Carlton County Broadband Profile 2020: Red Rating: Ranking out 76 of 87

Green=served Purple=underesrved Red=unserved

Rank (from 100/20 megabits per second): 76
Code: Red

Annually, Blandin Foundation pulls together data from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development and broadband news to gauge progress toward the state broadband goals (25 megabits per second download/3 Mbps upload by 2022 and 100 Mbps/20 Mbps by 2026). Leaders can use this information to improve broadband access and use in their communities. To see how the state is doing overall, or to compare counties, visit the Blandin Foundation interactive map. Or check out past years’ reports: 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Carlton County: Improvement will be expense, but they are looking

To meet the speed goals for 2026, Carlton County needs to act. They are one of several counties that is served primary with one national provider, who may not be as invested locally as a local provider or cooperative. They recognize the need for improvement; they need to find a way to make it happen.

Broadband Access:

2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 52.02 47.57 58.22 52.32
25/3 (2022 goal) 75.17 71.71 67.29 62.74

Computer Access:

County Households with computer …with desktop or laptop …with a smartphone …with a tablet et al …with other
State of MN 90.3% 81.1% 76.5% 59.3% 3.5%
Carlton 85.1% 73.1% 73.5% 71.0% 2.2%

What we learned in the past:

In 2017, Carlton benefited from a MN state broadband grant:

  • 2017 – Carlton County w/ Frontier – Phase I: Cromwell/Kettle River – GRANT: $569,058

Unfortunately, that grant aimed at building to 25/3 Mbps. Last year we saw that much of Carlton County is served by one large national provider. That is likely a bottleneck to better access.

Update from 2020:

In May (2020), local media pointed out the inequity in broadband coverage in Carlton County…

According to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, vast swaths of rural Carlton County are either unserved or underserved by broadband internet services. …

While larger cities and those relatively close to the I-35 corridor like Cloquet, Carlton and Moose Lake enjoy ideal speeds, the more rural communities like Cromwell, Wrenshall and Kettle River are underserved at best.

Fond du Lac Reservation, adjacent to Carlton County has received a Border to Border grant in the latest round that may or may not help Carlton in the future:

  • Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa – Big Lake Road Project – GRANT $602,916
    This last mile project will upgrade approximately 37 unserved and 99 underserved locations in a portion of Carlton County located within the boundaries of the Fond du Lac Reservation, including the western part of the City of Cloquet and Perch Lake Township. In a funding partnership with the State of Minnesota, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa will improve broadband service levels up to 1 Gbps download and 1 Gbps upload, meeting or exceeding the 2022 and 2026 state speed goals. By building a fiber to the home network, faster internet speeds will open up many opportunities such as telemedicine, home health care, electronic health records, online schooling, business development and more. All of these factors will assist in creating a more vibrant community and region.
  • Total eligible cost is $1,205,832
  • Local match is $602,916

Checklist:

  • Find more articles on broadband in Carlton County. (http://tinyurl.com/z4me5k4)
  • 100/20 Mbps ranking: 76 (down 3)
  • Has worked with Blandin: yes
  • Has received a MN Broadband grant: yes
  • Household density: 15.5

Details:

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Big Stone County Broadband Profile 2020: Green Rating: Ranking out 7of 87

Green=served Purple=underesrved Red=unserved

Rank (from 100/20 megabits per second): 7
Code: Green

Annually, Blandin Foundation pulls together data from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development and broadband news to gauge progress toward the state broadband goals (25 megabits per second download/3 Mbps upload by 2022 and 100 Mbps/20 Mbps by 2026). Leaders can use this information to improve broadband access and use in their communities. To see how the state is doing overall, or to compare counties, visit the Blandin Foundation interactive map. Or check out past years’ reports: 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Big Stone County: remains in top 10 ranking for broadband at speeds of 100/20

In 2018, after partnering with Federated Telephone Cooperative on a successful MN Border to Border grant, Big Stone County moved to top 10 (often top 5) ranking for access to 100/20 Mbps broadband. Their broadband access remains the same; their ranking slips only because other counties are doing even better. It’s good to see their recent involvement in the State Telecommuter Forward program, showing an interest in broadband promotion and use as well as access.

