Chisago County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow Rating: Ranking 60 out of 87

Rank: 60
Code:  Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Chisago County: resilience with a plan

Chisago County ranks 60 for broadband access out of 87 counties. Chisago County has 76.81 percent coverage of broadband of 100 Mbps down. They have 4878 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $45.3 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Chisago 47.7 21,120 76.81 4878 45365400

Like several other counties, Chisago County has areas where there is one national provider (or another). Often national providers are not as engaged in rural areas as providers with roots in the community. Chicago has found creative ways to get around that in several towns in the county.

Few counties are as engaged as Chisago is with promoting better broadband; last year a report from the Institute for Local Self Reliance pointed out, they have a plan to apply for State funding one community at a time until they’re covered. With a plan like that, they get a green code, despite their numbers!

In December 2022, Qwest got almost $500,000 to deploy the fiber to 119 unserved and 66 underserved locations in Harris Minnesota.

Chisago County is getting a yellow ranking because they have been stagnant but I suspect their years of engagement will help prepare them to take advantage of incoming federal (BEAD) funding.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 76.81 73.63 73.34 71.92 71.26 69.53 65.45
25/3 (2022 goal) 79.08 78.7 79.21 84.34 83.85 73.27 65.25

Past grants:

  • 2022: Qwest Corporation dba CenturyLink QC, $465,814.00
  • 2017 – CenturyLink – Fish Lake Township FTTH Project – GRANT $1,833,724
  • 2016 – SUNRISE TOWNSHIP (CENTURYLINK) FIBER TO THE HOME – GRANT: $1,074,852
  • CenturyLink (Qwest Corporation) – Nessel Township FTTH Project – GRANT $1,657,550

Find more article on Chicago (https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=chisago&submit=Search)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Chippewa County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow Rating: Ranking out 44 of 87

Rank: 44
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Chippewa County: stagnant access just over 80 percent

Chippewa County ranks 44 (dropping one place) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Chippewa County’s percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up is 84.52). They have 728 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $6.8 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

Chippewa 8.0 4,702 84.52 728 6770400

 

Chippewa County saw improvement in coverage this year, even if they dropped ranking. In December 2022, Farmers Mutual received $4.7 million to service to 636 unique locations across 10 townships in rural portions of Chippewa County. Hanson Communications has applied for the most recent round of Border to Border grants (awards should be made early 2024); if they get funding that will certainly help reach their goal.

Chippewa County is in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in Chippewa County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (76.09 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (98.3 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

Chippewa County retains their yellow ranking because it seems like efforts are being made to improve broadband but it still needs to happen.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 84.52 80.55 82.67 83.55 81.7 24.8 24.45
25/3 (2022 goal) 85.37 82.62 86.26 85.23 83.23 72.33 72.28

Grants:

  • 2022: Farmers Mutual Telephone Company, $4,728,186.00
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile, Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Chippewa County. (http://tinyurl.com/htwz58a)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Cass County Broadband Profile 2023: Red Rating: Ranking out 80 of 87

Rank: 80
Code:  Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Cass County: a long way to go

Cass County ranks 80, down one, for broadband access out of 87 counties. Their coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 is 56.15 percent. They have 10179 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $95 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Cass 9.6 23,214 56.15 10179 94664700

Cass County’s rank and percentage of cover has slipped slightly this year. This is the second year that coverage for 100/20 has dipped. One concern is that they have had wide access to 25/3 for many years, which may make some people feel complacent with the access they have and then broadband dips in community priority.

In December 2022, CTC was awarded $4.9 million in a Border to Border grant to extend broadband to parts of St. Louis, Carlton, and Cass counties. So that should help. In February, Cass County voted to invest ARPA funds on a broadband grant submitted by Arvig, which didn’t get funding but still shows an interest.

