Blandin on Broadband

News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends

Blandin on Broadband

Google has scaled back its plans for a proposed data center in Hermantown (St Louis County)

The Minnesota Star Tribune reports

Google has scaled back its plans for a proposed data center campus in Northeast Minnesota in response to community concerns, the tech giant said this week.

The initial 1.8 million square-foot campus planned for Hermantown is now expected to be 1.66 million square feet, shrinking from four data center buildings to three, reducing the amount of disturbed wetlands and land.

The project, kept secret by city officials for a year, has fueled enormous pushback in this town of 10,000 near Duluth. Since it was revealed as a data center last year through a Minnesota Star Tribune public records request, the project has generated a lawsuit, and inspired political candidates and a highly organized grassroots opposition group protesting everything from tax subsidies to nondisclosure agreements.

“We’ve been listening,” Google representative Tyler Huebner said at a Monday Hermantown City Council meeting.

Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy spokesperson talks in Ely about data centers (St Louis County)

The Timberjay reports

Kathryn Hoffman, CEO of the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy, spoke earlier this month to a Tuesday Group gathering about AI data center projects in Minnesota and their environmental implications.
Data centers are already common around the state of Minnesota — “data center” acting as a catchall term for rooms full of computers that store and share data — but the recent trend of hyperscale data centers is new, resulting from the exponentially growing demand for data storage and computational power created by large language models associated with AI.
Hyperscale data centers are recognizable by their enormous physical size, modular scalability, and need to consume enormous amounts of electricity. They use components that allow new additions to be easily added and can individually consume as much power as entire cities.

They talk about present and future scenarios…

According to Cleanview, a market intelligence firm, there are 30 active data centers within the state. Of these, only two are hyperscale centers: Meta’s two buildings in Rosemount, which have power capacities of 168 MW and 140 MW. According to Hoffman, Minnesota is a potential new location for companies looking to build hyperscale centers, especially as Virginia and Texas — two states that have led the country in data center construction — begin to fill. Minnesota’s availability of water and electricity makes it a prime target.
Hoffman said that it would not take many data centers to massively increase electricity demand in the state, citing a statistic from the Star Tribune which reported that if just ten of these facilities were built, they would consume as much electricity as every household in the state. She warned that the increased energy demand would likely raise energy bills for taxpayers in the state and make it far more challenging for Minnesota to meet its goal of becoming carbon-free by 2040.
Several hyperscale projects have been proposed around Minnesota, although often under the cover of non-disclosure agreements signed with city officials. A lack of transparency has surrounded many of the proposed projects. Hoffman said that a whistleblower was the first to alert environmental groups about the proposals.

MPR journalists talk about how data centers are spurring more folks to run for office

MPR reports

The controversial issue of building data centers is roiling the Minneapolis North Loop neighborhood. Residents packed a meeting Wednesday night about a proposed data center for a 13-acre site that includes the old Star Tribune printing plant.

Public meetings in other Minnesota cities faced with data center projects have also been packed. The centers are not only igniting public debate but they also seem to be motivating more people to run for public office.

MPR News host Cathy Wurzer spoke with MinnPost reporter Brian Arola, about why data centers are motivating candidates to run in upcoming elections.

Listen to the full interview for more information especially in Faribault.

Google is visiting MN communities (Pine Island & Hermantown) where they are looking at data centers Goodhue & Olmstead and St Louis Counties)

MPR reports…

Staffers with tech giant Google turned on the charm and put in some face time in Minnesota this week, as the company tried to smooth over some ruffled feathers and win over naysayers in two small towns where it hopes to build massive data centers.

Wednesday evening Google hosted what it called a community celebration in Pine Island, about 20 minutes northwest of Rochester, with free food, live music and family activities.

Meanwhile, 200 miles to the north in Hermantown, just outside Duluth, Google hosted an open house to answer questions from area residents about the hyperscale data center it wants to build there.

The event in Pine Island was pretty laid back as people gobbled up the free food and kids jumped in bouncy houses, a sharp contrast to the Hermantown meeting, where data center opponents disrupted Google’s presentation and several of them were escorted out by police.

The meetings come as Google faces some uncertainty with both projects. In Hermantown, where the project still needs city council approval, the proposal is facing intensified opposition after recordings were leaked of senior Hermantown officials mocking data center opponents.

