Stearns County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 37 of 87

Rank: 37
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

County 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Stearns 93.42 38 91.07 37 32.74 66 27

Stearns bump up from green to yellow but with grants on the way

Stearns County saw a great increase in broadband access in 2025. They are set up to get funding for fiber through BEAD, which helped bump them into Green Status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 1,651 locations in Stearns County. The majority of locations will fiber rest will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Stearns has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 91.07 75.79 84.68 84.69 84.71 82.41 81.07 40.17 38.01
25/3 (2022 goal) 93.42 80.38 90.65 89.12 93.26 88.04 91.72 88.96 87.58

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Anoka: 1,651
The locations include a mix of fiber as well as satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Mediacom LLC Meeker Cooperative Light and Power Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Stearns                                      48                                   168                                   121                                   975                                   336                                         3                              1,651 Stearns

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Stearns $9747,192 was invested in five projects over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023estimates indicated that it would cost $73.1 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • County: Stearns – Runestone Telecom Association Crow Lake
    Grant: $1,538,614, Local Match: $512,875, Total Budget: $2,051,489
  • County: Stearns – Arvig Stearns County Wakefield & Luxemburg Area
    Grant: $708,790, Local Match: $866,299, Total Budget: $1,575,089
  • County: Stearns – Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Association Paynesville Township
    Grant: $542,077, Local Match: $662,538, Total Budget: $1,204,615
  • County: Stearns – AMTA – Stearns Phase 2
    Grant: $7,123,175, Local Match: $13,287,069, Total Budget: $20,410,244
  • Arvig – Arvig – Stearns Cty
    Grant: $910,537, Local Match: $303,512, Total Budget: $1,214,049
  • 2023: Runestone Telephone Assoc. – Stearns County West Phase 2 – GRANT $4,800,000
  • 2022: Albany Mutual Telephone, $746,964.00
  • 2022: Melrose Telephone Co. dba Arvig, $4,974,570.00 (Learn more)
  • ReConnect funding through Upsala Cooperative Telephone Association in Morrison, Stearns and Todd counties.
  • 2017 – Albany Mutual Telephone Association – Two Rivers Area – GRANT $616,743
  • 2016 – ALBANY MUTUAL TELEPHONE ASSOCIATION BIG WATAB LAKE – GRANT: $726,185
  • Arvig (Melrose Telephone Company) – Eden Valley & Melrose Area Project – GRANT $393,890
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Sytek Communications – Morrison/Todd/Stearns County FTTP Project – GRANT $1,048,668 This last mile project will bring service to 130 locations in Southwest Morrison, Southeastern Todd and Northeastern Stearns counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Stearns County (http://tinyurl.com/z463nan)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

St Louis County Broadband Profile 2025: Yellow rating: Ranking out 65 of 87

Rank: 65
Code: Yellow
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
St. Louis 83.8 70 81.23 65 25.29 78 21

St Louis County: Providers are active

St Louis County’s broadband coverage increased in 2025. A couple of providers have been active in the area and BEAD will bring in some funding for fiber. St Louis retains their Yellow status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 11,678 locations in St Louis County. More than half of the connections will be fiber, the rest is a mix of satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (St Louis has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 81.23 75.79 73.14 74.89 79.49 79.22 78.2 41.2 38.78
25/3 (2022 goal) 83.8 80.38 78.35 79.7 85.5 86.72 86.23 83.47 82.72

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in St. Louis: 11,678
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC CTC Frontier IBT Group USA, LLC Mediacom LLC Midco PAUL BUNYAN COMMUNICATIONS Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Tekstar Communications, Inc. (Arvig) Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Fiber Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber
St. Louis                              3,495                                   380                              1,383                              1,516                              3,634                                      49                                      991                                   168                                      62                           11,678 St. Louis

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In St Louis County, $4.573.980 was invested in nine projects over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $227 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants

  • Paul Bunyan Rural Telephone Cooperative NW St. Louis County GigaZone Expansion
    Grant: $3,924,157, Local Match: $2,099,108, Total Budget: $6,023,265
  • Representative Liz Olson, Senator Jen McEwen – Mediacom LLC Lakewood South
    Grant: $232,800, Local Match: $543,200, Total Budget: $775,999
  • Representative Liz Olson, Senator Jen McEwen – Mediacom LLC Lakewood Normanna
    Grant: $145,000, Local Match: $526,325, Total Budget: $671,325
  • Consolidated Telephone Company – CTC – RD9 Clinton Twp
    Grant: $2,292,790, Local Match: $2,292,790, Total Budget: $4,585,580
  • Mediacom LLC – Mediacom – Esquagama Lake
    Grant: $961,102, Local Match: $961,102, Total Budget: $1,922,204
  • 2023: Paul Bunyan Rural Telephone Coop – Paul Bunyan Communications Rural GigaZone Fiber – GRANT $5,569,281
  • 2022: Mediacom Minnesota LLC, $7,363,624.53
  • 2022: Mediacom Minnesota LLC – Esko – GRANT $4,400,732
  • 2022: Mediacom Minnesota LLC – Project 19 – Hibbing – GRANT $2,141,135
  • 2022: Paul Bunyan Communications – Northern Minnesota GigaZone Fiber – GRANT $3,052,120
  • 2022: Savage Communications Inc., $562,098.00
  • 2022: Consolidated Telephone Company, $4,857,030.00 (serving St Louis and Cass)
  • 2022: Mediacom Minnesota LLC – Esquagama Lake – GRANT $821,758
  • 2017 – CenturyLink – Fredenberg Township FTTH Project – GRANT $1,809,312
    2017 – Paul Bunyan Communications – North Central Fiber – GRANT $802,620
  • 2017 – MEDIACOM FAYAL TOWNSHIP – GRANT: $263,345
  • 2014 – Mediacom, Pintar Road – Award: $137,848. Total project cost: $275,697.
  • 2014 – Northeast Service Cooperative – Frontier Communications Corp., Border to Border Phase I – Award: $1.96 million.
  • 2019: Paul Bunyan Communications – North Central Minnesota Fiber Project– GRANT $2,562,916
  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: Charter Communications (Spectrum) – Getchell Road – GRANT $11,400 This middle and last mile project will provide broadband service to eight unserved households in northern Duluth in St. Louis County.
  • Mediacom Minnesota LLC – Field of Dreams Hermantown Project – GRANT $624,751 This last mile project will serve approximately 267 underserved households, six underserved businesses, and one underserved community anchor institution in Hermantown in St. Louis County.
  • Paul Bunyan Communications – City of Cook GigaZone Fiber – GRANT $311,254 This last mile project will improve high-speed broadband for 57 unserved and 254 underserved locations in the community of Cook in St. Louis County.

Find more articles on broadband in St Louis County (http://tinyurl.com/jnm9jah)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Sibley County Broadband Profile 2025: Red rating: Ranking out 86 of 87

Rank: 86
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Sibley 65.46 86 61.19 86 56.55 49 17

Sibley County: still stuck

Sibley County’s broadband coverage has dipped, slightly but a few times over the years. The have some BEAD money coming in but only for fixed wireless and satellite. They retain their Red status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 954 locations in Sibley County. The locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Sibley has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems like a strategy worth considering.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 61.19 63.23 63.51 65.63 65.29 62.86 62.87 62.84 51.01
25/3 (2022 goal) 65.46 66.74 66.82 69.76 70.05 74.29 73.59 63.47 71.27

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Sibley: 954
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet IBT Group USA, LLC Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fixed Wireless
Sibley                                      21                                   924                                         9                                   954 Sibley

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Sibley 0 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $20.4 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants

  • 2017 – Winthrop Telephone Company, Inc. – Cornish Township FTTP Project – GRANT $365,895
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080
  • 2014 – R-S Fiber Cooperative, FTTH Project – Award: $1 million.
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Winthrop Telephone Company, Inc. – Bismarck & Transit Township FTTP Project – GRANT $716,000 This last mile project will serve 148 unserved and six underserved locations, including homes, businesses and farms, in Bismarck, Transit and Round Grove townships in Sibley and McLeod counties

Find more articles on broadband in Sibley County (https://blandinonbroadband.org/?s=sibley&submit=Search)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Sherburne County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 30 of 87

