Crow Wing County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 32 of 87

Rank: 32
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Crow Wing 96.24 33 94.83 32 72.21 28 15

 Crow Wing County: Could be helped by BEAD funding

Crow Wing County has remained stagnant in 2025 but they are in line to get a lot of fiber connections when the BEAD funds are disbursed. Unfortunately, the locations that aren’t getting fiber and going to get satellite, which does not qualify to help them reach the MN State speed goals. That may cause a divide between based on access their locations.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 94.83 93.32 85.84 87.51 86.38 86.6 88.04 41.66 33.13
25/3 (2022 goal) 96.24 94.97 90.27 89.54 90.01 90.61 92.84 92.29 87.78

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Crow Wing: 1,174
The locations include a majority of fiber and some satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC CTC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Crow Wing                                   228                                   934                                      12                              1,174 Crow Wing

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Crow Wing has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $51 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Crow Wing ranked 30 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • 2022: Tri-Co Technologies, LLC dba Crosslake Communications, $343,552.00
  • 2016 – TDS TELECOM CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES — GRANT: $3,000,000
    2015 – Consolidated Telecommunications Company – Fort Ripley Phase II
    Grant award: $759,525
  • 2014 – Consolidated Telephone Cooperative, Region 5 Virtual Highway Project – Amount $2 million
  • 2020: CTC (Consolidated Telephone Company) – Fort Ripley/Executive Acres Project – GRANT $830,587
  • Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) – Stark-Ross Lake Area – GRANT $350,805 This last mile project will serve approximately 180 unserved locations in a portion of Ross Lake Township in Crow Wing County.
  • Crosslake Communications – O’Brien/Goodrich Lake Fiber Project – GRANT $618,970 This last mile O’Brien/Goodrich Lake Fiber Project will serve approximately 232 unserved households in Crow Wing County.

Find more articles on broadband in Crow Wing County. (http://tinyurl.com/zechgaw)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Cottonwood County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 77 of 87

Rank: 77
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Cottonwood 78.57 79 73.21 78 55.59 50 17

 Cottonwood County: still stagnant

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 649 locations in Cottonwood County. The majority of locations will get fiber, just a few will get fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Cottonwood has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.) Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

With little movement, Cottonwood retains their Red status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 73.21 68.46 67.15 67.02 67.2 66.67 66.67 66.34 19.24
25/3 (2022 goal) 78.57 76.27 74.17 74.11 71.12 72.79 74.17 67.89 60.52

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Cottonwood: 649
The locations include a majority fiber connections.

County AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet Federated Rural Electric Association Nuvera Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber
Cottonwood                                         4                                   576                                      69                                   649 Cottonwood

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Cottonwood has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $14.8 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • Hanson Communications – Hanson – Comfrey FTTP
    Grant: $395,138, Local Match: $592,711, Total Budget: $987,849
  • 2016 – WOODSTOCK TELEPHONE WESTBROOK – GRANT: $412,391
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080
  • 2010 – ARRA funding for City of Windom – SWMBG will build FTTP (Fiber to the Premise) infrastructure to eight rural communities in Southwestern Minnesota.

Find more articles on broadband in Cottonwood County. (http://tinyurl.com/gnqcknv)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Clearwater County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 16 of 87

Rank: 16
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Clearwater 99.24 14 98.37 16 98.21 7 8

 Clearwater County: Stagnant but so close

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 8 locations in Clearwater County. However, all of locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute. It’s telling to see that only 8 addresses in the county got BEAD bids.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Clearwater has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. Maybe it’s something worth considering.) Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Despite staying stagnant, Clearwater is too close to goal to get any ranking other than green.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.37 98.33 98.28 98.85 99.59 89.32 89.3 89.3 73.41
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.24 99.25 99.26 99.29 99.76 99.74 99.74 99.58 99.58

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Clearwater: 8
The locations will all get satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Clearwater                                         5                                         3                                         8 Clearwater

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Clearwater has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $558,000 to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

2024 Grants:

  • Garden Valley Telephone Company 2024 Rural Mahnomen County
    Grant: $4,626,012, Local Match: $1,542,008, Total Budget: $6,168,020
  • In 2018, Garden Valley Telephone Company received a $20 million loan from the USDA to deploy fiber in Polk, Clearwater, Pennington, Marshall and Red Lake counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Clearwater County. (http://tinyurl.com/homdjrt)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Cook County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow Rating: Ranking out 35 of 87

Rank: 35
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Cook 93.02 40 92.97 35 92.97 12 8

 Cook County: stalled and not much help coming from BEAD

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 83 locations in Cook County. All of the locations will get satellite connections, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Cook has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So maybe that’s a route to consider.) Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Cook County has been so close for so long but the proposed BEAD funding will not help Cook County reach the MN State speed goals, so I have to bump them to a Yellow status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 92.97 91.61 90.36 90.95 94.5 94.5 94.5 94.5 94.46
25/3 (2022 goal) 93.02 92.01 90.68 90.99 94.5 94.5 94.5 94.5 94.5

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Cook: 83
The locations all satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Cook                                      77                                         6                                      83 Cook

 

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Cook County, $8,000 was invested in one project over the years.