Unfortunately, Cass County will retain their red ranking because they are still at the bottom of the rankings.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 56.15 56.37 64.02 63.21 51.61 35.92 34.07
25/3 (2022 goal) 91.79 96.44 94.02 84.53 88.02 77.58 66.92

grants:

  • 2-22: Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) was one of the grant recipients, receiving $4,857,030 in funding (to cover St. Louis, Carlton, and Cass counties)
  • 2016 – TDS TELECOM CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES — GRANT: $3,000,000
  • 2014 – Consolidated Telephone Cooperative, Region 5 Virtual Highway Project – Award $2 million
  • 2020: CTC received CARES Act funding from both Crow Wing and Cass County.
  • 2019: Paul Bunyan Communications – North Central Minnesota Fiber Project– GRANT $2,562,916
  • 2019: WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355
  • West Central Telephone Association – Rural Staples Phase 2 – GRANT $465,050 This last mile project will serve 56 unserved locations in extremely rural areas of Wadena and Cass counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Cass County. (http://tinyurl.com/hgtulgm)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Carver County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking out 24 of 87

Rank: 24
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Carver County: CarverLink makes plans for 2024

Carver County ranks 24 (down from 19) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 2967 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $27.5 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Carver 89.1 33,530 91.15 2967 27593100

Carver County is lucky to have CarverLink, a publicly owned broadband fiber optics network that celebrated a 10-year anniversary in September 2023. (They shared a nice history of the project at the time.) Unfortunately, they have seen a slight dip in ranking and coverage in the last year, but that’s likely to be from map correction. But their they made a plan in September to help reverse that…

Sept 2023 the County Board unanimously approves moving forward with the preliminary 2024 recommended budget which includes $2.5 million that would be utilized to expand the current Connect Up Carver project with a Connect Up Carver 2.0 project. This project and funding would essentially provide the County what it needs to become the first County in the State of MN to make available high speed bandwidth to all locations within the County that want it.

With leadership from CarverLink, Carver County retains its green ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 91.15 93.2 90.2 89.37 86.51 85.09 81.04
25/3 (2022 goal) 92.22 94 93.32 93.73 92.14 89.81 98.51

Grants:

  • 2013, Carver County received ARRA funding for Carverlink, a publicly owned 89-mile base ring with 33 miles of lateral lines. It was completed in Fall of 2013.

Find more articles on broadband in Carver County. (http://tinyurl.com/jxj9v9x)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Carlton County Broadband Profile 2023: Red Rating: Ranking out 82 of 87

Rank: 82
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Carlton County: hard overcoming a national incumbent provider

Carlton County ranks 82 for broadband access of 73 counties; up one place from last year. They have 6407 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $59.5 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Carlton 16.1 14,071 54.47 6407 59585100

Carlton County saw a slight bump from 83 to 82 but they are still in the bottom 10 ranking. Two projects in Carlton County got funding at the end of 2022, totaling more than $5 million so that will help them reach the broadband goal. In 2023, SCI did get $1.3 million grant Border to Border grant to serve 503 households and businesses in the townships of Barnum, Eagle Lake, Lakeview and Moose Lake. Upsala Cooperative Telephone has applied for the latest (and undecided at time of posting) round of Border to Border funding for a project in Carlton County.

Unfortunately, Carlton County is one of several counties that is served primary with one national provider, who may not be as invested locally as a local provider or cooperative. The County has shown an interest in investing federal (ARPA) money; they need engaged providers. Increased federal funding may open doors for them.

Carlton County residents were awarded 11 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes.

Carlton County still gets a red ranking but I’m hopeful that the influx of funding will encourage more.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 54.47 48.71 52.08 52.02 47.57 58.22 52.32
25/3 (2022 goal) 63.33 59.41 72.79 75.17 71.71 67.29 62.74

Grants:

  • 2023: Carlton County Broadband Expansion – GRANT $1,271,835
  • 2022: Mediacom Minnesota LLC, $801,834.27 – for a project with a cost of $2,719,526
  • 2022: Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) was one of the grant recipients, receiving $4,857,030 in funding (to cover St. Louis, Carlton, and Cass counties)
  • 2017 – Carlton County w/ Frontier – Phase I: Cromwell/Kettle River – GRANT: $569,058
  • Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa – Big Lake Road Project – GRANT $602,916

Find more articles on broadband in Carlton County. (http://tinyurl.com/z4me5k4)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Brown County Broadband Profile 2023: Red Rating: Ranking out 54 of 87

Rank: 54
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Brown County: maybe some deployment will spur more

Brown County rank drops from 45 to 54 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 78.4 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 2268 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $21 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Brown 17.0 10,498 78.4 2268 21092400

Brown County seems to have taken a slight bump backwards. Their ranking dipped as the percentage of coverage of broadband. That may change if Hanson Communications gets funding in the latest (still in process) Border to Border grant round.

