Minnesota Broadband Task Force Meeting: September 10

The agenda is out for the next Task Force meeting. I’m planning to go and to take notes.

Governor’s Task Force on Broadband
September 10, 2013
Douglas County Library, 720 Fillmore Street, Alexandria, MN 56308

10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

  • 9:30 Pre-meeting coffee and rolls served by Friends of the Douglas County Library
  • 10:00 Welcome by Alexandria Mayor Sara Carlson
  • 10:10 Introductions/ Approval of Minutes
  • 10:20 Public Comments
  • 10:30 Presentation “Introducing Libraries” –  Jennifer Nelson, State Library Services
  • 10:45 Presentation “Libraries Respond to the Digital Landscape” – Melinda Ludwiczak, Metropolitan Library Service Agency (MELSA)
  • 11:30 Presentation “The Future is Today” – MaryAnn Van Cura, State Library Services
  • 12:00 Lunch
  • 12:30 Presentation “Leveraging Resources for Digital Access: Making it Work” – -Peg Werner, Viking Library System
  • 1:15 Presentation “Proposed E-Rate Changes” – Speaker invited to discuss the FCC proceeding
  • 1:35 “Final Thoughts” – Jennifer Nelson, State Library Services
  • 1:50 Task Force Business – Review/approve outline for December report
  • 2:00 Adjourn formal meeting
  • 2:00 Library tours provided by Douglas County Director and others

Blandin Foundation named a FTTH Top 100

Bernadine_InCommonsWe are honored to be named one of Broadband Communities Magazine’s Fiber to the Home Top 100. We are so pleased to be listed with many esteemed colleagues who also strive for “Building a Fiber-Connected World.”

Here is what they said about the Blandin Foundation…

Blandin Foundation www.blandinfoundation.org 877-882-2257

Key Products: Grant making, community leadership development and public policy programs

Summary: A private foundation based in Grand Rapids, Minn., the Blandin Foundation has been dedicated since 1941 to strengthening rural Minnesota communities. Its Broadband Initiative, launched in 2003, helps communities educate citizens about the need for ultra-high-speed broadband and plan and execute broadband projects. The foundation has published informational guides, sponsored conferences and educational events and supported many feasibility studies for the development of robust, high-speed broadband networks. It has supported implementation of broadband applications in schools, health care facilities and other institutions and for home-based users and has promoted broadband adoption in rural communities. In 2012, the foundation selected nine rural Minnesota communities for intensive, two-year partnerships to advance local broadband initiatives. It also led the Minnesota Intelligent Rural Communities (MIRC) coalition – a group of educational, job training and economic development organizations – in a BTOP-funded program to enhance broadband adoption and use by small businesses, unemployed residents and local governments. Completed in 2012, the MIRC program introduced more than 250,000 rural Minnesotans to online resources to find jobs, continue their educations and strengthen their businesses.

I’ll take this opportunity to add some of the most significant outcomes of the work that we’ve been able to track so far:

  • Data examining broadband subscription levels during the three years of MIRC’s implementation suggest that broadband adoption growth in participating communities grew close to 15% faster than in the rest of rural Minnesota.
  • Those communities that reported the highest rates of participation [in MIRC activities] also experienced the highest rates of broadband subscription growth.
  • Such evidence allows us to conclude that community-based broadband literacy and market development efforts can and do make a difference.
  • According to the University of Minnesota/Crookston’s MIRC project evaluator, “it is not hard to connect the MIRC project as a major contributor to Minnesota’s leading position [nationally] in rural broadband adoption.”
  • And, in the words of a MIRC partner in Thief River Falls, “MIRC is a life changing project for many individuals in the nine communities.”

Fire Island Test Case for US with only wireless access

Fire Island is a long way from Minnesota, but what’s happening with telecommunications there could be a sign of what’s to come – especially for markets where there isn’t a compelling business case for providing broadband access.

Here’s the quick take on the Fire Island deal from Speed Matters

As reported in Speed Matters, Verizon is planning to substitute wireless-based Voice Link service to several islands on the New Jersey shore, as well as to Fire Island. So far, there have been objections from residents, businesses and the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC).