No New Posts from 2025

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $4.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Cook ranked 29 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • 2010: Cook County formed a partnership with Arrowhead Electric Cooperative, which applied for and was awarded over $16 million in federal stimulus grants and low interest loans to build a fiber-to-the-home broadband network throughout Cook County.
  • In addition, Cook County awarded Arrowhead Cooperative a $4 million grant from the 1% sales tax fund.

Find more articles on broadband in Cook County. (http://tinyurl.com/hgbzlt7)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Clay County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 34 of 87

Rank: 41
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Clay 95.87 34 93.61 34 19.91 85 14

Clay County: Continued improvement gets closer to the goal

Clay County has seen continued improvement in broadband access, most recent cause was probably their $5 million ReConnect award.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 30 locations in Clay County. Some of the locations will get fiber and some locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Clay has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Clay County retains green status due to continued progress.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 93.61 87.89 90.71 92.06 89.08 87.57 82.32 82.52 74.13
25/3 (2022 goal) 95.87 93.23 96.75 95.56 95.66 90.31 95.82 95.45 83.15

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Clay: 30
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Tekstar Communications, Inc. (Arvig) Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber
Clay                                      13                                      17                                      30 Clay

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Clay has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $2.6 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Clay ranked 27 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.
  • Clay County will benefit from a ReConnect awardRed River Rural Telephone Association – The investment will be used to deploy high-speed fiber optics to 17 businesses, 55 farms, and one school in Clay County, and 482 people will benefit. They received $5,166,742 as a grant.

Past Grants

  • Red River Communications – Red River – Rural Hawley
    Grant: $970,411, Local Match: $970,411, Total Budget: $1,940,822
  • 2022: 702 Communications – Western Clay County Kragnes Township– GRANT $2,624,830
  • 2019: Arvig (Loretel Systems, Inc.) – Cormorant Lakes Area Project – GRANT $430,780

Find more articles on broadband in Clay County. (http://tinyurl.com/hcgg9rm)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Chisago County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow Rating: Ranking 61 out of 87

Rank: 61
Code:  Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Chisago 85.59 67 83.98 61 41.87 62 12

Chisago County: slow improvement needs a jump start

Historically, Chisago County has been very engaged in broadband, as a 2021 report from the Institute for Local Self Reliance pointed out.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 1,278 locations in Chisago County. Most of the locations will get fiber, but some will satellite connections, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute. Yet, that fiber should help reach the state goals

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Chisago does not have a history of seeking Line Extension so maybe something to pursue.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Chisago County is retains their yellow ranking because they growth seems to have slowed down.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 83.98 80.71 76.81 73.63 73.34 71.92 71.26 69.53 65.45
25/3 (2022 goal) 85.59 82.82 79.08 78.7 79.21 84.34 83.85 73.27 65.25

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Chisago: 1,278
The locations include a majority fiber connections with some satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC East Central Energy Fiber Frontier Midco Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Fiber Cable Coax Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Chisago                                   210                                   341                                   346                                      19                                   359                                         3                              1,278 Chisago

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Chisago has invested $2,900,841 in three project over the years.

No New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $45.3 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grant:

  • County: Anoka, Chisago: Midco North Central
    Grant: $801,700, Local Match: $801,700, Total Budget: $1,603,400
  • 2022: Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC, $465,814.00
  • 2017 – CenturyLink – Fish Lake Township FTTH Project – GRANT $1,833,724
  • 2016 – SUNRISE TOWNSHIP (CENTURYLINK) FIBER TO THE HOME – GRANT: $1,074,852
  • CenturyLink (Qwest Corporation) – Nessel Township FTTH Project – GRANT $1,657,550

Find more article on Chisago (https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=chisago&submit=Search)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Chippewa County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow Rating: Ranking out 33 of 87

Rank: 33
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Chippewa 93.85 36 93.64 33 24.48 79 13

 Chippewa County stays stagnant

Chippewa County’s coverage jumped up a lot last year and stayed stagnant this year.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 4 locations in Chippewa County. Some locations will get fiber and some locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute. But the notable fact is that they will only get help for 4 locations.

