21 MN broadband providers accept Enhanced A-CAM funding

The FCC has announced providers who have accepted E-ACAM support, which means more time and money to build to broadband at speeds of 100/20 rather than the old A-CAM goal of 25/3…

Today, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) announces carriers that have accepted offers of model-based Enhanced Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) support.

Here are the providers that accepted in Minnesota (name followed by current funding mechanism):

  • Albany Mutual Telephone Association      ACAM
  • Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc            ACAM
  • Arvig Enterprises, Inc.     ACAM
  • Benton Cooperative Telephone Company               ACAM
  • Consolidated Telephone Company            BLS
  • Emily Cooperative Telephone Company   BLS
  • Garden Valley Telephone Company           ACAM
  • Gardonville Cooperative Telephone Association    ACAM
  • Halstad Telephone Company        ACAM
  • Harmony Telephone Company     ACAM
  • Johnson Telephone Company      ACAM
  • Kasson & Mantorville Telephone Company            ACAM
  • Manchester-Hartland Telephone                BLS
  • Park Region Mutual Telephone Company of Minnesota     ACAM
  • Paul Bunyan Rural Telephone Cooperative             ACAM
  • Spring Grove Communications     ACAM
  • Telephone & Data Systems, incl. UScellular            ACAM
  • Upsala Cooperative Telephone Association            ACAM
  • West Central Telephone Assn.     ACAM
  • Wikstrom Telephone Company, Inc.         ACAM
  • Tri-Co Technologies, LLC BLS

The FCC adds…

Confirmation of receipt of a carrier’s election letter and inclusion on this list does not constitute authorization to receive Enhanced A-CAM support pursuant to the terms of the offer.  Carriers electing Enhanced A-CAM support will not begin receiving such support until the Bureau issues a public notice authorizing the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to disburse the appropriate amounts.  The Commission is publishing this list of carriers that have accepted Enhanced A-CAM “to inform, among other processes, the BEAD Program challenges conducted by states or eligible entities and prevent any duplication of support to a location where it is determined that the Enhanced A-CAM service provider plans to deploy a technology that would satisfy the requirements for being deemed an enforceable commitment for the deployment of qualifying broadband to a location.”

They add…

We note that based on the election letters received, the number of acceptances has exceeded the participation threshold set by the Commission in the Enhanced A-CAM Order.

Here’s more information on Enhanced A-CAM and BEAD from Cost Quest

The primary purpose of Enhanced A-CAM is to synchronize study areas with the Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program funding initiatives. This alignment is aimed at preventing redundant funding efforts and potential strategic manipulation within the same geographical zones.

There are two ways Enhanced ACAM aligns with the NTIA BEAD funding program:

  • The locations are based on Version 2 (V2) of the National Broadband Map to align with the locations under the BEAD program.
  • The timeline is the same as outlined by the NTIA for BEAD locations – 4 years.

The eligible Enhanced ACAM areas will be excluded from BEAD eligibility due to their receipt of Enhanced A-CAM funding. This alteration is anticipated to enhance the efficacy of BEAD funds in expanding coverage. Telecom analyst Mike Conlow highlights, “If all ISPs accept the Enhanced A-CAM offer and build fiber, cable, or licensed fixed wireless, that takes 582,675 locations off the board for the BEAD program,” (Mike Conlow’s Newsletter).

Will providers in MN take E-ACAM funding, which requires 100/20 Mbps expansion?

Telecompetitor does a nice job outlining a funding challenge that some providers are having right now…

Small rural carriers have a big decision to make by Sept. 29, now that the FCC has released new broadband funding offers. The new offers are based on a higher broadband speed, as mandated in the enhanced Alternative Connect America Model (E-ACAM) order adopted earlier this summer.

Carriers must advise the FCC by the September deadline, on a state-by-state basis, whether they want to participate in the E-ACAM program and accept the new offers.

The initial program, established several years ago, covers some of the costs of deploying broadband to unserved areas based on a cost model. Traditionally, providers were required to deploy speeds of 25 Mbps downstream and 3 Mbps upstream, and deployment cost estimates were based on deploying that speed.

The FCC E-ACAM program, established earlier this summer, raises the deployment speed required to 100/20 Mbps and gives carriers additional time to deploy service. The offers made this week are based on a new cost model considering the higher deployment speed requirement.

The new offers were made to small rural carriers that serve high-cost areas and receive support through the Universal Service high-cost program. This group includes those carriers that participate in the existing ACAM program, as well as those that receive funding based on embedded costs.

They have posted the offers made are on an FCC spreadsheet.

Here are the offers made in Minnesota

State Holding company Current funding Total locations
MN Ace Telephone Association BLS              12,401
MN Albany Mutual Telephone Association ACAM                3,918
MN Alliance Communications Cooperative, Inc. ACAM                   722
MN Arvig Enterprises, Inc. ACAM              81,179
MN Benton Cooperative Telephone Company ACAM                5,837
MN Rural Communications Holding Corporation ACAM              23,388
MN Christensen Communications Company ACAM                1,700
MN City of Barnesville Municipal Telephone BLS                1,189
MN Consolidated Telephone Company BLS              13,684
MN Emily Cooperative Telephone Company BLS                2,559
MN Farmers Mutual Telephone Company (MN) ACAM                1,418
MN Garden Valley Telephone Company ACAM              18,021
MN Gardonville Cooperative Telephone Association ACAM                3,784
MN Halstad Telephone Company ACAM                1,635
MN Harmony Telephone Company ACAM                1,124
MN Interstate Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. ACAM                1,816
MN Johnson Telephone Company ACAM                3,267
MN Kasson & Mantorville Telephone Company ACAM                5,349
MN Larson Utilities, Inc. ACAM                2,377
MN Lismore Cooperative Telephone Company ACAM                   487
MN Mabel Cooperative Telephone Company ACAM                   894
MN Manchester-Hartland Telephone Company BLS                   640
MN Nuvera Communications, Inc. ACAM              28,353
MN Nuvera Communications, Inc. BLS              23,499
MN Northern Telephone Company/Wilderness Valley Telephone Company ACAM                   177
MN KCL Enterprises, Inc. ACAM                   311
MN Park Region Mutual Telephone Company ACAM                7,434
MN Paul Bunyan Rural Telephone Cooperative ACAM              15,787
MN Polar Communication Mutual Aid Corporation ACAM                   239
MN Runestone Telephone Association ACAM                5,946
MN Spring Grove Communications ACAM                1,365
MN Telephone & Data Systems, incl. UScellular ACAM              40,810
MN Upsala Cooperative Telephone Association ACAM                1,217
MN West Central Telephone Assn. ACAM                5,532
MN Wikstrom Telephone Company, Inc. ACAM                9,671
MN Winnebago Cooperative Telecom Association ACAM                   848
MN Woodstock Telephone Company ACAM                1,822
MN Hanson Communications, Inc. ACAM                6,666
MN Tri-Co Technologies, LLC BLS                3,460
MN Federated Telephone Cooperative ACAM                3,478

The spreadsheet provides more info – but I know it would get lost in formatting on the blog. But for more info, check out the original versions.