A study conducted on behalf of Amdocs finds that consumers value reliability, affordability, and uninterrupted access — and suggests that providers may benefit by offering all three via mixed-technology networks. …
Cable has the highest level of internet access (39%). It is followed by fiber (31%) and FWA (9%). The study found that 3% of consumers do not have a dedicated internet connection at home.
Fully 60% of respondents say their home internet is very reliable, but at the same time cite cost as the biggest issue. Commentary in the press release says that this illustrates the need to balance performance with affordability.
Overall, the priorities are closely divided. An equal percent (38%) of consumers prioritize speed and reliability when choosing a provider. The study commentary suggests that CSPs can put together offerings in their networks that eliminate trade-offs.
FWA and satellite broadband are the new kids on the block. Amdocs says that FWA is emerging as a strong competitor but that more than half of consumers — 47% — have never heard of it.
The broadband satellite sector is even newer. The survey found that 67% of consumers would consider switching if it provides a comparable experience. Concerns about cost, reliability, and speed persist. The study found that 37% of consumers are unfamiliar with satellite Internet. This, Amdocs Research says, points to an education gap about the technology.
Category Archives: Satellite
FCC approves SpaceX’s direct-to-cell Starlink-T-Mobile satellite service at higher power levels
The Federal Communications Commission has approved SpaceX’s request to operate its direct-to-cell Starlink-T-Mobile satellite service at higher power levels.
That’s despite the strong objections of AT&T, Verizon, and EchoStar, who found that the decision could degrade terrestrial mobile network performance. AT&T had submitted an analysis predicting an 18% drop in throughput in areas affected by SpaceX’s emissions.
The FCC granted the conditional waiver March 7, with one condition: SpaceX must mitigate any interference issues or risk losing the waiver entirely.
Trump Administration eliminates preference for fiber in BEAD grants, opens the door to satellite
The Trump administration is eliminating a preference for fiber Internet in a $42.45 billion broadband deployment program, a change that is expected to reduce spending on the most advanced wired networks while directing more money to Elon Musk’s Starlink and other non-fiber Internet service providers. One report suggests Starlink could obtain $10 billion to $20 billion under the new rules.
Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick criticized the Biden administration’s handling of the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program in a statement yesterday. Lutnick said that “because of the prior Administration’s woke mandates, favoritism towards certain technologies, and burdensome regulations, the program has not connected a single person to the Internet and is in dire need of a readjustment.”
The BEAD program was authorized by Congress in November 2021, and the US was finalizing plans to distribute funding before Trump’s inauguration. The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), part of the Commerce Department, developed rules for the program in the Biden era and approved initial funding plans submitted by every state and territory.
Advocacy concerned the Feds will steer BEAD funding to Musk
The Voice of Alexandria reports…
An internet rights group on Tuesday raised alarm over reports the United States may steer billions of dollars to Elon Musk’s Starlink by making changes to a rural broadband deployment program.
Net neutrality supporter Free Press spoke out after the Wall Street Journal reported that the Department of Commerce could set Musk up for a windfall by overhauling a $42.5 billion program established under former President Joe Biden to bring broadband internet service to rural parts of the country.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has told staff he plans to significantly increase the share of money available to satellite-internet providers such as Starlink rather than firms that use fiber-optic cables to deliver high-speed internet service, the Journal reported, citing people familiar with the situation.
Starlink is a unit of Musk’s SpaceX company.
Musk — the world’s wealthiest person and a top donor to Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign — has status as a “special government employee” and “senior adviser to the president.”
Trump put Musk in charge of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency that has been slashing the ranks of US agencies under the auspices of budget cutting.
“The Trump administration is undermining an essential bipartisan program designed to bring reliable and affordable broadband to tens of millions of Americans — and it’s doing so just to line Elon Musk’s already bulging pockets,” Free Press co-chief Craig Aaron said in a statement.
The Commerce Department did not respond to a request for comment.
Why BEAD Should Continue to Prioritize Fiber?
The Institute for Local Self Reliance has published a policy brief on why BEAD Should Continue to Prioritize Fiber Internet Network Investments…
In designing BEAD, Congress recognized that it was foolish to spend thousands of dollars per home every 5-10 years to deliver obsolete connections and chose instead to build fiber optic networks that will last generations – ultimately both saving taxpayer dollars and delivering an equitable Internet access option to millions of rural homes. To be clear, BEAD’s priority for fiber does not bar the use of other technologies when appropriate. In cases where the cost of fiber is simply too great, other technologies are on the table – likely wireless options of both terrestrial and low-earth orbit.