One issue is that using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access and wireline with fixed wireless. Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding. So perhaps the federal maps are giving them credit for more coverage than the state maps would.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. That may be helpful since that is state funding. Another statewide issue is changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Chippewa has made such progress in the last couple of years, but it seems like there may be barriers in the future so they retain their yellow status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 93.64 93.96 84.52 80.55 82.67 83.55 81.7 24.8 24.45
25/3 (2022 goal) 93.85 93.89 85.37 82.62 86.26 85.23 83.23 72.33 72.28

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Chippewa: 4
The locations are getting satellite only.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Chippewa                                         4                                         4 Chippewa

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Aitkin 0 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $6.8 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • County: Chippewa, Renville – Hanson Communications – Hanson – Chippewa Cty W
    Grant: $2,081,494, Local Match: $2,544,150, Total Budget: $4,625,644
  • 2022: Farmers Mutual Telephone Company, $4,728,186.00
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile, Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Chippewa County. (http://tinyurl.com/htwz58a)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Cass County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 84 of 87

Rank: 84
Code:  Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Cass 89.67 48 70.59 84 43.51 59 15

Cass County: back to bottom 10 ranking

After some increase in coverage last year, Cass County stays stagnant in 2025.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 91 locations in Cass County. Some locations will get fiber and some locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute. But the notable fact is that they will only get help for 91 locations.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Cass has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful except that Line Extension is meant for last mile and Cass doesn’t have a lot of infrastructure to extend..) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Unfortunately, Cass if going to retain their Red status. I just don’t see anything in their current or proposed future that would indicate the needed increase in broadband to meet state goals.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 70.59 69.15 56.15 56.37 64.02 63.21 51.61 35.92 34.07
25/3 (2022 goal) 89.67 89.15 91.79 96.44 94.02 84.53 88.02 77.58 66.92

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Cass: 91
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections. But what’s really telling is that only 91 locations have bids in an area that’s so unserved.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC CTC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Cass                                      46                                      42                                         3                                      91 Cass

 

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Aitkin $125,000 was invested on one project over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • One concern over the years is that they have had decent access to 25/3 for many years, which may make some people feel complacent with the access they have and then broadband dips in community priority.

Past Grants:

  • 2-22: Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) was one of the grant recipients, receiving $4,857,030 in funding (to cover St. Louis, Carlton, and Cass counties)
  • 2016 – TDS TELECOM CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES — GRANT: $3,000,000
  • 2014 – Consolidated Telephone Cooperative, Region 5 Virtual Highway Project – Award $2 million
  • 2020: CTC received CARES Act funding from both Crow Wing and Cass County.
  • 2019: Paul Bunyan Communications – North Central Minnesota Fiber Project– GRANT $2,562,916
  • 2019: WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355
  • West Central Telephone Association – Rural Staples Phase 2 – GRANT $465,050 This last mile project will serve 56 unserved locations in extremely rural areas of Wadena and Cass counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Cass County. (http://tinyurl.com/hgtulgm)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Carver County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 17 of 87

Rank: 17
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Carver 98.07 22 97.85 17 57.31 48 19

Carver County: CarverLink makes plans for 2025

Carver County is lucky to have CarverLink, a publicly owned broadband fiber optics network that celebrated a 10-year anniversary in September 2023.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 460 locations in Carver County. Some of the locations will get fiber while some locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Carver has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

With leadership from CarverLink, Carver County retains its green ranking.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 97.85 98.38 91.15 93.2 90.2 89.37 86.51 85.09 81.04
25/3 (2022 goal) 98.07 98.62 92.22 94 93.32 93.73 92.14 89.81 98.51

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Carver: 460
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Carver                                   111                                   168                                   166                                      15                                   460 Carver

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Carver has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $27.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • 2013, Carver County received ARRA funding for Carverlink, a publicly owned 89-mile base ring with 33 miles of lateral lines. It was completed in Fall of 2013.

Find more articles on broadband in Carver County. (http://tinyurl.com/jxj9v9x)

The maps below come from the

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Carlton County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow Rating: Ranking out 76 of 87

Rank: 76
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Carlton 79.54 77 74.04 76 27.93 73 15

Carlton County: Continues slow progress forward

Carlton County’s rank continues to bump up, more importantly, they continue to increase the broadband coverage. For many years, Carlton County was served primary with one national provider, who may not be as invested locally as a local provider or cooperative. But a local cooperative has brough the competition.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 3,339 locations in Carlton County. The majority of locations will fiber, which will make a big difference. Also some locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute. They will have to remember those locations are broadband continues to expand.

