Attorney General Ellison calls on Congress to protect Americans from unchecked AI development

Attorney General Ellison announces...

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison today joined a bipartisan coalition of 26 attorneys general in calling on Congress to immediately regulate the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. In a letter to congressional leaders — House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer — Attorney General Ellison and the coalition warn that reports of recent incidents demonstrate that unchecked AI development endangers Americans and poses a potential threat to our financial system, critical infrastructure, and national security. The coalition urges Congress to quickly pass substantive legislation to regulate the AI industry to ensure that development occurs at an intentional pace, incorporates safety and transparency by design, and maintains states’ ability to oversee the industry.

“To protect public health, our government regulates everything from aircraft to aspirin to aircraft. It is past time Congress do the same with artificial intelligence,” said Attorney General Ellison. “This new technology has the potential to cause big problems or to help solve them, and which route it takes may well depend on what we do now to shape and guide it. We will be doing the American people a tremendous disservice if we allow the frontier of AI development to remain a wild west of near-misses and chilling failures. That’s why I’m calling on Congress to responsibly regulate artificial intelligence, to not preempt state-level rules and regulations, and to give state attorneys general full authority to enforce federal law regulating AI.”

On July 16, Hugging Face, an open-source library and repository, reported that it was being attacked by an unknown third party. Within a week, OpenAI admitted that the attack was waged by its AI agents, which escaped a testing environment and infiltrated Hugging Face using stolen credentials. OpenAI was aware of the agents’ capabilities and failed to monitor their activity or stop their exploits. The agents’ actions, if perpetrated by a human, would have constituted criminal conduct.

Following the Hugging Face incident, Anthropic and Meta also acknowledged their AI agents had also entered the open web and performed dangerous and unlawful actions. This agent behavior has been known to the industry for years and is a direct result of their training. Through a practice called “reinforcement learning,” AI labs reward models’ achievement of goals and penalize unsuccessful attempts, leading models to take reckless measures to complete the tasks they are given.

These reports have led to some of the AI industry’s leading developers calling for regulation. OpenAI’s Chief Global Affairs Officer called for “mandatory, capability-based national AI safety regulation.” Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei urged the United States to lead international coordination of AI model development because this effort “will require government support.”

Attorney General Ellison and the coalition are calling on Congress to take immediate action to ensure AI development does not lead to irreversible damage or further illegal behavior. In their letter, Attorney General Ellison and the coalition emphasize that any AI regulatory scheme considered by Congress must include:

  • Federal oversight of safety testing and standards, led by experts in the field of AI model safety and backed by consistent performance benchmarks;
  • Uniform and transparent government-led incident response with public findings that allow the industry to rapidly evolve in response;
  • Safety infrastructure and experienced leaders to make critical safety decisions unburdened by profit maximization;
  • International cooperation to pace AI advancement and prevent the development of harmful superintelligence; and
  • A prohibition on preemption of state laws and full authority for state officials to enforce federal protections.

Joining Attorney General Ellison in sending the letter to Congress are the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, the District of Columbia, and American Samoa.

US Senators Sanders and Casar introduce legislation to create new federal agency to ban artificial superintelligence, pause advanced AI development

Senator Bernie Sanders announces…

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas) today introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act — legislation to stop artificial intelligence (AI) oligarchs from building machines humans cannot control and to pause advanced AI development until we have put in place rigorous federal testing and oversight to ensure AI does not harm humanity.

“When you are racing towards a cliff, you don’t just ease up on the gas pedal. You hit the brakes. When the future of humanity is at stake, we cannot let a handful of Big Tech CEOs write their own rules,” Sanders said. “Scientists have been clear: AI is an existential threat to humanity. It must be treated as such. This legislation will permanently ban the development of artificial superintelligence and would put in place an immediate pause on advanced AI development until we have clear safety rules in place — developed by the most knowledgeable scientists in our country. Congress must act now before it is too late.”

“Experts are warning that AI superintelligence, wielded by the wrong humans or by rogue AI, could kill countless numbers of people. But Donald Trump says he wants to encourage it. Something has to change,” Casar said. “Our bill bans the development of artificial superintelligence and pushes for international agreements so that no one, anywhere, builds AI too powerful for humans to control. Furthermore, our bill would immediately halt other dangerous AI capabilities, such as the capacity to develop biochemical weapons, or the capacity for AI to develop new AI instead of humans.”