Rank: 30
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Sherburne 96.63 30 95.11 30 21.68 83 16

Sherburne County: Great improvement

After a nice increase in 2024, broadband coverage in Sherburne County stayed stagnant in 2025 but it seems they are working with providers on BEAD projects so that should help in 2026. They retain their Green Status

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 1,601 locations in Sherburne County. The majority of locations will get fiber the rest will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Sherburne has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 95.11 95 87.19 82.82 90.69 73.66 72.36 67.11 28.02
25/3 (2022 goal) 96.63 96.54 90.08 86.14 95.78 82.9 91.63 89.23 75.4

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Sherburne 1,601
The locations include a majority of fiber with a mix of cable, satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC East Central Energy Fiber IBT Group USA, LLC Midco Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Tekstar Communications, Inc. (Arvig) Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Fixed Wireless Cable Coax Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber Fiber
Sherburne                                      96                                      69                                   425                                         8                                   909                                         6                                      73                                      15                              1,601 Sherburne

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Sherburne $899,457 was invested in three projects over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $66.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Sherburne ranked 8 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Sherburne County has worked with the Blandin Foundation. They seemed to renew an interest in broadband post-pandemic.

Past Grants

  • 2023: Arvig (Tekstar) – Sherburne County Area Fiber Extension – GRANT $182,576
  • 2022: Tekstar Communications, Inc. dba Arvig, $1,075,943.50 (Learn more)
  • 2017 – Palmer Wireless – Sherburne County Road 3 – GRANT $110,661
  • 2016 – PALMER WIRELESS BIG LAKE INDUSTRIAL PARK – GRANT: $ 90,988
  • 2016 – PALMER WIRELESS DEL TONE ROAD AND ST. CLOUD AIRPORT – GRANT: $ 179,400
  • 2014 – Palmer Wireless, Becker Industrial Park – Award: $151,934.

Find more articles on broadband in Sibley County(http://tinyurl.com/ztm6c9n)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Scott County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 25 of 87

Rank: 25
Code:  Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Scott 96.36 32 95.6 28 62.91 40 17

Scott County: providers building in the area

Scott County has seen very incremental broadband improvements over the last couple years. They stand to get more fiber in the area with BEAD funding and in 2025, a couple of providers announced expansions. They retain their Green status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 1,866 locations in Scott County. The majority of locations will get fiber the rest will get satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Anoka has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 95.6 94.61 93.67 92.04 91.02 89.43 89.15 88.61 88.38
25/3 (2022 goal) 96.36 95.52 94.9 94.11 93.26 97.13 96.43 94.5 96.1

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Anoka: 1,866
The locations include a majority fiber and a mix of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Mediacom LLC Midco Nuvera Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Xfinity Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Fiber Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber
Scott                                      22                                      86                                      50                                   500                                      12                                         2                              1,194                              1,866 Scott

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Scott 0 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $26.8 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Scott ranked 3using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • 2022: Nuvera Communications, Inc., $2,436,427.00
  • 2017 – Jaguar Communications – Sand Creek Township Area Broadband Project – GRANT $192,405
  • 2019: BEVCOMM (Eckles Telephone Company) – Le Sueur County Project – GRANT $1,857,376
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Webster Rural FTTP – GRANT $431,260 This last mile project will serve 103 unserved and 178 underserved locations in Wheatland and Webster townships in Rice County, Euraka and Greenvale townships in Dakota County, and New Market and Cedar Lake townships in Scott County.

Find more articles on broadband in Scott County (http://tinyurl.com/gt4afcy)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Roseau County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 22 of 87

Rank: 22
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Roseau 97.61 27 96.72 24 75.69 23 7

Roseau County: So close but need to get traction again

Roseau County’s broadband coverage has been stagnant for the past few years. They are very close to goal do they retain their Green status, but they need a push to get closer.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 92 locations in Roseau County. Some of the locations will get fiber, the rest will get satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Roseau has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that may be a strategy worth considering.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 96.72 96.67 96.5 90.71 85.23 79.41 72.59 67.3 0
25/3 (2022 goal) 97.61 97.78 96.56 90.92 87.44 81.92 75.88 67.3 62.16

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Roseau: 92
The locations include a mix of fiber and satellite connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Wikstrom Telephone Company Inc Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber
Roseau                                      24                                      68                                      92 Roseau

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Roseau 0 was invested over the years.