Statewide there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty. But those changes might be a benefit in Carlton County.

I am boosting Carlton County’s status to Yellow, based on the expectation that the BEAD funding will be disbursed in the next year.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 79.65 66.77 54.47 48.71 52.08 52.02 47.57 58.22 52.32
25/3 (2022 goal) 74.04 74.26 63.33 59.41 72.79 75.17 71.71 67.29 62.74

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Carlton: 3,339
The locations include a majority of fiber connections, although there is some satellite connections too.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC CTC East Central Energy Fiber IBT Group USA, LLC Mediacom LLC Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Fiber Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Carlton                                   292                                      52                              2,654                                   153                                   117                                      56                                      15                              3,339 Carlton

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Carlton, $766,654 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $59.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Carlton ranked 73 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.
  • Pine Knot News featured Carlton’s Broadband project in June, “The transformational $10.9 million project features 180 miles of fiber optic cable, and will bring higher internet speeds and greater reliability to households across a wide area of rural Carlton County, all the way north to Munger and Solway Township. Mediacom is responsible for the project that has potential to reach 1,679 homes, 420 of those in Thomson Township, should they choose to sign up for the service.”

Past Grants:

  • County: Carlton: Consolidated Telephone Company CTC Round 10 Wrenshall Community Broadband Project
    Grant: $2,127,530, Local Match: $2,127,530, Total Budget: $4,255,060
  • 2023: Carlton County Broadband Expansion – GRANT $1,271,835
  • 2022: Mediacom Minnesota LLC, $801,834.27 – for a project with a cost of $2,719,526
  • 2022: Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) was one of the grant recipients, receiving $4,857,030 in funding (to cover St. Louis, Carlton, and Cass counties)
  • 2017 – Carlton County w/ Frontier – Phase I: Cromwell/Kettle River – GRANT: $569,058
  • Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa – Big Lake Road Project – GRANT $602,916

Find more articles on broadband in Carlton County. (http://tinyurl.com/z4me5k4)

The maps below come from the

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Brown County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow Rating: Ranking out 59 of 87

Rank: 59
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Brown 84.78 68 84.13 59 72.45 27 16

 Brown County: maybe some deployment will spur more

Brown County has not seen movement since last year. They did get grant funding in the area last year, perhaps that impact will be apparent soon. But not yet.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 943 locations in Brown County. However, the majority of locations will go to fiber, which will help quite a bit.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Although, Brown has not benefited from Line Extension awards in the past.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

I am boosting Brown County’s status to Yellow, based on the expectation that the BEAD funding will be disbursed in the next year.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 84.13 84.12 78.4 79.96 75.99 74.6 74.5 73.76 72.89
25/3 (2022 goal) 84.78 87.5 83.31 84.88 84.66 83.67 83.66 96.31 95.92

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Brown: 945
The locations include a majority of fiber connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet Federated Rural Electric Association Nuvera Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber
Brown                                         1                                      26                                         2                                   914                                   943 Brown

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Brown has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $21 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • County: Brown, Cottonwood – Hanson Communications – Hanson – Comfrey FTTP
    Grant: $395,138, Local Match: $592,711, Total Budget: $987,849
  • 2107 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc.– Hanska A&D FTTP – GRANT $324,894
  • 2016 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc. – Hanska – GRANT: $ 200,397
  • 2019: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – New Ulm SW Project – GRANT $385,600
  • Minnesota Valley Telephone Company (MVTC) – Rural Franklin Fiber Project – GRANT $226,800. This middle and last mile project will serve approximately 45 unserved locations in the City of Franklin and the townships of Sherman, Eden, Camp and Birch Cooley in Redwood, Renville and Brown counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Brown County. (http://tinyurl.com/z2wwkye)

The maps below come from the

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Blue Earth County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow Rating: Ranking out 68 of 87

Rank: 68
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Blue Earth 85.9 65 80.52 68 61.94 42 17

Blue Earth County: Middle of the pack and dropping

Blue Earth County seems to be stuck or slipping in the last couple years but providers keep investing in the area. There was a 2024 MN State grant awarded last year and the impact of that should emerge soon. Mediacom also invested in the last year.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 782 locations in Blue Earth County. The majority of locations will get a fiber, which is going to help the county.

