Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 20, 2013

Small Businesses in Rural MN Using Facebook

Last week I got to spend a couple of days in Lac qui Parle County. LqP is home to a ARRA-funded fiber to the home network. It’s also home to a couple of businesses who are making good use of Facebook and other social media channels. I thought it might be fun to hear from two businesses (The Cellar Door and Crazy About Purses) about how and why Facebook has been working for them:

Earlier this evening the bill to establish an Office of Broadband Development passed in the Senate and House and is on its way to the Governor’s Office. As was mentioned earlier this week, the Office has been moved from the Department of Commerce to DEED (Department of Employment and Economic Development) and the director will be appointed by the Governor.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 16, 2013

Broadband Update from Cook County

I’m pleased to share an update from the Arrowhead Electric Coop Facebook page – with a reminder that while this is good news, it doesn’t mean service will be available next week…

arrowheadBig Broadband News!!  Progress on backhaul (the all important connection to Duluth) is being made.  Monday, make ready work will begin on power poles in Lake County.  Once completed the much needed fiber optic cable will be installed and eventually spliced into Arrowhead’s cable.  It’s a huge step in the right direction for Arrowhead and everyone in Cook County.  No dates to provide at this time…stay tuned….!!

If interested in construction crew locations in Cook County: Fiber Splicers working in Schroeder, Aerial drop crews working in Grand Marais and pulling cable into conduit installed last year along Bethany Dr.
Meeting with contractor today to begin discussing the much anticipated construction crew ramp up…

Yesterday I reported an update on the Office of Broadband Development as was reported at the Minnesota Broadband Task Force meeting. In short, the proposal had been modified to move the Office to DEED and maintain a budget of $1 million over two years.

Late last night, the  Jobs and Economic Development Finance conference committee adopted the Office of Broadband Development language to be sent to the floor for a full vote.

They placed the Office under DEED’s jurisdiction and the decide that the director will be appointed by the governor. The office is slated for $250,000 per year (and admin support).

I’ll paste the pertinent info from the bill below

The Budget Info:

(o) $250,000 each year is from the general
7.16fund for the Broadband Development Office.

27.26   Subd. 4.Administrative Services

28.8$100,000 each year is for the support of
28.9broadband development.

