St Louis County is slipping in MN broadband county ranking

It’s fun to see the Timberjay write about the MN Broadband County Profiles…

St. Louis County is falling behind in the deployment of high-speed broadband, tumbling down the rankings of Minnesota counties based on recent data from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development, or OBD.
Ann Treacy tracks broadband development initiatives for the Blandin Foundation in her regular “Blandin on Broadband” email updates, and her recent analysis reveals the challenges facing residents in the state’s geographically largest county when it comes to getting high-speed broadband internet access.
The currently accepted baseline for high-speed broadband is 100 megabits per second download and 20 megabits per second upload, and OBD has a goal of reaching full access to these speeds statewide by 2026.
That target appears to be a tall order for St. Louis County, however, according to Treacy’s analysis. OBD estimates that 23,734 households of the county’s 88,360 residential locations are without wired 100/20mbps service, ranking 68th in the state, a drop of 11 places from last year’s rankings.

eNews: MN Monthly Recap January 2024: MN Broadband County Profiles

Happy New Year!
The 2023 County Broadband Profiles are done! Each year, using data from the OBD and progress tracked on the blog through the year, we create profiles of each county looking at how close each county is to ubiquitous broadband and what’s happening in the county to improve access.

Check out the ranking of counties:

Check out the county profiles:

  1. Aitkin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xH
  2. Anoka – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xQ
  3. Becker – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xT
  4. Beltrami – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xW
  5. Benton – https://wp.me/p3if7-9xZ
  6. Big Stone – https://wp.me/p3if7-9y2
  7. Blue Earth – https://wp.me/p3if7-9y5
  8. Brown –  https://wp.me/p3if7-9y8
  9. Carlton – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yc
  10. Carver – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yf
  11. Cass – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yi
  12. Chippewa – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yl
  13. Chisago – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yr
  14. Clay – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yu
  15. Clearwater – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yx
  16. Cook – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yA
  17. Cottonwood – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yD
  18. Crow Wing – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yG
  19. Dakota – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yJ
  20. Dodge – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yM
  21. Douglas – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yP
  22. Faribault – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yS
  23. Fillmore – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yV
  24. Freeborn – https://wp.me/p3if7-9yY
  25. Goodhue – https://wp.me/p3if7-9z2
  26. Grant – https://wp.me/p3if7-9z5
  27. Hennepin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9z8
  28. Houston – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zb
  29. Hubbard – https://wp.me/p3if7-9ze
  30. Isanti – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zh
  31. Itasca – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zm
  32. Jackson – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zp
  33. Kanabec – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zs
  34. Kandiyohi – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zv
  35. Kittson – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zy
  36. Koochiching – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zB
  37. Lac qui Parle – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zE
  38. Lake – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zH
  39. Lake of the Woods – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zK
  40. Le Sueur – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zN
  41. Lincoln – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zQ
  42. Lyon – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zT
  43. Mahnomen – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zW
  44. Marshall – https://wp.me/p3if7-9zZ
  45. Martin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9A2
  46. McLeod – https://wp.me/p3if7-9A5
  47. Meeker – https://wp.me/p3if7-9A9
  48. Mille Lacs – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ac
  49. Morrison – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Af
  50. Mower – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ai
  51. Murray – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Al
  52. Nicollet – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ao
  53. Nobles – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ar
  54. Norman – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Au
  55. Olmsted – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ax
  56. Otter Tail – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AA
  57. Pennington – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AD
  58. Pine – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AG
  59. Pipestone – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AJ
  60. Polk – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AM
  61. Pope – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AP
  62. Ramsey – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AS
  63. Red Lake – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AV
  64. Redwood – https://wp.me/p3if7-9AY
  65. Renville – https://wp.me/p3if7-9B1
  66. Rice – https://wp.me/p3if7-9B4
  67. Rock – https://wp.me/p3if7-9B7
  68. Roseau – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ba
  69. Scott – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bg
  70. Sherburne – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bj
  71. Sibley – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bq
  72. Louis – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bd
  73. Stearns – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bt
  74. Steele – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bw
  75. Stevens – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Bz
  76. Swift – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BB
  77. Todd – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BE
  78. Traverse – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BH
  79. Wabasha – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BK
  80. Wadena –  https://wp.me/p3if7-9BN
  81. Waseca –  https://wp.me/p3if7-9BQ
  82. Washington – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BT
  83. Watonwan – https://wp.me/p3if7-9BW
  84. Wilkin – https://wp.me/p3if7-9C1
  85. Winona – https://wp.me/p3if7-9C4
  86. Wright – https://wp.me/p3if7-9C7
  87. Yellow Medicine – https://wp.me/p3if7-9Ca

