also require significant amounts of water, electricity and land.

“There’s two sides of the quarter there of Hutchinson,” Elaine Carter, Hutchinson Planning Commission chair, said. “There’s the culture of not in our backyard, but there is also the culture of forward progress. So I think we want to maintain our homegrown values and we really want to protect our most vulnerable citizens.”

Data Centers are on the agenda for an upcoming meeting…

The planning commission is holding a public hearing on the regulations on Nov. 10, and the city council is expected to look at the rules on Dec. 1.

The drafted regulations are included in the planning commission agenda below.

For more Kansas news, click here. Keep up with the latest breaking news by downloading our mobile app and signing up for our news email alerts. Sign up for our Storm Track 3 Weather app by clicking here. To watch our shows live on our website, click here.

Clearfield and East Central Energy (ECE) collaborate to expand FTTP in Minnesota and Wisconsin

Clearfield announces…

Clearfield, Inc. (NASDAQ: CLFD), a leader in fiber connectivity solutions for telecom, data center, and network infrastructure environments, today announces its continued collaboration with East Central Energy (ECE), a Minnesota-based electric cooperative expanding fiber broadband access across rural Minnesota and northwestern Wisconsin. Recently, ECE became the first broadband provider in Minnesota to secure an executed Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program agreement, with a project expected to bring high-speed connectivity to approximately 3,750 locations.

“Clearfield has been a trusted part of our fiber network since we began building it in 2023,” said Dennis Rice, Broadband Manager at East Central Energy. “As we expand into more rural areas, we need equipment that’s reliable and practical to deploy. Clearfield’s team has been extremely responsive in helping us navigate the challenges of these grant-funded projects, and that level of support makes a real difference as we continue growing our network.”

For its 2026 Wisconsin buildout, ECE selected several Clearfield solutions that comply with the Build America, Buy America (BABA) requirement, including FxMP fiber management panels, FxDS patch-only panels, and FieldSmart® Fiber Active Cabinet (FAC) enclosures. The panels feature Clearfield’s Clearview® Blue Cassettes and support high-density fiber connectivity, while the active cabinets provide integrated fiber management and power infrastructure. Together, these solutions are helping ECE establish the foundation for its growing fiber network while meeting federal funding requirements.

As ECE prepares for its next phase of construction under the federal BEAD program, Clearfield’s fiber management and active cabinet solutions are helping the cooperative build scalable networks while addressing deployment costs and federal funding requirements. The BEAD milestone builds on ECE’s ongoing fiber expansion, which has connected approximately 8,400 members since residential installations began in Fall 2023. With continued construction planned through 2030, ECE aims to serve approximately 25,000 members across its service territory.

“East Central Energy’s execution of Minnesota’s first BEAD program agreement by a broadband provider marks an important milestone in our efforts to expand reliable, high-speed internet access to unserved and underserved communities,” said Bree Maki, Executive Director at the State of Minnesota’s Office of Broadband Development, which is part of the state’s Department of Employment and Economic Development. “Reaching rural locations requires strong partnerships, detailed planning, and a commitment to delivering lasting infrastructure. As BEAD-funded projects move toward deployment, ECE’s relationship with Clearfield and build progress demonstrates the important role that local providers play in connecting more Minnesotans to the opportunities that broadband makes possible.”

Since 2023, ECE has relied on Clearfield fiber connectivity solutions to support the cooperative’s growing broadband network. As ECE fiber expands its footprint across Minnesota and Wisconsin, the relationship continues to play an important role in helping the cooperative manage deployment challenges, control infrastructure costs, and prepare for future network growth. Beyond providing equipment, Clearfield has worked closely with ECE to navigate BABA requirements, helping the cooperative prepare accurate equipment specifications and bills of materials for federally funded deployments. This support is particularly important as broadband providers transition from project planning to construction under BEAD.

“As BEAD-funded projects move toward construction, providers need solutions that help them manage costs, meet funding requirements, and build networks that will serve their communities for decades,” said Cheri Beranek, Chief Executive Officer at Clearfield. “East Central Energy is a great example of a provider taking a thoughtful approach to rural broadband expansion. We’re proud to support these efforts with reliable fiber infrastructure and the technical expertise needed to keep these projects moving forward.”