No New Posts from 2025

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $2.1 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Roseau ranked 74 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • 2017 – Wikstrom Telephone – Wiktel NW MN Broadband – GRANT $1,307,785
  • 2016 – SJOBERG’S INC. ROSEAU AND LAKE OF THE WOODS COUNTIES — GRANT: $354,740
  • 2016 – CENTURYLINK THIEF RIVER MIDDLE MILE – GRANT: $1,324,400
  • 2016 – WIKSTROM TELEPHONE COMPANY WIKTEL NW MN – GRANT: $950,823
  • 2014 – Sjoberg Cable, Broadband Grant Proposal – Award $261,575
  • 2014 – Wikstrom Telephone, Kittson, Marshall, Roseau Broadband Extension Amount $425,000
  • 2019: Wikstrom Telephone – Wiktel NW MN Broadband Project – GRANT $1,151,526

Find more articles on broadband in Roseau County (http://tinyurl.com/gsq45ua)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Rock County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 10 of 87

Rank: 10
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Rock 99.91 5 99.91 4 43.18 61 14

Rock County: Nearly Perfect

Rock County’s broadband coverage is almost perfect. They had 100 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up in 2023 but now the maps show 99.91 percent. It is a map correction, but they are still very close and retain the Green status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 48 locations in Rock County. However, those locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Rock has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that might be a strategy worth considering for the last few households.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.91 99.34 100 99.9 99.93 99.93 99.93 99.93 66.32
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.91 99.34 100 99.9 99.93 99.93 99.93 99.93 68.17

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Rock: 48
The locations include satellite only.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Rock                                      48                                      48 Rock

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Rock 0 was invested over the years.

No New Posts from 2025

Highlights from Past Reports

Past Grants:

  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080
  • 2014 – Rock County Broadband Alliance (RCBA), FTTP Project – Award: $5 million.

Find more articles on broadband in Rock County (http://tinyurl.com/jjeesst)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Rice County Broadband Profile 2025: Red rating: Ranking out 62 of 87

Rank: 62
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Rice 88.04 54 83.95 62 83.7 19 19

Rice County: Dropped from yellow to red ranking 

Rice County’s broadband coverage seems to be incrementally shrinking, albeit within a margin of error. They should receive some BEAD funding but only for satellite and fixed wireless. They maintain their Red status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 2,188 locations in Rice County. More than half will get fiber but the rest will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Rice has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 83.95 85.44 84.16 85.23 85.58 82.95 82.43 32.63 48.85
25/3 (2022 goal) 88.04 89.1 88.89 90.12 94.18 93.75 92.46 93.2 97.93

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Anoka: 2,188
The locations include a mix of fiber as well as satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Midco Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Spectrum Mid-America, LLC Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fiber    
Rice                                   179                                   512                                   943                                         3                                   551                              2,188 Rice

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Rice $150,000 was invested in one project over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $30.8 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Webster Rural FTTP – GRANT $431,260 This last mile project will serve 103 unserved and 178 underserved locations in Wheatland and Webster townships in Rice County, Euraka and Greenvale townships in Dakota County, and New Market and Cedar Lake townships in Scott County.
  • BEVCOMM (Cannon Valley Telecom, Inc.) – Rural Morristown Fiber Expansion Project – GRANT $210,692 This last mile project will serve approximately 14 unserved and 94 underserved locations in portions of Rice, Waseca, and Steele counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Rice County (http://tinyurl.com/jg6q8gs)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Renville County Broadband Profile 2022: Red rating: Ranking out 81 of 87

Rank: 81
Code: Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Renville 73.69 84 71.78 81 46.24 57 21

Renville County: Still stuck

Renville County’s broadband coverage seems to be incrementally shrinking, albeit within a margin of error. They should receive some BEAD funding but only for satellite and fixed wireless. They maintain their Red status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 217 locations in Renville County. However, those locations will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Renville has benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that seems hopeful for them as well.)

They has been in a potentially precarious position, because there is a discrepancy between wireline access  and wireline with fixed wireless. Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless.