Upcoming Events, Opportunities and Resources

Wright County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow rating: Ranking out 65 of 87

Rank: 65
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Wright County: still stalled at 80 percent coverage

Wright County ranks 65 (down 16 points) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 75.43 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 2708 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $25.1 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Wright 72.4 51,720 75.43 2708 25,184,400

Last year’s report from the Institute for Local Self Reliance looked at broadband in Monticello and Buffalo in Wright County.

In December 2022, the Office of Broadband Development (OBD) awarded Border to Border grants that will benefit Wright County

  • Spectrum received $2.8 million to cover 626 households and 12 businesses
  • Meeker Cooperative received $104,337 to serve 86 unserved rural households, 16 underserved rural households and 5 farms in central Minnesota.
  • Spectrum received $1 million to provide reliable high speed internet to 387 homes and 25 business in portions of the City of St. Michaels and the Township of Rockford in Wright County

Wright County is a code yellow community in part because their percentage of access has been stalled and the reporting is inconsistent.

In 2023, OBD awarded Border to Border grants that will benefit Wright County

  • Arvig received $879,747 to build to 256 households, farms and businesses throughout parts of rural Wright County
  • Frontier received $829,800 to provide 5 Gbps symmetrical service to 316 households, businesses, community anchor institutions and farms
  • Meeker Cooperative received $1.2 million to serve 525 households, businesses and the French Lake Township Hall in central Minnesota

Also, Meeker and Midco have applications in to the latest (still open) round of Border to Border funding; results should be available in early 2024.

Wright County has a lot going on for broadband right now. That will help them increase coverage and prepare them to take advantage of federal (BEAD) funds. The retain their yellow ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 75.43 78.02 86.15 82.51 81.02 80.61 29.26
25/3 (2022 goal) 80.54 83.58 92.71 89.69 91.07 87.89 81.17

Grant:

  • 2023: Frontier – Wright County – City of Clearwater – GRANT $829,800
  • 2023 Arvig (Tekstar) – Wright County Area Fiber Extension – GRANT $879,747
  • 2023: Meeker Coop Light & Power – French Lake Township – Wright County – GRANT $1,270,132
  • 2022: Spectrum Mid-America, LLC managed by Charter Communications Inc., $2,832,155.00 (Learn more)
  • 2022: Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association (Vibrant Broadband) – Collinwood Lake – GRANT $104,337
  • Spectrum Mid-America, LLC managed by Charter Communications Inc. – Wright County Project 4 – GRANT $1,008,146
  • 2017 – Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Annandale East – GRANT $537,050
  • Meeker Coop. Light & Power Assoc. (Vibrant Broadband) – Lake Louisa/Lake Marie Project – GRANT $297,940

Find more article on Wright County https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=%22wright+county%22&submit=Search

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Yellow Medicine County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow rating: Ranking 79 of 87

Rank: 79
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Yellow Medicine County: improvement but too slow

Yellow Medicine County ranks 79 (down one point) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They 61.09 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 1695 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $15.7 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Yellow Medicine 5.7 4,354 61.09 1695 15763500

Yellow Medicine has steadily increased broadband coverage, unfortunately they are far away from the goal. They will need a concerted effort to get closer to the goal. In 2023, Interstate Telecom was awarded almost $5 million in Border to Border funding to construct a 100% fiber-to-the-premises broadband network with speeds capable of up to 1 Gbps download and 1 Gbps upload. The project will serve 483 locations in Yellow Medicine County. ITC has another application in to the latest (still open) round of Border to Border funding; results should be available in early 2024.

