A second look at MN County broadband ranking from TC Business Mag

Twin Cities Business is reporting on the MN Broadband County ranking – but I want to let careful readers know that this is based on the ranking I posted in December 2024. It’s still valuable, but again for folks who are long time readers, this isn’t an update, it’s just sharing the mainstream media coverage…

Rural businesses need access to fast, reliable broadband as much as metro-area firms do. Based on 2024 data gathered by the state, some Greater Minnesota counties are actually outpacing the Twin Cities region. The following rankings measure access to gig broadband, which is internet service with speeds of 1 gigabit per second (Gbps), the current standard for “high-speed.” Surprisingly, Anoka, a metro county, came in seventh from the bottom at 17%.

 

eNews: MN Monthly Recap January 2025: MN Broadband County Profiles

Happy New Year!
The 2024 County Broadband Profiles are done! Each year, using data from the OBD and progress tracked on the blog through the year, we create profiles of each county looking at how close each county is to ubiquitous broadband and what’s happening in the county to improve access.

Check out the ranking of counties:

Check out your county profile or a profile of a county that you might learn from:

  1. Aitkin – https://wp.me/p3if7-aw4
  2. Anoka – https://wp.me/p3if7-ayW
  3. Becker – https://wp.me/p3if7-az1
  4. Beltrami – https://wp.me/p3if7-az6
  5. Benton – https://wp.me/p3if7-azb
  6. Big Stone – https://wp.me/p3if7-azi
  7. Blue Earth – https://wp.me/p3if7-azn
  8. Brown – https://wp.me/p3if7-azs
  9. Carlton – https://wp.me/p3if7-azx
  10. Carver – https://wp.me/p3if7-azC
  11. Cass – https://wp.me/p3if7-azH
  12. Chippewa – https://wp.me/p3if7-azM
  13. Chisago – https://wp.me/p3if7-azR
  14. Clay – https://wp.me/p3if7-azW
  15. Clearwater – https://wp.me/p3if7-aA1
  16. Cook – https://wp.me/p3if7-aA6
  17. Cottonwood – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAc
  18. Crow Wing – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAh
  19. Dakota – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAn
  20. Dodge – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAs
  21. Douglas – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAx
  22. Faribault – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAC
  23. Fillmore – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAP
  24. Freeborn – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAU
  25. Goodhue – https://wp.me/p3if7-aAZ
  26. Grant – https://wp.me/p3if7-aB4
  27. Hennepin – https://wp.me/p3if7-aB9
  28. Houston – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBe
  29. Hubbard – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBj
  30. Isanti – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBp
  31. Itasca – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBu
  32. Jackson – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBA
  33. Kanabec – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBF
  34. Kandiyohi – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBK
  35. Kittson – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBP
  36. Koochiching – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBU
  37. Lac qui Parle – https://wp.me/p3if7-aBZ
  38. Lake – https://wp.me/p3if7-aC6
  39. Lake of the Woods – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCb
  40. Le Sueur – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCg
  41. Lincoln – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCl
  42. Lyon – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCq
  43. Mahnomen – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCw
  44. Marshall – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCB
  45. Martin – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCG
  46. McLeod – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCL
  47. Meeker – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCP
  48. Mille Lacs – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCU
  49. Morrison – https://wp.me/p3if7-aCZ
  50. Mower – https://wp.me/p3if7-aD4
  51. Murray – https://wp.me/p3if7-aD9
  52. Nicollet – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDe
  53. Nobles – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDj
  54. Norman – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDo
  55. Olmsted – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDt
  56. Otter Tail – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDy
  57. Pennington – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDD
  58. Pine – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDI
  59. Pipestone – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDN
  60. Polk – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDS
  61. Pope – https://wp.me/p3if7-aDX
  62. Ramsey – https://wp.me/p3if7-aE2
  63. Red Lake – https://wp.me/p3if7-aE7
  64. Redwood – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEd
  65. Renville – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEi
  66. Rice – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEn
  67. Rock – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEs
  68. Roseau – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEx
  69. Scott – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEH
  70. Sherburne – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEM
  71. Sibley – https://wp.me/p3if7-aER
  72. St. Louis – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEC
  73. Stearns – https://wp.me/p3if7-aEW
  74. Steele – https://wp.me/p3if7-aF1
  75. Stevens – https://wp.me/p3if7-aF6
  76. Swift – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFb
  77. Todd – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFg
  78. Traverse – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFl
  79. Wabasha – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFq
  80. Wadena – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFv
  81. Waseca – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFA
  82. Washington – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFF
  83. Watonwan – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFK
  84. Wilkin – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFP
  85. Winona – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFT
  86. Wright – https://wp.me/p3if7-aFX
  87. Yellow Medicine – https://wp.me/p3if7-aG2