Brown gets a red ranking because they are going backwards and there hasn’t seen a big demonstration of wanting change.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 78.4 79.96 75.99 74.6 74.5 73.76 72.89
25/3 (2022 goal) 83.31 84.88 84.66 83.67 83.66 96.31 95.92

Grants:

  • 2107 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc.– Hanska A&D FTTP – GRANT $324,894
  • 2016 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc. – Hanska – GRANT: $ 200,397
  • 2019: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – New Ulm SW Project – GRANT $385,600
  • Minnesota Valley Telephone Company (MVTC) – Rural Franklin Fiber Project – GRANT $226,800. This middle and last mile project will serve approximately 45 unserved locations in the City of Franklin and the townships of Sherman, Eden, Camp and Birch Cooley in Redwood, Renville and Brown counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Brown County. (http://tinyurl.com/z2wwkye)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Blue Earth County Broadband Profile 2023: Red Rating: Ranking out 61 of 87

Rank: 61
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Blue Earth County: Middle of the pack

Blue Earth County dropped from rank 41 to 61 for broadband out of 87 counties. They have se76.46 percentage access to 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2019. They have 5301 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $49.1 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Blue Earth 28.2 21,603 76.46 5301 49299300

Blue Earth County seems to have gone backwards this year. Percentage of access has dipped five percent. I suspect that is due to map corrections, perhaps after challenges. They aren’t in line for any grants in the works.

Blue Earth County had a broadband feasibility study done in 2019. They might do well to loop back to that study for ideas of what to do to prepare for future funding. They are getting a red ranking because they have moved backwards and there doesn’t seem to be a current push to move forward. Their ranking dropped 20 points and that was the steepest drop this year.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 76.46 81.88 80.76 77.81 77.91 14.13 55.6
25/3 (2022 goal) 89.37 92.5 84.78 85.36 78.33 77.95 88.35

Grants:

  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Blue Earth County. (http://tinyurl.com/j5pe9kr)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Big Stone County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking out 6 of 87

Rank: 6
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Big Stone County almost there

Big Stone County ranks 12 for broadband access out of 87 counties a bump up from 12 last year. They are at 99.71 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2018. They have 7 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $65,000 to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Big Stone 4.6 2,430 99.71 7 65100

Big Stone is on the way to getting to goal coverage. They rank in the top 10 and that’s what they get a green rating. They got a great advantage when Federated Telephone got grant funding to building in the area in 2014.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.71 97.9 98.6 98.6 98.91 98.91 70.12
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.71 97.17 99.48 99.48 99.58 98.91 70.12

Grants:

  • 2014 – Federated Telephone Cooperative, Big Stone County

Find more articles on broadband in Big Stone County. (http://tinyurl.com/zfgwstd)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Benton County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking out 20 of 87

Rank: 20
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Benton County: getting traction toward goal again

Benton County ranks 20 for broadband, up from 25 last year. They have hovered around 89 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2019. They have 769 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $7 million get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Benton 31.8 13,116 94.14 769 7151700

Benton County seems to be getting traction again. They have comfortably edged over 90 percent coverage. In 2023, Cooperative Telephone got almost $3 million to build to 836 households, businesses, farms, and community institutions in Glendorado Township and portions of Gilmanton, Maywood, Minden, and Saint George Townships.

Benton County gets a green ranking because they are so close to the goal and seem to have built momentum to getting it done.

