Lyon County Broadband Profile 2025: Red rating: Ranking out 51 of 87

Rank: 51
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Lyon 86.36 63 85.89 51 12.97 86 14

Lyon County: Incremental upgrades

Lyon County’s broadband percentage has remained stagnant for four years, and has actually dipped this year, although within an acceptable margin. That and limited potential support from BEAD means they retain their Red status.

Lyon County has been in potentially precarious position because there is a big discrepancy between wireline access and wireline with fixed wireless, which impacts their BEAD eligibility.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 22 locations in Lyn County and that is all for satellite access, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Lyon has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards . So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 85.89 86.83 86.81 84.27 82.31 79.92 81.89 72.77 0
25/3 (2022 goal) 86.36 87.21 87.07 85.29 84.52 85.82 85.8 80.71 72.37

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Lyon: 22
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Lyon                                      20                                         2                                      22 Lyon

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Aitkin $7,5000 was invested in one project over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $10.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Lyon ranked 84th using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • Woodstock Telephone Company – Lynd FTTP – GRANT $325,548 (Lyon County) – This middle and last mile project will serve 203 underserved households, three underserved businesses and three underserved anchor institutions in the City of Lynd in Lyon County.
  • 2017 – MVTC (Minnesota Valley Telephone Company, Inc.) – Milroy Broadband Project – GRANT $742,365
  • 2017 – Woodstock Telephone Company – Balaton FTTP – GRANT $413,009
  • 2016 – MIDCO CANBY TO MARSHALL MIDDLE MILE AND LAST MILE – GRANT AMOUNT: $623,000
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Lyon County (http://tinyurl.com/hzlzzvs)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Lake County Broadband Profile 2025: Red rating: Ranking out 69 of 87

Rank: 69
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Lake 80.11 76 80.02 69 74.71 24 10

Lake County: Seems to be going backwards

Lake County seems to be losing ground. I’m sure this is part of a map correction but it’s disheartening. It is the reason they retain their Red status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 1,360 locations in Lake County. However, the majority of locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Lake has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So perhaps that’s a strategy worth considering.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 80.02 82.54 88.56 84.15 93.32 93.39 93.4 94.3 94.32
25/3 (2022 goal) 80.11 82.61 88.59 84.2 93.34 93.85 93.86 94.3 94.32

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Lake: 1,360
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Mediacom LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Lake                              1,124                                   204                                      26                                         6                              1,360 Lake

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Aitkin 0 was invested over the years. (But they did invest in a large federal grant years ago.)

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • Over the years, Lake County (or cities within) has not invested matches for any successful MN Broadband grants. But they received an American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) award in 2010 to build Fiber to the Home (FTTH).
  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $7.6 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Lake ranked 37 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • In 2010, Lake County received an ARRA award of $66.3 million to improve broadband access in their area; about $10 million of the award was an outright grant; the rest was a low-interest loan. There were bumps along the road to getting fiber to the community but now they are well served.

Find more articles on broadband in Lake County (http://tinyurl.com/j7pu3le)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Koochiching County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 71 of 87

Rank: 71
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Koochiching 81.11 73 79.7 71 68.78 33 10

Koochiching County: incremental increases

Koochiching County saw some increased access in 2025, but it’s still less than 80 percent, which is not good, which is how they retain their Red status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 1,689 locations in Koochiching County. Most locations will get fiber majority but some of locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Koochiching has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that may be a strategy to consider.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 79.7 74.92 73.83 72.3 72.85 68.6 73.41 73.44 68.55
25/3 (2022 goal) 81.11 76.94 76.37 75.8 80.2 81.57 81.22 73.5 68.6

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Koochiching: 1,689
The locations include a mix of fiber and satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC PAUL BUNYAN COMMUNICATIONS Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Wikstrom Telephone Company Inc Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber
Koochiching                                   683                                      517                                   166                                   323                              1,689 Koochiching

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Koochiching $26,000 was invested in one program over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $16.9 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants

  • 2023: Koochiching County – Koochiching County International Falls Economic Development – GRANT $77,300
  • 2015 – Midcontinent Little Fork Middle Mile – Grant award: $277,448
  • Paul Bunyan Communications – North Central Minnesota Fiber Project– GRANT $2,562,916

Find more articles on broadband in Koochiching. (http://tinyurl.com/gom8mqy)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Jackson County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 83 of 87

Rank: 83
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Jackson 73.84 83 72.89 80 72.89 26 16

Jackson County sees improvements

Jackson County saw a nice increase in broadband in 2025, which is a nice change from stagnation and even going backwards.

