Blandin on Broadband

News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends

Blandin on Broadband

Harmony moves forward with revised proposed data center ordinance (Fillmore County)

KTTC reports after yesterday’s Joint Planning Session Meeting..

A Fillmore County community is moving closer to finalizing local regulations for a potential data center.

Residents in Harmony got a look at the sixth draft of a proposed data center ordinance during a meeting Wednesday night. The review comes after city leaders examined resident feedback at their previous meeting and sent the language back to the city attorney for revisions.

Several key amendments were presented in the updated draft, including a mandate for a closed-loop cooling system and a requirement for an annual noise study to ensure facilities comply with Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards.

The revised proposal would also cap water usage at 60,000 gallons per month for cooling systems unless granted special approval by the city. Additionally, the draft outright bans the use of non-disclosure agreements to ensure project details remain open to the public.

No formal council action was taken Wednesday as officials gathered further feedback from community members.

Next steps…

The draft ordinance will now head to the city’s planning and zoning committee during its meeting on Oct. 14 at 7 p.m., where a public hearing will be held.

If the committee approves the draft, the ordinance will go before the Harmony City Council for final consideration.

US House bipartisan advances bill to curb AI data center utility costs

CNBC reports…

The House on Wednesday advanced by a vote of 417-3 a first-of-its-kind bill that aims to curb data center-related utility bill rate hikes, as backlash to the proliferating facilities grows ahead of the 2026 midterm election.

The bipartisan bill — dubbed the Ratepayer Protection Act — is the first of its kind to establish standards that state regulators could adopt to require artificial intelligence data centers with a demand of 100 megawatts or more to cover the costs of building new power sources, transmission lines and other infrastructure, rather than passing those costs down to consumers. The Senate has not yet taken action on the measure.

A trio of progressive Democrats — Reps. Summer Lee of Pennsylvania, Delia Ramirez of Illinois and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan — were the only members to oppose the bill.

“The principle is commonsense: Those creating the new demand should be responsible for the costs associated with meeting that demand,” the bill sponsor Rep. Gabe Evans, a Colorado Republican seeking reelection in one of the most tightly contested House seats this year, said in a Washington Reporter op-ed on Monday.

Otter Tail County is asking questions about data centers, resources and authority within regulations and local governments

The Fergus Falls Journal reports…

If a corporation purchased farmland in an Otter Tail County township to build a data center, and the township lacked a zoning ordinance, would the township have any say? That was a question posed at the Otter Tail County Board meeting on Tuesday, Sept. 8.

The conversation on data centers was spurred by a request from Deputy Administrator Nick Leonard. He asked for permission to apply to attend a two-day training regarding best practices for data center development that is set to take place in December in South Carolina. It was noted that only 15 applicants from across the U.S. would be accepted.

I hope the Deputy Administrator has an opportunity to share what he learned in the training. It sounds like the conversation at the board meeting posed many potential scenarios and part of the reason was understanding that the county may have more resources than townships to address the topic. Here’s one example of an issue…

Commissioner Sean Sullivan, who represents District 5 of Fergus Falls, responded, “I think we discussed that we would take them as they came before us individually.”

Commissioner Wayne Johnson, who serves District 2, which includes Star Lake, added, “My understanding, currently, is if it stands outside lakeshore we really have nothing to say.”

The county has regulations in place for property that has shoreline on waterfronts , or is in close proximity to a body of water. The oversight of such projects often starts with the county’s Planning Commission. According to the county website, “The planning commission considers projects located in the shoreland areas for conditional use permits” and “projects located in the non-shoreland areas.” Typically, the commissioners review the planning commissioners recommendations and either approve or deny them.

An example of township versus county…

“So it is up to each township then?” Bucholz asked.

“Yes,” Johnson responded.

Bucholz asked what happens if a township doesn’t have a zoning ordinance.

“Landowner rights, basically,” Johnson replied. “The guy wants to sell it and they want to develop it and the township doesn’t have any say in it; it’s game on for the data center.”

And impact on local fire stations…

Another concern that data centers may bring to the doorsteps of townships has to do with the volunteer fire departments that often serve those rural areas. Berg-Moberg explained the power source that a data center may use may require specialized equipment and additional training by fire department members, which may lead to increased costs for townships.

Fergus Falls is not alone in grappling with these decisions.

EVENT Sep 16: Harmony City Council to review data center ordinance (Fillmore County)

KTTC reports...

Harmony City Council to review data center ordinance,

The video talks about the preparation the council has done and the public reponse.

The discussion will continue at the Joint Planning Session Meeting, where they plan to discuss Data Center Ordinance 5th Draft on Sep 16 2026 at 6pm at Harmony Community Center – Council Room (225 3rd Ave. SW, Harmony, MN 55939). 

Bemidji Planning Board votes for data center moratorium (Beltrami County)

The Bemdji Pioneer reports…

The data center discussion has officially reached Bemidji City Hall, as the Bemidji Planning Board voted 6-1 for a one-year moratorium on data centers during its Monday meeting.