And description…

Sec. 13. [116J.998] OFFICE OF BROADBAND DEVELOPMENT.
77.8    Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms
77.9have the meanings given them.
77.10(b) “Broadband” or “broadband service” means any service providing advanced
77.11telecommunications capability and Internet access with transmission speeds that, at a
77.12minimum, meet the Federal Communications Commission definition for broadband.
77.13(c) “Local unit of government” has the meaning given in section 116G.03,
77.14subdivision 3.
77.15(d) “Office” means the Office of Broadband Development established in subdivision
77.162, paragraph (a).
77.17    Subd. 2. Office established; purpose. (a) An Office of Broadband Development is
77.18established within the Department of Employment and Economic Development and shall
77.19remain in existence until the commissioner certifies that the state has met the broadband
77.20goals established in section 237.012. The director shall be appointed by the governor and
77.21shall serve in the unclassified service. The director must be qualified by experience and
77.22training in broadband. The office may employ staff necessary to carry out the office’s
77.23duties under subdivision 4.
77.24(b) The purpose of the office is to encourage, foster, develop, and improve broadband
77.25within the state in order to:
77.26(1) drive job creation, promote innovation, and expand markets for Minnesota
77.27businesses;
77.28(2) serve the ongoing and growing needs of Minnesota’s education systems, health
77.29care system, public safety system, industries and businesses, governmental operations,
77.30and citizens; and
77.31(3) improve accessibility for underserved communities and populations.
77.32    Subd. 3. Organization. The office shall consist of a director of the Office of
77.33Broadband Development, as well as any staff necessary to carry out the office’s duties
77.34under subdivision 4.
77.35    Subd. 4. Duties. (a) The office shall have the power and duty to:
78.1(1) serve as the central broadband planning body for the state of Minnesota;
78.2(2) coordinate with state, regional, local, and private entities to develop, to the
78.3maximum extent practicable, a uniform statewide broadband access and usage policy;
78.4(3) develop, recommend, and implement a statewide plan to encourage cost-effective
78.5broadband access, and to make recommendations for increased usage, particularly in
78.6rural and other underserved areas;
78.7(4) coordinate efforts, in consultation and cooperation with the commissioner of
78.8commerce, local units of government, and private entities, to meet the state’s broadband
78.9goals in section 237.012;
78.10(5) develop, coordinate, and implement the state’s broadband infrastructure
78.11development program under section 116J.999;
78.12(6) provide consultation services to local units of government or other project
78.13sponsors in connection with the planning, acquisition, improvement, construction, or
78.14development of any broadband deployment project;
78.15(7) encourage public-private partnerships to increase deployment and adoption
78.16of broadband services and applications, including recommending funding options and
78.17possible incentives to encourage investment in broadband expansion;
78.18(8) monitor the broadband development efforts of other states and nations in areas
78.19such as business, education, public safety, and health;
78.20(9) consult with the commissioner of commerce to monitor broadband-related
78.21activities at the federal level, including regulatory and policy changes and the potential
78.22impact on broadband deployment and sustainability in the state;
78.23(10) serve as an information clearinghouse for federal programs providing financial
78.24assistance to institutions located in rural areas seeking to obtain access to high-speed
78.25broadband service, and use this information as an outreach tool to make institutions
78.26located in rural areas that are unserved or underserved with respect to broadband service
78.27aware of the existence of federal assistance;
78.28(11) provide logistical and administrative support for the Governor’s Broadband
78.29Task Force;
78.30(12) provide an annual report, as required by subdivision 5;
78.31(13) coordinate an ongoing collaborative effort of stakeholders to evaluate and
78.32address security, vulnerability, and redundancy issues in order to ensure the reliability of
78.33broadband networks; and
78.34(14) perform any other activities consistent with the office’s purpose.
79.1(b) In carrying out its duties under this subdivision, the Office of Broadband
79.2Development shall have no authority to regulate or compel action on the part of any
79.3provider of broadband service.
79.4    Subd. 5. Reporting. (a) Beginning January 15, 2014, and each year thereafter,
79.5the Office of Broadband Development shall report to the legislative committees with
79.6jurisdiction over broadband policy and finance on the office’s activities during the previous
79.7year.
79.8(b) The report shall contain, at a minimum:
79.9(1) an analysis of the current availability and use of broadband, including average
79.10broadband speeds, within the state;
79.11(2) information gathered from schools, libraries, hospitals, and public safety facilities
79.12across the state, determining the actual speed and capacity of broadband currently in use
79.13and the need, if any, for increases in speed and capacity to meet current or anticipated needs;
79.14(3) an analysis of incumbent broadband infrastructure within the state and its ability
79.15to spur economic development;
79.16(4) an analysis of the degree to which new, additional, or improved broadband
79.17infrastructure would spur economic development in the state;
79.18(5) a summary of the office’s activities in coordinating broadband infrastructure
79.19development under section 116J.999;
79.20(6) suggested policies, incentives, and legislation designed to accelerate the
79.21achievement of the goals under section 237.012, subdivisions 1 and 2;
79.22(7) any proposed legislative and policy initiatives; and
79.23(8) any other information requested by the legislative committees with jurisdiction
79.24over broadband policy and finance, or that the office deems necessary.
79.25(c) The report may be submitted electronically and is subject to section 3.195,
79.26subdivision 1.
79.27EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

