Office of Broadband Development visits ECE in Pine City (Pine County)

Pine County News reports…

Along with staff from East Central Energy (ECE), officials from the Minnesota Legislature and the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development met in Pine City for a site visit on July 17 to observe speed testing and review progress tied to state-funded broadband grants as part of the ongoing ECE Fiber broadband expansion project.

The visit marked a significant milestone in the cooperative’s broadband buildout, as it completed a crucial step for the December 2022 awards given through the Minnesota Border-to-Border Broadband Grant Program, administered by the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development. The grants totaled nearly $15M and enabled three large-scale broadband projects in Isanti, Kanabec, and Pine counties. Designed to bring reliable high-speed fiber internet to 7,584 serviceable points, the project includes some of the hardest-to-reach areas in east central Minnesota.

State support and oversight

Senator Aric Putman, Chair of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Broadband, and Rural Development, and Representative Nathan Nelson (District 11B) joined the site visit to better understand the progress of rural broadband deployment by electric cooperatives. Also present were Bree Maki and Mike Wimmer from the Minnesota Office of Broadband Development, whose leadership has been vital to ECE’s broadband success and advocacy. The group observed performance testing and mapping verifications by Connected Nation, the state’s contracted assessor, to ensure compliance with network speed and coverage requirements.

The ECE Fiber network now spans over 2,200 miles of fiber, with more than 5,000 members already connected and additional installations in progress. So far, approximately 300 businesses have been connected. Since launching the initiative, ECE has created 45 new jobs, including technicians, designers, and support staff.  This continues to strengthen the local economy while building long-term technical capacity within the region.

To leverage existing electric infrastructure, ECE designed its fiber network to follow its electric lines (approximately 60% overhead and 40% underground). Because the cooperative uses non-conductive fiber lines, installation can run closer to neutral wires, minimizing the need for new poles or underground components and further lowering construction expenses.

Mediacom Communications launches multi-gig service in Howard Lake and Winsted, Minnesota (McLeod County)

Morning Star reports…

Mediacom Communications today announced the company has launched multi-gig and symmetrical speed broadband services to over 2,400 households located in the rural Minnesota communities of Howard Lake and Winsted.

Utilizing breakthrough technology to enhance its 1.3 million-mile fiber network, Mediacom has created a more responsive end-to-end customer experience that prioritizes faster upload and download speeds, uncompromised network reliability, safe and secure connections, and lower latency.

Utilizing the new platform, Howard Lake and Winsted residents will be able to choose from the following Xtream Internet offerings from Mediacom:

  • Internet 300 tier with speeds of 300 Mbps down and 100 Mbps up.
  • Internet 1 Gig Symmetrical tier with speeds of 1000 Mbps down by 1000 Mbps up.
  • Internet 2 Gig Unlimited tier with speeds of 2000 Mbps down by 1000 Mbps up.

Broadband Now ranks states for broadband: MN ranks 40

Broadband Now reports…

Every year, our team analyzes broadband access, affordability, performance, and competition across all 50 states and Washington D.C. to determine which states are leading and lagging in closing the digital divide.

Minnesota ranked 40 based on the following categories and scores:

  • Access to Wired or Fixed Wireless Broadband: 93.2%
  • Access to Wired Low-Priced Broadband: 80.3%
  • Median Download Speed: 99.6 Mbps
  • Median Upload Speed: 23.9 Mbps
  • Median Round Trip Time: 31.4 ms
  • Internet Providers in Minnesota: 115

Here’s more on Broadband now, coming from their own website…

BroadbandNow is the best place to find and compare local internet providers, and we have the most comprehensive dataset of internet plans, pricing, and availability.  Our data comes from the FCC and is supplemented by data provided to us directly by ISPs. We also verify plans and pricing of all 2,000+ ISPs as often as once per month.

We’re proud to publish independent research on broadband in America, recognized and cited by The New York Times, Washington Post, Ars Technica, The New Yorker, and numerous other publications. If you’d like to be connected to a broadband expert, please reach out to us.

