Hennepin County near top of Digital Counties list

The Center for Digital Government in conjunction with the National Association of Counties recently announced their top digital counties. Hennepin County came in second for cities with population of more than 500,000. Here are the items they outline in the article…

Survey questions were asked in a variety of areas such as computing, networking, applications, data and cybersecurity, open government, mobile services, and much more. The survey results reflect work done during the 2012 year.

The article doesn’t provide a lot of detail, but last year Gov Tech publications wrote about some of the progress in the health care area. They reported at the end of 2012 that Hennepin County reduced Medicaid costs by 40 percent to 90 percent for its most expensive participants through a pilot program called Hennepin Health.

Minnesota Broadband Task Force July 24 – agenda

The Task Force meeting next week has been moved from Tuesday to Wednesday. Below are the details. I plan to attend and take notes.

Governor’s Task Force on Broadband
July 24,2013
1st Floor Conference Room,
CenturyLink
200South 5th Street,
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 [Please note this event is in Minneapolis – previously it was noted in St Paul.]
10:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m.

  • 10:00 – Welcome, Introductions, Approval of Minutes
  • 10:10 – Welcome by CenturyLink
  • 10:20 – Public Comments
  • 10:30 – Discussion of Office of Broadband Development with Robin Sternberg, Deputy Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
  • 11:00 – Presentation by Cable Companies (how investment decisions are made) Richard Sjoberg, Sjoberg’s, Thief River Falls, Minnesota
    Steve Johnson, Midcontinent Communications, Cold Spring, Minnesota
    David Pratt, Arvig, Perham, Minnesota
  • 11:30 – Presentation by Telephone Companies (how investment decisions are made, CAF update)
  • 12:00 – Lunch
  • 12:30 – Subgroup Breakout Session 1
    (Best Practices/Incentives and Broadband Adoption subgroups)
  • 1:00 – Subgroup Breakout Session 2
    (Mobile/Wireless and Coordination Across Govt./Monitor FCC & PUC Decisions/Cost of Broadband subgroups)
  • 1:30 – Task Force Discussion of December Report
  • 1:50 – Wrap‐up, Upcoming Meeting Information
  • 2:00 – Adjourn

Smart Rural Communities Challenge – let’s see some MN contenders!

Earlier this week I got an opportunity to talk with Brent Christensen from the MTA (Minnesota Telecom Alliance) about Smart Rural Communities competition hosted by the NTCA, the Rural Broadband Association. Before I describe the opportunity I want to flag this is a great opportunity for smart Minnesota communities to get noticed for their great work. I’d love to see Minnesota dominate the competition!

Back to the details from the NTCA website…

The Rural Broadband Association is accepting nominations to identify Showcase and Paradigm Smart Rural Communities. A Showcase Smart Rural Community will have achieved high-levels of broadband connectivity and collaboration with one or more local vertical industries to support innovative applications. A Paradigm Smart Rural Community will demonstrate collaboration among the broadband provider and multiple local vertical industries to develop apps and network solutions.

The NTCA Smart Rural Community (SRC) initiative is intended to promote the development and deployment of broadband-enabled applications to support and foster innovative solutions for education, health care, public safety, public utilities, civic engagement and commerce in rural America.

A couple of logistic details – the community must be served by a NTCA/MTA member – if you’re not sure just ask your local provider if they are members or contact the MTA and they might be able to connect you with your local provider. The deadline is July 31.

Below are the questions from the application/nomination form. It’s pretty straightforward but I suspect it’s important to demonstration collaboration with community stakeholders – so including them would be helpful.

  1. Please provide the population of your service area.
  2. Please describe the type and capacity of broadband service provided (if broadband provided over multiple platforms, please describe capacity for each platform), including any specific residential or business offerings.
  3. Please describe major industries or anchor institutions in your area; these may include public utility, commercial, government, education, health‐care and not‐for‐profit organizations. Please describe any special or unique challenges confronting these users, and how broadband has enabled users to meet those challenges. These may include economic, demographic, regulatory or other.
  4. Please explain whether broadband played a role in the recruitment, retention, or expansion of commercial, government, or not‐for‐profit industries to the area. Please describe other positive local or regional economic or social impact generated by your firm’s broadband offerings, and how your efforts contemplate and plan for future growth and sustainability. Please include both quantitative and qualitative information.
  5. Please describe joint or collaborative undertakings with other community stakeholders, and your community leaders’ collaborative efforts to promote and stand behind broadband technology. Include a description of these leaders’ positions in industry or government.
  6. Please provide additional information that would be useful in determining whether your community is a Smart Rural Community. This information may include interactive, multimedia presentations or academic studies relating to your service area and deployment.