Common Cause Media sponsored a public meeting last week on Fire Island – where apparently 40 people testified to express their anger about being shifted to wireless. The testimony is powerful – and is captured at least in part in the video below. A business owner went from DSL to wireless and is having trouble accessing the applications he needs. Another woman talks about the inability to do some remote healthcare monitoring via wireless; she needs her phone. Another talks about the worry about limited access to phone in case of emergency for her son, who has no cell phone.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qRFlrKqfshs

The video starts with a local resident explaining that Fire Island is a test case for the whole country. I think he’s right and that’s why I think folks in rural Minnesota may want to pay attention. Wireless Internet access is great but it doesn’t meet all needs.

It takes a team to create a Digital Strategy

Harvard Business Review recently ran an article on “How To Build a High-Performing Digital Team.” Someone suggested a I post it here because this is a little bit of where my worlds collide. When I’m not writing about broadband, I’m often building websites or creating social media strategies or teaching others how to do these sorts of things.

People often ask “how much is it? And “what’s most important?” And for years I’ve been saying – well, how much is a wedding? And what’s most important there? OK bride and groom should be the easy answer – but you know what I mean. If you’re a foodie, you care about the meal; if you’re into fashion, you care about the dress; if you play an instrument you care about the music. In a perfect world you’d have the best of everything but that’s not always realistic.

The HBR offers a list of 6 attributes to consider when building a digital team..

  1. People who are omnivores, not vegans. [Not too focused in one direction/solution.]
  2. People who understand a website launch is only the beginning.
  3. People who recognize that design is a differentiator.
  4. People who are comfortable with uncertainty and can act with agility.
  5. People who eat the dog food, willingly and visibly.
  6. People who bring varied perspectives, earned from experience.

You can check out the article for more details on each attribute. I think it’s a good list. But I also think this is a list for a big company with access to lots of potential candidates. For smaller companies I might come up with something a little different. My list assumes you will have one person to focus on digital marketing – and I understand that the same person may be responsible for all marketing (and dishwashing and payroll and…). And I purposefully add the term marketing because while the marketing folks may work with the folks who maintain your server (or laptops or network), in my experience the IT folks are not always the best drivers of the marketing side of technology use.

Here seven more attributes to consider when support and staff are limited.

  1. Get permanent folks who like to learn. Technology changes a lot – that better be fun for the person knee deep in it.
  2. Find consultants who are willing to teach. Not all of them are. Don’t expect your web developer to teach staff html – but they should be willing to teach them how to make updates to the site, or maintain a Facebook page or understand a Google Adwords campaign. As a consultant I’ll tell you that with social media the voice and immediacy are very important so having someone on staff who can do the daily updates is the perfect world solution.
  3. Get folks with experience or at least an interest in your industry. Social media plans are very different for different industries. This applies to permanent staff and consultants.
  4. Find people you trust and listen to them. Website analytics look very scientific, but there’s a lot of art to analyzing it. Someone may visit your site for only 20 seconds because they hated it or because they really only needed the phone number and found it right away. Finding someone who will focus on trying to determine what that answer is and not what makes them look best is key.
  5. Be realistic. The hot shot consultant may suggest a strategy that budgets 20 hours a week on maintaining your online presence. That’s not going to work if your main driver on staff is also the head chef. Find people who understand that balance and can work with you based on your time and budget restrictions.
  6. Have room for mistakes so long as you learn something and the risks are mitigated. With a field that changes so drastically there are great rewards for people who take risks but not every campaign will be a winner. Again it’s a matter of balancing risk and reward – determining that balance in advance helps optimize the expense.
  7. Find people you understand. I was one hired to simply explain another consultants proposal. If you don’t understand what they are proposing, how will you know if they succeed and how can you learn from them? I find that someone unwilling to use a common language often doesn’t understand the business implications or applications for social media.

You can keep everything in house, but for most small businesses I think this can be a false economy – unless you have someone who really wants to get into it. I often say hire out if you only need to do something once – like build a website. Consider internal support for daily/weekly maintenance and if it’s good use of staff time. Having some expectations for your digital team and measuring against them will help you determine if it’s good use of staff time.

Again I think the original HBR article is great and the attributes are spot on, but thought I’d add a twist for smaller businesss too. Hope it’s helpful.

