Willmar Council approves next step in Willmar Connect in split 5-3 vote

The West Central Tribune reports…

The Willmar City Council on Monday in a split 5-3 vote approved moving forward with the Willmar Connect project, a city-owned, open-access broadband network.

After more than three years of planning, the Willmar City Council on Monday in a split 5-3 vote approved moving forward with the city-owned, open-access broadband network now known as Willmar Connect.

Councilor Tom Gilbertson made a motion to approve the plans and specifications for the first phase of the project, as well as to solicit bids, which Councilor Vicki Davis seconded. Both voted in favor of the motion, along with councilors Carl Shuldes, Audrey Nelsen and Justin Ask.

Voting against the motion were councilors Stephen Gardner, Rick Fagerlie and Tom Butterfield, who all questioned the financial viability of the project to pay for itself without affecting property taxes.

Phase one of the project involves constructing the network operations center and installing fiber throughout all the neighborhoods west of First Street South, between U.S. Highway 12 and Willmar Avenue. Phase one may expand into areas within phase two of the project if there are clusters of residents and businesses who have completed the pre-sign-up for the service.

The infrastructure will be owned by the city and the network will be managed by Hometown Fiber. Multiple internet service providers can contract with the city to offer services on the network for a fee, which will be used to pay the principal and interest on the bonds that will fund the construction of the project. Eventually, those fees are expected to generate revenue for the city, as well.

Construction of phase one is estimated to cost approximately $7.8 million and phases two and three are estimated to cost just under $7 million each. The total estimated cost of the project is approximately $24.5 million, excluding interest on the bonds that will be used to fund it.

The city has already invested more than $1.1 million in planning the project, which has been funded by the city’s Industrial Park fund.

 

Golden Valley MN attracts fiber installation in City right-of-way and easements

CCX Media reports on Golden Valley’s adventures with a local fiber build…

 Over the next few years, several companies will be working throughout Golden Valley to install fiber optic cables in City right-of-way and easements. Fiber internet, also known as broadband, is a private utility similar to gas and electric. High-speed fiber optic internet offers a new service option for residents and businesses throughout the community. …

The city has set up a website to offer information and, when construction begins, an interactive map so residents know where the construction will be taking place.

 

Bois Forte-CTC extends NECS middle mile broadband to 2,000 locations around Lake Vermilion (St Louis and Koochiching Counties)

The Timberjay has a nice article on the history of broadband in parts of St Louis and Koochiching Counties – from NESC middle mile in 2015 to the Bois Forte-CTC extensions today. It’s proof that, like Rome, FTTH was not built in a day. I’m going to share an abridged version below, but I strongly suggested checking out the original.

Roughly a decade ago, the Northeast Service Cooperative strung a massive web of fiber across northeastern Minnesota. But what you’re seeing today isn’t a duplication of that work. It’s the follow-through. Thanks to a partnership between NESC, the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa and the broadband company CTC, more than 2,000 homes and businesses around Lake Vermilion’s south shore, Pelican Lake, and Nett Lake are finally getting high-speed broadband service.   

NESC’s “freeway” network was completed in 2015 after four years of construction and $43.5 million in federal investment. The goal wasn’t to wire every house. It was to build a middle mile, essential infrastructure that future projects could plug into.

Joe Weber, divisional director for the NESC middle mile system, said the project was originally built to serve schools, libraries, governments, and other public entities in places where private providers couldn’t justify the cost of running fiber.   

The original network spanned eight counties and connected about 320 public facilities. Since then, it has grown to over 1,300 miles of fiber stretching from Cambridge to Grand Portage.
The Bois Forte–CTC project wouldn’t have been feasible without the NESC backbone. Without it, CTC would have faced the enormous expense of building long stretches of new fiber just to link the project area to the larger internet. By tapping into NESC’s existing system, those costs were avoided. 

A common question that’s cropped up in recent months is whether a network built in 2011 to 2015 can keep up with the skyrocketing internet demands of 2025 and beyond. Both Weber and Buttweiler say that’s not a concern with fiber optics.
“The fiber itself has not changed at all,” Weber said. “The same investment 12 or 13 years ago is still working with new technology.”

ConnectSuperior sees 10 percent uptake in the first 2 months of service

Wisconsin Public Radio reports about our neighbors to the East.

This summer, after five years of planning, the city of Superior launched a new city-owned fiber optic network called ConnectSuperior.