If you feel like you’re not ready to apply this year – perhaps you can use this opportunity to start a community conversation for next year. It sounds as if this isn’t a one-off event.

Latest Digital Literacy Reports from Minnesota – Each one Teach One Challenge

Earlier this week, Connect Minnesota released a report on digital literacy and household broadband adoption. Here’s the quick take…

digitalThe 2012 Residential Technology Assessment from Connect Minnesota shows that approximately 904,000 [22 percent] adult Minnesotans do not subscribe to home broadband service. Minnesotans without home broadband service most often cite a lack of relevance, or the belief that home broadband service is not beneficial or useful to them, and cost as the top two reasons for not adopting the service. However, more than one in ten non-adopters in Minnesota (13%) cite a lack of digital literacy skills as their main reason for not adopting home broadband, which makes it the third most-cited reason for not having home broadband in Minnesota (Figure 1).

The report using data collected via random digit dial telephone survey of 1,201 adult heads of households across the state between October 2 and October 25, 2012.

The report also mentions the WhyBroadband? site created by the Minnesota Broadband Task Force. It’s a one-stop-shop for info on learning more about computer and Internet access.

Each One Teach One Challenge

I suspect that most folks reading this blog are broadband adopters. But many of us know someone who isn’t. Maybe we can all work to improving broadband adoption statistics by working with one person to help them increase their digital literacy in an each one teach one model. Maybe that means donating a computer to someplace such as PCs for People (which refurbishes computers for low income households). Maybe that means helping a parent, grandparent or acquaintance with some one-on-one training. Maybe that means volunteering at the library, community center or senior care facility to work with folks in a casual or formal setting.

At TED I saw a presentation on the decline of butterflies. One answer – plant gardens. This is the same sort of suggestion. If each of us took just a couple of hours it would make a difference. The WhyBroadband site links to curriculum that would help get folks going – but I’ve done some digital literacy training and I have found that when you have the luxury of working with one or two people it’s really a matter of finding out what would spark an interest with the non-adopter and exploring that topic together online. The objective isn’t necessarily for each of us to create computer geeks – just inspire the interest to learn more.

Will rural areas be stuck on wireless?

Fierce Telecom reports…

Verizon (NYSE: VZ) is apparently taking part in the move by incumbent carriers to shift customers away from the PSTN. First with its policy to move “chronic” customers off of copper; then with the deployment of Voice Link, a wireless service targeted at voice-only customers in rural areas where the carrier has not laid fiber.

Often I might leave this topic alone, since the impact on Minnesota is limited at this point – but the move sets a precedent that will have an impact rural areas in Minnesota.

On the one hand it makes sense. Customers are giving up their landlines in droves so why support it? On the other hand, this has the potential to leave a whole swath of the country without service or at least without choice.

The move brings the broadband conversation to old debates – should broadband be a utility or is it a commodity? And what’s broadband? Does broadband just relate to a speed definition? Are there expectations of reliability? What about data caps?

Utility versus Commodity

The difficulty with thinking of broadband as a utility is that it implies (and probably would introduce) a range of regulations that few providers want. But the problem with not thinking about it as a utility is that it has become a necessary infrastructure. I’ve written about the range of activities that require broadband – online job applications, access to telemedicine, remote and online education. It seems as if there’s a push to make better use of these online tools – especially by governments and government agencies from Civic Hack events to broadband in the courtroom. But is it fair to shift services online without ensuring that all citizens have the infrastructure to access those services? Or maybe more to the short term question, can the US government afford to maintain online and traditional services? And if not, is it fair to shift services to only those who have access to broadband especially since we’ve seen that the folks on the far end of the divide tend to be older, to have less education and lower incomes – folks who may be in greater need of public services. Perhaps an investment in infrastructure opens the door to cheaper online-delivered services in the future!

This might be an opportunity to come up with some public-private partnerships that have been touted both by the National Broadband Plan and the Minnesota Ultra High-Speed Task Force report. Maybe there’s room for the ubiquity and reliability of a utility with the value added service of a commodity. But it starts with asking some hard questions – of communities and providers. (I am reminded of statistic heard at the TED conference this summer of the global population shift to urban areas. Communities that don’t ask the hard questions may find the shift happening around and despite them.)