Thief River Falls (MIRC community) talks technology in Mayors and Cities Magazine

It was nice to see Thief River Falls Mayor Jim Dagg mention their involvement in the MIRC (Minnesota Intelligent Rural Communities) project and impact technology has had in the area in his recent interview with Mayors and Cities Magazine

How did you become involved with the Intelligent Community Forum?

We became involved through our Community Development Director and his application for grant funds for the C.K. Blandin Foundation which received federal funds to facilitate broadband deployment in rural areas. The city has used these grant funds to implement three specific projects:

A) Creation of a Business/Technology Center at our local Chamber of Commerce building. The center is used by the local area business community for various computer classes.

B) Technology Fairs for the Novice and Advanced Users were held in 2011 and 2012 which offered various training and workshops that focused on computers and high-speed internet. The technology fairs were open to the general public and were very well received.

C) Computers for the Community project allows for disadvantaged families that complete the mandatory computer classes to receive a refurbished computer along with one year of high speed internet service at a reduced rate.

What do you think of their organization?

It’s a great thing for rural Minnesota

And have they helped Thief River Falls?

Yes, I believe they have …

How can technology improve the quality of life in TRF?  And has it?

Yes, Digi key is a prime example of this.  The Company is the fifth largest electronic distributor in the world. They have many web-sites in multiple languages all headquartered out of TRF. Just think you can work here and sell something to someone in China, India or Europe and within 48 to 72 hours it is on their door steps. That is just one example of making a living selling to the world while enjoying living in TRF. The Thief River Falls School District is implementing a new program during the 2013-2014 school year to provide every student from kindergarten to Grade 12 with a computer.

Orchestra snags protest-ready URLs: a lesson in online brand management

Sometimes online marketing is really all about brand management. And sometimes the best thing you can do is minimize damage online. Apparently the Minnesota Orchestra knew that. City Pages reports…

The Minnesota Orchestral Association was six weeks into labor negotiations with its musicians in 2012 when it purchased at least 12 domain names with variations of the phrase “Save Our Minnesota Orchestra.”

On Wednesday, Song of the Lark, a blog run by Emily Hogstad, revealed that those URLs were scooped up by the association more than four months before the musicians were locked out of Orchestral Hall.

Interesting approach. Something to consider if you are concerned about your brand management – whether we’re talking business, personal or even community. Domain names are powerful in search engine ranking. An easy domain name fits on a strike placard. Cost for a domain name is about $10 a year.

Twin Cities school offers Doctor of Information Technology

According to the Minneapolis St Paul Business Journal

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that employment in the computer and information-systems management field is expected to grow 18 percent by 2020, with a median salary of $115,780 per year.

Responding to that trend, Minneapolis-based Walden University recently launched an online Doctor of Information Technology (D.I.T.) program “designed to enhance students’ technical expertise and develop leadership skills,” according to a news release from the university.

Three exciting things here that have implications for rural Minnesota as well. First – it’s an opportunity for Minnesota and Minnesotans to become certified IT experts. Second – the classes are available online so you can get your degree from International Falls or Lanesboro or Dawson Minnesota. Third tech positions very often are jobs that can be done remotely – so even after you get the degree you can get a job anywhere and stay in International Falls or Lanesboro or Dawson.

Farm Foundation Forum on Rural Broadband: A free webcast September 11

Looks like an interesting event. I am planning to listen and hope to take notes…

On Sept. 11, the Farm Foundation Forum will examine issues on the delivery of high-speed internet services to rural America.  This Forum will be 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. EDT at the National Press Club. A free webcast will also be offered. Hear the live speakers and ask questions of them as part of the discussion session.

To participate in this free webcast, register here. The webcast will be archived for those unable to view the live event.

Iowa farmer, Ann Jorgensen, a former member of the Board of the Farm Credit Administration, will moderate the forum. The following panelist will each have 10 minutes to present, after which the floor will be opened for discussion:  •  Sharon Strover, the Philip G. Warner Regents Professor in Communication and former Chair of the Radio-TV-Film Department at the University of Texas. She is one of authors of Rural Broadband Availability and Adoption; Evidence Policy Challenges and Options, a report commissioned by the National Agricultural and Rural Development Policy Center. •  Jessica Zufolo, Deputy Administrator of USDA’s Rural Utilities Service, on the challenges of advancing broadband access to rural communities. •  Mark Lewellen, manager of Spectrum Advocacy, Deere and Company, who will discuss broadband use by agriculture. •  John Windhausen, Executive Director of Schools, Health and Libraries Broadband Coalition (SHLB), examining broadband needs of rural communities and schools.