What else can you do at BroadbandNow? If you’re new to the site, we recommend testing your internet speed, exploring our national broadband map, or comparing internet providers in Chicago or wherever you live!

Impact of BEAD changes on the states depends on the state – in MN 22,000 locations didn’t get bids

The Institute for Local Self Reliance has a program I try to watch regularly. This week they talked a bit about the potential impact of BEAD changes on the states and specifically talked about Minnesota. They pointed out that 22,000 of the 76,000 BEAD eligible locations got no bid at all and 10 fiber companies dropped out of bidding. (Map of the 76,000 locations at right.) The podcaster noted that part of the problem may have the lack of early response to the RDOF results and not being more aggressive in trying to make more addresses BEAD eligible on the front end. That being said, I think Minnesota is one of the states that is pushing back on changes now by encouraging letters of support from community leaders to include with the final proposal when submitted.

Reports comparing social media use and mental health in rural youth vs suburban and urban youth

Hopelab looks at mental health and social media in kids in rural areas…

In this report, Hopelab examines the mental health, well-being, and online behaviors of young people aged 14-22 (n = 1,274) living in rural communities (21% of those sampled) compared to those living in suburban/urban communities (77%). The term “rural” refers to respondents who selected “rural” when asked to choose the option that best describes where they live, while “suburban/urban” includes those who selected either “suburban” or “urban.” This report explores how rural young people engage with social media, experience mental health and well-being, and access support for mental health needs in comparison to their suburban/ urban peers. This project centers the voices and experiences of rural young people and was developed using youth co-design practices. Youth co-distillation also informed the interpretation of results.6

Here are their key findings:

  1. Rural young people are less likely to use social media daily compared to their suburban/urban peers.
  2. Rural young people are more likely to prefer communicating via social media rather than in person, and they use social media differently than their suburban/urban peers.
  3. Rural and suburban/ urban young people experience depression and anxiety at similar rates.
  4. Rural young people are less likely to use mental health and well-being mobile apps, even when experiencing depression or anxiety.
  5. Rural young people are less likely to have attended online therapy to support their mental health and well-being.
  6. Rural young people are more likely to permanently stop using social media due to harassment, negative experiences, or concerns about time spent online.
  7. Rural young people are less likely to encounter affirming content about diverse identities on social media.
  8. Rural young people are less likely to report high levels of life purpose.

EVENT Aug 27: MN Legislative Commission on Cybersecurity

From the House and Committee Schedule email list…

Wednesday, August 27, 2025 , 1:00 PM

Legislative Commission on Cybersecurity

Chair: Rep. Bahner
Location: G-23 State Capitol
Agenda:

  1. Introductions
  2. Approval of November 22, 2024, minutes
  3. Election of chair, vice chair, and secretary
  4. Future meeting topics and schedule
  5. Member Discussion: 2026 session
    • AI, Cybersecurity, and Data Privacy bills
  6. Intention to go into closed meeting per Minnesota Statutes 3.888, Subd. 5

For more agenda information, click here

Economist Paul Krugman recognizes the tension between data needs and energy limitations

Earlier this week, Economist Paul Krugman discussed data centers in a recent column. Like Toto in The Wizard of Oz, he pulls back the curtain, so that we can see what’s powering the magic…

Many applications of information technology are, like the automats of yore, less miraculous than they seem. True, the user experience makes you feel as if you’ve transcended the material world. You click a button on Amazon’s web site and a day or two later the item you wanted magically appears on your porch. But behind that hands-free experience lie a million-strong workforce and a huge physical footprint of distribution centers and delivery vehicles.

And the disconnect between the trans-material feel of the consumer experience and the physical realities that deliver that experience is especially severe for the hot technology of the moment, AI. We’re constantly arguing about whether AI is a bubble, whether it can really live up to the hype. We don’t talk enough about AI’s massive use of physical resources, especially but not only electricity.

And we certainly don’t talk enough about (a) how U.S. electricity pricing effectively subsidizes AI and (b) the extent to which limitations on generating capacity may nonetheless severely limit the technology’s growth.