They may also be concerned about being in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in the County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (56.69 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (99.5 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

It seems as if Yellow Medicine has an engaged provider that might be able to help them reach the broadband goal with state or upcoming federal (BEAD) funding.

2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 61.09 58.17 48.81 37.71 38.86 37.72 19.28
25/3 (2022 goal) 68.63 68.7 64.65 59.83 68.31 46.91 20.42

Grants:

  • 2023: Interstate Telecommunications Company – Yellow Medicine County West Fiber-To-The-Home Project – GRANT $4,988,174
  • 2016 – MIDCO CANBY TO MARSHALL MIDDLE MILE AND LAST MILE – GRANT AMOUNT: $623,000
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Yellow Medicine County (http://tinyurl.com/zhsj3ke)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Winona County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow rating: Ranking out 39 of 87

Rank: 39
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Winona County: pretty good access and needs a push for ubiquitous

Winona County ranks 39 (down 9 points) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 85.33 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 2525 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $23 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Winona 26.8 17,214 85.33 2525 2343600

Winona County has been focused on broadband for years; they were part of the Minnesota Intelligent Rural Communities (MIRC) starting in 2010, a Blandin-led and federal (ARRA) funded broadband adoption project.

In 2022, HBC announced 10 Gig residential service in the City of Winona. Two months later they announced expansion in rural parts of the county.

In December 2022, Ace Telephone received $3.2 million to serve 486 underserved households, 34 underserved businesses, and 88 underserved farms in Winona County.  Broadband-leaning conversations were happening in Winona in 2023, the was an active Digital Connection Committee that shared their views with the Digital Equity Report that the Office of Broadband Development (OBD) submitted to the NTIA as part of the federal funding (BEAD) application and OBD hosted a discussion about the Equity Plan in draft form.

Winona County residents were awarded 35 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes.

Winona has been hovering around 85 percent coverage for a long time but recent conversations and grants in the area should help prepare Winona to take advantage of federal (BEAD) funding so they retain their yellow ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 85.33 85.62 87.59 87.47 86.43 86.31 81.17
25/3 (2022 goal) 87.55 88.88 91.65 88.09 86.58 86.48 92.13

Grants:

  • 2022: Ace Telephone Association, Inc., $3,218,201.00
  • 2016 – WINONA COUNTY PICKWICK AREA – GRANT: $416,640
  • 2015 – Hiawatha Broadband Communications – Winona County Whitewater Area – Grant Award: $247,000
  • 2015 – Winona County Hiawatha Broadband Communications – Cedar Valley Area – Grant award: $314,450
  • 2019: AcenTek – Rural Houston Exchange FTTH – GRANT $2,895,318
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: AcenTek – Rural Peterson Exchange FTTH – GRANT $1,492,096 This last mile project will serve 214 unserved households, 18 unserved businesses, 88 unserved farms, and two unserved community anchor institutions as well as 47 underserved households and five underserved businesses in areas of Fillmore and Winona counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Winona County (http://tinyurl.com/hqsckxg)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Wilkin County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow rating: Ranking out 49 of 87

Rank: 49
Code:  Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Wilkin County: going the wrong way – need to focus

Wilkin County ranks 49 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 81.97 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 464 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $4.3 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Wilkin 3.4 2,574 81.97 464 4315200

They have hovered around 77 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2020 but recent grants may change that.

In December 2022, Red River Rural Telephone received $2.1 million to upgrade approximately 315 underserved locations near the Breckenridge, Doran and Foxhome area of Wilkin County. In 2023, Red River got two more grants: one for $2.2 million to  serve 128 locations in North Wilkin County, located near Breckenridge and Foxhome and $2 million to upgrade approximately 86 unserved locations near the rural Doran and Campbell areas of Wilkin County.