Looking last year we saw that Jackson County was in a precarious position when it comes to federal (BEAD) funding because looking at access in Chippewa County using the FCC National Map there is a big discrepancy between wireline access (60.86) percent coverage) and wireline with fixed wireless (97.86 percent). Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding, which may explain why Jackson only had bids on 197 locations. (At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved.) Most of the locations will get fiber; the rest will fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Jackson has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

I wish I could color Jackson Orange, rather than keep them in red but with limited prospects proposed in BEAD, they retain their Red status.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 72.89 60.86 62.34 61.98 68.84 68.84 68.84 68.79 68.9
25/3 (2022 goal) 73.84 62.7 63.88 63.8 69.86 70.05 70.42 68.83 68.9

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Jackson: 197
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet Federated Rural Electric Association Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Fixed Wireless Fiber
Jackson                                      22                                   175                                   197 Jackson

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Jackson 0 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $15.9 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Jackson ranked 84th using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • 2023: Federated Rural Electric Assoc. – Jackson County Fiber-To-The-Premises – GRANT $7,068,222
  • In 2010, Southwest Minnesota Broadband Services (SMBS) received ARRA funds to deploy fiber to the home in Jackson and other counties. Through SMBS, Jackson County was also part of the Blandin Broadband Communities initiative in 2015-2016
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Jackson County. (http://tinyurl.com/h3vyqx9)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Goodhue County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 72 of 87

Rank: 72
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Goodhue 80.57 74 79.15 72 71.51 30 20

Goodhue County: still holding onto haves and have-nots

Goodhue County’s broadband access has been stagnant for several years. Access has declined in the last year, although within an acceptable margin.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 2,302 locations in Goodhue County. Some of the locations will get fiber but a majority of locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Goodhue has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Stagnation and mixed expectations with BEAD disbursement keep Goodhue at a Red status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 79.15 80.13 80.51 78.56 76.09 75.15 71.84 55.99 60.33
25/3 (2022 goal) 80.57 81.95 82.14 81.78 81.66 83.9 79.44 77.1 87.46

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Anoka: 2,302
The locations include fiber as well as satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Midco Nuvera Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Goodhue                              1,098                                   825                                   102                                   257                                      20                              2,302 Goodhue

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Goodhue, 15,000 was invested for one project over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $33 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Goodhue ranked 11 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Nuvera White Rock
    Grant: $1,884,429, Local Match: $628,143, Total Budget: $2,512,572
  • 2022: $4 million grant Red Wing Ignite received to encourage broadband-based entrepreneurship and innovation
  • 2017 – Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Wanamingo – GRANT $768,600
  • 2017 – New Ulm Telecom, Inc. – White Rock Rural East FTTP – GRANT $411,704
  • 2016 – NEW ULM TELECOM, INC. GOODHUE-BELLECHESTER – GRANT: $ 332,328
  • 2015 – New Ulm Telecom Goodhue Fiber Project – Grant award: $115,934
  • BEVCOMM (Pine Island Telephone Company) – NE Pine Island Fiber Project Phase I – GRANT $222,222
  • Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Goodhue Welch FTTP – GRANT $340,790 This last mile project south of Welch will serve 100 unserved and 15 underserved locations in Goodhue County.
  • Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Goodhue West FTTP – GRANT $532,232 – This last mile project will serve 148 unserved and two underserved locations in Goodhue, Zumbrota, Minneola, and Belle Creek townships in Goodhue County and Chester Township in Wabasha County.

Find more articles on broadband in Goodhue County. (http://tinyurl.com/z3jwte4)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Freeborn County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 36 of 87

Rank: 36
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Freeborn 89.76 47 88.72 43 88.55 15 15

Freeborn County: Slow progress

Freeborn County has been stagnant for several years. Access has declined in the last year, although within an acceptable margin.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 0 locations in Freeborn County.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Freeborn has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems like a new route to consider.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

After a few years of stagnation and no prospects with BEAD funding, Freeborn has slipped to Red status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 88.72 89.55 89.1 86.36 85.89 84.51 83.88 34.18 94.59
25/3 (2022 goal) 89.76 90.52 89.96 86.98 88 87.94 87.92 84.31 99.44

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Freeborn: 0

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Freeborn has not invested over the years.

No New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $12.6 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Freeborn ranked 52 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

They had the unfortunate distinction from Recon Analytics to be named the unhappiest broadband county in the US.