Broadband Access:

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 94.14 89.94 90.25 89.36 88.18 25.83 14.28
25/3 (2022 goal) 95.46 90.96 92.88 92.05 91.47 87.49 87.61

Grants:

  • 2023:  Cooperative Telephone – Benton County South of Trunk Highway 23 – GRANT $2,988,275
  • 2017 – Benton Cooperative Telephone Company – Rice Ramey – GRANT $765,015
  • 2017 – Palmer Wireless – Duelm Hwy 95 – GRANT $162,814
  • 2014-CenturyLink Foley, Benton County–Balkan Township – Award: $382,883.
  • 2020: Benton Cooperative Telephone Company – Ramey Phase I – GRANT $936,759
  • Benton Cooperative Telephone Company – Ramey Phase 2 Project – GRANT $338,011

Find more articles on broadband in Benton County (https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=benton+county&submit=Search)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Beltrami County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking out 12 of 87

Rank: 12
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Beltrami County well served thanks to Paul Bunyan

Beltrami County ranks 12 for broadband access. They have hovered around 99 percent access to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2019. They have 230 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $230,000 to get ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Beltrami 6.0 18,401 98.75 230 213900

Beltrami County has fallen in the ranking for broadband coverage but that’s only because others have been catching up. They have an engaged cooperative provider and it seems likely that they should reach the goal of ubiquitous broadband. It’s worth noting that they rank number 4 for Gig access.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.75 98.86 99.25 99.25 98.79 96.3 96.35
25/3 (2022 goal) 98.93 98.92 99.49 99.49 99.41 99.4 99.36

Grants:

Checklist:

Find more articles on broadband in Beltrami County. (http://tinyurl.com/z5yvec6)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Becker County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking out 41 of 87

Rank: 41
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Becker County: eking toward total coverage

Becker County ranks 41 for broadband access out of 87 counties. That’s up from 48 last year. They have 84.75 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 2765 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $27.5 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Becker 12.5 18,130 84.75 2765 25714500

Becker County went from 6 percent coverage to 100/20 in 2020. They have had measured increase to the goal since. In 2022, local provider Arvig committed to spending almost $20 million on upgrades in Becker, Otter Tail and Redwood Counties. In 2023, Arvig announced their plan to use E-ACAM funds to bring 100Mbps broadband to Becker, Hubbard, Otter Tail, Redwood, Stearns, Todd Counties.

Becker County residents were awarded 34 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes.

They get a green rating because they continue to move toward the goal, they are closing the gap between access to 25/3 versus 100/20, which means expansion in the area is better quality and they have providers interested in building out.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 84.75 78.45 73.42 73.41 6.22 12.95 6.58
25/3 (2022 goal) 93.96 92 92.53 78.99 91.36 88.94 69.41

Grants

  • 2016 – PAUL BUNYAN COMMUNICATIONS HUBBARD, BECKER & ITASCA COUNTIES – GRANT: $1,742,232
  • Arvig (Loretel Systems, Inc.) – Cormorant Lakes Area Project – GRANT $430,780

Find more articles on broadband in Becker County. (http://tinyurl.com/jkah37b)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Anoka County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking 11 out of 87

Rank: 11
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Anoka County Almost there

Anoka County ranks 11 (up 4 places) for broadband access and 6 for digital equity out of 87 counties. They have stayed constant with about 96 percent coverage of broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2017. They have 4367 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $43 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Anoka 254.3 113,461 98.93 1214 11290200

Anoka received an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) grant in 2013, which has helped serve government facilities. It has taken a while for broadband to get to residents but at almost 99 percent coverage, it’s getting very close. In 2023, Comcast was awarded more than $2.5 million to bring fiber to more than 1200 residents in Nowthen. Both Comcast and MidCo have applied for Border to Border grants in to the Office of Broadband Development; decision should be announced Winter 2024.

Anoka gets a green ranking because they are so close to goal. Anoka is part of the seven county metro area, which means the population density is much of the county makes it an attractive market for providers, but there are certainly rural parts to Anoka County as well.