The ECE network is built on 10-gigabit-capable XGS-PON technology to support residential and business connectivity. The cooperative continues to expand its broadband operations and is developing an internal lab to support network testing, provisioning, and future technology upgrades.

Monticello prepares for City Council hearing on Nov 9 by talking about transparency (Wright County)

The Monticello Times reports..

What does transparency look like when a community is divided over a controversial development?

In Monticello, the question has become central to the debate over the proposed Edmonson Business Center, a roughly 547-acre hyperscale data center development proposed by Monticello Tech LLC south of 85th Street NE and east of Highway 25.

The proposal has raised questions about electricity demand, water use, noise from backup generators and the financial obligations associated with the development.

Some residents have accused city officials of withholding information or failing to adequately address their concerns, while others say the information is available but want more explanation of how and why decisions are being made.

The city has published studies, development applications and meeting materials on its website. Public meetings have been livestreamed and recorded, an open house was held on the area’s environmental review, and government records have been made available upon request.

Yet as the proposal approaches a pivotal City Council hearing Nov. 9, disagreement persists over whether making information available is the same as being transparent.

Data center backlash ousts incumbents in some Minnesota towns (Pine Island & Hermantown)

MPR reports…

Fervent opposition to large-scale data centers proved to be a motivating political factor in high-profile races from Ohio to Texas in this year’s election. The hot-button issue also played a major role in some local races across Minnesota.

In Pine Island, a town of 4,000 just north of Rochester, a political neophyte who opposed the planned Google data center there won two-thirds of the vote against the incumbent interim mayor who supports the project.

And in Hermantown, where a second Google data center generated a fierce backlash from local residents, two political newcomers won seats to the city council, outpolling an incumbent who voted to approve the massive project just last week.

 

New Mayor in Pine Island makes Google data center part of his workplan (Goodhue County)

Post Bulletin reports...

A new mayor in Pine Island hopes to bring a new direction to the city’s biggest issue: the proposed Google data center.

Mark E. Lang earned 66.4% of the vote Tuesday, Nov. 3, during the city’s elections. Brandi Veith Staloch, who took over last summer when former mayor David Friese stepped down, earned 32.9% of the vote, unofficially.

Lang, who said he wanted to get a better deal for the city when it came to the data center, will be joined by at least one new city council member, Tosca Wohl.

He will need help…

All three available seats — the two council seats and the mayoral post — would have had to be swept by those opposed to the data center in order to flip the balance of power in Pine Island.

City of Eagan is suing IronGate Data Center (Dakota County)

Sun This Week reports...

The city of Eagan is suing data center company Eagan Capital LLC, due to alleged code violations at IronGate Data Center, according to Mayor Mike Maguire’s update at the Nov. 2 City Council meeting.

“The city is taking legal action regarding the continued operation of four temporary chillers at the Eagan Capital facility at 3199 Pilot Knob Road. Eagan Capital has been operating without the required permits and approvals. The city is currently in the process of filing a complaint with the court, and will then file a motion for an injunction to stop the operations of the chillers,” Maguire said.

“We will continue to follow the legal process to ensure our regulations are enforced consistently. We will provide additional information when there are developments that can be shared publicly,” Maguire added.

Local residents who live north of the data center facility across Tower View Road have complained of noise and vibrations from the chillers and have waited a long time for this process to take place, Maguire said.

The article details the history between the City and IronGate and mentions other issues…

This isn’t the only lawsuit regarding data centers in Eagan.

Eagan Capital filed a lawsuit June 15 against Eagan to void the city’s one-year data center moratorium, calling it unlawful and ill-advised.

The City Council unanimously passed a moratorium on development of new data centers within 500 feet of residential homes or that use more than 20 megawatts of electricity. The moratorium is active until Feb. 17, 2027, or earlier if the council decides to end it.

Faribault Planning Commission approves data center standards goes to City Council Nov 24 (Rice County)

The Faribault Daily News reports…

In front of a packed room, the Faribault planning commission voted unanimously to approve the data center standards it developed over eight work sessions. Recommendations will now be presented to the Faribault City Council at a meeting on Nov. 24.

If passed, this would make a conditional use permit mandatory for any data center in Faribault. This allows the city to set and enforce standards before and after a developer moves into town. Data centers are fully permitted in town right now, meaning there are no specific regulations that are possible to enforce until these recommendations are approved.