New MN Bill: Minnesota Digital Choice Act with personal digital data (SF4100)

The Minnesota Senate will hear about the following this morning:

Commerce and Consumer Protection

Chair: Senator Matt D. Klein

Location: G-15 Capitol

Public Notice Date: 2026-04-23 11:29 AM

Documents added Revision 4

Testifiers must be in person.
Other items may be added to the agenda.
The number of testifiers and length of time permitted is at the discretion of the chair.

Agenda:

New MN Bill: Social media platforms requirements for minors (SF4696)

The Minnesota Senate will hear about the following this morning:

Commerce and Consumer Protection

Chair: Senator Matt D. Klein

Location: G-15 Capitol

Public Notice Date: 2026-04-23 11:29 AM

Documents added Revision 4

Testifiers must be in person.
Other items may be added to the agenda.
The number of testifiers and length of time permitted is at the discretion of the chair.

Agenda:

MN eNews April 2026: Legislative Updates and Upcoming State Broadband Conference

The MN Legislature is in session. Hot topics related (or tangential) to broadband seem to surround data centers, artificial intelligence (AI) and security or privacy of online tools, such as social media. You can find links to the related bills in the State News section below.

EVENT April 29: MN Broadband Summit!
The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Office of Broadband Development is hosting the Connecting One: Minnesota 2026 Broadband Summit on Wednesday, April 29, 2026.

State News   

National News

Vendor/Technology News

Office of Broadband Development Updates and News:

Local Broadband News

Aitkin County
Paul Bunyan Communications expanding fiber to more than 2,400 Homes and Businesses in Central Aitkin County

Great Scott Township
Paul Bunyan Communications finishes broadband expansion in Great Scott and unorganzied Township in St. Louis County
Broadband expanded to more than 100 households in Great Scott Township and Mountain Iron

Hermantown
Google plans to open a large data center in Hermantown

Hubbard County
Paul Bunyan Communications expands fiber to more than 3,200 Homes and Businesses in Northern Minnesota

St Louis County
St. Louis County names new development director with experience in broadband expansion
Paul Bunyan Communications expanding fiber to more than 600 more locations in 2026 in St Louis County
Two providers are looking at expanding to Eagles Nest Township (St Louis County)

Stearns County
Stearns County Administrator Mike Williams retires after tenure of broadband expansion

Twin Cities
Arvig expands broadband service to Twin Cities with connection to Eagan Data Center

Wadena
Wadena County talks about plans for future, giving a nod to broadband progress

Willmar
Willmar Council to consider agreements for Willmar Connect initiative on March 16, 2026
Willmar City Council offers contact to build community network to third option Kramer Group
Willmar Council rescinds contract offer to NC3 and goes with the Kramer Group to build network for community broadband

Upcoming Events, Opportunities and Resources

How can you trust the news source you’re looking at online? Here’s a checklist.

I have been a reference and research librarian. I’ve been a teacher. I was on the board of Twin Cities Daily Planet, an online citizen journalism newspaper, for many years. Information literacy is a top priority for me. When I read an article or report, I look at who wrote, who paid for and who published it. Lately when I’ve been seeing a new type of article – the sponsored article; and now I’m seeing the sponsored article morph into partner content, So. I thought it might be helpful to share a checklist of things I do when reading an article to assess the purpose.

It all starts at the beginning. Does the headline (or social media link) make sense? For example, you see a headline about the Vikings losing and you just watched them win. Seems fishy and might merit some investigation. Here are some things to consider:

  1. Check the date. I have seen old articles reemerge after an online news source upgrades their backend. The article can look new to a news aggregator, such as Google Alert. With timely events, check the time the update was published. Was the game actually over?
  2. Check the publisher. Are you looking at the MN Star Tribune, a Viking superfan blog or have you wandered into a Packer online forum? On a website look at the “about” section to see who they are and what their mission is. For a report or a book, you might look for the funder or sponsor of the work in the same way. Is the book about the Vikings written about a coach with a summer camp and is he (or she) mentioning that camp a lot? Consider their perspective and goal for the article.
  3. Check the type of article or resource you are reading. Not everything in the newspaper is “just the facts ma’am.”
    1. News article: reports on a news event in a timely fashion, generally sticking to the facts
    2. Feature article: a more in-depth article that often includes quotes, context and/or a narrative. They aren’t just sticking to the facts, they use quotes, they use narrative to frame the story
    3. Editorial: is written by the editors of the publication
    4. Letter to the Editor: is a letter written by a reader to the editor often sharing their thoughts, opinions or stories in response to a recently published article.
    5. Op-Ed (Opposite the Editorial page): similar to a letter to the editor but often longer and addresses a topic or issue more broadly. Often submitted by authors who consider themselves experts on that topic; they share their thoughts, opinions or stories.
    6. Sponsored content: paid, promotional content designed to look like part of a publication. I have seen this also labeled as partner content. The “sponsored” or “partner” label is not always prominent. A loose relative to paid content is paid search results. Do a search on Google, especially for something like [Duluth hotel] and you will see the top results are labeled as sponsored.
  4. Check the author. Similar to checking the publisher, you can usually click on their name for the publication bio. If it’s a letter to the editor or sponsored content, there will likely be a link to more information on them or their affiliation. Or look them up on Google. Most reporters will have a history or past article and/or affiliations. Recently, I tried to check out a reporter on a new publication (ironically focused on AI) and I could not find them on Google, which was highly unusual.
  5. Check the cited resources. This is going an extra step but depending on the situation, it’s helpful. Check out the sources (reports or other articles) that the author has cited and put them through the same checklist.
  6. Make sure you are looking at the right source. Some folks will go so far as to spoof a legitimate publisher to post their information. (Or even more likely to try to get your credit card information.) So if something still doesn’t look right – check the domain name. If you are looking for the Vikings make sure you are looking at [https://www.vikings.com/] NOT [https://www.vickings.com/ or https://www.vikings.us or https://www.mnvikings.com/%5D. Also please don’t try those last three addresses – I made them up, but they might go to sources that are trying to spoof the site.