The Pine Island data center project is also now on hold, even though city officials have signed off on it while a judge considers the merits of a lawsuit seeking a more thorough environmental review.

EVENT Aug 20: Northfield Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on data center regulations

KYMN reports

The Northfield Planning Commission will hold a public hearing tonight on a proposed zoning amendment that would dramatically reduce the required setback for data processing facilities, commonly known as data centers, from 3,950 feet to 200 feet from existing or planned parks, trails and recreational features.

The proposal has drawn attention as data centers have become a controversial issue nationwide, with critics raising concerns about energy consumption, water use and, in some communities, development agreements negotiated behind closed doors.

City officials, however, say the amendment is not connected to any pending data center project.

“This is really part of the city’s regular review and housekeeping of our zoning ordinance,” City Administrator Ben Martig said during a recent interview.

According to Martig, the city adopted extensive standards for data processing facilities several years ago after a public review process. Those regulations addressed issues such as noise, energy use, visual impacts and compatibility with surrounding properties. Staff later concluded that the nearly 4,000-foot setback requirement from parks and trails appeared to be a drafting error and lacked any engineering, environmental or operational basis.

Under the proposed amendment, the setback would be reduced to 200 feet, matching the distance already required from residential properties.

Martig said the existing standard effectively makes development difficult because trails and recreational features are often located near industrial areas. The amendment is one of several zoning “housekeeping” changes currently under review, including revisions to industrial block length requirements.

Will the workforce be ready for building data centers and rural networks when BEAD projects hit the streets?

RCR Wireless News reports

The US has two infrastructure priorities converging on one scarce resource: people who know how to build networks. AI data centers are sucking skilled workers into a construction boom, just as the long-delayed BEAD initiative finally starts moving into deployment. And actually, it is not just about the fiber technicians; the same labor pool includes electricians, HVAC specialists, surveyors, trenchers, engineers, and other trades needed to build broadband networks. The numbers are already uncomfortable. The industry was estimated in 2024 to be short around 58,000 workers to meet BEAD’s goals. AT&T plans to add 3,000 technicians this year. Meta has its own fiber-training programme. Meanwhile, the US telco workforce has fallen from 1.4 million in 2001 to fewer than 598,000 in 2025.

There is a stark economic imbalance here, of course. A hyperscaler or major carrier building AI infrastructure can afford recruitment, training, and wages that smaller community-based broadband operators cannot. Every worker pulled toward a lucrative data-center project is potentially one less available for a rural fiber build. And this is before the AI construction boom really peaks. Economist Anirban Basu expects labor pressure to worsen in 2027 as AI infrastructure spending expands. So the irony is clear: America’s AI infrastructure boom could make it harder, slower, and more expensive to deliver the connectivity needed by Americans still waiting for broadband.

Congressional candidate Jake Johnson (CD1) talks about data centers at New Ulm Town Hall meeting (Brown County)

The [New Ulm] Journal reports

Democratic nominee for Minnesota’s first congressional district, Jake Johnson, visited New Ulm for a town hall meeting on Monday.

He was asked about data centers…

Johnson fielded multiple questions about artificial intelligence (AI) technology, including the uses of the technology and the data centers needed to sustain it.

Johnson said he believed there is a way for AI technology to be helpful for moving society forward, but the reality is there is justifiable fear of what AI could do if misused.

“We need a Congress that recognize to make sure the benefits of AI are economic benefits to southern Minnesota while protecting against the potential harm,” he said. “We also have to make sure the gains are not just realized by tech billionaires.”

Johnson said the question of AI data centers and their impact on natural resources had come up at each of his town halls.

He supports a moratorium on data centers in the country until four metrics are achieved. First, eliminating non-disclosure agreements for elected officials. He said there needed to be an open public conversation about data centers. Second, assurances of protection for natural resources and increased electrical costs are not pushed on to local citizens. Third, if the data centers are built it, it needs to be done by local union workers. Fourth, any profits gained from the data center must stay in the state.

“Anything short of those four metrics being achieved represents an extraction and exploitation of our way of life,” he said.

Freeborn County extends data center moratorium for another year

KAAL TV reports

Freeborn County is putting off data center development for another year as officials work on rules for how those projects could be regulated.

The Freeborn County Board of Commissioners approved an extension of its data center moratorium following a public hearing on August 18.

The original moratorium was approved on August 19, 2025, and stopped the county from accepting, processing or approving permits for data centers in the unincorporated parts of Freeborn County.