Fiber does not mean bigger bills to residents…
On the matter of residential pricing, fiber optic networks in rural areas operated by rural cooperatives offer services at prices comparable to or less than that of urban areas. For instance, Paul Bunyan in Minnesota has options starting at $60/mo for 250 Mbps symmetrical and a gigabit for $80. Co-Mo Connect, one of the first electric co-ops to build its entire electric footprint with fiber, starts at $55/mo for 100 Mbps and a gig at $85/mo. Starlink residential prices start at $120/mo for far lower speeds.
Some wireless options are everywhere, but not all of the time…
A final consideration is that some wireless technologies – primarily low-earth orbit and mobile wireless – are not able to serve all homes simultaneously and may not be able to serve all homes in rural America looking for service. Some of these technologies could serve almost anyone, but cannot serve everyone – meaning that some homes will be put on waiting lists when the system reaches max capacity.
SpaceX Authorized for Operations at Lower Altitudes
I’m borrowing the Benton Institute for Broadband & Society’s recap of the FCC reports…
The Federal Communications Commission’s Space Bureau granted the application of Space Exploration Holdings, LLC (SpaceX) to construct, deploy, and operate a constellation of second generation non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) fixed-satellite service (FSS) satellites, known as its Gen2 Starlink constellation. The Bureau also granted SpaceX’s application to provide Supplemental Coverage from Space (SCS) within the United States and to operate on certain frequency bands for the purpose of performing direct-to-cellular (direct-to-cell) operations outside the United States using its previously authorized 7,500 Gen2 Starlink satellites and granted SpaceX’s modification application to operate using V-band frequencies at altitudes ranging from 340 km to 360 km. The FCC authorizes SpaceX to operate its previously authorized 7,500 Gen2 Starlink satellites at the previously proposed altitudes of 340 km, 345 km, 350 km, and 360 km. SpaceX is authorized to communicate with these satellites in the previously authorized Ku-, Ka-, E-, and V-band frequencies, in conformance with the technical specifications SpaceX has provided to the FCC the conditions previously placed on its authorizations, and new conditions the FCC now places on SpaceX. SpaceX is also authorized to conduct operations using its very high frequency (VHF) beacons at altitudes of 340 km, 345 km, 350 km, and 360 km, again, subject to conditions. Authorization to permit SpaceX to operate up to 7,500 Gen2 satellites in lower altitude shells will enable SpaceX to begin providing lower-latency satellite service to support growing demand in rural and remote areas that lack terrestrial wireless service options. The FCC decided that this action will facilitate SpaceX’s operations for its Gen2 system, which the FCC previously found would bring improved broadband connectivity to unserved and underserved areas of the United States.
I have highlighted the last portion; it seems to be lining up SpaceX technology for BEAD funding.
Doug Dawson looks at history of Starlink and RDOF and how that may impact BEAD funding
Doug Dawson describes how Starlink being denied RDOF awards might have opened the door to even greater opportunities for the satellite provider through BEAD, despite the fact that the reasons they were denied have not been entirely resolved…
The FCC finally decided to reject Starlink on the speed issue. When Starlink applied to enter the RDOF reverse auction, it said it could meet the 100/20 Mbps speed goal. And it looked for a while like it might. In the first quarter of 2021, Ookla says Starlink had an average U.S. speed of 66/16 Mbps but improved to 91/11 Mbps by the second quarter of 2022. However, since then, the speeds have slipped, and for the whole U.S. Ookla says speeds were 67/8 Mbps at the end of 2023 and a little slower in the first quarter of 2024.
Starlink has done a phenomenal job launching satellites and now has 6,371 functional satellites in orbit. But Starlink is like any ISP might be a victim of its own success – the slower speeds over time probably reflects that the number of customers has outpaced the number of satellites. The FCC was justified in rejecting the RDOF on the speed issue – the FCC 100/20 Mbps goal was not aspirational, but a real technical requirement.
The FCC could also have rejected Starlink on the coverage issue as well. One of the benefits of winning the RDOF subsidy is that winners were protected from any other ISPs receiving subsidies to build in the same Census blocks. For all practical purposes, RDOF winners in rural places were granted a monopoly – but for that award they were expected to be able to serve everybody.
