PCs for People, a nonprofit that describes itself as promoting digital inclusion, has introduced CONNECT, a fixed wireless service (FWA) and wired service.
The FWA element of CONNECT uses 5G and 4G LTE networking. The 5G service delivers download speeds as fast as 280 Mbps and uploads as fast as 80 Mbps. On the 4G/LTE side, the service runs as fast as 50 Mbps download and 10 Mbps upload speeds.
The new PC for People CONNECT service provides wired symmetrical 100 Mbps connectivity through a multiple dwelling unit (MDU) service.
Costs are “a fraction of the cost of traditional Internet providers,” the organization says. “We believe access to the internet is access to opportunity,” PCs for People CEO Casey Sorensen said in a press release about the new service. “With CONNECT, we’re doubling down on our mission to expand affordable, reliable internet in communities that have historically been underserved.”
The organization was founded in 2008. It claims to have connected more than one million people — including more than 3,000 MDUs — and deployed hundreds of FWA access towers. PCs for People said it plans to enroll 11,000 people in Cuyahoga County, Ohio in the new CONNECT service by the end of September.
In April, PCs for People was cleared by the FCC to apply for funding in Minnesota in the $42.5 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program.
Category Archives: Wireless
Do satellite providers get more time to meet BEAD speed requirements than other broadband providers?
In the Office of Broadband Development Office Hour this morning, someone asked how many years low-Earth orbit satellite (LEO) had to deliver the speeds required to be eligible for BEAD funding. The answer was that OBD would adhere to NTIA guidance. So an hour later an article on LEO and BEAD in Broadband Breakfast caught my attention because it gave a more specific answer…
As broadband officials dig into the fine print of updated guidance governing a $42.45 billion federal broadband expansion program, many raised concerns Monday about new advantages carved out for low-Earth orbit satellite providers.
One of the clearest examples, they argued, was a provision under revised rules for the Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment program, that gives satellite providers up to 10 years to meet performance benchmarks — more than double the four years allowed for fiber and other technologies to comply. The rules, released by the Commerce Department earlier this month, purport to be “tech neutral,” but critics continue to find biases within them.
Trump announces new Trump Phone and Trump Mobile 5G
Alongside the team from Trump Mobile, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump unveil T1 Mobile, a transformational, new cellular service designed to deliver top-tier connectivity, unbeatable value and all-American service for our nation’s hardest-working people. …
Trump Mobile will offer 5G service through all three major cellular carriers. At the heart of Trump Mobile is its flagship The 47 Plan, which is available for only $47.45 per month. Subscribers will receive the following added benefits:
-
Unlimited talk, text, and data
-
Complete device protection
-
24/7 roadside assistance thrugh Drive America
-
Telehealth services, including virtual medical care, mental health support, and easy ordering and delivery for prescription medications
-
Free International calling to more than 100 countries, including many with American military bases to help honor the families who are bravely serving in our military abroad
-
No contracts, no credit check
Here is what some of the mainstream media are saying…
CNBC: Trump’s $499 smartphone will likely be made in China
The Trump Organization says the phone will be “built in the United States” — but experts note the phone was likely designed and would be manufactured by a Chinese firm.
“There is no way the phone was designed from scratch and there is no way it is going to be assembled in the U.S. or completely manufactured in the U.S.,” Francisco Jeronimo, vice president at International Data Corp., told CNBC on Tuesday. “That is completely impossible.”
MSNBC: Trump Mobile won’t make cellphones cheap again. Here’s what will.
Like many other Trump-branded products, Trump Mobile is a licensing agreement for the president’s name, in this case between the Trump Organization and a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO), T1 Mobile LLC. That company is partnering with “all three major cellular carriers” (AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile) to provide 5G service, and using Google’s Android operating system for its phone.
While Trump and his family profit from the licensing deal, Trump Mobile is a poor deal for consumers. At launch, its single prepaid wireless plan is $47.45 a month. That’s a reference to Trump being the 45th and 47th presidents, but it’s also nearly 20% more expensive than the equivalent plan from the three major U.S. phone carriers. In comparison, AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile’s prepaid carriers offer unlimited talk, text and data for $40 a month or less. Other MVNOs’ plans are even cheaper. …
Not only are there just three major phone carriers in the U.S., most Americans’ cellphones are made by two companies — Apple and Samsung. Under the first Trump administration, the already concentrated market further consolidated from four to three large players after the Justice Department approved the T-Mobile Sprint merger in 2019. The two companies claimed they needed to combine in order to compete with AT&T and Verizon “more effectively,” and that they would offer consumers and businesses “lower prices [and] greater competition” while creating “thousands of new American jobs.” In reality, this deal resulted in higher prices and a number of layoffs despite the promise of new jobs.