The new resolution extends that moratorium through August 19, 2027.

The county says its current regulations aren’t enough to address the specific impacts of data centers and that allowing the moratorium to expire could threaten public safety and the orderly development of the county.

The McLeod County Chronicle Editor raises questions about plans for Revolve Labs data center in Glencoe

The McLeod County Chronicle reports

Plans for a new Revolve Labs data center in Glencoe are moving forward, but questions surrounding noise, water use, the project’s location, and its long-term impact on the community continue to follow the development.
Those concerns have surfaced as Revolve Labs prepares for a new data center technology campus that will include up to approximately 80,000 square feet of building space and represent an initial investment of at least $459.9 million.
The Glencoe City Council approved a development agreement with Revolve Labs July 20. The agreement describes the project as an opportunity to expand the city’s tax base, create employment and business opportunities, and bring infrastructure improvements to the community.
But as the city and Revolve Labs move forward with an investment approaching half a billion dollars, uncertainty remains over some of the most basic information surrounding the company’s presence in Glencoe.
Questions about Revolve Labs’ familiarity with the community have emerged over details that would seem almost impossible for a company already operating in the city not to know: Where is its existing facility, and where will its new one be located? Yet Revolve Labs has provided conflicting information about both.

On a high level those questions focus on:

  • Info the company
  • Noise
  • Water use
  • What Glencoe gains

EVENT Aug 19: Google to host celebration for Pine Island data center project (Goodhue & Olmstead Counties)

KTTC reports

Google will host a community celebration Wednesday for its proposed data center project in Pine Island.

Google is expected to announce the project’s “Panther Program” and other initiatives benefiting the Pine Island School District with a projected amount of $24 million.

The proposed data center has sparked debate in Pine Island as residents raise concerns over energy consumption and environmental impacts.

The event will feature live music, food and family activities from 4 to 8 p.m. at Trailhead Park.

Find stories like this and more, in our apps.

MPR speaks to Minnesota Design Center and their work leading discussion about data centers in Minneapolis (Hennepin County)

I mentioned the data center meetings in Minneapolis’ North Loop earlier, today MPR talks more about the meetings led by the Minnesota Design Center. They heard about how the first meeting went last night (Aug 18)…

MARY BINKLEY: It was a really nice exercise that Dr. Burga and his colleagues from the U had US go through. There were giant maps of the North Loop at several tables, and they asked us to plot where in the North Loop, where are the things that we love about the North Loop, what do we think is missing, and what are the concerns about data centers.

And as I was looking at what people put on their Post-It notes, I learned that people really, really value the green space that we have in the North Loop along the Mississippi River as well as our small business community. This is a community that has everybody’s favorite restaurants and coffee shops and gyms and retailers, and that definitely came out in the feedback on the maps that we saw last night. It was a good exercise.

And a little bit on the agenda for the next meeting (Aug 20)…

FERNANDO BURGA: Certainly. Because we have to understand what is important for the community to be able to guide the work. So we start by understanding exactly how the community sees itself. What are the values, locations, histories that define the community.

From there, we move into a more systematic way to understanding impacts, which is what we’re going to be doing today. Today we’re going to be focusing on the question of data center impacts. And similarly to the maps, we have a series of tools that have been developed by our researchers here at the Minnesota Design Center to continue the process of collecting information and understanding the hopes, the dreams, the stories that define essentially how people see themselves, how they see their community impacted, and how they see the region impacted.

These tools are going to be geared around issues related to water, energy, economy, society, family, neighborhood, and also neighborhoods, people that live in other places that may enjoy coming to the North Loop. So we’re aiming to develop essentially an archive, also a system of information that we can then look at, and then on Thursday, we’re going to be considering alternatives. What are the ways that we can think about moving forward? Based on tomorrow’s presentation, we’re going to be able to develop that workshop, and then on Saturday we’re going to have a final share out with the community about next steps.

They also talk about the difference between rural and urban conversations about data centers…

FERNANDO BURGA: So the main similarity is that there’s deep concern and confusion about data centers coming to people’s communities. There is a lack of information, transparency. There is misinformation. People do not know what they don’t know. People feel paralyzed.

In many ways, each community is different and unique. We’re finding that specific communities across rural Minnesota are developing alternatives that include thinking about the design and the placement of buildings, for example. Some of them are in complete opposition, and this is a very divisive topic, one which is really affecting people emotionally and mentally also.