Over the past few months, we have learned that AI models can circumvent restrictions to hack into computers. We have learned they can create never-before-seen viruses. And we have learned they can automate research to build smarter AI. Even as the AI companies claim they recognize these dangers and want to slow down, they are racing ahead — investing hundreds of billions of dollars into a technology that nobody can fully predict or control. That is unacceptable. The Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act will protect humanity by:

  • Banning Artificial Superintelligence. No person or entity may develop or deploy Artificial Superintelligence — an AI that exceeds human cognitive performance and capabilities across most domains, or has sufficient capabilities to destroy or disempower humanity, including by overthrowing the federal government.
  • Pausing Advanced AI development until a new, federal AI regulatory body is up and running and has established clear rules and model review processes to ensure safe and secure development and deployment of AI.
  • Establishing a new cabinet-level federal Department of Artificial Intelligence to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence, including by enforcing a prohibition on artificial superintelligence. This department will be advised by the most knowledgeable scientists in our country to:
    • Monitor frontier AI systems at all stages of the lifecycle for dangerous capabilities.
    • Supervise the removal of dangerous capabilities like subverting shutdown commands or conducting unauthorized cyberattacks.
    • Supervise the destruction of artificial superintelligence.
  • Setting penalties for any person or entity that attempts to violate or circumvent the pauses and prohibitions laid out in this bill. Entities shall be subject to the corporate death penalty, and persons shall be subject to not more than 20 years in prison, which is similar to existing penalties related to unlawfully developing nuclear weapons.
  • Working to ban superintelligence around the world by setting the international policy of the United States to pursue international agreements, allied coordination, and policies such as export controls to prevent the development of artificial superintelligence anywhere in the world.

Read the bill text here.

Read a one-page summary here.

Read a section-by-section summary here.

Senator Klobuchar working on bipartisan AI safety bill

KFGO reports...

Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar is working with Republican senators on legislation aimed at reducing potentially catastrophic risks from advanced artificial intelligence.

The proposal under negotiation would require developers of the most powerful AI models to assess and report serious risks and take steps to prevent potential harm.

It could also give the federal government greater authority to test models and intervene if safety concerns aren’t adequately addressed.

The legislation is still being negotiated and has not yet been formally introduced.

UofM student used AI makerspace to create app to detect sustainability of food

I love a good makerspace story, especially in Minnesota! This one from the University of Minnesota caught my eye…

 [Student Daquari Hollins] started thinking, ‘Well, is there anything that exists that shows the sustainability practices of every product that you buy?’”

Hollins could not find an app on the market that offered that level of transparency, so he decided to build it himself.

The result is UConserve, a sustainability lifestyle app designed to give consumers immediate environmental transparency right at the grocery store shelf. By allowing users to scan the barcode of any domestic product, the application generates a screening-level estimate of its carbon footprint alongside deeper sustainability factors like acidification and eutrophication.

The tool bridges a critical gap for everyday shoppers trying to make ethical choices. In a time when socially conscious shoppers can find it difficult to understand a company’s carbon footprint, the app provides a glimpse into the hidden environmental toll of manufacturing, transportation and disposal.

He found a way at an AI Makerspace…

Turning his vision into a reality required bridging two historically isolated worlds: environmental data analysis and advanced computer science. When Hollins initially pitched the idea to peers in an environmental student group, he was met with skepticism. The work would likely be tedious to calculate an accurate environmental estimate for even a single item.

“I took that feedback in stride,” he says. “I was like, OK, it’s a huge undertaking, but that’s not impossible.”

To solve the scale problem, Hollins looked outside traditional sustainability disciplines. This interdisciplinary approach led him to the University of Minnesota’s AI Makerspace, where he collaborated with its manager, Joe Finnegan, and eventually consulted nationwide life-cycle assessment (LCA) professionals. By combining environmental science with machine learning, the team found a way to take massive, vetted government databases and translate them into an instantaneous mobile tool.

Located in Walter Library, the College of Science and Engineering’s AI Makerspace serves as a hybrid physical and digital sandbox designed to break down barriers for students from all academic backgrounds. Whether a student is studying computer science or philosophy, such as Hollins, the space provides free access to high-powered computing resources and expert guidance.