Broadband Access:

2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.6 98.91 98.91 70.12
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.48 99.58 98.91 70.12

Computer Access:

County Households with computer …with desktop or laptop …with a smartphone …with a tablet et al …with other
State of MN 90.3% 81.1% 76.5% 59.3% 3.5%
Big Stone 78.6% 69.3% 58.4% 44.0% 2.8%

What we learned in the past:

In 2014, Big Stone benefited from a MN state broadband grant:

  • 2014 – Federated Telephone Cooperative, Big Stone County

That moved them from pretty good status to contenders in 2018.

Update from 2020:

Big Stone County was named one of 23 Telecommuter Forward communities by the State in August 2020. How this will manifest during COVID is yet to be seen but it shows an interest in broadband adoption.

Checklist:

  • Find more articles on broadband in Big Stone County. (http://tinyurl.com/zfgwstd)
  • 100/20 Mbps ranking: 7 (down 2)
  • Has worked with Blandin: yes
  • Has received a MN Broadband grant: yes
  • Household density: 4.3

Details:

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Beltrami County Broadband Profile 2020: Green Rating: Ranking out 5 of 87

Green=served Purple=underesrved Red=unserved

Rank (from 100/20 megabits per second): 5
Code: Green

Annually, Blandin Foundation pulls together data from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development and broadband news to gauge progress toward the state broadband goals (25 megabits per second download/3 Mbps upload by 2022 and 100 Mbps/20 Mbps by 2026). Leaders can use this information to improve broadband access and use in their communities. To see how the state is doing overall, or to compare counties, visit the Blandin Foundation interactive map. Or check out past years’ reports: 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Beltrami County near the top and climbing

Beltrami is the home county to Paul Bunyan Telephone, a cooperative that is focused on Gigabit service to their customers/stakeholders. The provider is also invested and engaged in promoting use of the network with things such as their annual Gigazone Gaming competition. In the last year, the community has become a Telecommuter Forward community, which will further promote broadband use, especially as residents (maybe recruits) look for ways to work from home amid COVID concerns.

It’s worth noting that Beltrami County has top ranking in Minnesota for counties with Gigabit access.

Broadband Access:

2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.25 98.79 96.3 96.35
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.49 99.41 99.4 99.36

Computer Access:

County Households with computer …with desktop or laptop …with a smartphone …with a tablet et al …with other
State of MN 90.3% 81.1% 76.5% 59.3% 3.5%
Beltrami 86.6% 76.2% 70.7% 54.1% 1.9%

What we learned in the past:

Beltrami County is lucky enough to be home to Paul Bunyan Communications, a local cooperative that has chosen to upgrade their area to Gigabit speeds. Paul Bunyan also is active in the community, including by sponsoring tech-intensive events such as an annual Gigazone Gaming competition. Beltrami has not benefited from MN state grants; they have not received grants from the Blandin Foundation. They are an example of a community that benefits from fully-invested provider.

A couple years ago, Beltrami was part of a Blandin Foundation report on the Community Return on Public Investment in broadband, which found (using formulas) that with these investments Beltrami County has the potential to realize:

  • A combined household economic benefit of broadband of $38,631,700 annually
  • A combined increase in residential real estate value of $102,593,266

Update from 2020:

Beltrami County was named one of 23 Telecommuter Forward communities by the State in August 2020. How this will manifest during COVID is yet to be seen but it shows an interest in broadband adoption. Also Paul Bunyan received a MN Border to Border grant to bring fiber to the Leach Lake Indian Reservation and the southeast Beltrami. That work might not be done until 2021, but it might be the nudge the county needs to get top ranking. It will obviously benefit the county but improving service around the county will help expand a culture of broadband use too.

It may be worth noting that Beltrami has lower-than-average access to computers and devices, which seems unusual given the hotbed of broadband access and activity.

Checklist:

Details:

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)

Green (good shape)

Anoka County Broadband Profile 2020: Green Rating: Ranking out 9 of 87

Green=served Purple=underesrved Red=unserved

Rank (from 100/20 megabits per second): 9
Code: Green

Annually, Blandin Foundation pulls together data from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development and broadband news to gauge progress toward the state broadband goals (25 megabits per second download/3 Mbps upload by 2022 and 100 Mbps/20 Mbps by 2026).. Leaders can use this information to improve broadband access and use in their communities. To see how the state is doing overall, or to compare counties, visit the Blandin Foundation interactive map. Or check out past years’ reports: 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Anoka County Top 10 but limited improvements lately

As a fairly (but not entirely) metro county, it is easier for providers to make a business case to serve Anoka. They received an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) grant in 2013, which has helped serve government facilities. Their coverage has slightly slipped in the last few years, albeit by less than a percentage point. Their ranking has slipped too, as other counties improve their coverage. However, early in 2020, they began working with the Blandin Foundation to find a way to serve their unserved areas.