Through our work in empowering small Minnesota communities’ partnership with University of Minnesota Extension, we are considering these questions, and we are developing essentially a set of engagement, models, kits, tools but also developing the research and the questions that allow us then to move forward proactively and work with a community like the North Loop Neighbors Association in the North Loop that is open and available to be able to have this type of conversation with the public.

Hermantown data center discussion takes some turns that result in proposed greater transparency (St Louis County)

The Duluth News Tribune reports on incidents and issues that arose in Hermantown…

City officials apologized Monday night for disparaging comments about opponents of a proposed Google data center.

But that did little to alleviate the anger of community members, who turned out to condemn the leaked audio remarks and again take a stand against the 1.66-million-square-foot project in the southwest corner of the city.

Some results…

Mayor Wayne Boucher, Police Chief Jim Crace and City Administrator John Mulder all addressed the public at the start of the meeting.

A Google representative also announced the company was mutually agreeing to terminate all nondisclosure agreements with city officials “in the spirit of openness and partnership.”

The Duluth Monitor last week reported on recordings of an internal staff meeting from June in which leaders were heard talking about community members who addressed the council.

And an update on the data center in question…

Tyler Huebner, a Google representative, provided a brief update with updated designs. He said the facility’s footprint has been reduced slightly and will include three data center buildings, three mechanical buildings, a two-story office building and a fire-suppression building.

Minnetrista City Council approves a one-year moratorium on data centers (Hennepin County)

The Laker Pioneer reports

The Minnetrista City Council approved several new ordinances at its Aug. 3 meeting, including one that authorizes a study of and a one-year moratorium on data centers.

David Abel, community development director, explained that the city has not received any data center applications but wants to get ahead of the issue as new projects emerge elsewhere in the metro area. Mayor Lisa Whalen said the moratorium will give the city time to establish rules and regulations for data centers, as Minnetrista currently has no ordinances governing them.

Council member Brian Govern took a different view, supporting the study but opposing the moratorium. He said data centers could present an opportunity for Minnetrista and a moratorium could take the city out of the running. Govern also said data centers do not pose unique risks compared with other heavy industrial uses and noted that, because Minnetrista has few industrial-zoned areas, a proposed data center would likely require rezoning, giving the council an opportunity to review it.

The council approved the moratorium 3-1, with council member Cathleen Reffkin absent. 

North Mankato City Council prepares for data center moratorium vote (Nicollet and Blue Earth Counties)

Mankato Free Press reports

The North Mankato City Council continued discussions Monday on a proposed moratorium on large-scale data centers, reviewing potential size and water-use thresholds, environmental review, zoning and the scope and cost of a possible study.

Under the parameters discussed at Monday’s work session, the proposed moratorium would prohibit data centers larger than 150,000 square feet or using more than 50,000 gallons of water per day.

No official action was taken and a second public hearing and consideration of the proposed moratorium will come before the council in the coming weeks.

The discussion followed the council’s Aug. 3 meeting, when members tabled action on a proposed interim ordinance to allow additional research after about 40 minutes of public testimony. Nearly every speaker supported a temporary pause while the city studies how data centers should be regulated.

MinnPost looks at the impact of data center decision on local elections

MinnPost looks at the impact of data center decision on local elections…

How do you feel about data centers? 

“It’s usually the first topic I’m asked about,” said Lexi Temple, one of a half-dozen candidates who advanced to November’s general election. “It’s by far the top priority.”

One of several Minnesota cities eyed as landing spots for hyperscale AI data centers, Faribault highlights how the issue is beginning to shape elections. It is spurring newcomers to run for office on “transparency” platforms in some of the same places where local officials signed non-disclosure agreements to keep data center details out of the public eye.

Where is this noticeable?

MinnPost monitored city council filings in six cities prominently linked to data center developments over the last couple of years: Faribault, Farmington, Hermantown, Monticello, North Mankato and Pine Island.

In all six, there was an uptick in candidate filings this year compared with 2024. Faribault and North Mankato saw the biggest increases:

Faribault: 10 candidates (+4 from 2024)

North Mankato: 8 candidates (+4)

Farmington: 6 candidates (+2)

Hermantown: 4 candidates (+2)

Pine Island: 4 candidates (+2)

Monticello: 4 candidates (+1)

They found that the mayoral elections in these towns also had more candidates.