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

Broadband Access:

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 71.78 71.99 72.23 70.79 70.86 63.23 59.06 51.78 50.43
25/3 (2022 goal) 73.69 73.92 73.98 73.41 74.48 67.74 61.9 55.06 59.27

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Anoka: 329
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless
Renville                                      16                                   201                                   217 Renville

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Renville 0 was invested over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $16 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)
  • In 2022, Renville ranked 66 using Microsoft’s Digital Equity Tool, which looks at various factors of a community.

Past Grants:

  • Hanson Communications – Hanson – Chippewa Cty W
    Grant: $2,081,494, Local Match: $2,544,150, Total Budget: $4,625,644
  • 2016 – RENVILLE COUNTY HBC & RS FIBER – GRANT: $807,966
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080
  • 2014 – R-S Fiber Cooperative, FTTH Project – Award: $1 million.
  • 2019: Nuvera Communications, Inc. – Hutchinson W Project – GRANT $346,282
  • 2019: Midco (Midcontinent Communications) – Renville Project – GRANT $230,835
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Minnesota Valley Telephone Company (MVTC) – Rural Franklin Fiber Project – GRANT $226,800 This middle and last mile project will serve approximately 45 unserved locations in the City of Franklin and the townships of Sherman, Eden, Camp and Birch Cooley in Redwood, Renville and Brown counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Renville County (http://tinyurl.com/hfazdvf)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Redwood County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 39 of 87

Rank: 57
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Redwood 91.82 42 90.5 39 25.4 77 15

Redwood County: Moving up the ranking

Redwood County’s broadband coverage has been improving steadily over the years and now they have edge into the above 90 percent barrier. Subsequently, they have bumped from Yellow to Green status.

ranks 57 (up 6 places) for broadband access out of 87 counties. Redwood County went from almost 40 percent coverage in 2021 to 82 percent now. Last year, they worked on better broadband with the help of a Lead Fellow and a broadband survey. Redwood County’s work getting the community engaged with a survey will likely help them strive to get federal (BEAD) funding once it becomes available. That is how they retain their yellow ranking.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 373 locations in Redwood County. Half of the locations are slated for fiber; the rest will get a satellite or fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Redwood has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that might be a strategy worth considering.)

Statewide, there have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 90.5 82.38 76.23 80.17 40.04 36.48 33.56 33.56 34.37
25/3 (2022 goal) 91.82 91.94 87.31 48.35 76.12 44.59 70.94 72.07 41.51

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Redwood: 373
The locations include a mix of fiber as well as satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC AMG Technology Investment Group, LLC d/b/a Nextlink Internet Nuvera Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Fiber Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Redwood                                         4                                   170                                   198                                         1                                   373 Redwood

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Redwood, $1914986 was invested in one project over the years.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $13.4 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • 2022: Hanson Communications, Inc., $923,918.00
  • 2022: Redwood County Telephone Co. dba Arvig, $1,336,037.04 (Learn more)
  • 2017 – MVTC (Minnesota Valley Telephone Company, Inc.) – Milroy Broadband Project – GRANT $742,365
  • 2016 – ARVIG – REDWOOD COUNTY TELEPHONE MIDDLE MILE FIBER EXTENSION – GRANT: $27,998
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080
  • 2019: MVTC (Minnesota Valley Telephone Company, Inc.) – Rural Lucan Fiber Project – GRANT $635,400
  • MN State Grant awarded in 2021: Minnesota Valley Telephone Company (MVTC) – Rural Franklin Fiber Project – GRANT $226,800 This middle and last mile project will serve approximately 45 unserved locations in the City of Franklin and the townships of Sherman, Eden, Camp and Birch Cooley in Redwood, Renville and Brown counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Redwood County (https://tinyurl.com/3z8k43r5)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Red Lake County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 1 of 87

Rank: 1
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Red Lake 100 1 100 1 100 1 8

Red Lake County: Four years of ubiquitous broadband

Red Lake County ranks 1 for broadband access out of 87 counties. They have 100 percent coverage to broadband of 100 Mbps down and 20 up. They haven’t invested local government funding, nor have they benefited from Line Extension but they got there.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 2025 100 100 100 93.85 83.18 83.17 83.17 48.01
25/3 (2022 goal) 2025 100 100 100 99.99 99.86 99.99 99.99 99.99

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Red Lake: 0

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Red Lake 0 was invested over the years.