Broadband Access:

 Anoka 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.93 96.64 97.41 97.14 97.45 97.86 96.1
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.22 97.72 98.72 98.57 98.8 98.87 97.56

Previous Grants:

  • 2023: Comcast-Xfinity – Comcast/City of Nowthen – GRANT $2,549,413
  • 2022: Tekstar Communications Inc, dba Arvig, $219,727
  • 2013: The County received federal (ARRA) funding in 2013. In partnership with Zayo, the County was able to build a 287-mile broadband network for government facilities.

Find more articles on broadband in Anoka County.(http://tinyurl.com/zuvt4x7)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Aitkin County Broadband Profile 2023: Green Rating: Ranking 40 out of 87

Rank: 40
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Aitkin County sees great gains in 2022

Aitkin County went from ranking 77 last year to 40 in 2023. They have gone from 60.36 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up in 2022 to 93.96 percent coverage in 2023. They have 2100 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $19.5 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Aitkin 6.9 13,770 84.75 2100 19530000

In 2022, Aitkin County worked with  Blandin Foundation as an IRBC (Iron Range Broadband Community) and they were cohorts in Blandin’s inaugural Accelerate! program, a process to spur community acquisition and deployment of federal and state broadband funds.

In November 2022, the Mille Lacs Messenger reported that an $4.8 million broadband construction would be completed in fall of 2023. In December 2022, Paul Bunyan Communications shared more about a Minnesota State Border to Border funded project that would expand broadband to Aitkin, Itasca and St Louis Counties. And in June 2023, Paul Bunyan reported broadband expansion in Grand Rapids, Warba, Marble, Calumet and Waukenabo Township in  Aitkin County.  SCI was awarded a almost $800,000 from a Border to Border grant to serve 199 locations in the townships of Balsam, Logan, Spalding, Turner and Workman. Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative has two applications for Border to Border grants in to the Office of Broadband Development; decision should be announced Winter 2024.

Aitkin County residents were awarded 65 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes.

In the past, a roadblock for Aitkin was that the county is widely served by a national provider that has not been upgrading the connections in their area. It seems that is becoming less of a hindrance.

Aitkin is getting an optimistic green code after significant improvement in the last year and greater interest from the County and area providers.

Broadband Access:

Aitkin 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 84.75 60.36 52.96 46.66 37.74 17.55 11.52
25/3 (2022 goal) 93.96 68.13 64.32 63.62 60.17 45.68 27.48

Grants:

  • Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative (MLEC) – Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Phase 4 FTTH – GRANT $198,607. This fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) project will serve 80 unserved and five underserved locations along the southeast side of Farm Island Lake in Aitkin County. Through a funding partnership with the State of Minnesota, MLEC will bring 1 Gbps speeds to 84 homes and one business on the fiber route, exceeding the State’s 2022 and 2026 speed goals.
  • 2017 – SCI – Shamrock Township Broadband Expansion – GRANT $148,503
  • 2016 – MILLE LACS ENERGY COOPERATIVE FTTP PROJECT – GRANT: $1,757,640
  • 2020 – Emily Cooperative Telephone Company – Round Lake Fiber Project – GRANT $376,000
  • 2020 Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative (MLEC) – MLEC Phase 3 FTTH Project with CTC – GRANT $1,253,955
  • 2020: SCI Broadband (Savage Communications Inc.) – Glen Township Broadband Expansion Project – GRANT $195,848

Find more articles on broadband in Aitkin County. (http://tinyurl.com/hdqdmhr)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

2023 Minnesota Broadband County Profiles: from Aitkin to Yellow Medicine

The 2023 County Broadband Profiles are done! I wanted to give folks who get an email alert each time something is posted on the blog that today is the day you’re going to get a lot. Also, I wanted to share some notes.

Minnesota has two broadband speed goals:

  • Ubiquitous access to speeds of 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up (25/3) by 2022
  • Ubiquitous access to 100/20 by 2026

Using data from the Office of Broadband Development and stories collected on the Blandin on Broadband blog, I have created a broadband snapshot of each county and their progress, especially on meeting the 2026 goal and ranked each green (good shape), yellow (warning) and red (yikes).