How much generating capacity are we talking about? The Department of Energy estimates that data centers already consumed 4.4 percent of U.S. electricity in 2023, and expects that to grow to as much as 12 percent by 2028:

Krugman also recognizes that there’s a disconnect between increasing energy needs and policies that help or hinder energy creation…

So suppose that AI really does consume vast quantities of electricity over the next few years. Where are all those kilowatt-hours supposed to come from?

America is, of course, adding generating capacity as you read this, and can accelerate that expansion if it chooses to. But there are two big obstacles to any attempt to keep up with the demand from AI.

The first is that in recent years growth in U.S. generating capacity has become increasingly dependent on growth in renewable energy. According to S&P Global, almost 90 percent of the generating capacity added in the first 8 months of 2024 came from solar and wind:

Krugman explains that this is a problem because the current Administration has eliminated many of the green energy subsidies and they have been trying to prevent future solar and wind projects. So as the graph above indicates, our energy generation is decreasing.

Krugman offers a possible solution…

Indeed, requiring that the AI industry take responsibility for the costs it imposes makes a lot of sense. It would by no means end progress in AI. As the website Tech Policy notes, there are many AI applications in which smaller, more focused models can perform almost as well as the bloated, all-in-one models currently dominating the field, while consuming far less energy. Until now there has been no incentive to take energy consumption into account, but there’s every reason to believe that we could achieve huge efficiency gains at very low cost.

But will we do the sensible thing? It’s obvious that any attempt to make AI more energy-efficient would lead to howls from tech bros who believe that they embody humanity’s future — and these bros have bought themselves a lot of political power.

So I don’t know how this will play out. I do know that your future electricity bills depend on the answer.

EVENT Sep 10: Webinar: Sustainable Computer Ownership Strategies for Rural Communities

An invitation from Digitunity for folks working on digital inclusion…

Join Digitunity for a live session focused on real-world solutions and actionable insights for rural communities working to close the computer ownership gap.

Sustainable Rural Solutions: Key Strategies for Computer Ownership Ecosystems September 10, 2025 | 1–2 PM EDT

Register here

Across the U.S., rural communities face persistent barriers to computer ownership. Digitunity, in collaboration with Brian Whitacre, Professor at Oklahoma State University, has just released a new report spotlighting proven strategies for building sustainable computer ownership ecosystems.

Meet Our Panel:

  • Brian Whitacre, Professor, Oklahoma State University
  • Deborah L. Mathews, Organizational Strategy Consultant and Program Evaluator
  • Karisa Tashjian, Senior Director of Programs and Strategic Partnerships, Digitunity

What to Expect:

  • Fresh research insights on rural computer ownership and why traditional solutions fall short
  • Actionable strategies to build local partnerships, foster sustainable systems, and measure community impact
  • Case studies and real-world examples from successful efforts in Mississippi and Arizona
  • Live Q&A with the authors and project leads

Mark your calendar and register today! We hope you’ll join us for this timely and practical discussion.

OPPORTUNITY: Net Inclusion 2026 Call for Proposals Due Monday Aug 25

An invitation from the NDIA to present at their annual conference…

Just a quick reminder that proposals are due Monday, 8/25. Here are helpful links, with more found in the FAQ:

Also, another reminder that all speakers and proposers must be NDIA affiliates. Membership is FREE, and the benefits are PLENTIFUL! Here’s the link:

Fairmont County Commission looks at 2026 budget – budget is discussed as an investment

The Fairmont Sentinel reports

The Martin County Board of Commissioners on Monday held a 2026 preliminary budget work session. As it stands, the county is looking at a 9.87 percent levy increase. It needs to adopt a preliminary budget and levy next month but won’t set the official amount until December.

They discussed a number of topics included in the budget and changes in the commission. Broadband was part of the discussion…

To close, Higgins asked the board what it wanted to see done next. Loughmiller said he was happy to leave the budget and levy it as is for now, though he did say he would like to see more done for broadband.

The board discussed using money from the reserves or the CIP.

“I’d like to continue to build the infrastructure and make Martin County a destination place. Western Martin County is where the broadband gap is,” Loughmiller said. “If we can do it, I’d rather invest in that kind of stuff.”