79.28    Sec. 14. [116J.999] COORDINATION OF BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE
79.29DEVELOPMENT.
79.30    Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms
79.31have the meanings given them.
79.32(b) “Broadband” or “broadband service” has the meaning given in section 116J.998,
79.33subdivision 1, paragraph (b).
79.34(c) “Broadband conduit” means a conduit, pipe, innerduct, or microduct for fiber
79.35optic or other cables that support broadband and wireless facilities for broadband service.
80.1(d) “Local unit of government” has the meaning given in section 116G.03,
80.2subdivision 3.
80.3(e) “Office” means the Office of Broadband Development established in section
80.4116J.998.
80.5    Subd. 2. Broadband infrastructure development. (a) The office shall, in
80.6collaboration with the Department of Transportation and private entities, encourage and
80.7coordinate “dig once” efforts for the planning, relocation, installation, or improvement of
80.8broadband conduit within the right-of-way in conjunction with any current or planned
80.9construction, including, but not limited to, trunk highways and bridges. To the extent
80.10necessary, the office shall, in collaboration with the Department of Transportation,
80.11evaluate engineering and design standards, procedures and criteria for contracts or lease
80.12agreements with private entities, and pricing requirements, and provide for allocation
80.13of risk, costs, and any revenue generated.
80.14(b) The office shall, in collaboration with other state departments and agencies as the
80.15office deems necessary, develop a strategy to facilitate the timely and efficient deployment
80.16of broadband conduit or other broadband facilities on state-owned lands and buildings.
80.17(c) To the extent practicable, the office shall encourage and assist local units of
80.18government to adopt and implement policies similar to those under paragraphs (a) and (b)
80.19for construction or other improvements to county state-aid highways, municipal state-aid
80.20roads, and any other rights-of-way under the local unit of government’s jurisdiction, and to
80.21other lands or buildings owned by the local unit of government.
80.22(d) Special consideration must be paid to projects under this subdivision that will
80.23likely improve access to broadband by rural or underserved communities.
80.24    Subd. 3. Reporting. As part of its annual report under section 116J.998, subdivision
80.255, the office shall report on activities taken under this section, including, but not limited to,
80.26the number of current and planned projects using the “dig once” approach, any gains in
80.27broadband speed or access associated with the project, and any costs or cost savings to
80.28the state, private entity, or end user of broadband services.
80.29    Subd. 4. No right of action. Nothing in this section shall be construed to create
80.30any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any
80.31party against the state of Minnesota; its departments, agencies, or entities; its officers,
80.32employees, or agents; or any other person.
80.33EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

Sec. 18. [161.462] FIBER COLLABORATION DATABASE.
83.2    Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the fiber collaboration database is
83.3to provide broadband providers with advance notice of upcoming Department of
83.4Transportation construction projects so that they may notify the department of their
83.5interest in installing broadband infrastructure within the right-of-way during construction
83.6in order to minimize installation costs.
83.7    Subd. 2. Database. (a) The Department of Transportation shall post on its Web site,
83.8and update annually, the list of upcoming construction projects contained in its statewide
83.9transportation improvement program, including, for each project:
83.10(1) the geographical location where construction will occur;
83.11(2) the estimated start and end dates of construction; and
83.12(3) a description of the nature of the construction project.
83.13(b) The commissioner shall post the information required in paragraph (a) as far in
83.14advance of the beginning of construction as is feasible.
83.15(c) The department’s Web site must allow a provider of broadband service to register
83.16to receive from the department electronic information on proposed construction projects
83.17added to the database in specific geographical areas of the state as soon as it is updated.
83.18EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

Sec. 26. STATE BROADBAND STRATEGY; REPORT.
92.19The Office of Broadband Development shall conduct research and produce a report
92.20recommending a set of programs and strategies the state can pursue to promote the
92.21improvement, more efficient and effective use, and expansion of broadband services in
92.22ways that will have the greatest impact on the state’s economic development, by which is
92.23meant enhancing the ability of Minnesota citizens and businesses to develop their skills,
92.24to expand businesses to new markets, develop new products, reach more customers, and
92.25lower costs. While the state’s broadband goals in Minnesota Statutes, section 237.012,
92.26address the universal provision of greater broadband access and speed statewide, this report
92.27must consider broadband as an economic development tool and must examine and analyze:
92.28(1) how the state can best use its limited resources to adopt strategies and make
92.29investments to improve the use of broadband services by subgroups of broadband users,
92.30including mobile broadband users, that promise to deliver the greatest economic impact
92.31per dollar of state investment;
92.32(2) roles the state can play in addition to financial assistance for broadband
92.33infrastructure, including supporting education and training for Minnesotans to enable
92.34them to use broadband more effectively; and
93.1(3) strategies and opportunities for state investment to leverage additional amounts
93.2of private capital and financial assistance from the federal government in order to achieve
93.3these goals.
93.4By January 15, 2014, the office shall submit the report to the chairs and ranking minority
93.5members of the senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over
93.6broadband issues.
93.7EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 14, 2013

Minnesota Broadband Task Force May 2013 – Full Notes

The Task Force this month was all about healthcare. It was interesting to hear about the impact of moving healthcare online – both in terms of improved health and reduced costs. And it made the point that Minnesota residents and Minnesota tax payers need broadband to take avail the state of these benefits.