NY Times: Trump Mobile Phone Company Announced by President’s Family, but Details Are Murky
Trump Mobile is the latest in a string of Trump family deals that were inked or accelerated after Mr. Trump won his second term, including a digital currency that is now a significant source of his wealth. Governance experts have said that the projects pose an unprecedented array of conflicts of interest for an American president.
“Good luck getting a federal agency to hold the company accountable if service fails or things go off the rails,” said Robert Weissman, co-president of Public Citizen, a nonprofit watchdog group.
It will be interesting to see if this has an impact on broadband policy and federal funding, especially with all of the recent changes to BEAD and the greater focus on wireless networks.
WISPA tells members to update their unlicensed fixed wireless coverage with FCC maps to prep for BEAD
Under new rules for the $42.45 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment program released Friday, states will have to make ineligible for funding some locations served with unlicensed fixed wireless. It’s a victory for the group, which has been pushing for the chance to update BEAD maps.
Broadband offices will have to consult the FCC’s coverage map to see where coverage is reported, and then will reach out to those ISPs to quickly verify they can adequately mitigate interference before running an additional grant application round.
“If you’re looking to defend the areas you’re servicing now, then you need to make sure that your information is up to date,” WISPA CEO David Zumwalt told members on a webinar Thursday. “It’s critical that you make sure that your BDC information is up to date.”
For communities, this means if the updated maps change the number of unserved (to served) locations, they may lose BEAD eligibility for those locations.
Should the smartphone-broadband bundle should be on every rural operator’s radar?
CoBank posts an article on “Why the smartphone-broadband bundle should be on every rural operator’s radar.” Here are their key points:
- Bundles are winning: Customers increasingly prefer bundled smartphone and home broadband services for simplicity and savings – national carriers like Verizon, T-Mobile, Comcast, and Charter are capitalizing on this trend and gaining market share.
- Rural competition is heating up: Massive federal funding, expanded wireless coverage, and improving satellite options (like Starlink and Amazon’s Project Kuiper) are intensifying competition in rural markets.
- Technology is enabling growth: Advances like the 6GHz band and next-gen FWA systems (e.g., Tarana) are making wireless broadband more viable and scalable – even in hard-to-serve areas.
- Smaller operators are taking notice: Regional players like WOW!, Midco, and Mediacom, along with NCTC members, are beginning to offer mobile services to compete with bundled offerings.
- The risk of doing nothing is rising: While offering mobile isn’t easy or cheap, not responding to the bundled threat could mean higher churn, lost customers, and long-term erosion of market share.
Recent study on consumer takes on various broadband technologies
A study conducted on behalf of Amdocs finds that consumers value reliability, affordability, and uninterrupted access — and suggests that providers may benefit by offering all three via mixed-technology networks. …
Cable has the highest level of internet access (39%). It is followed by fiber (31%) and FWA (9%). The study found that 3% of consumers do not have a dedicated internet connection at home.
Fully 60% of respondents say their home internet is very reliable, but at the same time cite cost as the biggest issue. Commentary in the press release says that this illustrates the need to balance performance with affordability.
Overall, the priorities are closely divided. An equal percent (38%) of consumers prioritize speed and reliability when choosing a provider. The study commentary suggests that CSPs can put together offerings in their networks that eliminate trade-offs.
FWA and satellite broadband are the new kids on the block. Amdocs says that FWA is emerging as a strong competitor but that more than half of consumers — 47% — have never heard of it.
The broadband satellite sector is even newer. The survey found that 67% of consumers would consider switching if it provides a comparable experience. Concerns about cost, reliability, and speed persist. The study found that 37% of consumers are unfamiliar with satellite Internet. This, Amdocs Research says, points to an education gap about the technology.
Questions about what’s happening with the 5G Fund and how it might impact rural areas
Criticism is mounting against the 5G Fund, a long-gestating US government program that would distribute billions of dollars to wireless network operators, with the goal of funding the construction of 5G networks in rural areas.
Indeed, the issues are so lengthy and complex that T-Mobile has suggested just ending the program altogether.
“Given the unprecedented infusion of billions of dollars of federal and state funding as well as ongoing private investment in 5G Fund infrastructure, it is premature for the commission to proceed with the 5G Fund auction,” T-Mobile told the FCC in a recent filing. “Indeed, the auction may not be necessary at all.”