Koons said there was money set aside. However, he said if the $1.8 million, set aside for the justice center, was taken out completely, it would be about a 2.47 percent increase to the levy.

As it is, in 2026, the board is looking to utilize $1.453 of the $1.8 million, originally levied for the justice center project, to put toward broadband.

Vibrant Broadband chooses Ribbon Communications for middle-mile network solution

A pretty technical update from Sax Central

Ribbon Communications has been selected to provide a middle-mile network solution for Vibrant Broadband.

The Plano, Texas-headquartered vendor will provide its IP-optical kit and automation software to Vibrant, the broadband arm of Meeker Cooperative, which is described as one of the Midwest’s oldest electric cooperatives and an early mover in rural fiber deployment.

At the heart of the network upgrade is Ribbon’s NPT 2100 router, a 1-rack-unit form factor (1-RU) platform that delivers up to 800 Gb/s of non-blocking switching capacity and offers interface options from 1 Gb/s to 400 Gb/s.

Vibrant is also adopting Ribbon’s Muse Multilayer Automation Platform, which layers SDN orchestration, service-lifecycle management, and low-code automation tools on top of the hardware.

And a slight update on Vibrant’s plans…

Vibrant plans to use the new equipment to extend fiber into unserved areas of central Minnesota and bolster its network backbone for advanced services.

Ribbon Communications, meanwhile, adds another name to its middle-mile client list, following similar initiatives in AlabamaIllinoisMontana, and Pennsylvania.

As U.S. broadband funding programs push fiber deeper into the countryside, community-owned power cooperatives such as Vibrant’s parent Meeker have become a virile market for middle-mile upgrades.

Charter execs face class action after $9 billion stock drop linked to loss of ACP for subscribers

Broadband Breakfast reports

Charter Communications CEO Chris Winfrey and CFO Jessica Fischer have been sued in a class action.

The core allegation: Charter allegedly misled investors about the financial impact of the end of the Affordable Connectivity Program.

The suit, filed Thursday by plaintiff Mark Sandoval in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York, alleged that the executives issued “materially false and misleading statements” that led investors to believe the company could quickly move past the loss of the federal subsidy. The ACP, which provided $30 monthly discounts for low-income households until funding ran out in May 2024, had supported about 5 million Charter customers.

EVENT Aug 28: Office of Broadband Development Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal Virtual Information Session

Just a reminder (or heads up) of the next Office of Broadband Development Office Hours…

Registration now open for the Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal Virtual Information Session, Thursday August 28 at 11am CST, which will provide an overview of the Final Proposal, steps for public comment, and next steps for BEAD in Minnesota. This webinar will be recorded and posted to the OBD BEAD webpage.

I assume the Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal will be the hot topic…

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal will be posted to the OBD BEAD webpage for a 7-day public comment on Thursday August 28. The Final Proposal is due to the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) by Friday September 4.

It will be interesting to see who shows up for the meeting. I expect we’ll see many applicants, which should include many of the following:

Approved BEAD Applicants (8/8/2025)

  1. Ace Telephone Association
  2. AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet
  3. Broadband Corp
  4. Christensen Communications Company
  5. Consolidated Communications
  6. CTC
  7. EarthLink
  8. East Central Energy Fiber
  9. Emily Cooperative Telephone Company
  10. Federated Rural Electric Association
  11. Frontier
  12. Gardonville Cooperative Telephone Company
  13. Gateway Infrastructure LLC
  14. Hanson Communication
  15. Harmony Telephone Company
  16. IBT Group USA, LLC
  17. Johnson Telephone Company
  18. KMTelecom
  19. Kuiper
  20. MCC Broadband Data
  21. Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association
  22. Midco
  23. MiEnergy
  24. Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative
  25. MVTV Wireless
  26. Nuvera
  27. Otter Tail Telcom
  28. PAUL BUNYAN COMMUNICATIONS
  29. PCs for People
  30. Pinnacle Broadband LLC
  31. Red River Communications
  32. Runestone Telephone Association
  33. SCI Broadband
  34. Sjobergs
  35. Space Exploration Technologies Corp.
  36. Spectrum Mid-America, LLC
  37. Sytek Tekstar Communications, Inc.
  38. Wikstrom Telephone Company Inc
  39. Windstream Lakedale, Inc.
  40. Winnebago Cooperative Telecom Association
  41. Woodstock Communications
  42. Xfinity