Statewide factors: There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

While Blue Earth seems a little stuck, local providers continue to engage and assuming that the BEAD funding is disbursed in the next year, they should find themselves getting closer to goal.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 80.52 79.55 76.46 81.88 80.76 77.81 77.91 14.13 55.6
25/3 (2022 goal) 85.9 88.84 89.37 92.5 84.78 85.36 78.33 77.95 88.35

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Blue Earth: 782
The locations include a majority of fiber connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet IBT Group USA, LLC Midco Nuvera Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Blue Earth                                      10                                      71                                      17                                   622                                      58                                         4                                   782 Blue Earth

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Blue Earth has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • Over the years, Blue Earth County (or cities within) has invested $39,249 (total) for matches for 1 successful MN Broadband grant. This is an indicator of local government that is engaged and (literally) invested in better, local broadband.
  • Blue Earth County will benefit from a 2024 435,838 MN Broadband grant (Round 10) award that will serve 101 locations between Blue Earth and Faribault Counties.
  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $49.1 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • County: Blue Earth, Faribault: Bevcomm (Easton) Telephone
    Bevcomm (Easton) Rural MN Lake: Grant: $435,838, Local Match: $1,016,956, Total Budget: $1,452,794
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Blue Earth County. (http://tinyurl.com/j5pe9kr)

The maps below come from the

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Big Stone County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 11 of 87

Rank: 11
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Big Stone 98.81 19 98.81 13 41.58 63 10

Big Stone County still hovering around 99 percent

Big Stone County coverage has hovered around 99 percent since 2018.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 24 locations in Big Stone County. The majority of locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Big Stone doesn’t have a history of benefitting from Line Extension awards but they might help.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Big Stone is so close; they maintain their green status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.81 98.97 99.71 97.9 98.6 98.6 98.91 98.91 70.12
25/3 (2022 goal) 98.81 98.97 99.71 97.17 99.48 99.48 99.58 98.91 70.12

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Big Stone: 24
The locations include mostly satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Mediacom LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Big Stone                                      21                                         1                                         2                                      24 Big Stone

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Aitkin 0 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $65,000 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • 2014 – Federated Telephone Cooperative, Big Stone County

Find more articles on broadband in Big Stone County. (http://tinyurl.com/zfgwstd)

The maps below come from the

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Benton County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 19 of 87

Rank: 19
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Benton 97.85 25 97.54 19 43.49 60 16

Benton County: so close after steady progress for years

Benton County’s coverage dipped a little in the next year but it seem that it’s within a margin of error. They haven’t benefited from State Grants or Line Extension awards in the last couple years.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 361 locations in Anoka County. However, the majority of locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Benton County gets a green ranking because they are so close to the goal, but it feels as if they could use a burst of renewed engagement.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 97.54 97.95 94.14 89.94 90.25 89.36 88.18 25.83 14.28
25/3 (2022 goal) 87.85 98.38 95.46 90.96 92.88 92.05 91.47 87.49 87.61

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Anoka: 361
The locations include a majority of satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC East Central Energy Fiber Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Tekstar Communications, Inc. (Arvig) Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber
Benton                                   270                                      46                                      22                                      22                                         1                                   361 Benton

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Benton $1,154,008 was invested over the years on four projects.

No new Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $7 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Benton ranked 30 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • 2023:  Cooperative Telephone – Benton County South of Trunk Highway 23 – GRANT $2,988,275
  • 2017 – Benton Cooperative Telephone Company – Rice Ramey – GRANT $765,015
  • 2017 – Palmer Wireless – Duelm Hwy 95 – GRANT $162,814
  • 2014-CenturyLink Foley, Benton County–Balkan Township – Award: $382,883.
  • 2020: Benton Cooperative Telephone Company – Ramey Phase I – GRANT $936,759
  • Benton Cooperative Telephone Company – Ramey Phase 2 Project – GRANT $338,011

Find more articles on broadband in Benton County (https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=benton+county&submit=Search)

The maps below come from the

MAPS

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Beltrami County Broadband Profile 2025: Green Rating: Ranking out 7 of 87

Rank: 8
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Beltrami 99.64 8 99.6 7 99.6 4 9

 Beltrami County well served thanks to Paul Bunyan

Beltrami County ranks 7 for broadband access; up two places from last year. There are 9 broadband providers in Beltrami County. However Beltrami is hometown to Paul Bunyan Communications.

They have hovered around 99 percent access to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2019. They got a little closer in the last year. They maintain their green status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 0 locations in Beltrami County.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Beltrami has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems like a strategy worth considering to reach the last households.)

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.6 98.73 98.75 98.86 99.25 99.25 98.79 96.3 96.35
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.64 99.06 98.93 98.92 99.49 99.49 99.41 99.4 99.36

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Beltrami is not listed as a beneficiary of BEAD funding.

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Beltrami has not invested in MN State Grant matching over the years.

No New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

Past Grants:

Find more articles on broadband in Beltrami County. (http://tinyurl.com/z5yvec6)

The maps below come from the

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)