Broadband Access:

2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 97.14 97.45 97.86 96.1
25/3 (2022 goal) 98.57 98.8 98.87 97.56

Computer Access:

County Households with computer …with desktop or laptop …with a smartphone …with a tablet et al …with other
State of MN 90.3% 81.1% 76.5% 59.3% 3.5%
Anoka 92.7% 85.1% 79.7% 62.3% 3.0%

What we learned in the past:

The County received federal (ARRA) funding in 2013. In partnership with Zayo, the County was able to build a 287-mile broadband network for government facilities.

Update from 2020:

Anoka County Regional Economic Development has been working with the Blandin Foundation’s Community Broadband Resources program to help the cities of East Bethel, Columbus, Nowthen and Linwood Township with broadband improvement projects.

City of Nowthen, East Bethel and Columbus are looking to partner with one or more providers to build out the last-mile fiber network to all those unserved or underserved in their community. They are considering a variety of strategies and funding to solve their broadband issues.

Linwood Township is partnering with Midco to connect a 50+ single family development to broadband services.  Linwood is also considering options to improve fiber connections in other unserved or underserved portions of their community.

Checklist:

Details

  • Districts: CD 6
    Senate: 31, 35, 36, 37, 38, 41
    House: 31A, 31B, 35A, 35B, 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B, 38A, 41A, 41B
  • Find your reps

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Aitkin County Broadband Profile 2020: Yellow rating: Ranking out 80 of 87

Green=served Purple=underesrved Red=unserved

Rank (from 100/20 megabits per second): 80
Code: Yellow

Annually, Blandin Foundation pulls together data from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development and broadband news to gauge progress toward the state broadband goals (25 megabits per second download/3 Mbps upload by 2022 and 100 Mbps/20 Mbps by 2026). Leaders can use this information to improve broadband access and use in their communities. To see how the state is doing overall, or to compare counties, visit the Blandin Foundation interactive map. Or check out past years’ reports: 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Aitkin County ranked low but making improvements

Aitkin County has seen a little broadband expansion since the last annual county broadband profile; their ranking (for 100/20 Mbps access) has dropped from 80 to 81. The good news is that the maps were created in April and we have seen some improvements over the summer; but they have a long way to go.

The county has been working on broadband for years and, like last year, they are gaining traction. They received $1.9 million in funding from the USDA and another $1.8 million from MN Border to Border grants. They have a continued partnership with the Blandin Foundation, which has supported some broadband improvements and broadband adoption.

They were at a code RED in terms of broadband preparedness; optimistically, I upgrade them to yellow. The county is making a big push, although one barrier for them is that much of the county is served by one, large national provider.

Broadband Access:

2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 46.66 97.45 8 97.86
25/3 (2022 goal) 63.62 98.8 10 98.87

Computer Access:

County Households with computer …with desktop or laptop …with a smartphone …with a tablet et al …with other
State of MN 90.3% 81.1% 76.5% 59.3% 3.5%
Aitkin 83.7% 70.8% 63.9% 47.9% 2.9%

What we learned in the past:

Aitkin County government and residents have long been organized to promote broadband access and adoption. From 2015-2016, they worked with Blandin Foundation as part of the Central Woodlands Blandin Broadband Communities Cohort and, more recently, they have been part of the IRBC (Iron Range Broadband Communities) cohort. Last year we saw that much of Aitkin County is served by one large national provider. That is likely a bottleneck to better access. But the county persists. They have benefited from two MN state grants in their area:

  • 2017 – SCI – Shamrock Township Broadband Expansion – GRANT $148,503
  • 2016 – MILLE LACS ENERGY COOPERATIVE FTTP PROJECT – GRANT: $1,757,640

Update from 2020:

The area received $1.9 million in USDA funding and almost $2 million in MN Border to Border grants. Those projects are being deployed this summer (2020). Waukenabo Township celebrated the start of Fiber to the Home in August. They were also able to use IRBC (Blandin) grant funds to improve access in some places. 

In May, the Blandin Foundation Broadband Team visited with the county to hear about how broadband adoption programs were going. Access, seniors and healthcare had been hot topics.  COVID happened as they were deploying many projects, including some essential healthcare projects. So COVID helped patients adopt and broadband helped patients be safe.  They were able to serve 900 patients online (with their new MyChart enhancements) in the first few weeks of the quarantine because they were prepared. You can see the whole conversation in the video below.