We also got a quick Legislative update – and while the balls are still in the air – as of Tuesday – the Office of Broadband Development is slated for $1 million (although that is expected to be reduced in Senate) and the Office has been moved to DEED.

Read on for full notes.. Read More…

Last week the Blandin Foundation released the 2013 Rural Pulse, a research study that has been commissioned by the Blandin Foundation since 1998 to gain a real-time snapshot of the concerns, perceptions and priorities of rural Minnesota residents. It’s always good for gauging trends and attitudes in Minnesota, especially rural Minnesota. I am always most interested in where and how technology comes up in the discussion.

A highlighted concern in the report is the economy…

The Economic Lens: Concern about jobs continues.

While 22 percent of rural residents feel their local economy has improved over the last year, more than half believe it has stayed the same and 20 percent indicate that it has worsened. Urban Minnesota residents are nearly twice as likely to feel their local economy has seen improvement over the past year.

The need for attracting new, high-quality jobs continues to be the top priority for 36 percent of rural Minnesotans – more than twice as important as education. Urban dwellers also consider attracting new, high-quality jobs (28%) and educational opportunities (21%) to be top priorities.

Technology was suggested as a tool to help improve the economy…

Most rural and urban residents believe improved technology could assist with job retention and creation, and feel their local area works together to maintain and grow job opportunities.

The sentiment is not unfounded; the National Ag and Rural Development Policy Center made that connection in a report released in March.

The survey also indicates that rural residents feel that the local community is meeting the technology needs…

Quality of Life: Rural Minnesotans believe their community is addressing most local needs.

Most rural residents (87%) believe that their community offers equal access to essential services.

Rural residents give their community relatively good grades for addressing environmental stewardship, crime control, services for the elderly, education, improving access to technology and residential housing.

Taking great liberties in reading between the lines here, it seems that the perception is that the rural areas are addressing residential technology needs – and while I’m taking liberties, I’m going to change that to broadband. (Really how useful is technology without broadband these days?) However, the perception also is that rural areas are not addressing the broadband needs of businesses.

There are notable exceptions but from meetings I’ve attended it seems that again these observation may not be unfounded. Some of the larger providers are sticking with DSL-type speeds, which are more apt to meet household needs (unless you have a houseful of teens!) than business needs. The frustration is twofold: many businesses are hesitant to move to areas with slower speeds and it is more difficult to start or maintain a business with slower speeds.

The report helps make the case that broadband is important to local businesses and residents. For local leaders looking at broadband, I think knowing the concern for jobs and belief that technology can help can help hone messages to promote local broadband investment.

I know the following won’t change the outlook for most readers today – but I always feel like building leads to building. Zayo reports

Zayo Group today announced the expansion of its Tier 1 internet protocol (IP) backbone in the Minneapolis market. With this expansion, Zayo can provide extended IP services in Minneapolis, now offering up to 10Gbps at both the company’s IP PoPs and at end customer locations. The upgraded network will deliver high quality, high capacity internet service to enterprise and wholesale customers. Zayo’s IP expansion leverages Minneapolis’ extensive metro fiber assets, consisting of more than 1,300 route miles and more than 615 on net buildings.

Unfortunately the flip side to the news is that this widens the gap between the served (often in metro areas) and the un- and underserved markets in rural areas.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 10, 2013

Lake County Gets Green Light from RUS

The Lake County News Chronicle reports…

At the end of April, an official from the Rural Utilities Service paid a visit to Lake County. RUS is the entity that awarded grant and loan monies to the county to install its broadband network. According to County Administrator Matt Huddleston, an auditor spent a few days in the courthouse, reviewing the financial records for the broadband installation. At Tuesday’s county board meeting, Huddleston said RUS returned a clean bill of health for the project’s finances and found no oversights—a rare result after a RUS audit, Huddleston added.

And there’s more good news that seems to speak to the primary purpose of the idea of the ARRA stimulus funding…

Lake Connections, the brand under which Lake County is building and will operate the broadband network, has begun advertising for jobs as well. Contractors are currently renovating the Two Harbors headquarters, work that is expected to be complete by July.