Affordable Wireless Everywhere, brought to you by Facebook

This week Facebook announced that it’s making a push to get Internet access to more people with a project called internet.org…

The goal of Internet.org is to make internet access available to the two-thirds of the world who are not yet connected, and to bring the same opportunities to everyone that the connected third of the world has today.

The founding members of internet.org — Facebook, Ericsson, MediaTek, Nokia, Opera, Qualcomm and Samsung — will develop joint projects, share knowledge, and mobilize industry and governments to bring the world online. These founding companies have a long history of working closely with mobile operators and expect them to play leading roles within the initiative, which over time will also include NGOs, academics and experts as well. Internet.org is influenced by the successful Open Compute Project, an industry-wide initiative that has lowered the costs of cloud computing by making hardware designs more efficient and innovative.

It’s exciting. It’s great to see some heavy-hitting businesses focus on the problem. Heck, it’s great to see them shine a light on the problem. I’ve said in the past that maybe the websites and developers who are making money based on traffic sent to them ought to get invested in transport too. It’s interesting to see how they frame the problem, based on what they think it will take to solve the it…

In order to achieve its goal of connecting the two-thirds of the world who are not yet online, internet.org will focus on three key challenges in developing countries:

Making access affordable: Partners will collaborate to develop and adopt technologies that make mobile connectivity more affordable and decrease the cost of delivering data to people worldwide. Potential projects include collaborations to develop lower-cost, higher-quality smartphones and partnerships to more broadly deploy internet access in underserved communities. Mobile operators will play a central role in this effort by driving initiatives that benefit the entire ecosystem.

Using data more efficiently: Partners will invest in tools that dramatically reduce the amount of data required to use most apps and internet experiences. Potential projects include developing data compression tools, enhancing network capabilities to more efficiently handle data, building systems to cache data efficiently and creating frameworks for apps to reduce data usage.

Helping businesses drive access: Partners will support development of sustainable new business models and services that make it easier for people to access the internet. This includes testing new models that align incentives for mobile operators, device manufacturers, developers and other businesses to provide more affordable access than has previously been possible. Other efforts will focus on localizing services – working with operating system providers and other partners to enable more languages on mobile devices.

BUT I think the proposal brings up a lot of questions too.

First – it would be great to get the ball rolling at home. That might help the project get in gear with politics and red tape that they understand. It would be an opportunity to work with the technology and not international (or foreign) policies. Once it’s working here – then try new terrain.

Second – wireless? Just yesterday Broadband Reports quoted a recent OECD report expressing concern on the focus on wireless…

Limited spectrum and the increasing demand for data services mean that mobile networks will strive to offload traffic to fixed networks. Policy makers and regulators need to ensure enough supply to maintain sufficient backhaul for wireless networks, especially if there is insufficient fixed access network competition.

…The challenge for regulators is that, regardless of the technology used, many parts of the OECD look likely to face monopolies or duopolies for fixed networks. Wireless can provide competition, but spectrum availability will always impose limits that are not a constraint for fibre.”

I always like to add that there is definitely a place for wireless – it buys mobility – but it’s not the same as wired connectivity.

Third – I might have concerns at the same people who control access to the news controlling access to the transport. Seems like a media monopoly in the making.

Google Names Minnetonka As Top MN City For Online Biz

Good news for Minnesota reported by Twin Cities Business

Minnetonka is one of 50 U.S. cities that achieved Google “eCity” status for utilizing the Internet to identify new customers, connect with clients, and grow the local economy.

According to Google, the city is the best in the state at virtually connecting its schools, retail stores, and restaurants with its residents and visitors.

Google and independent research firm Ipsos MORI calculated the top five cities in each of the 50 states with the highest number of Adwords customers relative to population size. Google’s Adwords allows businesses to use keyworks related to their products and services to develop text-based ads that appear on Google. Businesses in each state’s top five cities were then evaluated on criteria such as whether they are listed in online directories, have a presence on social networking sites, and have websites that allow e-commerce, among other factors. Each criterion was given a score, and each business’ scores were aggregated to provide an overall score. The city with the highest score in each state was awarded “eCity” status. Click here for the full methodology.