MPR asks and answers questions about AI, security and regulation

MPR reports…

The CEOs of the country’s top AI companies are unifying in their call for a global slowdown on AI development, after two former researchers at Anthropic shared concerns that AI is becoming too powerful too quickly and could ultimately threaten humanity’s survival.

Manjeet Rege is the director of the Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence at the University of St. Thomas and also author of the book “Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Frameworks, Risks and Society.” He spoke to Minnesota Now host Nina Moini about AI technology, its risks and regulation.

Here are the questions they ask. You can check out the article for the answers:

  • The post from a former Anthropic employee has more than 170 million views. It says: ‘The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.’ What is your reaction to that?
  • Why can’t AI companies get ahead of the technology?
  • What is an example of an action AI may take that would be concerning?
  • What would good or effective AI regulation look like at this point?
  • President Trump has downplayed the need for new AI guardrails, saying that it would put the United States behind China. Why is that important, and how much of the conversation should that be?

AI leaders sound alarm over growing risks

FOX9 reports…

Leading artificial intelligence voices are raising concerns about whether safety measures are keeping pace with rapidly developing AI systems. Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned of serious potential risks in a new essay, drawing public agreement from OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Elon Musk, while President Donald Trump responded to concerns about AI safeguards.

See the fill video below:

 

Trump Administration and tech CEOs ask G-20 to adopt pro-AI policies

Quoting from the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society’s recap of an article in the Wall Street Journal…

Tech executives and Trump administration officials urged policymakers from other leading economies to minimize artificial-intelligence regulations, arguing that strict rules could strangle an industry capable of supercharging global growth and curing diseases. Nvidia Chief Executive Jensen Huang, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk of Tesla and SpaceX were among the speakers at a Group of 20 summit focused on innovation and technology, and they cautioned that aggressive regulations could limit the benefits of AI. Their message was echoed by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, White House AI adviser David Sacks and Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, who said the administration’s light-touch strategy is boosting the economy. “Don’t regulate hypothetical, theoretical harm. Regulate actual and pragmatic harm,” Huang told officials from the G-20 countries, adding that tech advancements such as advanced model training to make models more accurate are making AI safer than regulations proposed by the Biden administration and others.

LA Times looks into Meta’s $17-billion settlement and what it reveals about social media

LA Times reports…

After months of hype and mere hours in front of the jury, California’s blockbuster suit against Meta ended on Wednesday with a sweeping $17-billion settlement and 130 pages of promised changes to the platforms.

Witnesses at the blink-and-you-miss-it Oakland trial echoed much of what had already been heard this year by juries in Los Angeles, Santa Fe and Nashville.

But the evidence presented during the proceedings still shed new light on social media’s seedy underbelly.

Internal documents show Meta knew for years that its youngest users were the most likely to be targeted by bullies, extortionists and sexual predators.

Arturo Béjar, an ex-Meta employee, described girls being threatened with rape, boys whose feeds were flooded with snuff films, and middle schoolers inundated with sexually explicit images. Vulnerable children were algorithmically force-fed images of starving bodies and hanging teddy bears, the former engineer said while testifying for plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Some steps have been taken moving forward…

Under the agreement, Meta must flag parents whenever accounts it has identified as likely to solicit youngsters for nudes and then leverage those images for blackmail start messaging their kids. It will also send alerts if kids interact with posts about suicide, eating disorders and self-harm.

Some parents might wonder why such policies had to be litigated at all. But legal experts said the agreement reflects what was likely weeks, if not months, of careful backroom horse-trading.

Not everyone agrees…

“This settlement agreement is basically the government coercing Meta into censoring users,” said Ari Cohn, free speech counsel at Tech Freedom. “These are things that the government could never legislate. The government could not set a bedtime for the 1st Amendment or limit free speech to two hours a day.”

Although children are more vulnerable than adults, they have the same right to free expression, he said. Efforts to protect them will inevitably spill into censorship of all users — now on the orders of the government.

Do workers actually use Artificial Intelligence on the job?

KSTP 9 looks into the question: Do workers actually use Artificial Intelligence on the job? (Apparently only a third of workers have used it.)…

Is it AI or is it art? And how do we differentiate? The Walker is looking into it

MPR News covers a story about art gallery patrons accusing art of being “AI slop” and The Walker figuring out what to do with that. It’s a teachable moment for everyone involved – with teachers and learners writing the curriculum in real time…

The Walker Art Center in Minneapolis is adding new explanatory language to an exhibition after visitors mistook an artist’s digitally rendered work for generative AI.