In the early years, when it didn’t have a lot of satellites, Starlink put prospective customers on a wait list. The wait lists have disappeared, and Starlink is now willing to serve almost everybody in the U.S. – although there are a few places with geographical challenges where the company doesn’t claim the ability to serve.
The issue with coverage is that not everybody is a good candidate for Starlink. I live on a steep hill and am surrounded by other hills in all directions. I would guess that 35% to 45% of my view of the sky is blocked. My situation is not unusual in Appalachia, and much of the mountainous West and Southwest. If Starlink had only applied for RDOF in relatively flat areas, this would not have been an issue. However, Starlink won a lot of geography in RDOF in places like western North Carolina and the rest of Appalachia.
Starlink reception is also hindered by heavy foliage. The suggested solution for this is to put the receiver where this is not an issue. But there were places in the RDOF award areas that are fully covered by a forest canopy.
Interestingly, Starlink is back in the conversation in the BEAD grant process. Those awards are supposed to bring a broadband solution to every unserved and underserved location in the country. In every market, there are some locations where building other technologies is infeasible. NTIA prudently decided recently that Starlink is probably the only realistic solution for such places.
Unfortunately, some states say they don’t have enough money to reach everybody with fiber and/or wireless, and Starlink might get the final laugh by winning more subsidy from BEAD grants than it was denied for RDOF.
Starlink charges $100 “congestion charge” – MN not listed in states with extra charge
Starlink has added a $100 “congestion charge” to certain new subscribers of their Residential Services.
The one-time fee applies to new service plans within areas of “network congestion.” The Support section of the Starlink website provides details of the new charge.
“In areas with network congestion, there is an additional one-time charge to purchase Starlink Residential services. This fee will only apply if you are purchasing or activating a new service plan. If you change your Service address or Service Plan at a later date, you may be charged the congestion fee,” the post reads.
PCMag.com first reported the Starlink news last week, writing that the charge seems to be occurring to customers in several states including “Texas, Florida, Kansas, Ohio and Virginia, among others, which have slower Starlink speeds due to the limited network capacity.” The post also referenced a 2022 article on PCMag.com, which claimed that Starlink’s massive growth had resulted in congestion and slow speeds for some users.
The caveats of the new congestion charge are further clarified on Starlink’s website: “Our intention is to no longer charge this fee to new customers as soon as network capacity improves. If you’re not satisfied with Starlink and return it within the 30-day return window, the charge will be refunded.”
Low Orbit Satellites not good for the Ozone Layer
There was a paper published in June in the peer-reviewed Geophysical Research Letters titled Potential Ozone Depletion from Satellite Demise During Atmospheric Reentry in the Era of Mega-Constellations.
As can be deduced by the lengthy title, the scientists have uncovered a new risk coming from the reentry of low-orbit satellites through the atmosphere. Scientists at the University of Southern California Department of Astronautical Engineering are reporting the increased risk to the ozone layer by the upcoming massive increase in the number of satellites that will be returning to earth each year.
Low-orbit satellites contain a lot of aluminum, and when a satellite falls to Earth it creates aluminum oxide, which results in a chemical reaction that kills ozone. The issue doesn’t just arise at the time that a satellite falls to Earth, because the aluminum oxide particles can linger for up to five years as the particles slowly fall out of orbit.
This is a serious problem…
Depletion of the ozone layer is a serious problem, and a complete destruction of ozone would end most life on the planet since the ozone protects us from cosmic radiation and ultraviolet light coming from the sun. Even a partial depletion means increased skin cancers, cataracts, and damage to marine organisms, plants, and plastics. The planet has come a long way towards stopping depletion of the ozone layer with the Montreal Protocol in 1989 that phased out CFCs and other chemicals that deplete ozone. This treaty resulted in reducing harmful chemicals by 95%. In 2013, scientists predicted that we were a few decades away from the full recovery of the ozone layer.
This issue points out that there are often unintended consequences from any major deployment of a new technology. It’s impossible to deny the huge benefits of low-orbit satellites, and it seems likely that nobody saw this coming. This is obviously an issue that must be addressed, now that the problem has been identified. Perhaps it will be as simple as reducing or eliminating aluminum from low-orbit satellites. But the time to fix this is before there are tens of thousands of satellites in orbit.