The recent grants help Wilkin County shift from red to yellow ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 81.97 77.48 77.06 77.06 80.84 82.08 80.84
25/3 (2022 goal) 87.33 83.56 83.01 83.1 88.01 86.53 80.84

Grant:

  • 2023: Red River Rural Telephone Association – Rural Campbell – GRANT $2,035,500
  • 2023 Red River Rural Telephone Association – North Wilkin County – GRANT $2,227,363
  • 2022 Red River Rural Telephone Association, $2,157,663
  • 2017 – Advantenon – Rural Grant, Stevens and Wilkin Counties – Grant $316,554

Find more articles on broadband in Wilkin County (http://tinyurl.com/zh64v29)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Watonwan County Broadband Profile 2023: Red rating: Ranking out 73 of 87

Rank: 73
Code:  Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Watonwan County: hovering around 70 percent

Watonwan County ranks 73 for broadband access and out of 87 counties. They have 70.03 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 1336 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $12.4 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Watonwan 10.1 4,458 70.03 1336 12424800

Watonwan County has been hovering around 70 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since we began tracking. I don’t see any grants in the hopper or yet to be spent that could help them. They retain their red ranking.

Also they may also concerned about being in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in the County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (68.15 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (99.74 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

 

2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 70.03 71.06 69.25 68.5 67.75 68.42 64.58
25/3 (2022 goal) 74.61 78.27 77.62 79.32 79.21 70.7 65.26

Grants:

  • 2017 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc. – Hanska A&D FTTP – GRANT $324,894
  • 2016 – NEW ULM TELECOM, INC. HANSKA – GRANT: $ 200,397
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Watonwan County (http://tinyurl.com/jpnf6xv)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Washington County Broadband Profile 2023: Green rating: Ranking out 16 of 87

Rank: 16
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Washington County: nearly there with a grant in process

Washington County ranks 16 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have hovered from 97.09 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 2404 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $22.4 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Washington 195.4 82,618 97.09 2404 22357200

Washington County in part of the 7-metro county region. It has some suburban areas and some rural areas. So, some areas attract providers while other areas need incentive. They have been stalled for many years now and there seems to be little engagement outside of Scandia and that is how their code has been escalated from green to yellow.

In December 2022, MidContinent received $975,131 in Border to Border funding to bring gigabit broadband service to 1,075 households, businesses and farms in Grant, Hugo, and Stillwater. In 2023, MidCo received $1.6 million to serve 575 households, businesses, farms and community anchor institutions in May Township. Comcast has three applications in to the latest (still open) round of Border to Border funding; results should be available in early 2024.

In 2023, Scandia started working on a 5-year broadband plan.

With an increase in coverage and ongoing provider attention, Washington has shifted from yellow to green ranking.

Broadband Access:

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 97.09 93.59 96.02 95.8 95.8 96.1 94.97
25/3 (2022 goal) 98.17 95.7 97.88 98.45 98.44 97.21 96.52

Grants

  • 2023: Midco – Midco May Township – GRANT $1,580,300
  • 2022: Midcontinent Communications, $975,131
  • 2019: Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Scandia Project – GRANT $510,358
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Scandia – GRANT $78,824 This last mile project will serve 78 underserved households and one underserved business in remote neighborhoods of Scandia in Washington County.

Checklist:

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Waseca County Broadband Profile 2023: Red rating: Ranking 64 out of 87

Rank:64
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Waseca County: stalled at 75 percent broadband access

Waseca County ranks 64 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 76.12 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 1699 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $15.8 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Waseca 16.5 7,145 76.12 1699 15800700

Waseca County has been hovering around 75 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2018. I don’t see any grants in the hopper or yet to be spent. They retain their red ranking.