NEW MN GRANTS:

  • Emily Cooperative Telephone Company – Round Lake Fiber Project – GRANT $376,000
    This last mile project will upgrade approximately 242 unserved and 103 underserved locations in the Esquagamah Lake and Round Lake areas of Aitkin County. In a funding partnership with the State of Minnesota and Aitkin County, Emily Cooperative Telephone Company will improve broadband service levels up to 1 Gbps download and 1 Gbps upload, exceeding the 2022 and 2026 state speed goals. The use and development of broadband will provide various home-based business options, stimulate economic growth, and stimulate innovation and investment.
  • Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative (MLEC) – MLEC Phase 3 FTTH Project with CTC – GRANT $1,253,955
    This last mile project will serve 282 unserved and 225 underserved households, businesses and farms in areas of Farm Island and Nordland Townships in Aitkin County. In a funding partnership with the State of Minnesota, CTC, and Aitkin County, MLEC will improve broadband service levels up to 1 Gbps download and 1 Gbps upload, exceeding the 2022 and 2026 state speed goals. The use and development of broadband will provide new and improved home-based business options, stimulate economic growth, and encourage innovation and investment in the area. Education, health care, energy efficiency, and public safety will also be advanced with access to broadband Internet.
  • SCI Broadband (Savage Communications Inc.) – Glen Township Broadband Expansion Project – GRANT $195,848
    This last mile project will serve 269 unserved homes, three unserved businesses, three unserved farms, one unserved community institution and five underserved homes in areas of Glen Township in Aitkin County. In a funding partnership with the State of Minnesota and Aitkin County, SCI Broadband will improve broadband service levels up to 250 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload, exceeding the 2022 and 2026 state speed goals. SCI will leverage its existing middle mile infrastructure to deploy a last mile fiber to the premise network to local businesses and residents. Building the fiber to the premise network will improve access to education, telemedicine, telecommuting, and economic development as a whole within the region.

Checklist:

Details:

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

I want to talk to your county or tribal community about broadband and its impact on your COVID response – interested?

As part of the Minnesota Broadband Profiles this year, I would love to talk to counties about their COVID experience based on broadband situation. I have one question only:

Is broadband helping or hurting your community’s ability to function during the pandemic? Generally, do you feel like broadband has been a help or a hindrance?

I would set up and record a Zoom call to include with the 2020 County Broadband Profiles. (You can check out the 2019 Profiles if you are unfamiliar.)  There are 87 counties and 11 tribal communities in Minnesota. My goal is not to talk to all of them. (Although I could.) My goal is to talk to the folks who will make it easy for me. So if you’re the economic developer, county commissioner or anyone with enough passion to get a few folks together for a call – I’m happy to talk to you and schedule something. (atreacy@treacyinfo.com)

Two requests:

  • Looking for multiple people to participate per county
  • Hoping for one local lead (so one point of contact for me)

My deadlines aren’t set in stone but I’m aiming to connect with people by July 31 and would love to schedule videos by Aug 17. I focus on county and tribal community because that is how the MN broadband maps come out.

2020 MN Broadband County Gig ranking. From 99 to 0 percent coverage. How do you rank?

The new MN County broadband maps are now up on the Office of Broadband Development websites- showing percentage of each county with (and without) broadband access. Earlier I looked at how counties ranked for access to 25/3 (the 2022 MN State speed goal), to 100/20 (the 2026 speed goal) and now Gig access!  (You can download the full spreadsheet of MN county details for speeds or 100/20 and Gig.)

We haven’t looked at Gig access in the past so I’m just going to put it out there and say congrats to the top of the list and good luck to the folks are the bottom. (You can also download this info in a spreadsheet – which will likely be better formatted.)