Upcoming Events, Opportunities and Resources

Yellow Medicine County Broadband Profile 2024: Red rating: Ranking out 84 of 87

Rank: 84
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Yellow Medicine 67.27 82 58.77 84 1.01 87

Yellow Medicine County: improvement but too slow

Yellow Medicine County ranks 84 (down five places) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Yellow Medicine has lost coverage percentage, likely due to map corrections but it leaves Yellow Medicine with stalled and inconsistent mapping and they are far away from the goal.

They may also be concerned about being in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in the County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (56.69 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (99.5 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

Unfortunately, Yellow Medicine has earned a red ranking at the bottom of the ranking list.

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 58.77 61.09 58.17 48.81 37.71 38.86 37.72 19.28
25/3 (2022 goal) 67.27 68.63 68.7 64.65 59.83 68.31 46.91 20.42

Grants:

  • 2023: Interstate Telecommunications Company – Yellow Medicine County West Fiber-To-The-Home Project – GRANT $4,988,174
  • 2016 – MIDCO CANBY TO MARSHALL MIDDLE MILE AND LAST MILE – GRANT AMOUNT: $623,000
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Yellow Medicine County (http://tinyurl.com/zhsj3ke)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Wright County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 50 of 87

Rank: 50
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Wright 89.35 47 84.5 50 23.07 70

Wright County: still stalled at 80 percent coverage

Wright County ranks 65 (up 15 places) for broadband access out of 87 counties. After a few years of stalling and inconsistent mapping, Wright saw a nice increase in access likely due to several MN State broadband grants in 2023. They are in line to benefit from another $1 million MN State grant in the near future. I have upgraded their ranking to green.

  • Over the years, Wright County (or cities within) has invested $703,900 (total) for matches for 3 successful MN Broadband grants. This is an indicator of local government that is engaged and (literally) invested in better, local broadband.
  • Wright County will benefit from a 2024 almost $1 million MN Broadband grant (Round 10) award that will serve 300 locations.
  • Wright County will not benefit from any line extension awards.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $19.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Wright ranked 10 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.
  • In 2023, Last year’s report from the Institute for Local Self Reliance looked at broadband in Monticello and Buffalo in Wright County.
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 84.5 75.43 78.02 86.15 82.51 81.02 80.61 29.26
25/3 (2022 goal) 89.35 80.54 83.58 92.71 89.69 91.07 87.89 81.17

2024 Grant:

  • County: Wright
    Grant: $945,133
    Local Match: $1,155,163
    Total Budget: $2,100,296
    The Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Cokato Township project will provide fiber-to-the-premise broadband access to rural sites in Cokato Township in Wright County, excluding the area within the city limits of the town of Cokato Minnesota. This project will improve unserved/underserved levels of service up to 1 gigabit per second download and upload speeds resulting in more efficient and effective e-learning, telemedicine options and enhanced precision agriculture tools to 300 locations, including 189 unserved and 111 underserved addresses.

Past Grant:

  • 2023: Frontier – Wright County – City of Clearwater – GRANT $829,800
  • 2023 Arvig (Tekstar) – Wright County Area Fiber Extension – GRANT $879,747
  • 2023: Meeker Coop Light & Power – French Lake Township – Wright County – GRANT $1,270,132
  • 2022: Spectrum Mid-America, LLC managed by Charter Communications Inc., $2,832,155.00 (Learn more)
  • 2022: Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association (Vibrant Broadband) – Collinwood Lake – GRANT $104,337
  • Spectrum Mid-America, LLC managed by Charter Communications Inc. – Wright County Project 4 – GRANT $1,008,146
  • 2017 – Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Annandale East – GRANT $537,050
  • Meeker Coop. Light & Power Assoc. (Vibrant Broadband) – Lake Louisa/Lake Marie Project – GRANT $297,940

Find more article on Wright County https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=%22wright+county%22&submit=Search

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Winona County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 38 of 87

Rank: 38
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Winona 89.7 46 89.19 38 26.66 66

Winona County: Rank goes from Yellow to Green

Winona County ranks 38 (up one point) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have seen some growth in broadband in the last year. They will benefit from a $3.2 million MN State Broadband grant and 35 Line Extension grants. Also, HBC has announced fiber expansion plans in the area that they say will bring service to more than 5,000 locations.