Google Adword customer number is a funny way to measure eCity status – but I do like the idea of measuring businesses and their online presence.

Direct Correlation between Broadband & Economic Increase in Rural Areas

The Daily Yonder continues its broadband series this week – looking at the economic impact of broadband in rural areas. Spoiler alert – they found that broadband had an impact on median household income, employment and number of local businesses. They used FCC datasets to slice and dice the numbers to come up with the following graphs:

There’s more info on the Daily Yonder site. It’s interesting to look into the detail. I’m so glad these folks were able to do it. It still doesn’t necessarily build a market case for businesses building broadband in rural areas – but it certainly makes the case that for society it’s a good investment.

MN E-Democracy’s Steve Clift gets nod from White House

I’m happy to post the following news. I have been an on-again-off-again E-Democracy volunteer since it’s very early days. I think they do great work and I think Steve has done a great job keeping E-Democracy on track and vital as the Internet has changed over the years.

From the Announcement

Steven Clift is being honored as a Champion of Change for his efforts in making government more transparent and accountable through technology.

Imagine. I am standing on my front porch in Minneapolis, trying to speak out to my neighbors:

“Yes, I love the idea of starting a community garden. Let’s meet.”

“Councilmember, what more can we do to get the FAA to respond to our complaints about dramatic airport noise increases in our neighborhood?”

“My neighbor, an Iraq vet, heard five shots and ran to the victim in the street as he lay dying. I never want to see a sobbing, collapsing mother need to come to a crime scene again.”

“Let’s have a “Community Eat-up” and support that new Salvadoran restaurant in our neighborhood. Who will join us?”

“Great. So glad you found seven neighbors to quickly bake those lasagnas for your friend’s memorial service today.”

“I found a lost puppy …”

If it was before 2008, these real examples would have remained unheard across my neighborhood.

Imagine being connected to over 1,000 of your neighbors via an online public space for community exchange (that’s 25% of households in my neighborhood).  You are able to connect with local elected officials who represent you, small business owners and workers, and local civil servants and community groups. Everyone who cares about your local community is welcome.

This is my own Standish-Ericsson neighborhood today – connected, vibrant, inclusive, and building community every day.

Today, E-Democracy’s BeNeighbors.org effort connects well over 15,000 people mostly in the Twin Cities across a network of dozens of online Neighbors Forums. Our lessons and assistance are available for networks everywhere.

More info from the White House press release

Steven Clift, Founder of E-Democracy

Minneapolis, Minnesota

Steven Clift is @democracy on Twitter. He launched E-Democracy.org in 1994 and it is the world’s first election information website. His “government by day, citizen by night” insights were built as leader of the State of Minnesota’s first e-government initiative. He spoke across 30 countries for over a decade from Estonia to Libya to Mongolia on open government and civic participation to support non-partisan, volunteer-powered efforts for inclusive online local democracy. An Ashoka Fellow, today he is E-Democracy’s Executive Director. He leads a dedicated team with the BeNeighbors.org effort to connect all neighbors online (and off) in public life across race and ethnicity, generations, immigrant and native-born, and more. He lives with his lovely wife and two children in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Broadband Task Force speaks out against sales tax on telecom equipment

This will come as no surprise to folks who attend the monthly Minnesota Broadband Task Force meetings (or who read the notes) where the repealing the tax exemption has been a big topic – but the St Cloud Times is reporting…

The chairwoman of Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton’s Broadband Task Force has echoed Republican criticism of a new state sales tax on telecommunications equipment.

Margaret Anderson Kelliher, a former Minnesota House speaker, said the tax could be an obstacle to new broadband infrastructure and lead to fewer jobs in that sector. She has written to Dayton about the tax and told Minnesota Public Radio News that the tax should be repealed.

Kelliher is a Democrat and currently directs the Minnesota High Tech Association. She argues the tax will make it harder to reach a state goal of having border-to-border broadband by 2015. The tax moves in the opposite direction of a task force recommendation to expand an exemption so it would cover more types of telecommunications equipment, such as fiber-optic cable.