One of my favorite things about broadband and the Internet is the ability to do things differently – not just faster. So I enjoyed an article last weekend in the Minneapolis Star Tribune on a local startup that’s using social media wisely – for market research and marketing…

But the three co-founders of Inspiration Medical already have financing. They’re using the crowdsourcing techniques to conduct the R&D and marketing work they need to bring their product to the market. And it’s a tough market: bleeders, people who, for a variety of reasons, have trouble stopping a cut from bleeding.

The company plans to launch its AllaQuix nonprescription pad that quickly stops nuisance bleeding for those on blood thinners. They are using social media to introduce their product to potential customers, and get feedback before they spend hundred of thousands on marketing.

Social media becomes a tool to help everyone’s aha idea become a reality.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 9, 2013

Target’s innovative use of social media

Always pleased to see Minnesota companies using social media creatively – even when it’s a really big Minnesota company. The Minneapolis St Paul Business Journal reports on Target partnering with Facebook on a new social media app…

Target Corp. is teaming with Facebook for a new digital-sales program, called Cartwheel, that’s one of the biggest-ever efforts by both companies to bridge the worlds of social media and real-world commerce.

Ad Age reports on the program, launched by Minneapolis-based Target, which will let customers select promotional deals at Target through their Facebook accounts. If they make the buy, their activity is shared with friends through their Facebook news feed.

On the one hand it’s cool and I always like a bargain, on the other hand I wonder how much I want my friends to see what I’m buying or frankly to know what they’re buying. Apparently they are thinking about that aspect of the project – but I have to wonder what constitutes a personal purchase. Using their example below, I don’t care if people know I buy underwear – but no one needs to know about daily purchases of gummi bears. Personal is in the eye of the beholder!

Ad Age notes that Cartwheel is similar to a Facebook offering called Beacon, which was shelved after a backlash over privacy. Target seems to have that in mind. Sales of some personal items, such as underwear, won’t be pushed onto a user’s news feed, and you can shut the sharing aspect off altogether if you want.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 8, 2013

MN Broadband Task Force Meeting Agenda: May 14, 2013

I am planning to attend the next meeting and will take notes. However, it’s always nice for the Task Force to hear from local folks – and TIES often has freshly baked cookies in the lobby!

Governor’s  Task Force  on Broadband
May 14, 2013
TIES  Event  Center,
Hamline  Room*
1640  Larpenteur Ave. N.,
St. Paul, MN 55108
10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

10:00-­‐10:15 Welcome/Introductions/Public Comments/Approve minutes from April 23, 2013 meeting
10:15-­‐10:45 Jennifer Fritz, Deputy Director, Office of Health Information Technology, Health Policy Division, Minnesota Department of Health
10:45-­‐11:30 Dave Hemler, CEO, Revation Systems, Inc. (See www.revation.com)
11:30-­‐12:00 Pete Frank, Information Technology Director, MNSure
12:00-­‐12:30 Lunch
12:30-­‐1:00 Sandy Long, PhD student in Health Informatics at the University of MN Topic: Health Information Technology in all areas of consumer engagement
1:00-­‐1:20 Subgroups “Best Practices/Incentives” and “Broadband Adoption” meet
1:20-­‐1:40 Subgroups “Mobile/Wireless” and “Coordination Across Govt./Monitor FCC & PUC Decisions/Cost of Broadband” meet
1:40-­‐2:00 Legislative update/Next meeting location and topics/Wrap-­‐up
2:00 Adjourn

*Park in main lot off of Larpenteur Avenue and enter building through the glass entry doors that face Larpenteur to enter the new event center where the Hamline Room is located upstairs—note street address is 1640 Larpenteur.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 8, 2013

US Senate Passes Internet Sales Tax

According to CNet

The U.S. Senate on Monday approved a controversial bill by more than a 2-to-1 margin that would allow states to levy taxes on Internet purchases.

The Marketplace Fairness Act, which would allow states to require online vendors to collect sales and use tax on certain out-of-state purchases, was approved in a bipartisan vote of 69 to 27. The bill, which already has the support of President Obama, will now move on to the House of Representatives.