Definitions Matter

In March I wrote about the importance of definitions in terms of funding…

The definition of broadband has been used to calibrate funding mechanisms. So even though the topic is dry and wonky – the outcome is important to folks on the street, especially in rural areas, because it defines the speeds that the government (state or federal) might subsidize. For example, Minnesota is shooting for ubiquitous broadband at speeds of 5-10 Mbps upstream and 10-20 Mbps down. The National Broadband Plan is looking for 100 million homes to have access to 100 Mbps; and 1 Mbps upstream and 4 Mbps down for the rest.

Verizon is following the lead of the National Broadband Plan and following the funding of the USF (which supported wired infrastructure) progression to CAF (which supports a lot of wireless infrastructure). Or maybe not following the money but definitely moving away from services that are no longer receiving subsidies that support a business case. Last summer, Kevin Beyer (from Federated/Farmers Telephone) described the issue with funding wireless as opposed to wired infrastructure. Kevin’s issue related to the interconnected nature of wireless access. It’s tough to have wireless access without wired Middle Mile support.

For the end users, I think there are other differences that will be felt more acutely – I think of rural advocate on The Range (Aaron Brown) and his $1000 annual bill for satellite and issue of data caps. A recent survey in the UK indicated clearly that consumers would give up wireless access before wired.

One of my biggest concerns with the shift to wireless is that will leave many rural areas in a future limbo because providers will abandon plans to upgrade wired access with wireless options. Last fall TeleCompetitor ran an article on innovative ways to boost access through copper – in response I spoke to Brent Christensen at MN Telecom Alliance…

In my mind, fiber is the ultimate “end state”. There are many in the wireless world that would seriously disagree. Regardless, there is no way you can successfully build a fiber network and supporting infrastructure from scratch with no existing revenue. You start out so far in the hole you can never dig out to operate the new network, say nothing of repaying the borrowed money. That is why you no longer see private CLEC’s starting up the way they did after the 1996 act.

Brent is not the first (especially independent provider) to say that fiber is the end game plan. But will that continue to be feasible if wireless replaces copper? Or will that make the business case even more difficult? Which gets back to the other debate – is broadband a utility? Does wireless meet all of the definitions of a broadband utility.

And I always feel like I need to add that there is definitely a place for wireless! There’s a reason people are giving up their landlines – so much more convenient to use a Smartphone. But wired means more than home phone – it means infrastructure.

Archived Webinar on Digital Inclusion Efforts in MN

Earlier this week the Blandin Foundation hosted a webinar called Working effectively with PCs for People.

The primary audience was Blandin Broadband Community leaders, folks who are looking to boost broadband demand and use in their communities. Some of the topics are pretty-project specific but many are not.  I think folks interested in digital inclusion in any community will find it interesting. It will help you:

  • Put together a great local effort to identify and reach targeted audiences to donate and receive computers.
  • Learn how to create a sustainable program rather than a one-time event.
  • Learn how others have teamed with broadband providers.

Presenters include Sam Drong of PCs for People; Renae Tostenson, Lac qui Parle Valley School District; Carrie Amann, CenturyLink; Briana Anderson, Kootasca Community Action; and Michelle Warner, Mobile Citizen. The webinar includes some touching stories from the field too!

 

BBC Community Project: eBusiness training at Fond du Lac

Bill_ColemanAs a Blandin Broadband Community, the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa set small business technology development as a priority.  Their goal is to spur small business formation and use of technology through small business training sessions on a variety of business technology strategies and tools. They will focus on e-commerce and small business training for trial members on Fond du Lac Reservation.

Like any community, Fond du Lac has many residents who own and operate small businesses, many of those operate out of their homes.  Within the Fond du Lac Reservation, many of these small business owners live in the rural countryside where broadband may not be readily available and learning technology tools may be difficult.

The Fond du Lac will bring small businesses together at community facilities where computers and connectivity are available for use by community members.  The training will provide hands-on experience that will show business owners how to research, purchase, market and sell.  The Fond du Lac steering team has discussed the creation of an online community marketplace where small businesses could sell their products on a shared web site that cooperatively promotes all of their goods, many of which are locally created food products, artisan crafts and artwork.   The ultimate goal would be to increase incomes of Fond du Lac tribal members.

Chaska Reconsidering Commuinty Wi-Fi

According to WatchDog, Chaska.net (a community run broadband service provider since 2004) is considering its options as upgrades are required to their infrastructure…

“It’s less about should we sell Chaska.net and it’s more do we reinvest into that next level of technology or do we think our goal of being a connected community has been met?,” said Chaska City Administrator Matt Podhradsky. “Are there enough private sector options where it doesn’t make sense as a public sector entity to move into providing a next level service?”