“This I think is a case where being able to correct this and take it back and make it the way it had been for about a decade or more, makes a lot of sense,” Kelliher said.

It’s a tough time to increase tax cuts so we’ll see what happens. One of the Task Force members had an alternative recommendation – collect the tax but earmark a portion of it for the Office of Broadband Development. That might be an innovative way to help get to the state broadband goals.

Cell phones in the classroom

Yesterday the Twin Cities Daily Planet published an interesting story on cell phones in the classroom. Reporter Sheila Regan had done an informal poll of teachers about how they feel about phones in the classroom. Most of them seemed to hate it – and I quote the use of hate. But a couple embraced the use…

Not all teachers and professors are against phones. TC Daily Planet’s Arts Editor Jay Gabler, who also teaches at the college level at Macalester and other places, says as long as his students are sufficiently engaged when they need to be, he’s fine with them using their phones, and he actively encourages laptops and tablets.

Other teachers embrace the technology. Renate Fiora, a physics teacher at Orono Senior High, tries to teach good technology etiquette, rather than just banning them, and says she actually gets more comprehensive answers from her students via text than she does with pen and paper. She also uses apps such as Poll Everywhere, and gives assignments in which students have to find a video example of the physics concept under discussion, and share its link to a Google Document. She gives quizzes with Google Forms, and shares links with her students using QR codes.

“I feel it’s important because it is a powerful tool and one that’s not going away,” Fiora said. “If we just ignore them and ban them, then kids will continue to use them for trivial uses. By using them in class, we get to show them the depths their devices can go, show the devices as the tools they are, and finally teach them proper etiquette while using them.









”

Last year, she called a student out for having her phone out and using it, and the student responded by showing the new video she had found of the physics tech Fiora had been talking about in class. “That was awesome. I had her email me the link so I could show the whole class.” Fiora said.

It’s an interesting question and picks up on a conversation I happened to have with someone yesterday about education and smartphones. The gist of the conversation – smartphones have changed how we access information. We now have a world of facts at our fingertips. The question we had – are we doing students a disservice to continue to focus on memorized facts or is this an opportunity to focus on higher order thinking?

Another question, if we are living in a world of distractions are we doing students a disservice to teach them in a cloistered environment? Or would they be better served learning to focus in a chaotic world?

Yet another, who is better served with the no phone policy – the teachers or the students? I’ve taught in rooms where folks seem to be online the whole time and it’s not as much fun as back when you had everyone’s rapt attention – but like the teacher’s story above, I’ve often found that the students were engaged in the topic – not distracted – as they went online. It wasn’t the student who needed to understand the role of the phone, it was me.

It will be fun to see what other folks think about phones in the classroom.

Monticello waits on bondholder decision

In June I reported on the latest issues with the Monticello FiberNet. The City had worked out a plan to offer the bondholders. In short they wanted to offer the bondholders something for the debt in exchange for owning the network outright. The bondholders would not be making their money back but the City was offering more than they might otherwise get for their investment.

 

Minnesota Public Radio has an update on Monticello

In July 2012, the city defaulted on its debt payment. Now bond holders who financed the network’s construction are deciding whether or not to take the city’s settlement offer — a return of 22 cents on the dollar.

Monticello city administrator Jeff O’Neill said it’s unclear whether the city’s broadband network may ever generate enough business to give bond holders a better return.

In a statement, he said the city wants to reach a settlement that provides bond holders “with an early buyout greater than what their bonds are currently worth, in exchange from their releasing the city from further obligations under the bonds.”  …

The bonds were issued based on the revenues of the system,” said Rick Frimmer, the attorney representing the city of Monticello’s bond holders. “The system failed to produce any revenues. That’s the risk that bond holders took.”

The article also looks at the role that Monticello has played in discussion of public networks. They were the poster child for public networks. As the article points out, they tried to get the local provider to upgrade their network. When that didn’t work the City decided to build. Then the local provider decided to sue and upgrade the network. The municipal network has had a tough time competing.

It’s a storybook version of how not to build a public-private partnership. I suspect that without the City moving forward the current provider would not have upgraded. The upgrade and competition have been good for local residents. But it seems like it has also been very good for the lawyers and costly for the City and I suspect the local provider. It’s frustrating when you think of broadband as a basic infrastructure.