Here’s the breakdown of rating:

  • Green Rating: 31
  • Red Rating: 25
  • Yellow Rating: 31

Everyone in the broadband world is watching what’s happening with Broadband Equity Access and Deployment Program (BEAD) funding. Minnesota has been allocated $652 million, which will be distributed through the Office of Broadband Development (OBD). OBD has noted that $652 million will not be enough. So smart counties will do what they can to prepare to apply for funds. That means, make sure the map reflects what your community is experiencing. It also means, make connections and plans not to be prepared to apply. The tricky part is that nothing has been decided yet. OBD submitted their Initial Proposal with plans for how they will distribute funds, but the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) has not yet approved it.  Therefore my general comments for each county do not include a lot of information on BEAD.

Also you can check out:

Counties…

  1. Aitkin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xH
  2. Anoka – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xQ
  3. Becker – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xT
  4. Beltrami – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xW
  5. Benton – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xZ
  6. Big Stone – https://wp.me/p3if7-9y2
  7. Blue Earth – https://wp.me/p3if7-9y5
  8. Brown –  https://wp.me/p3if7-9y8
  9. Carlton – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yc
  10. Carver – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yf
  11. Cass – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yi
  12. Chippewa – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yl
  13. Chisago – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yr
  14. Clay – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yu
  15. Clearwater – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yx
  16. Cook – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yA
  17. Cottonwood – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yD
  18. Crow Wing – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yG
  19. Dakota – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yJ
  20. Dodge – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yM
  21. Douglas – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yP
  22. Faribault – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yS
  23. Fillmore – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yV
  24. Freeborn – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yY
  25. Goodhue – https://wp.me/p3if7-9z2
  26. Grant – https://wp.me/p3if7-9z5
  27. Hennepin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9z8
  28. Houston – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zb
  29. Hubbard – https://wp.me/p3if7-9ze
  30. Isanti – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zh
  31. Itasca – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zm
  32. Jackson – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zp
  33. Kanabec – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zs
  34. Kandiyohi – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zv
  35. Kittson – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zy
  36. Koochiching – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zB
  37. Lac qui Parle – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zE
  38. Lake – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zH
  39. Lake of the Woods – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zK
  40. Le Sueur – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zN
  41. Lincoln – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zQ
  42. Lyon – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zT
  43. Mahnomen – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zW
  44. Marshall – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zZ
  45. Martin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9A2
  46. McLeod – https://wp.me/p3if7-9A5
  47. Meeker – https://wp.me/p3if7-9A9
  48. Mille Lacs – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ac
  49. Morrison – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Af
  50. Mower – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ai
  51. Murray – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Al
  52. Nicollet – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ao
  53. Nobles – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ar
  54. Norman – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Au
  55. Olmsted – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ax
  56. Otter Tail – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AA
  57. Pennington – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AD
  58. Pine – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AG
  59. Pipestone – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AJ
  60. Polk – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AM
  61. Pope – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AP
  62. Ramsey – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AS
  63. Red Lake – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AV
  64. Redwood – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AY
  65. Renville – https://wp.me/p3if7-9B1
  66. Rice – https://wp.me/p3if7-9B4
  67. Rock – https://wp.me/p3if7-9B7
  68. Roseau – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ba
  69. Scott – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bg
  70. Sherburne – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bj
  71. Sibley – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bq
  72. St. Louis – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bd
  73. Stearns – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bt
  74. Steele – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bw
  75. Stevens – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bz
  76. Swift – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BB
  77. Todd – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BE
  78. Traverse – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BH
  79. Wabasha – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BK
  80. Wadena –  https://wp.me/p3if7-9BN
  81. Waseca –  https://wp.me/p3if7-9BQ
  82. Washington – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BT
  83. Watonwan – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BW
  84. Wilkin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9C1
  85. Winona – https://wp.me/p3if7-9C4
  86. Wright – https://wp.me/p3if7-9C7
  87. Yellow Medicine – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ca

Minnesota Border to Border Broadband round 9 grant applicants

On December 12, 2023, grant applications were due to the Office of Broadband Development. Providers have until January 11, 2024 to challenge the applications.