Chaska.net now serves 1,400 subscribers, or about 13 percent of the southwestern Twin Cities suburb’s households, down 33 percent from a peak of 2,100 customers a few years ago.  Billed as the first municipal Internet utility in the country, Chaska.net started out providing fiber optic high speed service for the city, schools and some businesses back in the dark ages of the worldwide web — 1998.

The article goes on to provide some financial details…

The muni-network breaks about even on annual operating expenses, but has spent $3.3 million on technology infrastructure since its inception, including $2.1 million for dozens of WiFi cells and other equipment for the wireless system.  Officials say those funds came from the city’s electric utility and were partially offset by an unspecified amount of in-kind broadband services provided to city offices and operations.

Now city hall faces a daunting $2.5 to $3 million bill to upgrade the system by 2015 to meet technical support requirements from the manufacturer.  The deadline prompted the community to reexamine the feasibility of operating a citywide WiFi network that could siphon city funds needed for other priorities.

It will be interesting to see what they decide. I know that Chaska has been innovative in their use of wireless, such as equipping school buses with wireless access. Chaska is close to the Twin Cities, so I suspect there are more options for providers than there were in 2004. But you have to wonder what role the community network has played in making Chaska more attractive to a commercial provider. And will they look to an outside vendor for their government network as well. It seems as if providing their own government network may be a piece of the financial snapshot that we don’t get from the WatchDog article.

eBooks and their role on publishers, libraries, authors, readers

libraryGovernment Technology recently ran a story about ebooks and libraries. I think it’s interesting for anyone who uses a library or writes or sells books but it’s also interesting for anyone who is in an industry where technology can or might be a disruptive technology. Some disruptive technologies – such as digital versus traditional cameras – are clear game changers. eBooks are a pretty clear game changer too – but the relationship between ebook and library is a little slower to develop. It’s also a story of what happens when business plans don’t keep up with technology.

The quick background – libraries have to pay a lot more for ebooks than traditional books. They have to deal with restrictive borrowing policies. The big publishers have been calling these shots. Big publishers have traditionally been quite fair to libraries but have seen the threat of borrowing ebooks on their ability to sell ebooks. Some won’t even sell them ebooks. Another quick fact – ebook readership has grown from 6 percent in 2010 to 18 percent in 2011 to 33 percent in 2012.

More info from the article…

Before the arrival of e-books, the library business model for purchasing and distributing print books was set in stone. There were intermediaries between the publishers and libraries, companies like the giant distributor Baker & Taylor, but there was little tension. Libraries purchased books at a comfortable discount, sometimes as much as 40 percent off the retail price, and publishers earned an acceptable profit by selling them new releases and replacements for worn-out books. A library bought a copy of a book, and it could lend the copy as many times as the binding would hold; if the book was in high demand, the library could buy more copies. Affordable prices meant a library could build a huge reservoir of material for its readers.

The digital market, however, has been built from scratch in the last few years, and all those old norms have disappeared. There are still intermediaries that transmit digital files from the publisher’s online collection to the libraries — one company, OverDrive, owns an 85 percent market share — but little else is the same. First of all, not every major publisher is selling its products to any library that wants them. Several, including Simon & Schuster, Macmillan and Penguin, either don’t sell e-books to libraries at all or have only begun to do so through pilot projects that work with select libraries, usually concentrated in New York. This leaves out the nearly 9,000 other libraries spread throughout the rest of the country.

Even if publishers do sell to libraries, they’ve restructured the rules. HarperCollins, for example, sets a limit of 26 loans on each e-copy; after that limit is reached, the library has to purchase a new copy license.

And info on the solution…

It was remarkable in its simplicity: LaRue decided to build a digital warehouse and contracting system, which would allow his libraries to purchase directly from smaller publishers and authors, cutting out the Big Six and OverDrive, which would mean lower prices. In January 2011, Douglas County Libraries purchased Adobe software that for $10,000 would serve as the backbone of the new system, safely transferring files from the provider to the library to the reader. LaRue wrote “Dear Publishing Partner” letters, setting simple yet firm expectations for how the content would be handled and eliminating the restrictions that accompanied the major publishers’ products. The whole enterprise cost $200,000, but LaRue says the libraries have already saved that much in a year because the prices they’re paying for the independent and self-published materials are much lower, up to 45 percent below retail.