5G Fund money would likely be allocated through a reverse auction, where the lowest bid to cover a particular location with 5G wins.
T-Mobile isn’t alone…
T-Mobile isn’t the only company criticizing the FCC’s 5G Fund. However, most other companies argue for a delay in the program, not an end to it. And many are urging the FCC to ultimately expand the size of the 5G Fund from around $9 billion to about $36 billion.
“There are several significant objectives that should be completed before conducting the 5G Fund auction, to avoid wasting or improperly targeting 5G Fund support in rural America,” wrote the Coalition of Rural Wireless Carriers, which represents some small wireless network operators in the US.
The article talks about the option to delay…
The coalition argued that the FCC should wait to allocate 5G Fund cash until the BEAD program is well underway. That way, wireless network operators will know exactly where they can expect to obtain suitable backhaul connections for their rural cell towers.
Also, there’s satellite…
Finally, it’s worth noting that satellites may now play a huge role in the future of any discussion about 5G in rural areas.
Today, satellites are connecting to millions of regular smartphones all over the country, including in the rural areas targeted by the 5G Fund. Specifically, several generations of new Apple iPhones can connect to Globalstar satellites, while T-Mobile’s agreement with SpaceX could expand that kind of capability to millions more.
Libraries, school and others ask Senate to protect FCC wi-fi order
Broadband Breakfast reports...
National education groups are concerned that the Senate could prevent millions of people from accessing the internet with federal assistance.
A coalition of 31 education and library groups urged senators in a letter Monday to reject a resolution by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that would roll back the Federal Communications Commission’s decision to allow E-Rate funds for wireless hotspots.
“Almost 20,000 schools and libraries across the country are currently in the process of applying for several hundred thousand hotspots,” the letter stated, adding that millions of Americans could lose access to essential online resources if the measure, S.J.Res.7, is approved.
Winona County has 2,100 homes that are underserved or unserved
In recent years, broadband expansion projects have reached thousands of homes in rural Winona County. Still, an estimated 2,100 homes are underserved or unserved in Winona County, Minnesota Office of Broadband Development Executive Director Bree Maki said. The county is reaching the point where the remaining areas are also the most difficult to serve, she said. Maki said she is hopeful that in the four to five years, all of Winona County will be served. “I think especially during the pandemic, we realized that broadband is something that is essential to almost anybody, whether it’s trying to access medical records or medical appointments, as well as our students in education,” she said. Broadband access allows people to live and work in rural communities, she said.
There were five grant awards to different providers in the county over the past 10 years, Maki said, connecting about 2,000 homes and businesses with broadband.
Most recently, in January, MiEnergy secured a $14.1 million federal grant to help bring fiber to areas in Winona and Fillmore counties, including properties east of St. Charles, surrounding Utica, east and south of Lewiston and south of I-90. In 2022, Hiawatha Broadband Communications, Inc. (HBC) and Winona County announced they would collaborate on a $2.6 million project to bring broadband to Sylvan Heights, Saratoga, Big Trout Drive, Spillway Drive and the Arches areas. In 2020, with federal funding, HBC expanded existing networks near Pickwick and Rollingstone, as well as in Dakota County. AcenTek received a DEED grant in 2020 to upgrade broadband from copper to fiber-optic cables in Houston and Winona counties. According to HBC, the organization has also expanded the network in Pickwick and Rollingstone by adding 35 homes to fiber optic services with federal funding and, with some state funding, connected 3,000 homes to fiber optic services in Cedar Valley, East Burns Valley, Elba, Pickwick, the Whitewater State Park area, Wilson and Witoka.
With the county’s bluffs and karst landscape, Maki said it can be challenging to put fiber in the ground for broadband access. HBC Community Relations Manager David Dicke agreed that there are parts of the county where that is hard, because of the topography. “You can’t get fiber there because of the rock,” he said. “It’s astronomically expensive and makes it really not feasible financially.” HBC offers a wireless option, HBC Air, Director of Customer Operations Cory Limberg said. “… Where you’ve had some of these farm properties or out in the bluffs, in these areas where they just couldn’t get internet or any reliable cell service, we’ve had a product that our team can go out here and install in grain silos and other areas … where we can get them good internet access,” he said. Another challenge with expanding broadband access is running and managing a network after building it, Limberg said, so HBC considers these factors when weighing where to build. “And we’re in this for the long haul. HBC is not an organization that has been sold and bought and purchased and changed names many times … whereas some of these other companies that come in to build a network may be doing it to just sell it to another company.”