If approved, the bill would overturn a 1992 Supreme Court ruling that found out-of-state retailers generally don’t have to collect taxes unless they have a sufficient business presence. The bill, officially known as S.743, does include an exception for businesses that make under $1 million a year in revenue.

I’ve written about the Marketplace Fairness Act in the past. The push to tax has come from two fronts. First large businesses, especially those with a brick and mortar presence who are already paying taxes. Second local governments have been pushing to increase tax base. The push against the tax has come from small businesses and entrepreneurs – and I suppose folks who harken back to the early days of the Internet when there was a feeling of wilderness and self-policing.

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 7, 2013

Blandin Broadband eNews May 2013

BBC MapNews from the Blandin on Broadband Blog

Minnesota Broadband Task Force In April, the Broadband Task Force heard from broadband providers and supporters that offered reduced rate access and training to low income Minnesotans. Also there was some discussion of current broadband-related legislation, especially sales tax exemption for broadband deployment. The Task Force had recommended tax exemptions, but the Governor’s broader tax plan reduces exemptions. There was some discussion on the proposed Office of Broadband Deployment as well.http://wp.me/p3if7-2dt (An entrepreneur from the Iron Range voices his opinion on the tax issues as well, echoing opinions heard at Task Force. http://wp.me/p3if7-2e4)

The Governor’s Office recently appointed two new members to the Minnesota Broadband Task Force: Fred Underwood, Director of  Technology at the Fond Du Lac Reservation and Andrea Casselton, Director of the Office of Technology and Communications in St Paul.http://wp.me/p3if7-2dY

Minnesota Broadband Not World Class The latest Akamai report has been released, tracking worldwide broadband growth from Q4 2012. The US does not rank highly by international standards; Minnesota does even worse when compared to other states. We don’t do well with speed or adoption. We saw the same results last August. http://wp.me/p3if7-2dE

Update on Policy Broadband-Related Bills

  • The Legislature learned more about the Minnesota Telecommunications Regulations Bills (HF 985/SF 584) inclduing enforcement authority, tariffs, alternative regulation plans, obsolete provisions and plans to meet with FCC plans for 2019.http://wp.me/p3if7-2d5
  • The Legislature is looking at E-Government Advisory Council (SF804) to improve online government information services to citizens and businesses. (They are also looking at State procurement and solicitation provisions modifications.) http://wp.me/p3if7-2cZ
  • Senator Klobuchar talks about unlocking cell phones so that consumers can change providers without steep penalties; she also speaks about the importance of enforcing call completion regulation to ensure that rural areas receive calls from all providers.http://wp.me/p3if7-2cT
  • The House Taxes Committee met and quickly dismissed bills with potential to provide funding for broadband. Anything in HF1686 that related to fiber was dismissed once the legislators realized that this amendment might conflict with other policies. Legislators were not in favor of the broadband development grant program (HF389); perhaps relating to the tenuous connection between pre-paid phones and broadband more than the fund itself. http://wp.me/p3if7-2cP
  • North Dakota passed legislation exempting telecommunications equipment purchases from the sales tax, creating an incentive for high tech firms to invest in North Dakota’s communications infrastructure. http://wp.me/p3if7-2dN

Local Broadband News

Cloquet Valley Some progress is being made toward better broadband in a group of townships north of Duluth known as the Cloquet Valley Internet Initiative. They are encouraging local collaboration and awareness. http://wp.me/p3if7-2cw

Eagan Joining an informal worldwide initiative of programmers who are working to teach students the language of computers, Thomson Reuters offers computer-coding classes for 50 middle-school-age children . http://wp.me/p3if7-2dQ

Lake County Lake County breathes a sign of relief as half of their ARRA-funded fiber network is complete and the incumbents who have opposed the network seem to be backing away from the project. http://wp.me/p3if7-2dr

Minneapolis The Minnesota High Tech Association hosts their annual Spring Conference. Hot topics included innovation and creativity. http://wp.me/p3if7-2dS

Minneapolis is named fifth nerdiest city. http://wp.me/p3if7-2d8

Monticello Monticello extends the statute of limitations on legal claims bondholders can file against the city (related to FiberNet broadband network), striving to reach a resolution with the temporary agreement, set to expire June 1, 2013. http://wp.me/p3if7-2d2