The system went live in February 2012, and LaRue went to work finding partners. They soon flooded Douglas County’s digital shelves. The libraries have so far purchased e-books from more than 900 smaller publishers and hundreds of individual authors. They make up 21,000 of the 35,000 titles in his virtual catalog. The rest come from the major publishers, sold through intermediaries at much higher prices. Those mainstream titles are still more popular with readers, making up 65 percent of the county’s loans, but it’s clear that the appetite for the independent and self-published content is growing.

It seems like a terrific opportunity for the small publishers. In fact, this may be a road for authors to work directly with libraries…

Having lit this fuse, LaRue is turning his attention toward what he sees as the next frontier: libraries themselves as publishers. Now that Douglas County has the content management system for its direct-purchasing project, he thinks it would be easy to turn that into a self-publishing portal. The library would be the center of a local authors’ society, connecting self-starters to copy editors, cover artists and e-book distributors, and transforming thousands of Word documents sitting idly on neighborhood desktops into polished, professional products. LaRue hasn’t actually done this yet, but the idea is already attracting adherents. Officials at the Harris County Public Library say they’re interested in eventually starting a similar project.

A great example of innovation born of need. And it’s an innovation with a trickle effect. It will be interesting to see what the big publishers do. They can see what’s happened to the music industry, to Kodak cameras and Netflix. Will they be able to come up with their own innovation. I also think it’s a fun invitation for all of us to think about what we could do differently in our own industry. Are there needs to be filled? Are there opportunities worth taking? Broadband doesn’t just make things faster – it can be a game changer in the right hands!

Free webinar this Thurs: Facilitating computer donations in your community

Just wanted to share the following opportunity with folks. It’s specifically for the Blandin Broadband Communities – but I think there will be plenty of info that will be of great value to any community trying to boost broadband expansion. Also I think the PCs for People folks are great…

Here’s the link to register for our next webinar, this Thursday from 3 – 4 pm.

We’re pleased to have Sam Drong from PCs for People and a panel of on-the-ground experts with us. Learn how to put together a great local effort to identify and reach targeted audiences to donate and receive computers. You’ll learn how to create a sustainable program rather than a one-time event, and how others have partnered with broadband providers to increase broadband accessibility in their communities.

Update on Cook County Broadband

The Arrowhead Electric Coop does such a nice job of keeping customers and out-of-town fans updated on what’s happening with their fiber network. Yesterday they posted a Facebook update on progress in their area…

Broadband Construction 7/8/13: Underground construction doing clean-up in the Coyote Ridge area, boring County Road 7 & E. 5th St., Croftville area. Drops E & W 3rd and 4th Streets, Highway 61 in Grand Marais and County Road 60. Aerial work will resume on 7/9/13.

I like to share the update for two reasons. First – it’s good to see the network grow. Second – it’s a great example of best practice in terms of building interest and keeping potential customers informed.

USDA Distance Learning and Telemedicine (DLT) Grant Program

I thought the following might be of interest. As Always I’d love to see some Minnesota applications in the mix.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)’s Distance Learning and Telemedicine (DLT) Grant Program has issued its FY2013 Notice of Funding, Application Guide and related resources. Eligible applicants must operate a rural community facility or deliver telemedicine or distance learning services to an organization that operates such a facility. Applications are due August 12.

Here’s more info on the opportunity from the application…

DLT grants are specifically designed to provide access to education, training and health care resources for people in rural America. The DLT Program provides financial assistance to encourage and improve telemedicine services and distance learning services in rural areas through the use of telecommunications, computer networks, and related advanced technologies to be used by students, teachers, medical professionals, and rural residents.

The grants, which are awarded through a competitive process, may be used to fund telecommunications enabled information, audio and video equipment and related advanced technologies which extend educational and medical applications into rural locations. Grants are made for projects where the benefit is primarily delivered to end users that are not at the same location as the source of the education or health care service.

As in years past, the FY 2013 DLT Grant Application Guide has been updated based on program experience. All applicants should carefully review and prepare their applications according to instructions in the FY 2013 Application Guide and sample materials when compiling a DLT grant application. …

II. Maximum and Minimum Amount of Applications

Under 7 CFR 1703.124, the Administrator has determined the maximum amount of a grant to be made available to an applicant in FY 2013 is $500,000, and the minimum amount of a grant is $50,000, subject to availability of funding.

Comcast to bring Wi-Fi to Twin Cities

According to the Pioneer Press, Comcast may be bring Wi-Fi to the Twin Cities via its customers…

Cable company Comcast, the Twin Cities’ largest broadband-Internet provider, is the latest to boldly expand its Wi-Fi reach — even extending it outdoors.