7 communications-related bills getting attention in US House now
The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society report…
On March 4, the House of Representatives’ Commerce Committee, chaired by Rep. Brett Guthrie (R-KY), held a full committee markup to consider twelve bills in total––the committee’s first legislative markup of the 119th Congress.
“This Committee has a rich, bipartisan history, which we will continue in that spirit with the bills we are considering today,” said Rep Guthrie in his opening remarks. “Each of these bipartisan pieces of legislation was passed by the House last Congress, and I am proud that we will be moving these forward again today.”
Here, we look at the seven communications-related bills that are now teed up for a vote from the full House.
I am just going to include the list – the original article offer more detail…
- Precision Agriculture Satellite Connectivity Act
- Institute for Telecommunication Sciences (ITS) Codification Act
- NTIA Policy and Cybersecurity Coordination Act
- Promoting United States Wireless Leadership Act of 2025
- Trans-Atlantic Submarine Fiber Optic Cable
- Understanding Cybersecurity of Mobile Networks Act
- Critical Infrastructure Manufacturing Feasibility Act
Why BEAD Should Continue to Prioritize Fiber?
The Institute for Local Self Reliance has published a policy brief on why BEAD Should Continue to Prioritize Fiber Internet Network Investments…
In designing BEAD, Congress recognized that it was foolish to spend thousands of dollars per home every 5-10 years to deliver obsolete connections and chose instead to build fiber optic networks that will last generations – ultimately both saving taxpayer dollars and delivering an equitable Internet access option to millions of rural homes. To be clear, BEAD’s priority for fiber does not bar the use of other technologies when appropriate. In cases where the cost of fiber is simply too great, other technologies are on the table – likely wireless options of both terrestrial and low-earth orbit.
Fiber does not mean bigger bills to residents…
On the matter of residential pricing, fiber optic networks in rural areas operated by rural cooperatives offer services at prices comparable to or less than that of urban areas. For instance, Paul Bunyan in Minnesota has options starting at $60/mo for 250 Mbps symmetrical and a gigabit for $80. Co-Mo Connect, one of the first electric co-ops to build its entire electric footprint with fiber, starts at $55/mo for 100 Mbps and a gig at $85/mo. Starlink residential prices start at $120/mo for far lower speeds.
Some wireless options are everywhere, but not all of the time…
A final consideration is that some wireless technologies – primarily low-earth orbit and mobile wireless – are not able to serve all homes simultaneously and may not be able to serve all homes in rural America looking for service. Some of these technologies could serve almost anyone, but cannot serve everyone – meaning that some homes will be put on waiting lists when the system reaches max capacity.
EVENT Feb 27: FCC Announces Tentative Agenda for February Open Meeting
It’s always interesting to see what’s on the agenda of a new Administration…
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr announced that the items below are tentatively on the agenda for the February Open Commission Meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 27, 2025:
Enhancing National Security Though the Auctioning of Spectrum Licenses – The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would update 10 year-old AWS-3 service-specific competitive bidding rules to bring those rules in line with current practice as the first step in fulfilling the Commission’s statutory obligation to initiate an auction of licenses for the AWS-3 spectrum in the Commission’s inventory by June 23, 2026, under the Spectrum and Secure Technology and Innovation Act. (GN Docket Nos. 25-70, 25-71, 13-185)
Exploring New Uses for Mid-Band Spectrum in the Upper C-band – The Commission will consider a Notice of Inquiry exploring whether, and if so how, we could free up additional mid-band spectrum for new services in the Upper C-band to meet projected spectrum demand, spur economic growth, and advance American security interests. (GN Docket No. 25-59)
Making Wireless Emergency Alerts More Responsive to Public Safety and Consumer Needs – The Commission will consider a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking intended to give emergency managers and consumers greater customization of the Wireless Emergency Alerts they send and receive, which would increase public safety and reduce consumers opting out of this life-saving service. (PS Docket Nos. 15-91, 15-94)
Strengthening Call Blocking Rules – The Commission will consider a Report and Order that strengthens the Commission’s call blocking rules by expanding the requirement to block calls based on a reasonable do-not-originate list to include all providers in the call path and by designating an exclusive code to notify callers when certain calls are blocked. (CG Docket No. 17-59)
Combatting Loud Commercial Advertisements – The Commission will consider a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would undertake a review of the Commission’s commercial loudness rules, in effect since 2012, and seek comment on the need for updates or changes. (MB Docket No. 25-72)
Public Drafts of Meeting Items – The FCC publicly releases the draft text of each item expected to be considered at the next Open Commission Meeting. One-page cover sheets are included in the public drafts to help summarize each item. All these materials will be available on the FCC’s Open Meeting page: http://www.fcc.gov/openmeeting.