Redwood County The Redwood Area Development Corporation (RADC) posts their recent feasibility study. It indicates that residents in town have better access to broadband than residents in small communities or living on the outskirts of communities. http://wp.me/p3if7-2cj

Southwest Minnesota Thanks to a grant from the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, portable Interactive Television systems will be placed in 36 elementary schools within in Southern Minnesota providing advanced educational opportunities for more than 9,000 K-6 children.http://wp.me/p3if7-2co

St Paul PetChatz is the ultimate petcam; it can be controlled from afar using a phone app or desktop browser. With the tap of a touchscreen or a keyboard, the owner can release a treat from within the device for Fido to enjoy. http://wp.me/p3if7-2dB

Events

May 14: Webniar – Broadband Adoption Toolkit - 2:00-3:30 p.m. EDThttp://wp.me/p3if7-2dV

May 16: Webniar - Economic Development Webinar: Planning, Benefits and Impact - 2:00-3:00 p.m. EDT http://wp.me/p3if7-2dV

May 22: Webniar - Broadband Adoption Toolkit Webinar with Toolkit Creatorshttp://wp.me/p3if7-2dV

June 1-2: Civic Hack Day (various locations TBA) http://wp.me/p3if7-26t

July 29-30: eLearning Summit (St Paul) http://wp.me/p3if7-2dj

Looking for more events? Check out TechDotMN’s calendar http://tech.mn/events/. Many events are based in the Twin Cities but it is a comprehensive list. (If you have an upcoming event, consider submitting it.)

Bill_ColemanStirring the Pot

Question: What does our extended cold and snowy weather have in common with broadband?

Answer: The promise of 10-20 Mb ubiquitous broadband and 70 degrees and sunny weather both seem like they will never come!

We do know that 70 and sunny will be here sometime in the next 90 days, but the path to meeting the state broadband goal is much less certain.  The areas that lack wired broadband solutions that meet state broadband goals are clearly not easy to serve; densities and terrain ensure that private sector companies cannot invest in these areas and reach their ROI hurdles.  We know from the feasibility studies recently completed in some areas that the business case for these areas is marginal even with much longer public sector financing horizons and 100% adoption.   These areas with broadband are the same areas that needed significant subsidies to get telephone and electric utilities as those technologies emerged as standard requirements for quality of life and economic competitiveness.

The legislative session is almost over and once again, there are no signs of any new tools, financing programs or incentives to stimulate private or public sector investment, or a more defined or enabled public sector authority to stimulate broadband investments at the local or county level.

Even as we fail to reach the current state broadband goals, those very goals seem increasingly inadequate as Gb broadband is fast emerging as the new global standard.

What’s more, in Minnesota we still have health care, education, public safety all doing their own thing with no coordination in sight and not even on the task force agenda.

I am encouraged to see some regional planning emerging and hope that they can push their way forward to some new solutions – kudos to the east central broadband initiative and to the new group in Region Five!

Posted by: Ann Treacy | May 7, 2013

Open Data for Agriculture: News tools available online

Last week the World Bank hosted a conference on Open Data for Agriculture. The goal was to “brainstorm about how Open Data can be harnessed to help meet the challenge of sustainably feeding nine billion people by 2050.” It seems like that might be of interest to farmers and food advocates in Minnesota for a couple of reasons. First, Minnesota may have a role to play as food producer. Second, a range of tools have been developed that could be as useful in Minnesota as they are in Kenya. Third, this is an example of an industry that’s going digital – farmers without access to broadband and technology will be falling behind their international counterparts!

Here are some of the programs that were highlighted…

  • MFarm has built a mobile application that allows farmers to receive accurate, real-time crop-price information from five major markets in Kenya, via daily text message, six days per week. The service helps farmers to make informed decisions on what to plant when, how to price produce, and where to sell to the largest profit.  MFarm is currently refining their service and will soon begin integrating USAID data into their product to help deliver more accurate price information to users.

  • INSEAD has introduced Toto Agriculture, a smartphone interface fueled by USAID data that provides village-specific agricultural data. Users can use this free application to access localized information on soil, pests, climate, and planting tips in over 100 languages.