This week, the Philadelphia-based company detailed its nationwide plan to modify or replace its home customers’ wireless routers so that they broadcast two Wi-Fi signals: the private Wi-Fi network accessed by the homeowners, and a separate, public Xfinity-branded Wi-Fi signal accessible to all — neighbors and passersby.

In effect, this would make every Comcast Internet customer’s home a hotspot, potentially knitting together a Wi-Fi signal that could blanket a city, making accessing a signal similar to turning on the radio.

That would be great, especially if they consider broadening the reach to all of their coverage areas. In the nice accompaniment to the article, reporter Julio Ojeda-Zapata addresses some potential concerns from the customer perspective…

MAKE MY ROUTER PUBLIC? REALLY?

Residential Wi-Fi users may need a bit of time to wrap their heads around the idea of opening up their routers for public use while preserving their private access. Among the concerns they might raise:

Security. Properly configured, a router with public-access Wi-Fi should not represent a security risk for those on the router’s private and secure network. The technical reasons for this are a bit complicated; read an Open Wireless Movement explanation at openwireless.org.

Service degradation. Those using the slower public portion of a home router typically won’t degrade performance on the faster private side. Future routers would speed up public access when the private side isn’t being used and give the private network priority if required.

Legal liability. Those who fear being blamed for misuse of their public Wi-Fi signals are said to be protected under a “safe harbor” doctrine akin to that protecting Internet service providers. In other words, they’re likely not liable for the mischief of porn purveyors or music pirates.

Freeloading. Fear of freeloaders is misplaced, the Open Wireless Movement believes. “Sharing capacity helps everyone,” it says. “If you’ve ever been without Internet access and needed to check an email, you will remember how useful open networks can be in a pinch.”

Librarians to the Healthcare/Isurance Literacy Rescue

libraryI suspect many readers know, but I was a reference librarian. It’s a funny job where people wonder why you got a Master’s Degree in Library Science when they learned the alphabet in kindergarten. They also wonder why you have to look things up as if an MLIS is going to help you know the population Chicago in 1956. It’s a fun job – people come and ask all sorts of great questions. Even when I was a librarian 15 years ago, people came to the librarian to learn how to use technology and for basic information literacy skills. So I wasn’t surprised to see that the libraries and librarians are getting involved in helping people understand implications and applications of the new health care options. According to Minnesota Public Radio

The nation’s librarians will be recruited to help people get signed up for insurance under President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul. Up to 17,000 U.S. libraries will be part of the effort to get information and crucial computer time to the millions of uninsured Americans who need to get coverage under the law.

As the article points out, people already go to the library for information…

Libraries equipped with public computers and Internet access already serve as a bridge across the digital divide, so it made sense to get them involved, said Julie Bataille, spokeswoman for the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

“Libraries are a tremendous resource for people in their communities,” Bataille said. “They’re already a destination many individuals go to when they’re seeking out information and understanding on a variety of issues.”

I think it’s a great idea – but the last time I checked many libraries had a 30-minue time limit on computers, which is often enforced strictly because of the waiting list to use computers. Also many libraries are closed on Sundays and other odd hours. To really position the libraries and librarians to support the effort, I think it might be time to invest in computers, broadband and hours for the libraries!

ABCs of Becoming a Fiber Community via FTTH Council

Thanks to Bill Coleman for sharing the following resource. It’s only 5 pages long, but it includes a lot of the nuts and bolts that you need to consider when thinking about deploying Fiber to the Home. Here’s a high level look at what they discuss. The report fleshed out each step…

Community and Local Government Leadership & Support

  • Develop a clear broadband plan
  • Ensure commitment of community stakeholders, including local government personnel
  • Define an expeditious process for on-going permitting and inspections
  • Permit innovative construction techniques
  • Build out requirements have been proven counterproductive

Use of Existing Infrastructure

  • Publish data about existing infrastructure
  • Make all rights of way available on clearly defined reasonable terms through a rapid approval process
  • Make poles available on clearly defined reasonable terms through a rapid approval process
  • Ensure make-ready work s performed expeditiously
  • Coordinate all pole maintenance and make-ready work with the new provider to save costs
  • Allow prospective attachers to perform all make-ready work themselves through contractors

 

Proactively Improving Existing Infradtructure

  • Provide space on all poles for new attachers
  • Install ubiquitous finer conduit
  • Use building codes and community development plans to drive their deployments