County Gig Access Ranking
Beltrami 99.23 1
Stevens 96.79 2
Cook 94.5 3
Lake 93.23 4
Clearwater 89.32 5
Red Lake 83.18 6
Kittson 80.11 7
Lac qui Parle 78.96 8
Winona 76.16 9
Wadena 73.86 10
Steele 72.23 11
Wabasha 65.78 12
Itasca 62.89 13
Dodge 60.49 14
Grant 60.3 15
Goodhue 54.9 16
Hubbard 53.79 17
Big Stone 52.94 18
Rock 47.94 19
Cottonwood 47.58 20
Swift 47.52 21
Sibley 46.43 22
Crow Wing 43.99 23
Marshall 43.05 24
Mahnomen 43.01 25
Houston 41.17 26
Polk 40.95 27
Norman 40.08 28
Pope 35.34 29
Morrison 35.06 30
Todd 34.15 31
Becker 33.69 32
Olmsted 32.48 33
Freeborn 30.24 34
Cass 30.14 35
Rice 30.12 36
Roseau 27.93 37
Waseca 26.88 38
Douglas 26.61 39
Wilkin 26.04 40
Fillmore 26 41
Renville 25.87 42
Carver 24.3 43
Mower 23.29 44
Lincoln 19.73 45
Pennington 18.72 46
Otter Tail 18.38 47
Watonwan 17.17 48
Clay 15.6 49
Le Sueur 15.46 50
Hennepin 15.41 51
Traverse 14.57 52
Pipestone 12.47 53
Nicollet 11.99 54
Blue Earth 11.73 55
Aitkin 10.97 56
Stearns 10.34 57
Wright 9.66 58
Nobles 9.62 59
Koochiching 7.5 60
Chippewa 7.47 61
St. Louis 7.15 62
Chisago 6.79 63
Scott 6.77 64
Lyon 6.72 65
Dakota 4.94 66
McLeod 4.74 67
Carlton 4.01 68
Lake of the Woods 3.82 69
Meeker 3.19 70
Sherburne 3.09 71
Murray 1.88 72
Benton 0.79 73
Brown 0.78 74
Anoka 0.27 75
Washington 0.18 76
Yellow Medicine 0.17 77
Jackson 0.13 78
Isanti 0.12 79
Faribault 0.09 80
Ramsey 0.06 81
Kanabec 0 82
Kandiyohi 0 83
Martin 0 84
Mille Lacs 0 85
Pine 0 86
Redwood 0 87

2020 MN Broadband County Ranking for speeds of 100/20 – how do you rank?

The new MN County broadband maps are now up on the Office of Broadband Development websites- showing percentage of each county with (and without) broadband access. Earlier I looked at how counties ranked for access to 25/3 (the 2022 MN State speed goal) soon I’ll look at Gig access. You can download the full spreadsheet of MN county details for speeds or 100/20 and Gig.

Here I look at how counties rank for access to 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up (the 2026 speed goal).

Top 10 MN Counties for Speeds of 100/20 (drum roll please)

  1. Rock 99.93
  2. Ramsey 99.84
  3. Lac qui Parle 99.57
  4. Swift 99.5
  5. Beltrami 99.25
  6. Hennepin 98.97
  7. Big Stone 98.6
  8. Dakota 97.42
  9. Anoka 97.14
  10. Pennington 96.95

The counties in bold are returning to the Top 10 list. Pennington is a new addition; they replace Stevens, which comes in at number 11 with a percentage of 96.79. Congrats and nice work to these counties‼

Bottom 10 MN Counties for Speeds of 100/20 (starting with worst)

  1. Kanabec 26.41
  2. Redwood 36.48
  3. Yellow Medicine 37.71
  4. Pine 39.13
  5. Lincoln 40.42
  6. Faribault 40.56
  7. Aitkin 46.66
  8. Isanti 48.63
  9. Todd 49.12
  10. Traverse 50.97

The counties in bold are returning to the Bottom 10 list. I want to congratulate the counties that are off the bottom 10 list!!

  • Becker from 87 to 50 (with 73 percent coverage up from 6 percent last year!)
  • Otter Tail from 82 to 64 (with 66 percent coverage)
  • Norman from 85 to 73 (with 54 percent coverage)
  • Mahnomen from 86 to 53 (with 72 percent coverage)

Finally my favorite statistic – the most improved counties.

Top 9 Most Improved County by ranking

  1. Becker improved by 37
  2. Mahnomen improved by 33
  3. Hubbard improved by 27
  4. Roseau improved by 10
  5. Kittson improved by 8
  6. Norman improved by 8
  7. Grant improved by 7
  8. Clay improved by 6
  9. Lac qui Parle improved by 6

You can download a spreadsheet of ranking for 2019 and 2020. Or see the full list below. I know the table will not transfer well to the website BUT it will be searchable.)