Also, they are also concerned about being in a potentially precarious position because looking at access in the County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (75.4 percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (98.56 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

Broadband Access:

2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 76.12 75.12 75.02 75.34 75.2 75.06 98.75
25/3 (2022 goal) 78.18 78.19 78.65 83.92 82.19 75.3 98.75

Grant:

  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: BEVCOMM (Cannon Valley Telecom, Inc.) – Rural Morristown Fiber Expansion Project – GRANT $210,692 This last mile project will serve approximately 14 unserved and 94 underserved locations in portions of Rice, Waseca, and Steele counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Waseca County (http://tinyurl.com/z845jwy)

Added: Jan 10 based on info from Waseca: Waseca County has teamed up with Bevcomm for a low density border-to-border grant request to OBD. It was submitted on time for this most recent round. All the County Commissioners and our County Administrator have been absolutely great to work with and are 100 percent on board with expanding broadband services to all of Waseca County.

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Wadena County Broadband Profile 2023: Green rating: Ranking out 8 of 87

Rank: 8
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Wadena County: into the top 10!

Wadena County ranks 8 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 99.32 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 38 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $353400 to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Wadena 10.4 5,628 99.32 38 353400

Wadena County saw a great jump in access in 2019. There has bee incremental improvement since then and now they are 38 households away from ubiquitous coverage.

They retain their green ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.32 98.88 97.29 95.53 91.07 49.91 45.69
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.36 98.92 97.36 95.53 93.01 92.37 88.23

Grants:

  • 2015 – West Central Telephone Association Hwy 71 Wadena NORTH Expansion Project – Grant Award: $193,515
  • WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355

Find more articles on broadband in Wadena County (http://tinyurl.com/z7xgkz8)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Wabasha County Broadband Profile 2023: Red rating: Ranking out 71 of 87

Rank: 71
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Wabasha County: still stalled at 71 percent access

Wabasha County ranks 71 for broadband access out of 87 counties with 71.92 percent coverage of broadband at speeds of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 1735 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $16.1 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Wabasha 17.5 9,594 71.92 1735 16135500

 

Wabasha County was stagnant at 66 percent coverage for several years; now they seem to be hovering around 72 degrees. Hiawatha Broadband has applied in to the latest (still open) round of Border to Border funding; results should be available in early 2024.

Wabasha County residents were awarded 97 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes.

With limited progress, Wabasha retains their red ranking.

 

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 71.92 71.24 66.67 66.31 66.31 66.17 61.7
25/3 (2022 goal) 75.96 74.01 78.33 77.96 77.61 74.35 83.59

Grants:

  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Goodhue West FTTP – GRANT $532,232 This last mile project will serve 148 unserved and two underserved locations in Goodhue, Zumbrota, Minneola, and Belle Creek townships in Goodhue County and Chester Township in Wabasha County.

Find more articles on broadband in Wabasha County (http://tinyurl.com/gpllcg8)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Traverse County Broadband Profile 2023: Yellow rating: Ranking out 52 of 87

Rank: 52
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Traverse County: a nice increase this year

Traverse County ranks 52 (up 18 points) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 80 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 326 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $3 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Traverse 2.8 1,630 80 326 3031800

Broadband in Traverse County has been increasing at a good clip in the last two years. I don’t hear much about what’s happening there but something is. In December 2022, Runestone Telephone received $2.5 million to expand broadband in Grant, Stevens, and Traverse Counties.

They retain their yellow ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 80 67.5 50.97 50.97 49.39 45.62 45.37
25/3 (2022 goal) 80.55 71.12 67.87 67.25 67.25 66.14 45.37

Grants

  • 2022: Runestone Telephone Association – Herman-Dumont – GRANT $2,493,637

Checklist:

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Todd County Broadband Profile 2023: Red rating: Ranking out 85 of 87

Rank: 85
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Todd County: on bottom 10 list for broadband

Todd County ranks 85 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 53.43 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 4929 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $45.8 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Todd 10.8 10,583 53.43 4929 45839700

 

Working with the Blandin Foundation, Todd County has been focused on better broadband for a long time. They work hard but still rank at the bottom, demonstrating that even the hardest working counties need an engaged provider. That missing piece leaves them at code red, despite ongoing efforts.