  • iPlant: A community driven collaborative of researchers, educators, and students working to enrich all plant sciences through the development of the cyberinfrastructure essential for modern biology. The collaborative can sequence the genome of an individual cow in 3 hours, taking the time of sequencing from months down to hours.

 

There was also a huge push and unveiling of open datasets…

At last week’s conference, USDA, USAID, and a number of other entities—both domestic and international—unleashed a host of new datasets, tools, and platforms—with more to come in the weeks and months ahead. For our part, the U.S. Government:

  • Launched The Food, Agriculture, and Rural “data community” on Data.gov, which offers more than 300 datasets (and growing!) that relate to the social, economic, and environmental aspects of agriculture. For example, the new community offers Quick Stats—a comprehensive tool for accessing agricultural data profiles by subject area or commodity, such as crops and plants, or livestock. Over the next few months, USDA will make these data available in a robust Application Programming Interface (API) to enable easier sharing of data by third party applications and services.

  • The Millennium Challenge Corporation released an open evaluation data catalog that contains household survey metadata from food security programs in Armenia, El Salvador, Ghana, and the Philippines, and more data is coming soon.

  • Launched USAID.gov/Developer, a page that curates APIs and datasets specifically for developers looking to scrub in and work with open global development data. APIs include the U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants, or Greenbook, which encompasses all international aid funding allocations.  This data will help developers and researchers more dynamically parse these data, that goes all the way back to the Marshall Plan.

Chris Mitchell promotes community networks. He’s at the Institute for Local Self Reliance, so his view makes sense. He follows broadband access closely. Late last week he posted an interesting article on CenturyLink, noting that CenturyLink’s plan for 1 Gbps service in Omaha is an outlier, not a sign of the times to come.

Chris points out that Omaha – or at least the part of Omaha getting the upgrade – needed the upgrade for technical reasons. And I think it doesn’t hurt that the area getting the upgrade sounds like an affluent area. It’s certainly positive news for Omaha that the upgrade is coming. And if it does well financially, it could be good news for other areas as well – but for the reasons that Chris points out, I agree that it’s probably an outlier, especially in terms of rural communities. Also I’ve heard the folks at CenturyLink say as much. Rural areas are a tough investment – tough terrain, low population density and managers are obliged to make business decisions that benefit shareholders.

What does this mean for local underserved communities? Chris looks at that question…

CenturyLink just doesn’t have the money to upgrade most of its communities. Will it in future years? That is a question that Phil Cusick of JPMorgan asked: “Okay. And, so we should look at CapEx as being essentially flat for the next few years?”

CFO Stewart Ewing response:

That’s our thinking now. Pretty flat, we could bring it down some, cut it off a little bit depending on. It’s really based on the success of these new initiatives, I mean, what we think we can drive in terms of revenue and margins going forward.

CenturyLink is not dumb or evil, it just has different priorities for investment than what communities need. The sooner local governments understand this, the better. Heck, CenturyLink itself has made this point in Minnesota:

We’re a public company. We have shareholders. We have rules and commitments. If you’re smaller, the shareholders are the owners. There’s more flexibility – especially if owners/shareholders are local.

Minnesota Public Radio summed it up:

Noting that CenturyLink wants every customer it can find, Ring pointed out that the company nonetheless needs a return on investment that satisfies shareholders and meets the demands of larger commitments and fiduciary responsibilities.

If you’re a community looking at broadband and you are served by CenturyLink (or CenturyLink is nearby), it still makes sense to invite them to the table to talk about broadband. They know broadband. They may know if your area is expecting an upgrade in the near future. They may be in a position to be swayed by growing interest in broadband. Most providers will talk to specific customers about upgrades to their service – maybe it’s a matter of aggregating those demands. But it’s also wise to keep Chris’ observations in mind. The key to a public-private partnership is finding a solution that meets the needs of the community and commercial provider and the first step may be recognizing that those needs are not necessarily the same.

An area/project to watch is the North East Central communities. They held a broadband summit in February – inviting community leaders and providers. One of the stated outcomes from the summit was an effort to continue discussion between community leader and providers. Brian Estrem from U-reka Broadband spoke about the moving the public-private effort forward…

Older Posts »

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 462 other followers

%d bloggers like this: