CrowdFiber – a tool for building networks together

I was just part of a conversation the other day about deploying broadband to rural areas and issues of population density. Urban areas have the advantage of having the numbers to help make the business case to invest in better broadband. For rural areas making the number work can be much more difficult. It would be helpful to be able to at least reach and mobilize the rural population that is there. And that’s just one thing that the new CrowdFiber tool will be able to do. It’s only in beta testing now but it sounds as if it will be open for regular business soon…

CrowdFiber is an online marketplace where service providers, local governments, utilities, community organizations, interested citizens, consumers and businesses can organize around the goal of building, investing in and sustaining Gigabit communities.

The website goes on to explain the role it can play in facilitating fiber deployment based on the role the reader plays in the community…

If you’re a consumer or business who wants to find out if advanced broadband services are coming to your community, you will be able to visit CrowdFiber.com and search for your address. If there’s an active CrowdFiber campaign underway in your area, you’ll have the option of “joining the crowd” by pledging to that campaign. If not, you’ll have the option of starting a new “greenfield” campaign!

If you’re a service provider, you’ll be able to create and manage “edge out” campaigns to aggregate demand in areas near your existing infrastructure. This will help you prioritize expansion of your network into areas where demand is the highest – thereby reducing risk at the same time you are building community support.

If you’re a community organization, local government, utility or even an interested citizen, you’ll be able to start a new greenfield campaign in your area. To do this, you’ll draw your geographic zones on a map (which might coincide with neighborhood boundaries), set goals for the amount of money you need to raise or backers you need to secure, define pledge levels, raise funds and aggregate everyone’s demand. Your CrowdFiber campaign can then be used to attract service provider investments and other resources, or to finance you becoming your own community-based service provider!

One last note, I think it’s always helpful to know who is behind a project. To their credit, the sponsors have made the connection to business clear…

CrowdFiber is a project of Civitium, LLC — a consulting firm that has planned, engineered and managed the construction of innovative broadband networks around the world for more than a decade. For more information, visit Civitium’s website.

Bush Community Innovation Grants – up to $200,000

This has been a great week for grants and other opportunities. I hope it’s a sign of good things to come. Yesterday I noticed that the Bush Foundation is offering Community Innovation Grants. It sure seems like broadband could be a part of some innovative community projects. I don’t know more than what they’ve posted online but it could be worth pursuing. Near the bottom they allude to a second opportunity for communities that are really on top of their innovation game. So there’s something for communities at all places on the innovative spectrum…

The Community Innovation Grants support innovation through community-powered problem-solving: inclusive, collaborative processes focused on making the most of community assets.  We think of this as civic R&D, allowing communities to develop and test new solutions to community challenges. …

We welcome projects starting at all points along the path of creating innovative solutions, from identifying a community need or opportunity all the way through testing a new idea. We imagine that community-powered problem-solving projects may include things like community engagement, capacity-building, or piloting new solutions.

Take a look at these project examples to get your creative juices flowing.

Program Basics

  • Grants range from $10,000 up to $200,000.
  • You may identify and define your community. This could be a geographic community (e.g. a neighborhood, town, state or Native nation) and it could be an affinity or racial/ethnic community.
  • We are not prioritizing any specific issues and instead are open to projects that address all sorts of needs and opportunities. In addition, projects can be at various stages of the problem-solving process including identifying the need or opportunity, generating ideas, building capacity or solution testing. Proposals can focus on one area or span multiple stages.
  • Bush Foundation staff will work with grantees to agree upon the appropriate grant period for their project. We anticipate most grants will use their funds within two years.
  • The first round of applications in 2013 are due on Thursday, July 11, 2013 at 5 p.m. CDT. Our second round will open in December of 2013. Starting in 2014, we expect to offer two grant rounds each year.
  • We are currently developing a small grant version of the Community Innovation Grants program for projects up to $10,000. More information about this program is coming soon!

Have you already achieved your community innovation and you’re looking for recognition and creative capital? Consider applying for the Bush Prize for Community Innovation.

(Spoiler alert – the Bush Prize can be up to $500,000!!)

Details on Additional Connect America Fund subsidies: $485 Million to Expand Broadband Access Across Underserved Rural Areas

Connected Nation recently put out a  press release on the additional round of Phase I Connect America Fund subsidies for larger (“price cap”) local telephone companies. Here are some highlights…

2013 Connect America Fund Phase I Program

Largely speaking, this funding opportunity is structured similarly to the Connect American Fund Phase I program of 2012, but there are several important changes in its implementation. Specific program details include:

Areas Eligible for Phase I Subsidies – For the 2013 round of Phase I subsidies, eligible areas now include areas traditionally served by these 13 price cap carriers that do not have access to fixed broadband service of at least 3 Mbps download/768 Kbps upload speeds, according to the National Broadband Map. Last year, eligible areas included only those unserved by fixed broadband service at speeds of only 768 Kbps download/200 Kbps upload. This new definition nearly triples the number of areas eligible for Phase I subsidies in 2013 than were eligible in 2012.

BTOP and BIP Areas Excluded – The FCC will not award Phase I subsidies in areas where the federal government has already allocated subsidies for broadband build-out through the BTOP or BIP programs.

Build-Out Requirements – A provider that accepts the one-time Phase I funding for a census block will have 3 years to build-out broadband at speeds of at least 4 Mbps down/1 Mbps up in that census block.

Use of the National Broadband Map – The FCC will be using the National Broadband Map to identify eligible areas for these subsidies. It will use the version of the Map currently online based on broadband inventory estimates for June 2012.

Subsidy Amounts per Location Served – Under this program the FCC is offering subsidies on a per-location-passed basis with two separate benchmarks. For areas that do not have access to fixed broadband at 768 kbps download/200 kbps upload, the FCC is offering a one-time subsidy of $775 per location passed to fund the upgrade. To upgrade areas that have access 768 kbps/200 kbps fixed broadband but which do not have access to the FCC’s benchmark of 3 Mbps download/768 Kbps upload, the FCC will provide a one-time subsidy of $550 per location.

Allocation of Subsidies Across Price Cap Carriers – The FCC will make up to $485 million available in this program, allocated among the 13 price cap providers. In this Order it sets an initial allocation of $300 million as follows:

price cap

These amounts are not, however, a cap for funding available under this program for each provider. Recognizing that the subsidies offered to each provider may not be accepted (as was the case in 2012 Phase I program), the FCC is introducing a mechanism by which the providers can request funds beyond this allocated amount. In particular, each provider can submit subsidy requests for 2013 up to $300 million. If the program is oversubscribed, the FCC will allocate up to $485 million in subsidies based on the proportions of the allocation above.

The allocation, then, is perhaps best thought of as a guarantee for a minimum amount of subsidies if the subsidy recipients agree to make the associated build-out commitments. Providers like PRTC and Cincinnati Bell that do not have an initial allocation may identify areas to which it would make a build-out commitment in exchange for Phase I funds, and those requests may be accepted if all $485 million is not claimed by all other providers.

Process and Mapping Challenges – The FCC is establishing a 60-day challenge process to resolve disputes as to whether the National Broadband Map accurately reflects the availability of broadband in areas eligible for Phase I funding. After price cap providers make their build-out commitments, the FCC will make those areas public and invite comment from the public within 30 days, with another 30 days reserved for rebuttal. In this way, parties will be able to challenge eligibility of the subsidy if, for example, they can prove that a given area is already served. By insisting that these disputes be raised publicly and in a targeted manner, this process represents a significant improvement over prior efforts by the FCC to resolve this category of disputes.

Telecom Industry Unhappy with Telecom Tax

I like to at least try to offer a balanced view on broadband policies. So I’ve been hoping to see something positive about the change in Minnesota’s telecommunications equipment sales tax but haven’t seen anything. In fairness, I suspect that the people who are intended to benefit aren’t keeping an eye on the issue. It will mean more money for the State in terms of tax revenue; I guess the question is will the tax prevent revenue by pricing projects out of budget?

The Minnesota Telecom Alliance has been keeping an eye on the issue – as obviously their members are on the frontlines of such purchases. They posted the following in a recent newsletter…

For many years Central Office Equipment has been exempt from State sales tax.  This is no longer the case.  While the legislation expanded sales tax exemptions for other items, it removed this important tool for telcos.  Repealing the COE sales tax exemption was originally proposed by the Governor in his first budget in February.  It was taken out of his revised budget later in the session.  As a result, it was taken out of the House’s tax bill but not the Senate’s bill.  As the bill went through the conference committee process, the MTA and other industry segments lobbied hard to keep the exemption.  A special thank you to Gene Wenstrom (Hanson Communications) and Dave Schornack (Arvig) for their many calls and text messages to Senators Skoe and Koenen.  It should be noted that repealing this sales tax exemption is completely opposite of the Governor’s own Broadband Task Force, which had recommended expanding the exemption to include all Broadband equipment purchases.

David C. Olson, president of the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce followed up the sentiment in a recent letter to the editor in the Duluth News Tribune

The telecommunications equipment sales tax will make it more expensive to supply broadband and technology that is critical for rural areas in Northeastern Minnesota and elsewhere in the state to compete and thrive. The tax on storage and warehousing could devastate this industry’s ability to compete in Minnesota and will result in sales tax on storage of agricultural inputs, too.

Eagan Signs First Provider

According to the Minneapolis Star Tribune

The city of Eagan and Frontier Communications have reached an agreement under which Frontier will become the first telecommunications provider on AccessEagan, the city’s wholesale fiber network.

The agreement could mean faster Internet speeds and more service options for many businesses in Eagan. It also adds the city’s 16-plus miles of fiber optic lines to Frontier’s more than 302 miles of fiber in Dakota County.

AccessEagan is a wholesale fiber network owned by the city and open to any telecommunications carrier wishing to provide services to Eagan businesses. The city provides no retail services.

The AccessEagan lines are in central and north Eagan mostly, with an extension going in this summer in the Cedar Grove area, where an outlet shopping mall is being built.

It will be fun to see what happens both in terms of faster access and competition.

Opportunity for Techie Girls in MN

Lots of opportunities coming up today. I learned about the following from the MHTA newsletter…

The Anita Borg Institute is seeking applications for high school students to attend the October 2-5 Grace Hopper Celebration here in Minneapolis.  40 high school students will be selected to attend this prestigious event as part of the GenConnext program.

They are inviting 40 high school students from the Minneapolis area to participate in GHC 2013. Here are the details…

  • Dates: October 2-5, 2013.
  • Location: Minneapolis Convention Center

What will you do at the event?

  • Experience being part of Career Fair that features organizations like Google, • Facebook, Cisco, Microsoft, HP, University of Minnesota, Carnegie Mellon University, Harvey Mudd, and many more.
  • Attend one of the largest Poster sessions featuring research work from over • 150 undergraduate & graduate students.
  • Connect with women mentors and other high school students who share your • tech interests.
  • Be inspired by attending sessions, enjoy a delicious lunch and possibly attend • the Friday evening celebration.
  • Learn what you need to do to prepare for a technology career through a • panel of experts.
  • Participate in a code-a-thon to benefit humanity or be engaged in some • hands‑on skill Gaming Workshop.

Apply to participate

Complete the simple and easy online application. Visit: http://gracehopper.org/2013/conference/grace-hopper-genconnext-program/.

Please note: The application deadline is June 30, 2013.

Google Academy for Teachers – Apply by June 10

blog_schoolI’ve heard great things about the Google Academy for Teachers by former attendees. Here’s the spiel about the program…

The GTA is a FREE professional development experience designed to help primary and secondary educators from around the globe get the most from innovative technologies. Produced by CUE, each Academy is an intensive, two-day event during which participants get hands-on experience with Google’s free products and other technologies, learn about innovative instructional strategies, receive resources to share with colleagues, and immerse themselves in a supportive community of educators making impact.

The deadline is June 10 – the training is happening July 24-25, 2013 in Chicago. They are looking for approximately 50 teachers. I would love to see some Minnesota teaches in the mix!

Minnesota Online Sales Tax Starts July 1

It’s official Minnesota will require major online sites to collect Minnesota’s 6.875 percent sales tax starting July 1, 2013. Good news for brick and mortar shops who have felt the lack of online tax (or really lack of enforcing online tax) has been unfair. Bad news for shoppers and large online retailers. Small online businesses are still exempt from the tax. The Pioneer Press reports…

The new law will have some wrinkles that don’t completely close the online tax-free opening. Smaller e-commerce sites are still not covered. Nor are online retailers that don’t have affiliated partners or physical stores in Minnesota. An affiliated partner would be a third-party seller that a retail site such as Amazon connects with an online buyer.

Catch Deer River High School Students’ Cross Country Online Concert Tonight

I am in the room with Superintendent Matt Grose from Deer River Schools and he just told us about something very fun that’s happening online tonight when the Deer River high school students will be performing a joint concert online with students in Chicago, California and professional singers. You can sign up to see them online through the Cisco website.

Bridging the Gap Concert
(Live Webcast May 22, 2013 at 6:00 pm Pacific Time / 8:00 pm Central Time)

Join students from across the nation, as they perform, sing, read poetry, dance, and celebrate the arts with their peers during this cross-country telepresence event.

– Deer River High School | Deer River, Minnesota
– Martin Luther King College Prep | Chicago, Illinois
– Emerson Middle School | Los Angeles, California

Hosted annually, Bridging the Gaps concert is sponsored by Urban Entertainment Institute (UEI) and Cisco. Founded by Fred Martin in 2002, the UEI is an after-school program that is dedicated to training inner-city youths in the performing arts at no charge to their families.

Minnesota not on top ranking list for broadband availability according to NTIA

NTIA’s Report on Broadband Availability is out. They have tracked availability from June 2010 to June 2012. Here’s the quick answer…

ntia

Broadband at the basic speed combination of 3/768 is available to 98.18% of the population, and 94.39% of Americans can subscribe to services of at least 10 Mbps

I’d like to remove that 3/768 track, but the NTIA explains why they track such slow speeds…

NTIA begins its analysis at the combined advertised connection of 3 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, which is the closest combination of speeds for which NTIA collects data that would allow a consumer to “access a basic set of applications that include sending and receiving e-mail, downloading Web pages, photos and video, and using simple video conferencing.”

I think it’s also important to know their definition of available; it’s a little non-standard…

For the purposes of NTIA’s data collection, broadband is “available” if it can be deployed to a business or consumer within 7-10 business days and without an extraordinary commitment of resources. This definition is in contrast to “adoption,” which means that a consumer or business subscribes to or uses broadband at a particular location. The definition of broadband does not specifically include price, latency, bandwidth limitations, or other factors that may impact a user’s ability to purchase or use the service.

What about Minnesota?

As always I’m most concerned with how Minnesota stacks up in the report. They include a list of the top 15 States with Most Broadband Access at 10, 25, and 50 Mbps. Minnesota does not make any of those lists. I guess on a silver lining note, we don’t make the worst list either. Minnesota also got no mention on a recent Akamai report that track speed and adoption.

About a week ago, Connect Minnesota gave a sneak preview on Minnesota’s broadband availability. (Connect Minnesota provides data to NTIA for their report.)

Last October, our data showed that there was 61.57% access across the state at the 10 Mbps by 6 Mbps tier (and 81.97% at the 10 Mbps x 3 Mbps tier, fixed platform; factoring in mobile broadband, we had 87.18% availability at this speed tier).

As of April 2013, we see an improvement of nearly eight percent: April 2013 data showed that 69.19% of Minnesota households have access to broadband at a minimum of 10 Mbps download by 6 Mbps upload (and 87.0% at the 10 Mbps x 3 Mbps tier, fixed platform; factoring in mobile broadband, we have 97.28% availability at this speed tier).

It’s great (really great!) to see a 8 percentage growth – and hopefully that will put us on track to make the Top 15 list in the future but it doesn’t help us rank today.

Outside of the Minnesota perspective, there were a few other points I found interesting…

  • Almost 100% of urban residents have access to download speeds of at least 6 Mbps, but only 82% of rural communities can access these speeds. Almost 88% percent of urban residents have access to speeds of 25 Mbps. Only 41% of rural residents, less than half those in urban communities, have the same access. …
  • approximately 5% of the population lives in areas with basic wireless broadband service, but no wireline broadband service. …
  • The increase in wireline speeds is primarily a result of an increase in cable speeds, followed by a much smaller increase in fiber deployment.

Why is Target going to San Fransisco for Tech Talent?

Here’s a frustrating headline from Minneapolis/St Paul Business Journal:

Target goes tech-hunting in San Francisco

Why aren’t they looking in Minnesota? Here’s the news…

Target Corp. has opened an office in San Francisco, where it plans to scout for tech talent to build its e-commerce and mobile technology efforts.

Reuters reports that Target had hired David Newman to run its Technology Innovation Center, which will seek out other tech companies that can help Target’s tech ventures, like speeding up its website or improve the shopping experience for smartphone-wielding customers already in its stores.

A good friend and definite tech talent moved to San Francisco a couple of years ago. So I know why. He’s had more opportunities there – with established and startup companies. He moved there because he knew he’d learn more, earn more and have greater opportunities. (I’m not sure he realized that earning more might be offset by such a rising cost of living!) At the end of the day, he is a tech talent from Minnesota and he was drawn West. And his migration is part of why it makes sense that a company wanting to tap into such talent would look West. It’s where the talent goes.

I guess what I’m asking is how Minnesota can build the talent – and perhaps more importantly the reputation as a place to go for tech talent? I think programs like Thomson Reuters working with youth on programming skills helps. I think communities, such as Fergus Falls have done a good job marketing themselves as a great place to telework – but it seems like a concerted statewide effort to bolster efforts to improve and promote our local tech skills would help keep Minnesota companies from going to San Francisco to find tech talent.

Small Businesses in Rural MN Using Facebook

Last week I got to spend a couple of days in Lac qui Parle County. LqP is home to a ARRA-funded fiber to the home network. It’s also home to a couple of businesses who are making good use of Facebook and other social media channels. I thought it might be fun to hear from two businesses (The Cellar Door and Crazy About Purses) about how and why Facebook has been working for them:

Minnesota Office of Broadband Development Bill on to Governor

Earlier this evening the bill to establish an Office of Broadband Development passed in the Senate and House and is on its way to the Governor’s Office. As was mentioned earlier this week, the Office has been moved from the Department of Commerce to DEED (Department of Employment and Economic Development) and the director will be appointed by the Governor.

Broadband Update from Cook County

I’m pleased to share an update from the Arrowhead Electric Coop Facebook page – with a reminder that while this is good news, it doesn’t mean service will be available next week…

arrowheadBig Broadband News!!  Progress on backhaul (the all important connection to Duluth) is being made.  Monday, make ready work will begin on power poles in Lake County.  Once completed the much needed fiber optic cable will be installed and eventually spliced into Arrowhead’s cable.  It’s a huge step in the right direction for Arrowhead and everyone in Cook County.  No dates to provide at this time…stay tuned….!!

If interested in construction crew locations in Cook County: Fiber Splicers working in Schroeder, Aerial drop crews working in Grand Marais and pulling cable into conduit installed last year along Bethany Dr.
Meeting with contractor today to begin discussing the much anticipated construction crew ramp up…

Update on MN Office of Broadband Development – keep it in DEED, less money

Yesterday I reported an update on the Office of Broadband Development as was reported at the Minnesota Broadband Task Force meeting. In short, the proposal had been modified to move the Office to DEED and maintain a budget of $1 million over two years.

Late last night, the  Jobs and Economic Development Finance conference committee adopted the Office of Broadband Development language to be sent to the floor for a full vote.

They placed the Office under DEED’s jurisdiction and the decide that the director will be appointed by the governor. The office is slated for $250,000 per year (and admin support).

I’ll paste the pertinent info from the bill below

The Budget Info:

(o) $250,000 each year is from the general
7.16fund for the Broadband Development Office.

27.26   Subd. 4.Administrative Services

28.8$100,000 each year is for the support of
28.9broadband development.

And description…

Sec. 13. [116J.998] OFFICE OF BROADBAND DEVELOPMENT.
77.8    Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms
77.9have the meanings given them.
77.10(b) “Broadband” or “broadband service” means any service providing advanced
77.11telecommunications capability and Internet access with transmission speeds that, at a
77.12minimum, meet the Federal Communications Commission definition for broadband.
77.13(c) “Local unit of government” has the meaning given in section 116G.03,
77.14subdivision 3.
77.15(d) “Office” means the Office of Broadband Development established in subdivision
77.162, paragraph (a).
77.17    Subd. 2. Office established; purpose. (a) An Office of Broadband Development is
77.18established within the Department of Employment and Economic Development and shall
77.19remain in existence until the commissioner certifies that the state has met the broadband
77.20goals established in section 237.012. The director shall be appointed by the governor and
77.21shall serve in the unclassified service. The director must be qualified by experience and
77.22training in broadband. The office may employ staff necessary to carry out the office’s
77.23duties under subdivision 4.
77.24(b) The purpose of the office is to encourage, foster, develop, and improve broadband
77.25within the state in order to:
77.26(1) drive job creation, promote innovation, and expand markets for Minnesota
77.27businesses;
77.28(2) serve the ongoing and growing needs of Minnesota’s education systems, health
77.29care system, public safety system, industries and businesses, governmental operations,
77.30and citizens; and
77.31(3) improve accessibility for underserved communities and populations.
77.32    Subd. 3. Organization. The office shall consist of a director of the Office of
77.33Broadband Development, as well as any staff necessary to carry out the office’s duties
77.34under subdivision 4.
77.35    Subd. 4. Duties. (a) The office shall have the power and duty to:
78.1(1) serve as the central broadband planning body for the state of Minnesota;
78.2(2) coordinate with state, regional, local, and private entities to develop, to the
78.3maximum extent practicable, a uniform statewide broadband access and usage policy;
78.4(3) develop, recommend, and implement a statewide plan to encourage cost-effective
78.5broadband access, and to make recommendations for increased usage, particularly in
78.6rural and other underserved areas;
78.7(4) coordinate efforts, in consultation and cooperation with the commissioner of
78.8commerce, local units of government, and private entities, to meet the state’s broadband
78.9goals in section 237.012;
78.10(5) develop, coordinate, and implement the state’s broadband infrastructure
78.11development program under section 116J.999;
78.12(6) provide consultation services to local units of government or other project
78.13sponsors in connection with the planning, acquisition, improvement, construction, or
78.14development of any broadband deployment project;
78.15(7) encourage public-private partnerships to increase deployment and adoption
78.16of broadband services and applications, including recommending funding options and
78.17possible incentives to encourage investment in broadband expansion;
78.18(8) monitor the broadband development efforts of other states and nations in areas
78.19such as business, education, public safety, and health;
78.20(9) consult with the commissioner of commerce to monitor broadband-related
78.21activities at the federal level, including regulatory and policy changes and the potential
78.22impact on broadband deployment and sustainability in the state;
78.23(10) serve as an information clearinghouse for federal programs providing financial
78.24assistance to institutions located in rural areas seeking to obtain access to high-speed
78.25broadband service, and use this information as an outreach tool to make institutions
78.26located in rural areas that are unserved or underserved with respect to broadband service
78.27aware of the existence of federal assistance;
78.28(11) provide logistical and administrative support for the Governor’s Broadband
78.29Task Force;
78.30(12) provide an annual report, as required by subdivision 5;
78.31(13) coordinate an ongoing collaborative effort of stakeholders to evaluate and
78.32address security, vulnerability, and redundancy issues in order to ensure the reliability of
78.33broadband networks; and
78.34(14) perform any other activities consistent with the office’s purpose.
79.1(b) In carrying out its duties under this subdivision, the Office of Broadband
79.2Development shall have no authority to regulate or compel action on the part of any
79.3provider of broadband service.
79.4    Subd. 5. Reporting. (a) Beginning January 15, 2014, and each year thereafter,
79.5the Office of Broadband Development shall report to the legislative committees with
79.6jurisdiction over broadband policy and finance on the office’s activities during the previous
79.7year.
79.8(b) The report shall contain, at a minimum:
79.9(1) an analysis of the current availability and use of broadband, including average
79.10broadband speeds, within the state;
79.11(2) information gathered from schools, libraries, hospitals, and public safety facilities
79.12across the state, determining the actual speed and capacity of broadband currently in use
79.13and the need, if any, for increases in speed and capacity to meet current or anticipated needs;
79.14(3) an analysis of incumbent broadband infrastructure within the state and its ability
79.15to spur economic development;
79.16(4) an analysis of the degree to which new, additional, or improved broadband
79.17infrastructure would spur economic development in the state;
79.18(5) a summary of the office’s activities in coordinating broadband infrastructure
79.19development under section 116J.999;
79.20(6) suggested policies, incentives, and legislation designed to accelerate the
79.21achievement of the goals under section 237.012, subdivisions 1 and 2;
79.22(7) any proposed legislative and policy initiatives; and
79.23(8) any other information requested by the legislative committees with jurisdiction
79.24over broadband policy and finance, or that the office deems necessary.
79.25(c) The report may be submitted electronically and is subject to section 3.195,
79.26subdivision 1.
79.27EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

79.28    Sec. 14. [116J.999] COORDINATION OF BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE
79.29DEVELOPMENT.
79.30    Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the following terms
79.31have the meanings given them.
79.32(b) “Broadband” or “broadband service” has the meaning given in section 116J.998,
79.33subdivision 1, paragraph (b).
79.34(c) “Broadband conduit” means a conduit, pipe, innerduct, or microduct for fiber
79.35optic or other cables that support broadband and wireless facilities for broadband service.
80.1(d) “Local unit of government” has the meaning given in section 116G.03,
80.2subdivision 3.
80.3(e) “Office” means the Office of Broadband Development established in section
80.4116J.998.
80.5    Subd. 2. Broadband infrastructure development. (a) The office shall, in
80.6collaboration with the Department of Transportation and private entities, encourage and
80.7coordinate “dig once” efforts for the planning, relocation, installation, or improvement of
80.8broadband conduit within the right-of-way in conjunction with any current or planned
80.9construction, including, but not limited to, trunk highways and bridges. To the extent
80.10necessary, the office shall, in collaboration with the Department of Transportation,
80.11evaluate engineering and design standards, procedures and criteria for contracts or lease
80.12agreements with private entities, and pricing requirements, and provide for allocation
80.13of risk, costs, and any revenue generated.
80.14(b) The office shall, in collaboration with other state departments and agencies as the
80.15office deems necessary, develop a strategy to facilitate the timely and efficient deployment
80.16of broadband conduit or other broadband facilities on state-owned lands and buildings.
80.17(c) To the extent practicable, the office shall encourage and assist local units of
80.18government to adopt and implement policies similar to those under paragraphs (a) and (b)
80.19for construction or other improvements to county state-aid highways, municipal state-aid
80.20roads, and any other rights-of-way under the local unit of government’s jurisdiction, and to
80.21other lands or buildings owned by the local unit of government.
80.22(d) Special consideration must be paid to projects under this subdivision that will
80.23likely improve access to broadband by rural or underserved communities.
80.24    Subd. 3. Reporting. As part of its annual report under section 116J.998, subdivision
80.255, the office shall report on activities taken under this section, including, but not limited to,
80.26the number of current and planned projects using the “dig once” approach, any gains in
80.27broadband speed or access associated with the project, and any costs or cost savings to
80.28the state, private entity, or end user of broadband services.
80.29    Subd. 4. No right of action. Nothing in this section shall be construed to create
80.30any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any
80.31party against the state of Minnesota; its departments, agencies, or entities; its officers,
80.32employees, or agents; or any other person.
80.33EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

Sec. 18. [161.462] FIBER COLLABORATION DATABASE.
83.2    Subdivision 1. Purpose. The purpose of the fiber collaboration database is
83.3to provide broadband providers with advance notice of upcoming Department of
83.4Transportation construction projects so that they may notify the department of their
83.5interest in installing broadband infrastructure within the right-of-way during construction
83.6in order to minimize installation costs.
83.7    Subd. 2. Database. (a) The Department of Transportation shall post on its Web site,
83.8and update annually, the list of upcoming construction projects contained in its statewide
83.9transportation improvement program, including, for each project:
83.10(1) the geographical location where construction will occur;
83.11(2) the estimated start and end dates of construction; and
83.12(3) a description of the nature of the construction project.
83.13(b) The commissioner shall post the information required in paragraph (a) as far in
83.14advance of the beginning of construction as is feasible.
83.15(c) The department’s Web site must allow a provider of broadband service to register
83.16to receive from the department electronic information on proposed construction projects
83.17added to the database in specific geographical areas of the state as soon as it is updated.
83.18EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.

Sec. 26. STATE BROADBAND STRATEGY; REPORT.
92.19The Office of Broadband Development shall conduct research and produce a report
92.20recommending a set of programs and strategies the state can pursue to promote the
92.21improvement, more efficient and effective use, and expansion of broadband services in
92.22ways that will have the greatest impact on the state’s economic development, by which is
92.23meant enhancing the ability of Minnesota citizens and businesses to develop their skills,
92.24to expand businesses to new markets, develop new products, reach more customers, and
92.25lower costs. While the state’s broadband goals in Minnesota Statutes, section 237.012,
92.26address the universal provision of greater broadband access and speed statewide, this report
92.27must consider broadband as an economic development tool and must examine and analyze:
92.28(1) how the state can best use its limited resources to adopt strategies and make
92.29investments to improve the use of broadband services by subgroups of broadband users,
92.30including mobile broadband users, that promise to deliver the greatest economic impact
92.31per dollar of state investment;
92.32(2) roles the state can play in addition to financial assistance for broadband
92.33infrastructure, including supporting education and training for Minnesotans to enable
92.34them to use broadband more effectively; and
93.1(3) strategies and opportunities for state investment to leverage additional amounts
93.2of private capital and financial assistance from the federal government in order to achieve
93.3these goals.
93.4By January 15, 2014, the office shall submit the report to the chairs and ranking minority
93.5members of the senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over
93.6broadband issues.
93.7EFFECTIVE DATE.This section is effective the day following final enactment.