Public Attendance – The Open Meeting is scheduled to commence at 10:30 a.m. ET in the Commission Meeting Room of the Federal Communications Commission, 45 L Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. While the Open Meeting is open to the public, the FCC headquarters building is not open access, and all guests must check in with and be screened by FCC security at the main entrance on L Street. Attendees at the Open Meeting will not be required to have an appointment but must otherwise comply with protocols outlined at: https://www.fcc.gov/visit. Open Meetings are streamed live at www.fcc.gov/live.
Expectations of Trump Administration Broadband policies
Fierce Telecom looks at what the Trump Administration could mean for a number of broadband issues…
First things first. Historically, the party in power has held a 3-2 majority at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), allowing them to carry out the president’s policy agenda. Traditionally, the sitting chair has stepped down, allowing the President to pick a new FCC chief.
So, with Trump in the White House, that means the FCC will be Republican-led and likely by sitting Commissioner Brendan Carr. Though Trump hasn’t specified his choice for FCC chair, Carr is the most senior Republican on the Commission and analysts have singled him out as the probable pick.
For USF (Universal Service Fund)…
On the Universal Service Fund front, reform could also come via a Republican-led Congress, according to Ted Hearn, Policyband publisher and former VP of industry association ACA Connects. …
Instead of relying on fees from broadband providers or big tech, Cruz has argued the USF should be funded via appropriations from Congress. That way, lawmakers can keep a closer eye on where the money goes and what rules are set for broadband programs under the FCC.
For wireless…
But back to Carr’s potential agenda. In the Project 2025 document, Carr also advocates for the FCC to free up more spectrum for wireless service, though it’s unclear how it would do this given the agency’s auction authority lapsed in March 2023 and has yet to be renewed.
Carr also indicated Republicans should eliminate policies which allow broadband funding to be used for overbuilding and improve coordination on spectrum policy and infrastructure spending.
For BEAD and Net Neutrality…
Project 2025 aside, Carr has also opposed net neutrality rules adopted by the FCC, as well as rules designed to regulate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in political ads.
Additionally, he argued against the FCC’s decision to revoke Starlink’s $885 million Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) subsidy award, calling it “regulatory harassment” of Starlink owner Elon Musk. Why does that matter? Well, Musk potentially has a lot to gain should policy for the $42 billion Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) Program swing in favor of Starlink’s satellite service. Granted the FCC isn’t in charge of administering BEAD – the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is – but Musk would likely find an ally in Carr.
Comcast accelerates broadband deployment with fixed wireless access and fiber
Comcast’s CFO Jason Armstrong said that two years ago the company used to increase its broadband footprint by passing 800,000 more homes per year, but now it’s pacing at around 1.2 million new homes passed yearly.
Speaking on the company’s third quarter 2024 earnings call, Armstrong reiterated what Comcast executives have been saying for several quarters now — that fixed wireless access (FWA) and fiber are its two key competitors in terms of technology.
During Fierce Networks’ recent Broadband Nation Expo, Jason Livingood, VP of Technology Policy, Products and Standards with Comcast, said the company has been focused on building in rural areas over the last couple of years, and Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment (BEAD) grants will drive even more. “Luckily, we’ve got teams that have experience with underground and aerial,” said Livingood.
He said hybrid fiber coax (HFC) is only deployed in greenfield areas “in a small number of cases” where it just makes more sense with other DOCSIS infrastructure nearby.
While Comcast is dealing with fiber competitors — and deploying some fiber, itself — the company is also facing pressure from fixed wireless access (FWA) encroachers.
They also talked about loss of the Affordable Connectivity Program…
The analysts at New Street Research estimate that Comcast lost 14,000 ACP subs in the first quarter. And Comcast says in addition to the 32,000 subs it lost in Q3, it also counted 64,000 ACP losses that it anticipates in the fourth quarter. In all, it appears that Comcast will lose about 110,000 ACP subs in total or about 8% of its total ACP base of 1.4 million.
EarthLink buys Nextera Communications in Minnesota
US independent ISP EarthLink has announced the acquisition of Nextera Communications, a Minnesota-based provider of fixed wireless, voice, and data services. This is EarthLink’s fifth acquisition this past year.
Effective immediately, Earthlink said the transaction underscores its ambition towards organic growth in the fixed wireless sector, and its aim to establish the largest, most reliable network nationwide.