Given this vote, the motion will move forward to crafting the ordinance and hosting a public forum.

If passed by the city council, there would be no council action to approve data centers exceeding 10,000 square feet in size for one year. In lieu of this, a study would be completed to see how a data center would affect the local community.

The vote wasn’t unanimous..

The lone vote against the moratorium came from board member Mark Dickinson.

The City Council will vote…

The lone vote against the moratorium came from board member Mark Dickinson.

Some folks in Faribault question timing of data center vote so close to Midterm Elections (Rice County)

Faribault Daily News reports…

With at least two new faces guaranteed on Faribault’s next city council, Councilor John Rowan says City Hall is ‘making a bet’ that data center regulations proposed by the planning commission will be easier to pass with the current council — and he doesn’t think the city should be fast‑tracking the vote before new members are seated.

Here’s their timeline…

The planning commission revealed its timeline on bringing its recommendations for data center standards to the Faribault City council on Sept. 1. The plan will see its recommendations finalized in October, a public hearing on the standards on Nov. 2, and finally will be presented to the council Nov. 24. The council previously voted to extend Archer datacenter’s timeline to present an updated environmental assessment worksheet to March, an effective moratorium on its development. If the council votes on the plan before January, councilors elected on Nov. 2 will not be able to vote on it.

The article goes on to give points of views from different folks and roles in the community.

 

Albertville City Council reviews data center concept in Sep 8 meeting (Wright County)

Hometown Source Press & News reports…

The Albertville City Council reviewed a concept for a data center and approved a 7.49% preliminary tax levy increase for 2027 at a meeting on Sept. 8.

City Planner TJ Hofer presented the council with a concept for a data center from Nodiac Oakwood. A concept review allows for a city council to give feedback on an item without making a formal decision.

Hofer said Nodiac proposed to construct a modular data center at the intersection of 70th Street and Karment Avenue northeast, immediately adjacent to a Wright-Hennepin electrical substation. The data center would be located on a newly-created 3.66-acre parcel on a larger lot.

Hofer said that Nodiac’s data center would not be considered a “hyperscale” data center.

More details on the proposed building…

Nordic’s proposal included 20 “modular data center” modules, 10 electrical transformers, 30 concrete equipment pads for cooling units and other equipment, parking and security fencing.

The building would not be permanent, but “factory built enclosures on concrete pads or similar foundations,” per the narrative. Nodiac estimated that the site would operate for 30 years or more.

Hofer said Nodiac would not use municipal water or sewer and it would truck in its own water and propylene glycol mixture that had a five to eight year cycle. Nodiac would then truck the old water to a wastewater facility.

Nodiac believes 20 megawatts of energy will power the center, and did not detail the impact that would have to local electrical users. While dependent on usage and other factors, one megawatt generally can power 400-900 homes, according to a worksheet published by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission via energy research group UtiliPoint.

Worth noting…

The City Council did not take any formal action on the concept review.

But…

The next Albertville City Council meeting is at 7 p.m. Monday, Sept. 21, at Albertville City Hall.

Inver Grove Heights City Council approves a change to its one-year data center moratorium to exclude a company that threatened to sue (Dakota County)

KSTP TV reports…

Taxpayers in Inver Grove Heights won’t have to foot the bill for a multi-million-dollar lawsuit but will likely still get the data center at the core of the issue, much to many residents’ chagrin.

On Monday night, the Inver Grove Heights City Council approved a change to its one-year data center moratorium that now excludes a company that sued the city because of it.

That company, Qlevr — which wants to build a 54,000-square-foot facility at the former Travel Tags building along Carmen Avenue East — says it was in the development process and in good standing with the city for its proposed data center project before that moratorium was passed, so it sued.

After Monday…

The city shared the following about the next steps:

  • The City Council will consider the major site plan application at its Sept. 28 meeting;
  • If the major site plan application is approved at that meeting, the developer would need to have an approved development contract with the City. That is a standard requirement for all developments in Inver Grove Heights;
  • Once that is approved, the speed at which the project can move forward depends on how quickly the developer applies for and is issued a building permit from the City.

That major site plan application process has already been addressed, where the council set when generators can be used and sound testing done by the city.

More Minneapolis neighborhoods have data centers on the radar and may attend the Minneapolis Planning Commission meeting on October 13, 2026 (Hennepin County)

KARE11 reports…

Less than a week after a data center developer from Virginia backed out of a plan to build one in Minneapolis’ North Loop neighborhood, other residents are preparing for any future proposals.

“I really hope to see a momentum established and committed to concrete action in ensuring the safety and livability of our community,” said Marshall Terrace Neighborhood Organization (MTNO) Greenspace & Ecology Coordinator Amy Pond.

Pond and MTNO Board Chair Lexi Clendenen hosted a data center discussion in the northeast part of the city Monday night for people to learn, ask questions and be part of a united community, according to a press release.