Joe Dobrow recently took his two children to the Walker. They wandered from exhibition to exhibition, eventually settling in front of a screen in a dark hallway.

The screen was looping the 2026 video “Field Recordings” by artist Olalekan Jeyifous. It is the first solo museum exhibition for the New York-based artist who is known for his immersive speculative world-building artworks. The video features realistically animated people in leafy riverine settings, sometimes in groups, sometimes with deer, sometimes tinkering with what seem like remnants of analog technology.

“My kids were fairly intrigued with it,” Dobrow said, but “it seemed to me to be almost entirely AI slop.”

Part of the solution…

The Walker, along with the rest of the museum world, is grappling with how to develop policy about the display and disclosure of AI-generated or AI-assisted art. “We are in the process of developing one,” she said.

Jasper and Huldisch said the new explanatory language for the exhibition will be installed this week.

“I recognize that AI usage raises very real ethical questions, and I understand why people want transparency around it,” Jeyifous said. “The difficulty right now is that we don’t have much nuance in the language to describe it. Saying that AI was utilized somewhere in a process can very quickly become perceived as ‘this artwork was entirely AI-generated,’ even when those are fundamentally different things. Disclosure can provide useful context, but it can also unintentionally become the lens through which the entire work is understood, regardless of how marginal that tool was to its production.”

Rep. Kelly Morrison asks AI questions in a House Small Business Committee Hearing before the Congressional recess

Forbes posts a video clip of Rep Kelly Morrison asking questions about how AI companies can gain public trust…

In a House Small Business Committee Hearing before the Congressional recess, Rep. Kelly Morrison (D-MN) asked Chike Aguh, Head of Innovation & Strategy, Kapor Center, what steps small business owners should take to improve both their employees’ and the public’s trust in using AI.

Understanding the privacy and security implications of interacting with AI

Axios has a series that I think is helpful to share with folks around you to help them recognize and understand various features of AI. You can bring it up at your next family picnic or share with friends and family as a reminder about the importance of online privacy…

Imagine a chatbot built to keep you talking a little longer. To change your mind about something. Or persuade you to buy something.

  • Now imagine it could draw on everything it knows about you — including the fears, insecurities and private details you shared in conversation — to do it.

Why it matters: Few rules directly govern that scenario today, making AI companies’ promises about how they use consumer data especially consequential.

The big picture: In the first installment of Axios’ “What they know about you” series, published in 2019, we examined the information major tech companies collected about their users. In 2024, we followed up with a look at what consumer data AI companies use to train their systems.

  • This new series revisits those questions — and widens the lens. We’ll examine not only whether a company uses consumer data to train future AI models, but also how it can use that data now: to personalize responses, retain a memory, recommend content or target advertising.

EVENT Oct 5, 2026: Bridging the Digital Divide Virtual Conference 2026: AI Behind and Beyond the Walls of Our Prisons and Jails

From the NDIA listserv…

Join us for Bridging the Digital Divide Virtual Conference 2026 featuring Jeffrey Abramowitz, J.D. presenting:
Bridging the Digital Divide: AI Behind and Beyond the Walls of Our Prisons and Jails
📅 Monday, October 5, 2026
⏰ 8:00–9:00 a.m. MT
💻 Online
Explore how AI and digital literacy can expand opportunities for education, workforce readiness, and successful reentry.
Learn more & register: https://lnkd.in/g-dsWHwx

EVENT September 9, 2026 (Brainerd): Entrepreneurs on Tap Fall 2026

Sharing information from Facebook on an upcoming series in Brainerd MN…

Entrepreneurs on Tap is back for Fall 2026 and bigger and bolder than ever before with an AI Takeover and new partner!

This fall, Up North Homes- Halie Majerus will be joining us each month as we dive deep into different ways that your small business can use AI. Our kick-off event will be Wednesday, September 9th at 5:00 PM at Jack Pine Brewery where we will cover the do’s (and don’ts) of AI image generation.

To view our complete line up, visit www.northcentralsbdc.com/workshops-and-events

New MN Bill: Open Meeting Law; meeting broadcasting through social media authorized HF3295

The new bill will be discussed today (May 7) at 1pm on HTV1…

HF3295 (Gordon) Open Meeting Law; meeting broadcasting through social media authorized.