I hope that’s helpful. Always in the back of my mind I ask myself why this person is sharing this information. Is it a journalist, a scientist, a lobbyist, a sales person or a community member? And what is their agenda?

I don’t go through the checklist every time. I have my trusted resources and that’s a manageable way for me to feel confident with information. But I do use this checklist a couple of times a week with new publications. A year ago, I used it less often.

To learn more about information literacy, especially if you are in a position to teach or influence others, check out the American Library Association (ALA) resources on the topic.

Minnesota plans to include warning labels on social media sites

South Carolins Public Radio takes an interesting look at Minnesota’s plan for social media warnings…

At least a dozen states have tried to keep kids off social media with bills requiring apps to verify ages. But courts have blocked most of those attempts. So lawmakers in Minnesota tried something different. Next summer, Minnesotans of any age will see a mental health warning label when they log on. That is, unless tech companies block the new law. Here’s Minnesota Public Radio’s Dana Ferguson.

DANA FERGUSON, BYLINE: Imagine you’re getting ready to hop on your Instagram, Facebook or TikTok account. You hit the screen on your phone, and in seconds, you’re directed to the latest pictures, stories or posts. This time next year…

ZACK STEPHENSON: The only change is going to be that you’re going to see a message before you can interact with the app.

FERGUSON: State Representative Zack Stephenson wrote the new Minnesota law requiring social media companies to add warning labels, flagging risks of mental health harm from excessive use.

STEPHENSON: I think the evidence is very clear that social media use is linked with depression, anxiety, loneliness, self-harm, suicidal ideation, eating disorders, all sorts of terrible mental health conditions.

FERGUSON: The Democrat likens them to warnings for tobacco products.

STEPHENSON: So I believe you’ll see a message telling you that prolonged use of social media can lead to those outcomes.

FERGUSON: Former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy called for warning labels last year. He pointed to the research on prolonged social media use and mental health. Minnesota is the first state to require them, but New York may not be too far behind. Stephenson says the warnings could prompt some to spend less time scrolling.

STEPHENSON: If you had expected big tobacco to make cigarettes less addictive in the ’50s and ’60s, you would have been sorely mistaken. They would never have done that. Addiction was their business model, and the same thing is true for Big Tech.

You can see the full interview on their website.

Bill introduced in MN House: HF1957 appropriating money for a grant to the Minnesota Technology Association

MN House reports

Elkins; Mueller; Tabke; Kotyza-Witthuhn; Lee, K.; Feist and Allen introduced:

H. F. 1957, A bill for an act relating to economic development; appropriating money for a grant to the Minnesota Technology Association.

The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Workforce, Labor, and Economic Development Finance and Policy.

Bill as introduced

A bill for an act
relating to economic development; appropriating money for a grant to the Minnesota
Technology Association.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:

Section 1. MINNESOTA TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATION.

$1,000,000 in fiscal year 2026 and $1,000,000 in fiscal year 2027 are appropriated from
the general fund to the commissioner of employment and economic development for a grant
to the Minnesota Technology Association to support the SciTech internship program, a
program that supports science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) internship
opportunities for two- and four-year college students and graduate students in their fields
of study. The internship opportunities must match students with paid internships within
STEM disciplines at small, for-profit companies located in Minnesota having fewer than
250 employees worldwide. The grant must provide selected hiring companies 50 percent
of the wages paid to the intern, capped at $3,000 per intern. The program must work toward
increasing the participation among women or other underserved populations. This is a
onetime appropriation.

 

Internet filters in schools are keeping kids in the dark

USA Today reports on the dangers of technology policies that lack nuance…

There’s a common complaint among high school students across the country, and it has nothing to do with curfews or allowances: Internet filters are preventing them from doing online research at school. Records obtained by The Markup from districts across the country show just how broadly schools block content, forcing students to jump through hoops to complete assignments and even keeping them from resources that could support their health and safety.

School districts must block obscene or harmful images to qualify for federally-subsidized internet access under the Children’s Internet Protection Act, passed by Congress nearly 25 years ago. But the records, from 16 districts across 11 states, show they go much further. Schools are limiting not only what images students can see, but what words they can read.

Some of the censorship inhibits students’ ability to do basic research on sites like Wikipedia and Quora. Students have also been blocked from visiting websites that web-filtering software categorizes as “education,” “news,” or “informational.” But even more concerning for some students are blocks against sex education, abortion information, and resources for LGBTQ+ teens—including suicide prevention.