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost 0 to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past grant:

  • None

Find more articles on broadband in Red Lake County (http://tinyurl.com/gt8g24c)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Ramsey County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 3 of 87

Rank: 3
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Ramsey 99.95 2 99.92 3 59.77 44 11

Ramsey County: nearly at 2026 goal already

Ramsey County is a metro-based county where the market makes it feasible for broadband providers to serve broadband profitably. Ramsey County is very close to reaching the state broadband goal; they retain their Green status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 323 locations in Ramsey County. However, all the locations will get a satellite or a fixed wireless connection, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Ramsey has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that might be a strategy for reach the last households.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.92 99.69 99.98 99.63 99.84 99.84 99.84 99.82 99.39
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.95 99.79 99.98 99.88 99.86 99.86 99.86 99.84 99.75

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Ramsey: 323
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC IBT Group USA, LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Fixed Wireless Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Ramsey                                   177                                   120                                      26                                   323 Ramsey

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Ramsy 0 was invested over the years.

No New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

Past grants:

None

Find more articles on https://bit.ly/2kgeboX

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Pope County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 8 of 87

Rank: 8
Code:  Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Pope 99.53 9 99.53 8 75.7 22 16

Pope County: so close

Pope County is very close to reaching the state broadband goal; they retain their Green status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 30 locations in Anoka County. However, all of locations are slated to get satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Pope has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that may be a strategy worth considering.)

There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 99.53 99.75 84.65 79.15 74.48 73 68.92 23.67 24.33
25/3 (2022 goal) 99.53 99,75 90.82 87.81 82.95 80.81 76.99 61.27 62.73

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Pope: 30
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Pope                                      29                                         1                                      30 Pope

 

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Pope $1,067,199  was invested on one project over the years.

No New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $19.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • 2022: Hanson Communications, Inc., $4,248,796.00
  • 2017 – Hanson Communications – Minnewaska Area FTTP – GRANT $4,996,791

Find more articles on broadband in Pope County (http://tinyurl.com/hx7q9fd)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Polk County Broadband Profile 2025: Green rating: Ranking out 14 of 87

Rank: 14
Code: Green
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Polk 98.93 16 98.7 14 58.52 46 11

Polk County: Very close

Polk County’s broadband coverage remains steady at almost 99 percent. It’s that proximity that helps them retain their Green status.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 37 locations in Polk County. However, all the locations will get a satellite, which does not qualify as served in the MN statute.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Polk has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that strategy may be worth considering.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 98.7 97.6 97.79 95.24 91.72 91.76 88.35 85.39 80.89
25/3 (2022 goal) 98.93 97.85 97.83 95.25 93.02 93.09 93.11 93 90.78

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Polk: 37
The locations will get satellite.

County Amazon Kuiper Commercial Services LLC Space Exploration Technologies Corp. Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Low Earth Orbit Satellite Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Polk                                      35                                         2                                      37 Polk

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Polk 0 was invested over the years.

No New Posts from 2025

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $2.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grant:

  • Garden Valley Telephone Co – Garden Valley Tel – Rural E Grand Forks
    Grant: $1,050,465, Local Match: $350,150, Total Budget: $1,400,620
  • 2023: Garden Valley Technologies – 2023 Rural Warren SW – GRANT $1,488,322
  • 2022: Garden Valley Technologies – Rural Warren East & Rural Oslo – GRANT $1,462,569
  • 2016 – HALSTAD TELEPHONE COMPANY KERTSONVILLE AREA – GRANT: $296,665
  • 2015 – Halstad Telephone Company – Gentilly Township – Grant award: $424,460
  • 2014 – Halstad Telephone Co., Halstad Tract MN 11902500 FTTH Amount $1.65 million
  • 2019: Halstad Telephone Company – Rural East Grand Forks Expansion Project – GRANT $440,000
  • MN State Grants awarded in 2021: Garden Valley Technologies – Northwest Thief River Falls and Euclid – GRANT $1,640,722 This middle and last mile project will serve 104 unserved and 22 underserved locations in portions of Marshall and Polk counties.
  • Halstad Telephone Company – North Fisher Expansion – GRANT $619,000 This last mile project will upgrade approximately 57 unserved and seven underserved locations in portions of Huntsville, Nesbit and Fanny townships in Polk County.
  • Wikstrom Telephone Co. Inc. – Wiktel NW MN Broadband 2020 – GRANT $490,997 The last mile project will serve 153 unserved locations in sparsely populated areas in Kittson, Marshall and Polk counties.