While I learned in an earlier post that the rules are not always the same for folks in and outside of the seven-county metro area, this still may be a topic that connects rural, urban and suburban communities. For folks in Minneapolis…

Some representatives of varying groups will likely be at the Minneapolis Planning Commission meeting on October 13. Public comment is expected as the city shapes new zoning ordinances for possible future data centers.

Earlier this year, the city council approved a temporary moratorium on data centers in most of the city to give councilors time to create these new standards. To learn more about their goals and next steps, click here.

 

Harmony resident speaks out against data center at City Council meeting (Fillmore County)

The Fillmore County Journal reports…

During the public forum portion of the September 8 Harmony City Council meeting, Harmony resident Ann Lyons spoke about the recent joint planning session at which community feedback was discussed in regards to the proposed data center ordinance. “I find it very disingenuous that residents were not able to speak at the meeting,” Lyons stated. She noted that a lifelong friend of hers, who works on the regulatory side of data centers, cautions the city not to sign anything as the proper regulations aren’t in place yet for data centers since they’re so new.

EVENT Sep 29: Future Data Center Zoning Ordinance Options in Farmington (Dakota County)

Sun This Week reports…

Farmington residents can attend a special meeting “Future Data Center Zoning Ordinance Options” at 6-8 p.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 29 in the banquet room at the Rambling River Center, 325 Oak St., in downtown Farmington.

Farmington Mayor Nick Lien requested this special Farmington City Council work session that will serve as a listening session and  informational meeting.

“As the large zoning update project which started in 2024 begins to wrap up, the City of Farmington is now looking to address potential changes for an independent section of zoning code around data centers,” according to a city news release.

City staff will provide an update on how the city ordinance is currently written and residents can share their thoughts.

The work session will also provide residents information about the data center zoning ordinance update and what it could look like, the city said.

If residents are unable to attend the Sept. 29 public meeting, an online feedback form will be available after the city meeting.

Community survey in Pine Island shows 75 percent oppose data center (Goodhue County)

The Post Bulletin reports…

Now a community survey conducted by an area resident has landed like a hand grenade in the middle of the fray — and may shed light on that question. The survey suggests broad opposition to the data center with 75.8% of respondents opposing it and 19.2% supporting it.

“Do residents of Pine Island city and nearby townships support the proposal to build a hyperscale data center in Pine Island. The majority answer is: No,” concludes the summary of the 73-page “Pine Island Sentiment Survey” authored by Susanne Blazek.

Blazek has a doctorate in social psychology with a minor in statistics from the University of Minnesota. More to the point, she has spent the last 15 years of her career conducting sentiment polls and large-scale public research, she says. Blazek makes no bones that she opposes the data center.

More on the survey…

One reason Blazek thinks the survey’s conclusions are valid is that the findings are in line with national polls, which show a strong backlash toward data centers. Surveys from organizations like Gallup, NBC News, and YouGov show roughly 65% to 70% of Americans opposing constructing a data center in their local area.

Blazek said the survey’s findings are based on 656 verified responses from people in the Pine Island city and surrounding areas. The survey reached 4,000 people through flyers and online messages for a 16% response rate, “which is considered OK.”

Minneapolis’ North Loop residents respond to proposed data center bowing out

CBS News TV reports…

The future of a property in Minneapolis’ North Loop is suddenly wide open. A data center developer is walking away from a deal to purchase the old Star Tribune printing facility. Ubah Ali heard reactions from residents in the neighborhood.

Plymouth City Council Approves One-Year Moratorium on New Data Centers (Hennepin County)

CCX Media reports...

The Plymouth City Council unanimously approved a moratorium on new data centers, which have come under increasing scrutiny in cities across the country.

The approval came at its Sept. 8 council meeting.

Grant Fernelius, the city’s community and economic development director, acknowledged a company recently contacted the city about building a data center of “fairly significant” size.

No official proposal has come forward, but the incident led city leaders to take action.

Plymouth’s moratorium will last one year and impacts data center proposals of at least 50,000 square feet.

The city council initially considered starting with at least 75,000 square feet, which is approximately the size of a Cub grocery store in Plymouth, but opted for the smaller building footprint.

The moratorium would not apply to existing businesses.

Data center developers withdraws deal proposed for Star Tribune building in Minneapolis (Hennepin County)

MPR reports…

A Virginia-based developer has withdrawn from a deal to transform the former Star Tribune printing facility in Minneapolis into a data center. The proposal drew heavy criticism from residents of the city’s North Loop neighborhood.

Minneapolis spokesperson Jess Olstad confirmed that Legacy Investing withdrew a land use application for the proposed facility, which would have included a 20-megawatt data center as well as other developments at nearby parcels.

More info…

Legacy did not respond to requests for comment. Emails to the company bounced back. Legacy previously developed a slightly larger data center in the Sleep Number building in downtown Minneapolis.

The proposed data center drew strong opposition at neighborhood forums last month from hundreds of city residents, who questioned the environmental impacts of the facility. Residents also doubted the facility would bring lasting jobs to the city.

Representatives for Legacy argued that the facility would only use as much water as two residential homes and that the facility would kickstart other nearby developments.