 

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 89.19 85.33 85.62 87.59 87.47 86.43 86.31 81.17
25/3 (2022 goal) 89.7 87.55 88.88 91.65 88.09 86.58 86.48 92.13

2024 Grant:

  • County: Fillmore, Olmsted, Winona
    MiEnergy Cooperative South West Fremont
    Grant: $3,164,721
    Local Match: $4,747,086
    Total Budget: $7,911,807
    The MiEnergy Cooperative project will see built Fiber to the Premise (FTTP) in the rural areas Southwest of Fremont, Minnesota located primarily in Winona and Filmore Counties. This project will provide services to 396 addresses, including 342 unserved and 54 underserved, and bridge the digital divide by offering residents access to essential services such as telemedicine, online education, and remote work opportunities. Funding partner Mabel Cooperative Telephone Company is contributing $2,373,543.

Past Grants:

  • 2022: Ace Telephone Association, Inc., $3,218,201.00
  • 2016 – WINONA COUNTY PICKWICK AREA – GRANT: $416,640
  • 2015 – Hiawatha Broadband Communications – Winona County Whitewater Area – Grant Award: $247,000
  • 2015 – Winona County Hiawatha Broadband Communications – Cedar Valley Area – Grant award: $314,450
  • 2019: AcenTek – Rural Houston Exchange FTTH – GRANT $2,895,318
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: AcenTek – Rural Peterson Exchange FTTH – GRANT $1,492,096 This last mile project will serve 214 unserved households, 18 unserved businesses, 88 unserved farms, and two unserved community anchor institutions as well as 47 underserved households and five underserved businesses in areas of Fillmore and Winona counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Winona County (http://tinyurl.com/hqsckxg)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Wilkin County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 27 of 87

Rank: 27
Code:  Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Wilkin 94.09 30 93.68 27 93.68 9

Wilkin County: increases rank up 27 places in rank

Wilkin County ranks 49 (up 22 places) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Wilkin has seen some strong expansion of broadband, especially in the last year. They aren’t in line to benefit from any 2024 MN State Grants or Line Extension grants but it seems that there is an interested provider in the area that will help when the BEAD funding becomes available.

Wilkin County retains yellow ranking.

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 93.68 81.97 77.48 77.06 77.06 80.84 82.08 80.84
25/3 (2022 goal) 94.09 87.33 83.56 83.01 83.1 88.01 86.53 80.84

Grant:

  • 2023: Red River Rural Telephone Association – Rural Campbell – GRANT $2,035,500
  • 2023 Red River Rural Telephone Association – North Wilkin County – GRANT $2,227,363
  • 2022 Red River Rural Telephone Association, $2,157,663
  • 2017 – Advantenon – Rural Grant, Stevens and Wilkin Counties – Grant $316,554

Find more articles on broadband in Wilkin County (http://tinyurl.com/zh64v29)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Watonwan County Broadband Profile 2024: Red rating: Ranking out 75 of 87

Rank: 75
Code:  Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Watonwan 75.69 77 71.69 75 20.67 75

Watonwan County: hovering around 70 percent

Watonwan County ranks 75 (down two places) for broadband access and out of 87 counties. Watonwan County has been hovering around 70 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since we began tracking. I don’t see any grants in the hopper or yet to be spent that could help them. They retain their red ranking.

Also they may also concerned about being in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in the County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (68.15 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (99.74 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 71.69 70.03 71.06 69.25 68.5 67.75 68.42 64.58
25/3 (2022 goal) 75.69 74.61 78.27 77.62 79.32 79.21 70.7 65.26

Grants:

  • 2017 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc. – Hanska A&D FTTP – GRANT $324,894
  • 2016 – NEW ULM TELECOM, INC. HANSKA – GRANT: $ 200,397
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Watonwan County (http://tinyurl.com/jpnf6xv)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Washington County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 26 of 87

Rank:26
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Washington 96.65 24 94.56 26 22.61 72

Washington County: nearly there with a grant in process

Washington County ranks 26 (down 10 places) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Washington County is part of the 7-metro county region. It has some suburban areas and some rural areas. Some areas attract providers while other areas need incentive.

In 2023, Scandia started working on a 5-year broadband plan. While the county has stalled for many years now but they will benefit from a 2024 grant happening in Scandia. That may lead to more activity especially once BEAD funding becomes available.

Washington retinas green ranking.

  • Over the years, Washington County (or cities within) has invested $375,085 (total) for matches for 3 successful MN Broadband grants. This is an indicator of local government that is engaged and (literally) invested in better, local broadband.
  • Washington County will benefit from a 2024 $689,700 MN Broadband grant award that will serve 161 locations in Washington and Chisago Counties.
  • Washington County will benefit from 86 line extension awards (Rounds 1 and 2), which extend broadband to individual locations.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $22.4 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Washington ranked 4 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Broadband Access:

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 94.56 97.09 93.59 96.02 95.8 95.8 96.1 94.97
25/3 (2022 goal) 96.65 98.17 95.7 97.88 98.45 98.44 97.21 96.52

2024 Grants

  • County: Washington, Chisago
    Midco Midco Scandia
    Grant: $689,700
    Local Match: $689,700
    Total Budget: $1,379,400
    The Midco Scandia project will build fiber to the premises (FTTP) in portions of Washington and Chisago County in the communities of Scandia and Franconia Township. This project will extend reliable broadband service ranging up to 5 Gbps symmetrical or under 100/20 Mbps offering to 161 locations, including 145 unserved and 16 underserved locations.

Past Grants

  • 2023: Midco – Midco May Township – GRANT $1,580,300
  • 2022: Midcontinent Communications, $975,131
  • 2019: Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Scandia Project – GRANT $510,358
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Scandia – GRANT $78,824 This last mile project will serve 78 underserved households and one underserved business in remote neighborhoods of Scandia in Washington County.

Find more articles on broadband in Washington County (http://tinyurl.com/z4dwzyy)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Waseca County Broadband Profile 2024: Red rating: Ranking 69 out of 87

Rank:69
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Waseca 77.12 73 74.91 69 36.69 58

Waseca County: stalled at 75 percent broadband access

Waseca County ranks 69 (down 5 places) for broadband access out of 87 counties.

Waseca County has been hovering around 75 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2018. I don’t see any grants in the hopper or yet to be spent. They retain their red ranking.

Also, they are also concerned about being in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in the County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (75.4 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (98.56 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

Last year, I was able to have a great conversation with Steve Kraus, in Waseca County, about their intention and momentum with broadband. Waseca’s community it ready and eager to work for better broadband. It’s great to see that they will benefit from $5.6 million in 2024 MN State grants. That should make a great difference in their ranking (and access) next year!

  • Over the years, Waseca County (or cities within) has invested $165,000 (total) for matches for 1 successful MN Broadband grants. This is an indicator of local government that is engaged and (literally) invested in better, local broadband.
  • Waseca County will benefit from two 2024 MN Broadband grants:
    $1.2 million that will serve 163 locations and
    $4.4 million that will serve 492 locations
  • Waseca County will not benefit from any line extension awards (Rounds 1 and 2), which extend broadband to individual locations.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $19.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Waseca ranked 84th using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Broadband Access:

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 74.91 76.12 75.12 75.02 75.34 75.2 75.06 98.75
25/3 (2022 goal) 77.12 78.18 78.19 78.65 83.92 82.19 75.3 98.75

2024 Grants:

  • County: Waseca
    Bevcomm Inc Waseca County Fiber Expansion Project – Ph 2
    Grant: $1,186,050
    Local Match: $395,350
    Total Budget: $1,581,400
    This Low Density Bevcomm Inc Waseca County project will deploy underground fiber infrastructure across Alton, New Richland, and Saint Mary townships in rural Waseca County. This project will provide up to symmetrical Gigabit speeds with unlimited data to 163 homes, businesses, and farms, including 151 unserved and 12 underserved locations. Waseca County will be a funding partner for this project with a match amount of $165,000.
  • County: Waseca
    Bevcomm Inc
    Bevcomm – Waseca-Cty Fiber
    Grant: $4,385,444
    Local Match: $1,461,815
    Total Budget: $5,847,259
    This Lower-Density Population Grant application will build underground fiber infrastructure to 492 homes, businesses, and farms in rural Waseca County, delivering speeds up to a Gigabit symmetrically with unlimited data to each address served. This proposed project will cover 234 miles to portions of seven townships in Waseca County, including Alton, Byron, Freedom, Otisco, Saint Mary, Vivian, and Wilton. The project will serve a region that has been overlooked due to the high cost of building to rural agricultural areas. Waseca County is contributing $675,000.

Past Grant:

  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: BEVCOMM (Cannon Valley Telecom, Inc.) – Rural Morristown Fiber Expansion Project – GRANT $210,692 This last mile project will serve approximately 14 unserved and 94 underserved locations in portions of Rice, Waseca, and Steele counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Waseca County (http://tinyurl.com/z845jwy)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Wadena County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 7 of 87

Rank: 7
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Wadena 99.51 7 99.49 7 64.49 32

Wadena County: into the top 10!

Wadena County ranks 7 (up one place) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Wadena County saw a great jump in access in 2019. They are a few dozen households away from ubiquitous coverage. Perhaps some Line Extension grants would help.

They retain their green ranking.

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.49 99.32 98.88 97.29 95.53 91.07 49.91 45.69
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.51 99.36 98.92 97.36 95.53 93.01 92.37 88.23

Grants:

  • 2015 – West Central Telephone Association Hwy 71 Wadena NORTH Expansion Project – Grant Award: $193,515
  • WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355

Find more articles on broadband in Wadena County (http://tinyurl.com/z7xgkz8)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Wabasha County Broadband Profile 2024: Red rating: Ranking out 71 of 87

Rank: 71
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Wabasha 77.73 72 73.63 71 69.71 28

Wabasha County: still stalled at 71 percent access

Wabasha County was stagnant at 66 percent coverage for several years; now they seem to be hovering around 72 percent. Wabasha County residents were awarded 97 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes and it shows a strong community engagement.

With limited progress, Wabasha retains their red ranking.

  • Over the years, Wabasha County (or cities within) has not invested in matches for any successful MN Broadband grants.
  • Wabasha County will not benefit from a 2024 MN Broadband grant.
  • Wabasha County will benefit from 97 line extension awards (Rounds 1 and 2), which extend broadband to individual locations. That is a lot of awards.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $16.1 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Wabasha ranked 24 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 73.63 71.92 71.24 66.67 66.31 66.31 66.17 61.7
25/3 (2022 goal) 77.73 75.96 74.01 78.33 77.96 77.61 74.35 83.59

Grants:

  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Goodhue West FTTP – GRANT $532,232 This last mile project will serve 148 unserved and two underserved locations in Goodhue, Zumbrota, Minneola, and Belle Creek townships in Goodhue County and Chester Township in Wabasha County.

Find more articles on broadband in Wabasha County (http://tinyurl.com/gpllcg8)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Traverse County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 35 of 87

Rank: 35
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Traverse 90.05 44 89.81 35 89.81 11

Traverse County: a nice increase this year

Traverse County ranks 35 (up 17 points) for broadband access out of 87 counties. I don’t hear much about what’s going on there. But broadband in Traverse County has been increasing at a good clip in the last three years. So much, they have earned a green ranking. 

  • Over the years, Traverse County (or cities within) has invested $19,490 (total) for matches for 1 successful MN Broadband grant. This is an indicator of local government that is engaged and (literally) invested in better, local broadband.
  • Traverse County will not benefit from a 2024 MN Broadband grant.
  • Traverse County will not benefit from any line extension awards.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $3 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Traverse ranked 71 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 89.81 80 67.5 50.97 50.97 49.39 45.62 45.37
25/3 (2022 goal) 90.05 80.55 71.12 67.87 67.25 67.25 66.14 45.37

Grants

  • 2022: Runestone Telephone Association – Herman-Dumont – GRANT $2,493,637

Find more articles on broadband in Traverse County (http://tinyurl.com/gmvojv8)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Todd County Broadband Profile 2024: Red rating: Ranking out 85 of 87

Rank: 85
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Todd 67.03 83 58.35 85 28.46 63

Todd County: on bottom 10 list for broadband

Todd County ranks 85 (again) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Working with the Blandin Foundation, Todd County has been focused on better broadband for a long time. They work hard but still rank at the bottom, demonstrating that even the hardest working counties need an engaged provider. That missing piece leaves them at code red, despite ongoing efforts. The fact that they have received 55 line extension grants demonstrates the community engagement.

  • Over the years, Todd County (or cities within) has invested $7,500 (total) for matches for 1 successful MN Broadband grant. This is an indicator of local government that is engaged and (literally) invested in better, local broadband.
  • Todd County will not benefit from a 2024 MN Broadband grant.
  • Todd County will benefit from 38 line extension awards (Rounds 1 and 2), which extend broadband to individual locations.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $45.8 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Todd ranked 83 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Broadband Access:

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 58.35 53.43 47.52 49.93 49.12 38.68 17.58 2.86
25/3 (2022 goal) 67.03 79.33 74.14 77.01 53.73 71.91 67.96 46.01

Past Grants:

  • ReConnect funding through Upsala Cooperative Telephone Association in Morrison, Stearns and Todd counties.
  • 2017 – WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Northern Todd County – GRANT $902,695
  • 2014 – Arvig (Mainstreet Communications LLC), Sauk Lake area $
  • 2019: WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355
  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: Arvig (Tekstar Communications, Inc.) – Lake Osakis, Sauk Lake & Smith Lake Project – GRANT $486,458 This middle and last mile project will upgrade approximately 230 unserved and 39 underserved locations in Todd and Douglas counties.
  • Sytek Communications – Morrison/Todd/Stearns County FTTP Project – GRANT $1,048,668 This last mile project will bring service to 130 locations in Southwest Morrison, Southeastern Todd and Northeastern Stearns counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Todd County (http://tinyurl.com/gl47tgq)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Swift County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 9 of 87

Rank: 9
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Swift 99.45 9 99.34 9 64.67 30

Swift County: Almost there

Swift County ranks 9 (up one point) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They will benefit from 5 Line Extension grants, which might be a good way for them to get broadband to the last few houses. They are so close to goal; they retain their green ranking.

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.34 98.94 97.5 99.5 99.5 99.6 64.15 30.41
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.45 99.41 97.91 99.54 99.54 99.64 99.64 78.95

Past grants:

  • 2015 – Federated Telephone Cooperative – Swift County FTTP 2015 – Grant award: $4,950,000
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Swift County (http://tinyurl.com/zfptnnz)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Stevens County Broadband Profile 2024: Green rating: Ranking out 4 of 87

Rank: 4
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3
(% covered)
25/3 rank 100/20
(% covered)
100/20 rank Gig
(% covered)
Gig
rank
Stevens 99.72 5 99.72 4 99.72 3

Stevens County: So close

Stevens County ranks 4 (up 14 points) for broadband access out of 87 counties.   

Stevens County ranking will notch back to yellow in part because of the reductions seen on the map and in part because of the lack of movement forward for so many years.

  • Over the years, Stevens County (or cities within) has not invested in matches for any successful MN Broadband grants.
  • Stevens County will not benefit from a 2024 MN Broadband grant.
  • Stevens County will benefit from 1 line extension award (Rounds 1 and 2), which extend broadband to individual locations.
  • Last years’ estimates indicated that it would cost $1.1 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Stevens ranked 25 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.
  • Stevens County has been involved with broadband for years – going back to working with Blandin Foundation-led, Minnesota Intelligent Rural Communities (2009-2012) effort.

Broadband Access:

2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.72 96.06 97.08 96.79 96.79 96.74 96.74 96.73
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.72 99.81 99.31 99.22 99.22 99.22 99.22 99.21

Grants:

  • 2022: Runestone Telephone Association – Herman-Dumont – GRANT $2,493,637
  • 2017 – Advantenon – Rural Grant, Stevens and Wilkin Counties – Grant $316,554
  • 2014 – Otter Tail Telcom, Swan Lake West – Award: $438,937.

Find more articles on broadband in Stevens County (http://tinyurl.com/joutu2h)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)