Find more articles on broadband in Polk County (http://tinyurl.com/zk8apgm)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape)

Pipestone County Broadband Profile 2025: Red rating: Ranking out 48 of 87

Rank: 48
Code:  Red
(See Blandin Foundation interactive map)

county 25/3 253 rank 100/20 10020 rank Gig gig rank Providers
Pipestone 88.84 50 86.3 48 28.01 72 12

Pipestone County: stagnant at 85 percent

Pipestone County’s broadband coverage has been stagnant for a few years and their prospects for BEAD funding is not going to close the gap; so they have been bumped from Yellow to Red status.

They have been in a potentially precarious position because there is a discrepancy between wireline access and wireline with fixed wireless. Minnesota doesn’t currently take fixed wireless into consideration when defining areas eligible for grants; the federal government does include access to fixed wireless. That could make a big difference to who is eligible for BEAD funding.

At the time of writing, the MN BEAD final proposal has not been approved, but the current proposal would mean coverage for 63 locations in Pipestone County. All of the locations qualify for fiber. That being said, 63 locations isn’t a lot.

There is still Line Extension funding yet to be distributed, which helps connect handfuls of  houses just beyond existing infrastructure. (Pipestone has not benefitted from earlier Line Extension awards. So that may be a strategy worth considering.) There have been changes with local and national broadband providers, which also leads to uncertainty.

2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
100/20 (2026 goal) 86.3 86.43 86.35 80.7 80.11 79.73 79.73 79.73 44.54
25/3 (2022 goal) 88.84 88.78 88.81 82.44 82.54 82.97 81.1 79.73 79.36

Possible BEAD support

The Minnesota BEAD Final Proposal has not yet been approved so the information below is subject to change; it includes the number of locations by county specifying provider and broadband type. (Learn more.)

Locations in Pipestone: 63
The locations include a majority of satellite and fixed wireless connections.

County Woodstock Locations         Grand Total County
Technology Type Fiber
Pipestone                                      63                                      63 Pipestone

Local Government Match for State Broadband Grants:

Over the years, many local governments (County, Municipal, Tribal) have invested in broadband deployment. This year, I have tracked how much local investment has been used to match MN State Grants. Local governments invest in other ways too, but this was one number I could realistically find and quantify investment by county, which means investment in that county, whether by county, cities or other local government entity.

In Pipestone 0 was invested over the years. However last year, Pipestone County Commissioners recently (Nov 2024) voted to provide $268,822 for a fiber optic internet project Woodstock Communications is planning if they get a MN State grant.

New Posts from 2025:

Highlights from Past Reports

  • 2023 estimates indicated that it would cost $4.5 million to get ubiquitous broadband in the county. (I haven’t updated the number because recent report offers scenarios of costs based on BEAD funding rules that make current estimates less predictable than in the past. Yet, I think the number is still helpful.)

Past Grants:

  • Woodstock Telephone Co – Woodstock Comm – Hatfield FTTH
    Grant: $1,612,932, Local Match: $537,644, Total Budget: $2,150,576
  • 2017 – Woodstock Telephone Company – Pipestone County Wireless – GRANT $363,851
  • 2015 – MVTV Wireless Middle Mile – Grant award: $808,080

Find more articles on broadband in Pipestone County (http://tinyurl.com/zhjm4pe)

The maps below come from the 

I am doing the annual look at broadband in each county – based on maps from the Office of Broadband Development and news gathered from the last year. I’m looking at progress toward the 2022 (25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up) and 2026 (100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up) and will code each:

  • Red (yikes)
  • Yellow (warning)
  • Green (good shape