Comcast to partner with Starlink to provider satellite to businesses with remote locations.
Comcast Business today announced a strategic agreement with Starlink, a leader in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite technology, to provide connectivity solutions to Comcast Business enterprise customers. The collaboration enables advanced satellite capabilities in Comcast Business’ Managed Connectivity portfolio to deliver fast and reliable connectivity that supports a range of business applications for enterprise customers, including those with locations in underserved regions.
Enterprises operating multiple, disparate locations are faced with unique connectivity challenges, particularly those with locations where traditional networks do not reach. From geographic limitations to scalability concerns and reliability issues, these companies face challenges less commonly encountered by their counterparts in more densely populated areas. Comcast Business’ collaboration with Starlink will address the demand for reliable, managed connectivity for these enterprise customers, as well as offer an innovative solution for enterprises looking to enhance network redundancy.
Phone satellite coverage may soon come to Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness
I might have pointed out the increased safety of phone access, but Minneapolis Star Tribune started differently…
The days of peaceful, internet-free camping trips in the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness may soon be over.
Tech companies will soon offer satellite service to ordinary cell phones that would improve coverage and safety in remote areas — including in some of Minnesota’s most beautifully remote regions. It also means travelers could be subject to a barrage of calls and texts while trying to escape the hustle and bustle of modern life.
Service currently extends as far as the Gunflint Trail, where AT&T installed a 200-foot cell tower in 2020 following controversy among those who prefer that the region stays off the grid.
AT&T and AST SpaceMobile announced an agreement on Wednesday to provide their first space-based broadband network to ordinary cell phones. AST SpaceMobile plans to deliver five commercial satellites to Cape Canaveral for launch into low Earth orbit as soon as this summer.
Solar storms bring beautiful Northern Lights in MN but disrupt precision agriculture
While most of us were gleefully chasing down the Northern Lights last weekend, the New York Times (via Yahoo News) reports on another side…
The powerful geomagnetic storm that cast the northern lights’ vivid colors across the Northern Hemisphere over the weekend also caused some navigational systems in tractors and other farming equipment to break down at the height of planting season, suppliers and farmers said.
Many farmers have come to rely on the equipment, which uses GPS and other navigational technology and helps them to plant more efficiently and precisely by keeping rows straight and avoiding gaps or overlap. But over the weekend, some of those operations in the Midwest, as well as in other parts of the United States and Canada, temporarily ground to a halt.
In Minnesota, some farmers who had planned to spend Friday night sowing seeds were hamstrung by the outages. “I’ve never dealt with anything like this,” said Patrick O’Connor, owner of a farm about 80 miles south of Minneapolis that mainly grows corn and soybean.
O’Connor said that after being rained out for two weeks, he got into his tractor around 5 p.m., hoping to spend the night planting corn. When he received a warning about his GPS system, he called a technical help line and was directed to a message saying there was an outage and nothing could be done to fix it.
Ag Web talked about what it means for farmers…
It’s all happening right as farmers are rushing to get the 2024 crop planted.
“The good news is those radio blackouts for GPS may only last for a few hours or half a day,” says Dr. Terry Griffin a Professor & Cropping Systems Economist at Kansas State University. “My message is: if this is a radio blackout then patience is your best bet. Go check the NOAA website and if the planetary K-Index is red instead of green then go have an early lunch.”
Beyond the inconvenience of delayed field work, there could be real dollars lost to such an extended outage.
From an agricultural perspective, Dr. Griffin has been studying the economic impacts of GPS outages for several years. He’s found that even a few hours to half a day of lost GPS signal can come with a cost for farmers. That’s especially true for farmers who miss an optimum planting or harvesting window. Pushing field work later into the season can ultimately cost them yield and performance during the season.
“There are there are some real penalties and real dollars that come into effect when we’re not able to do field work,” Dr. Griffin said.
That said, it depends on the time of year and the regions impacted. A January disruption would likely have less impact than one during planting or harvest.
Dr. Griffin says while GPS satellites have been in use and in orbit for many years – the first launched in 1978 – civilian use of GPS is relatively new.
He believes these new space weather events will come with a learning curve.“This was the first solar cycle maximum we’ve had that’s going to be big with satellite communications,” Dr. Griffin said. “So, we’re going to find out some things.”