Past Grants:

  • Blue Earth Valley Telephone Company Faribault County Fiber Expansion Project – Final Phase
    Grant: $1,779,163, Local Match: $5,337,488, Total Budget: $7,116,651
  • 2022: ReConnect program, will help connect over 6,000 people, 150 businesses, and 680 farms across Freeborn, Morrison, Stearns, Houston, and Todd counties.
  • 2017 – BEVCOMM (Cannon Valley Telephone) – Freeborn Southwest Rural Final – GRANT $122,460
  • 2016 – CANNON VALLEY TELECOM, INC. (DBA BEVCOMM) RURAL FREEBORN – GRANT:  $150,700
  • 2015 – BEVCOMM Cannon Valley Telecom – Rural Freeborn Fiber-to-the-Premises Project – Grant award: $149,625
  • Freeborn is also getting almost $2 million in FCC funding but that is over the next 10 years.
  • Winnebago Cooperative Telecom Association – SE Faribault/W Freeborn County FTTP – GRANT $953,842 This last-mile fiber optic project will bring service to 319 unserved locations, including 289 homes, 16 businesses, 11 farms, and three community anchor institutions in the townships of Clark, Foster, Kiester, Seely, Alden, Carlston, Manchester, Mansfield, and Pickerel Lake located in Southeastern Faribault and Western Freeborn counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Freeborn County. (http://tinyurl.com/hw7ptnz)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Cottonwood County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 77 of 87

Rank: 77
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Cottonwood 78.57 79 73.21 78 55.59 50 17

 Cottonwood County: still stagnant

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 649 locations in Cottonwood County. The majority of locations will get fiber, just a few will get fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Cottonwood has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.) Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

With little movement, Cottonwood retains their Red status.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 73.21 68.46 67.15 67.02 67.2 66.67 66.67 66.34 19.24
25/3 (2022 goal) 78.57 76.27 74.17 74.11 71.12 72.79 74.17 67.89 60.52

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Cottonwood: 649
The locations include a majority fiber connections.

County AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet Federated Rural Electric Association Nuvera Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber
Cottonwood                                         4                                   576                                      69                                   649 Cottonwood

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

Cottonwood has not invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $14.8 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • Hanson Communications – Hanson – Comfrey FTTP
    Grant: $395,138, Local Match: $592,711, Total Budget: $987,849
  • 2016 – WOODSTOCK TELEPHONE WESTBROOK – GRANT: $412,391
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080
  • 2010 – ARRA funding for City of Windom – SWMBG will build FTTP (Fiber to the Premise) infrastructure to eight rural communities in Southwestern Minnesota.

Find more articles on broadband in Cottonwood County. (http://tinyurl.com/gnqcknv)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Cass County Broadband Profile 2025: Red Rating: Ranking out 84 of 87

Rank: 84
Code:  Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Cass 89.67 48 70.59 84 43.51 59 15

Cass County: back to bottom 10 ranking

After some increase in coverage last year, Cass County stays stagnant in 2025.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 91 locations in Cass County. Some locations will get fiber and some locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute. But the notable fact is that they will only get help for 91 locations.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Cass has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful except that Line Extension is meant for last mile and Cass doesn’t have a lot of infrastructure to extend..) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Unfortunately, Cass if going to retain their Red status. I just don’t see anything in their current or proposed future that would indicate the needed increase in broadband to meet state goals.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 70.59 69.15 56.15 56.37 64.02 63.21 51.61 35.92 34.07
25/3 (2022 goal) 89.67 89.15 91.79 96.44 94.02 84.53 88.02 77.58 66.92

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Cass: 91
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections. But what’s really telling is that only 91 locations have bids in an area that’s so unserved.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC CTC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Cass                                      46                                      42                                         3                                      91 Cass

 

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Aitkin $125,000 was invested on one project over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • One concern over the years is that they have had decent access to 25/3 for many years, which may make some people feel complacent with the access they have and then broadband dips in community priority.

Past Grants:

  • 2-22: Consolidated Telephone Company (CTC) was one of the grant recipients, receiving $4,857,030 in funding (to cover St. Louis, Carlton, and Cass counties)
  • 2016 – TDS TELECOM CASS & CROW WING COUNTIES — GRANT: $3,000,000
  • 2014 – Consolidated Telephone Cooperative, Region 5 Virtual Highway Project – Award $2 million
  • 2020: CTC received CARES Act funding from both Crow Wing and Cass County.
  • 2019: Paul Bunyan Communications – North Central Minnesota Fiber Project– GRANT $2,562,916
  • 2019: WCTA (West Central Telephone Association) – Rural Staples Phase I Project – GRANT $555,355
  • West Central Telephone Association – Rural Staples Phase 2 – GRANT $465,050 This last mile project will serve 56 unserved locations in extremely rural areas of Wadena and Cass counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Cass County. (http://tinyurl.com/hgtulgm)

The maps below on the left comes from the Office of Broadband Development interactive map, reflecting data updated on December 16, 2024. Red dots represent locations unserved locations. Above I have tracked wireline access because that is the Minnesota definition of broadband. The info below includes wired and wireless. BEAD includes fixed wireless connections as served locations. (I wrote more on the distinction between the two last year, which may be if interest in the numbers range greatly for your county.)

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)