And be sure to mark your calendars for early September meetings…

OBD will be announcing regional, in-person Final Proposal Information Sessions on the BEAD Final Proposal. These will be scheduled the first week in September, and open to anyone to attend with no registration required. When finalized, dates and logistics will be posted to the OBD BEAD webpage and shared in another email blast.

 

American Society of Civil Engineers grade US broadband and offers recommendations for improvement

Description of the report card

Since 1998, ASCE [American Society of Civil Engineers] has issued a quadrennial assessment of the United States’ infrastructure networks, known as the Report Card for America’s Infrastructure. For more than two decades, the message behind the unflattering grades was consistent: federal, state, and local governments, in addition to the private sector, have not been prioritizing our interdependent infrastructure systems. In sum, the bill on our infrastructure systems was past due. We needed to reverse the nation’s growing infrastructure investment gap to remain competitive in the global marketplace, allow local businesses to thrive, and keep our families safely connected. That message grew louder with each evaluation, through our most recent Report Card release in early 2021.

The addition of broadband is new…

Broadband was introduced as a graded category in 2025, coming in at a C+. Although evidence points to improvements throughout infrastructure’s system-of-systems, nine categories remained within the D range—a clear sign that more needs to be done to improve the health of America’s built environment.

Here’s what the postcard says about broadband…

As the fabric of work, society, and commerce has moved into the digital realm, a fast and reliable connection to the internet has become essential.1 In 2000, only 1% of U.S. adults had broadband access at home, compared to 80% today.2 America’s economy requires reliable broadband access, with research showing that the nation would have lost $1.3 trillion in economic growth between 2010 and 2020 if broadband speeds and adoption had remained at 2010 levels.3 While the total amount of public spending on broadband is difficult to estimate, the private sector has invested approximately $2.2 trillion in broadband infrastructure since 1996, with the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) recently providing an additional $65 billion in federal dollars.4 Yet, broadband access and adoption continue to face several challenges. Estimates show that 10% of households (12.7 million) do not have a broadband subscription, whether at home or on a mobile device.5 As new investments are deployed to connect the remainder of Americans to broadband, extreme weather poses challenges to internet reliability and new technologies create a rapidly changing environment.

The report is interesting for the historical perspective as well as commentary on what is happening in the industry today. They end with some specific recommendations for improvement…

  • Incentivize internet service providers to provide better service data for key performance indicators such as delivered speeds and reliability of service.
  • Provide dedicated, predictable funding for broadband affordability programs.
  • Account for life-cycle costs and possible recovery costs from systems failures when delivering broadband projects.
  • Facilitate state-based reporting on the implementation of broadband plans, the use of BEAD, and other federal broadband funding.
  • Encourage partnerships with state and local agencies and broadband providers to facilitate service uptake for vulnerable communities. SOURCES 1.
  • Expand Dig Once policies to include broadband deployment plans in more public works projects, specifically transportation, energy, and water improvements that are already requiring work above and below the ground.
  • Incentivize the latest up-to-date codes and standards for utility poles and other structures that are often used for broadband deployment.

Conversation on T-Mobile buying US Internet on Connect This

The Institute for Local Self Reliance has a program I try to watch regularly. Travis Carter, head of US Internet, is one of the usual hosts. He wasn’t on this week, so I suspect a future show will talk more about T-Mobile’s recent purchase of US Internet. You can hear a little chat in the video clip below. There’s praise for Travis’s work, understanding that he would try to find a good solution for his customers and speculation on why sell now. Tariffs, wanting a change, something else? Also, there was a little grief but understanding at the loss of a small independent provider and competition.

The conversation continued, as it usually does, to competition, consolidation and other industry topics.