It’s not yet archived but an hour ago, I heard on MPR an interview with the MN farmer from the NY Times article. He talked about how it isn’t just a matter of using the GPS to make sure the rows in the field are straight. The GPS helps keep track of the soil quality, historical needs of the plants and more and distributes seeds and nutrients based location. So it made sense to wait until the solar storm was over rather than forge ahead using “tradition” sowing practices.
Also when asked if he thought this might happen again, the farmer said yes – if it’s happened once, it will likely happen again.
Interesting both in terms of the things the engineers and scientists need to learn about all aspects of precision agriculture and the value that the farmers put on using precision ag tools!
FCC dismisses Starlink’s spectrum application
Starlink’s mobile ambitions were dealt at least a temporary blow yesterday when the Federal Communications Commission dismissed SpaceX’s application to use several spectrum bands for mobile service.
SpaceX is seeking approval to use up to 7,500 second-generation Starlink satellites with spectrum in the 1.6 GHz, 2 GHz, and 2.4 GHz bands. SpaceX could still end up getting what it wants but will have to go through new rulemaking processes in which the FCC will evaluate whether the spectrum bands can handle the system without affecting existing users.
The FCC Space Bureau’s ruling dismissed the SpaceX application yesterday as “unacceptable for filing.” The application was filed over a year ago.
The FCC said the SpaceX requests “do not substantially comply with Commission requirements established in rulemaking proceedings which determined that the 1.6/2.4 GHz and 2 GHz bands are not available for additional MSS [mobile-satellite service] applications.”
But the FCC yesterday also issued two public notices seeking comment on SpaceX petitions to revise the commission’s spectrum-sharing rules for the bands. Dish Network and Globalstar oppose the SpaceX requests, and SpaceX will have to prove to the FCC that its plan won’t cause harmful interference to other systems.
SpaceX introduces SATCOM, akin to Starlink for precision agriculture
A deal announced today between SpaceX and John Deere illustrates another opportunity for SpaceX’s Starlink low-earth orbit satellite service – providing connectivity to support precision agriculture. John Deere is using the name SATCOM for the Starlink service, which is expected to be available in the second half of 2024.
John Deere needs internet connectivity to support communications between the John Deere Operations Center, which is the cloud that supports the company’s precision ag offerings, and the company’s autonomous tractors and other precision agriculture applications that the company offers.
As John Deere notes in its announcement about the service, not every farmer has good cellular connectivity. Accordingly, the SpaceX Starlink service provides connectivity between the farmer and the John Deere cloud.
John Deere dealers will install a ruggedized Starlink terminal, along with a 4G LTE JDLink modem, on farm equipment requiring connectivity to the cloud.
FCC says Starlink is ineligible for $900M in RDOF subsidies
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the US has announced not to award Elon Musk’s Starlink nearly $900 million subsidy for expanding broadband service in rural areas, based on its failure to meet the basic programme requirements.
The ‘Universal Service Fund’ programme, which uses funding collected from consumers, sought to expand access to broadband networks in rural areas.
“The FCC followed a careful legal, technical and policy review to determine that this applicant (Starlink) had failed to meet its burden to be entitled to nearly $900 million in universal service funds for almost a decade, ” said FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel.
The agency qualified Starlink at the short-form stage, but at the long-form stage, the Commission determined that Starlink failed to demonstrate that it could deliver the promised service.
“Funding these vast proposed networks would not be the best use of limited Universal Service Fund dollars to bring broadband to unserved areas across the US, ” the Commission noted.
And more details from Broadband Communities…
The FCC has reaffirmed a prior decision to reject Starlink’s application to receive public support through the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund program.
The decision was announced by the FCC in the form of a statement, released Dec. 12, which accompanied the release of an Order on Review that resulted in a decision to uphold the denial of Starlink’s application.
FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel’s statements were included in the FCC’s recent announcement. She said the FCC “followed a careful legal, technical and policy review to determine that this applicant had failed to meet its burden to be entitled to nearly $900 million in universal service funds for almost a decade.”
The original decision to deny Starlink’s application was made by the Wireline Bureau in August 2022. At the time, Rosenworcel said Starlink’s technology “has real promise,” but she raised concerns as well.
“The question before us was whether to publicly subsidize (Starlink’s) still developing technology for consumer broadband—which requires that users purchase a $600 dish—with nearly $900 million in universal service funds until 2032,” she previously said in August 2022, according to an FCC announcement about Starlink’s original denial.