Rank 2020 Ranking 2019 Change in rank
Aitkin 81 80 -1
Anoka 9 8 -1
Becker 50 87 37
Beltrami 5 6 1
Benton 21 20 -1
Big Stone 7 5 -2
Blue Earth 42 39 -3
Brown 47 44 -3
Carlton 76 73 -3
Carver 20 23 3
Cass 66 68 2
Chippewa 29 31 2
Chisago 52 51 -1
Clay 23 29 6
Clearwater 22 17 -5
Cook 14 13 -1
Cottonwood 62 59 -3
Crow Wing 26 21 -5
Dakota 8 7 -1
Dodge 43 41 -2
Douglas 56 56 0
Faribault 82 77 -5
Fillmore 75 70 -5
Freeborn 27 25 -2
Goodhue 46 50 4
Grant 68 75 7
Hennepin 6 4 -2
Houston 57 57 0
Hubbard 18 45 27
Isanti 80 72 -8
Itasca 28 27 -1
Jackson 58 55 -3
Kanabec 87 84 -3
Kandiyohi 48 47 -1
Kittson 35 43 8
Koochiching 59 46 -13
Lac qui Parle 3 9 6
Lake 15 14 -1
Lake of the Woods 72 65 -7
Le Sueur 54 52 -2
Lincoln 83 76 -7
Lyon 36 30 -6
Mahnomen 53 86 33
Marshall 61 66 5
Martin 71 64 -7
McLeod 70 63 -6
Meeker 74 74 0
Mille Lacs 69 67 -2
Morrison 55 53 -2
Mower 40 36 -4
Murray 77 69 -8
Nicollet 41 37 -4
Nobles 34 40 6
Norman 73 85 8
Olmsted 16 15 -1
Otter Tail 64 82 -2
Pennington 10 11 1
Pine 84 81 -3
Pipestone 37 35 -2
Polk 17 19 2
Pope 51 54 3
Ramsey 2 2 0
Red Lake 30 26 -4
Redwood 86 83 -3
Renville 65 62 -3
Rice 31 28 -3
Rock 1 1 0
Roseau 38 48 10
Scott 19 18 -1
Sherburne 49 49 0
Sibley 67 61 -6
St. Louis 39 38 -1
Stearns 33 32 -1
Steele 25 22 -3
Stevens 11 10 -1
Swift 4 3 -1
Todd 79 79 0
Traverse 78 71 -7
Wabasha 63 60 -3
Wadena 13 16 3
Waseca 45 42 -3
Washington 12 12 0
Watonwan 60 58 -2
Wilkin 44 34 -10
Winona 24 24 0
Wright 32 33 1
Yellow Medicine 85 78 -7

2020 MN Broadband County Ranking for 25/3 speeds – how do you rank?

The new MN County broadband maps are now up on the Office of Broadband Development websites- show percentage of each county with (and without) broadband access. It’s always interesting to use the new maps to see how the counties rank. Who is in the best shape in the short and long term? In this post I look at how counties rank when looking at access to 25 Mbps down and 3 up, which is the MN speed goal for 2022. (I will do another post that looks at 2026 goals of 100 Mbps down and 20 up and one on Gig access.) And I will compare to 2019 ranking.

Top 10 MN Counties for Speeds of 25/3

  1. Red Lake 99.99
  2. Rock 99.93
  3. Ramsey 99.86
  4. Clearwater 99.74
  5. Lac qui Parle 99.57
  6. Swift 99.54
  7. Beltrami 99.49
  8. Big Stone 99.48
  9. Hennepin 99.40
  10. Stevens 99.22

Great to see the top 10 with more than 99 percent coverage. The counties in bold were on this same list last year. Congrats to LqP for joining the list; it wasn’t much of a climb for them but nice all the same.

Bottom 10 MN Counties for Speeds of 25/3 (starting with worst)

  1. Redwood 44.59
  2. Todd 53.73
  3. Lake of the Woods 57.91
  4. Yellow Medicine 59.83
  5. Pine 60.24
  6. Kanabec 60.75
  7. Lincoln 60.91
  8. Fillmore 61.52
  9. Meeker 62.46
  10. Aitkin 63.62

Again the counties in bold were on this list last year. Both Redwood and Todd were listed at having greater coverage last year. I will dive into that when I look at County Profiles but it seems like perhaps providers are looking in greater granularity at the coverage this year or maybe updates were made to maps based on challenges from last year.

I want to cheer the counties who got off the bottom 10 list:

  • Marshall from 82 to 74
  • Murray from 81 to 78
  • Renville from 79 to 76
  • Martin from 78 to 38!!

You can download the full spreadsheet of MN county details or check out the table below. (I know the table will not transfer well to the website BUT it will be searchable.) Continue reading →