I am preparing to work on the MN Broadband County Profiles and part of that means figuring out which counties are in the hopper for possibly getting grants. I thought I’d share that info as part of the process:

Applicant NameProject NameCounty

2023 Broadband Grant Applications (Round 9)
Ace Telephone Association Rural Canton Fillmore
Albany Mutual Telephone Association Stearns Phase 2 Stearns
Arvig Hennepin County Hennepin
Arvig Mower County Mower
Arvig Naytahwaush Area Mahnomen
Arvig Stearns County Stearns
Benton Cooperative Telephone Company Buckman TS Morrison
Benton Cooperative Telephone Company Estes Brook Mille Lacs
Bevcomm Inc Bevcomm LeSueur County Fiber Le Sueur
Bevcomm Inc Bevcomm Waseca County Fiber Waseca
Comcast Anoka County Anoka
Comcast Carver County Carver
Comcast Carver County 2 Carver
Comcast Carver County 3 Carver
Comcast Dakota County Dakota
Comcast Scott County Scott County
Comcast Washington County Washington
Comcast Washington County 2 Washington
Comcast Washington County 3 Washington
Consolidated Telephone Company Clinton Twp St Louis
East Central Energy Mille Lacs South Mille Lacs
East Central Energy Pine Central Pine
East Central Energy Pine North Pine
Easton Telephone Company Rural Minnesota Lake Fiber Faribault
Federated Rural Electric Association Federated Martin County Martin
Federated Telephone Cooperative Western Kandiyohi FTTP Kandiyohi
Garden Valley Telephone Company Rural East Grand Forks Polk
Gardonville Cooperative Telephone Douglas County Douglas
Hanson Communications Chippewa County West Chippewa
Hanson Communications Comfrey Brown Cottonwood
Hiawatha Broadband Communications, Inc Dakota Goodhue Wabasha Dakota
ITC Lyon Northwest Lyon
ITC Yellow Medicine Central Yellow Medicine
JTN Communications JTN Dakota
Kasson & Mantorville Telephone Company Byron Rural North Olmsted
Mediacom LLC Chub Lake Dakota
Mediacom LLC Esqugama Lake St Louis
Mediacom LLC Hibbing Esko St Louis
Mediacom LLC Iron Junction St Louis
Mediacom LLC Lakewood St Louis
Mediacom LLC Oak Hill Spring Valley Fillmore
Mediacom LLC Ostrander Fillmore
Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Fahlun Township Kandiyohi
Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Gennesse Township Kandiyohi
Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Kandiyohi Township Kandiyohi
Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Lake Lillian Kandiyohi
Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Southside Township Wright
Midco North Central Anoka
Midco Wright Sherburne Wright Sherburne
Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative Cedar Lake Aitkin
Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative MLEC NW Aitkin Aitkin
NorthfieldWiFi NorthfieldWifi Dakota Rice
Nuvera Communications, Inc White Rock Goodhue
Red River Communications Red River Rural Comstock Rural Sabin Clay
Red River Communications Rural Hawley Clay
Runestone Telecom Association Crow Lake Twp Stearns
Savage Communications Inc East Central MN Pine
Savage Communications Inc Industrial Township Broadband St Louis
Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Blue Earth Blue Earth
Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Dakota County Dakota
Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Mower Co Mower
Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Sherburne Co Sherburne
Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Spectrum-Wright Co Wright
Spring Grove Communications Spring Grove Comm Spring Valley N Chester Fillmore
Treehouse Broadband, LLC Treehouse – Echo Trail St Louis
Upsala Cooperative Telephone Association dba Sytek Sytek – Swanville North Moose Lake Carlton
Wikstrom Telephone Company, Incorporated Wiktel NW MN Broadband RD9 Kittson
Woodstock Telephone Company Woodstock Comm – Hatfield FTTH Pipestone
Zito West Holding LLC Zito West Holding – Two Harbors Unreached Drops Lake