Todd County residents were awarded 55 line extension funding requests, which means state funding will subsidize last mile broadband extension to their homes.

Broadband Access:

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 53.43 47.52 49.93 49.12 38.68 17.58 2.86
25/3 (2022 goal) 79.33 74.14 77.01 53.73 71.91 67.96 46.01

 

Grant:

  • ReConnect funding through Upsala Cooperative Telephone Association in Morrison, Stearns and Todd counties.
  • 2017 – WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Northern Todd County – GRANT $902,695
  • 2014 – Arvig (Mainstreet Communications LLC), Sauk Lake area $
  • 2019: WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355
  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: Arvig (Tekstar Communications, Inc.) – Lake Osakis, Sauk Lake & Smith Lake Project – GRANT $486,458 This middle and last mile project will upgrade approximately 230 unserved and 39 underserved locations in Todd and Douglas counties.
  • Sytek Communications – Morrison/Todd/Stearns County FTTP Project – GRANT $1,048,668 This last mile project will bring service to 130 locations in Southwest Morrison, Southeastern Todd and Northeastern Stearns counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Todd County (http://tinyurl.com/gl47tgq)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Swift County Broadband Profile 2023: Green rating: Ranking out 10 of 87

Rank: 10
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Swift County: Almost there

Swift County ranks 10 (up one point) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 98.94 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 45 households without access to broadband at that speed. There is a slight dip in access this year but it is within a margin of error and may simply reflect a more granular look at access. Estimates indicate that it will cost $418500 to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Swift 5.6 4,239 98.94 45 418500

Swift County benefited from Federated Telephone’s Border to Border grant in 2015. They have hovered between 97-99 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up since 2019. They are so close to goal; they retain their green ranking.

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.94 97.5 99.5 99.5 99.6 64.15 30.41
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.41 97.91 99.54 99.54 99.64 99.64 78.95

Past grants:

  • 2015 – Federated Telephone Cooperative – Swift County FTTP 2015 – Grant award: $4,950,000
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Swift County (http://tinyurl.com/zfptnnz)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.

Stevens County Broadband Profile 2023: Green rating: Ranking out 18 of 87

Rank: 18
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

Stevens County: Good coverage but need a bump up

Stevens County ranks 18 (down 5 points) for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 96.06 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They have 124 households without access to broadband at that speed. Estimates indicate that it will cost $1.1 million to get to ubiquitous broadband in the county.

County Residential Location Density number of residential locations ≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds unserved households Cost to close gap
Stevens 5.5 3,171 96.06 124 1153200

Stevens County has been involved with broadband for years – going back to working with Blandin Foundation-led, Minnesota Intelligent Rural Communities (2009-2012) effort.

They have been stalled at 97 percent, with a slight dip this year, which is likely based on map challenges and corrections.

In December 2022, Runestone Telephone received $2.5 million to expand broadband in Grant, Stevens, and Traverse Counties.

Stevens County retains their green ranking because they are so close to goal but they will need a push to close the gap.

Broadband Access:

  2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 96.06 97.08 96.79 96.79 96.74 96.74 96.73
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.81 99.31 99.22 99.22 99.22 99.22 99.21

Grants:

  • 2022: Runestone Telephone Association – Herman-Dumont – GRANT $2,493,637
  • 2017 – Advantenon – Rural Grant, Stevens and Wilkin Counties – Grant $316,554
  • 2014 – Otter Tail Telcom, Swan Lake West – Award: $438,937.

Find more articles on broadband in Stevens County (http://tinyurl.com/joutu2h)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on Oct 31, 2023. Red dots represent locations unserved with wireline broadband; the Orange dots represent underserved locations. The map on the right comes from the FCC National Broadband map showing access to wired and licensed fixed wireless access, the darker the color, the greater percentage of broadband coverage.