ConnectSuperior works kind of like a highway, where the city supplies the infrastructure, and businesses can use that network to provide high-speed internet service to residents.

Stephanie Becken, the city’s broadband manager, told WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” that the new network has been a game-changer for Superior. Before, residents were limited to a handful of existing internet service providers in the area, and connectivity could be spotty because those companies hadn’t invested in updated infrastructure.

“Now, with this system, we’re able to really (welcome) as many internet service providers as the market can bear,” Becken said.

For some households, this means parents can work, kids can do schoolwork and other family members can play games or stream movies together, all at the same time — something that was inconceivable with the older internet speeds.

Woodstock Communications Deploys FTTP in Hatfield (Pipestone County) with MN State Grant

The Pipestone Star reports

Woodstock Communications has begun construction of a fiber optic internet network in the Hatfield area.

Work started east of Pipestone along State Highway 30 earlier this month. Woodstock Communications General Manager Terry Nelson said the project includes installing about 45 miles of fiber that will pass 116 homes in the project area. He said the fiber will be installed this fall and internet service is expected to be ready by the end of the year.

There will be no charge to residents in the project area to connect their residences. Projected pricing for broadband service is $44.95 for 100 megabits per second (Mbps) uploading and downloading speed, $54.95 for 250 Mbps, $74.95 for 500 Mbps and $104.95 for 1 gigabit per second. Nelson said that pricing is consistent with what Woodstock Communications charges in the rest of its service areas.

The project is estimated to cost $2,150,576. Woodstock Communications received a $1,612,932 grant from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) last year to help pay for it. The Pipestone County Commissioners voted in 2023 to provide $268,822 for the project, which would cover half of the local match for the grant. Woodstock Communications will pay the other half.

The project in the Hatfield area is phase one of a four-phase project to provide fiber internet access to all the rural parts of Pipestone County for an estimated $15,733,299. Woodstock Communications plans to seek other grants in the future to help fund the projects.

Benton looks at Achieving Affordability: State Strategies for Getting Everyone Online

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society has a new publication that looks at Achieving Affordability: State Strategies for Getting Everyone Online

In the absence of federal leadership, state governments are working to ensure that every household can afford to get and stay connected

They looked at…

Some state governments have long prioritized broadband affordability, while others are only now stepping in to fill the vacuum left by Washington. Across their strategic plans, all states cite affordability as one of the chief barriers to achieving universal connectivity. This report examines how states are working to make high-speed internet more affordable for their residents, offering a menu of policy
options explored by states around the country. These approaches fall into six broad categories:
1. LOW-COST PLANS: New York’s Affordable Broadband Act caps the cost of internet plans for low-income households at $20 per month or less. Connecticut will soon require low-cost plans for qualifying low-income residents.
2. STATE LIFELINE REFORM: State Lifeline programs collect mandatory fees from telecommunications companies, which are generally passed on to consumer bills, to fund discounts on eligible low-income residents’ phone and internet bills. State programs supplement a similar Lifeline program at the federal level, which provides a $9.25-per-month discount. Oregon recently passed legislation to expand its Lifeline subsidy and offer discounts on devices to low-income residents.
3. ONE-TIME SUBSIDIES: States, including Maryland and South Carolina, have used or plan to use federal funding for short-term affordability programs. These efforts are inherently time-limited and rely on one-off funding streams.

4. LOW-INCOME HOUSING INCENTIVES: States like Pennsylvania and Indiana are using the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to encourage developers to offer free or subsidized internet in affordable housing units.
5. CONSUMER PROTECTIONS and TRANSPARENCY MEASURES: States such as Arkansas, Virginia, and Tennessee have passed laws to improve pricing transparency and billing practices. These policies aim to empower consumers
to better understand the costs of internet service and avoid excess charges.
This approach may lower costs indirectly.
6. ENHANCED COMPETITION and CONSUMER CHOICE: Some states are fostering competition and affordability by permitting the market participation of municipal broadband providers and cooperatives, as well as investing in open-access, middle-mile infrastructure. Others offer deployment subsidies or regulatory relief to lower provider costs and encourage new entrants

They found…

States pursuing broadband affordability must consider key factors:
• Available state resources, such as fiscal and institutional capacity
• Local market landscape, including providers and their offerings
• The time horizon of affordability needs
• Positions of key political, industry, and consumer groups
• Implementation strategies for enrolling households and managing program
outreach

Broadband Breakfast reports on Gigi Sohn’s visit to Minnesota

Broadband Breakfast reports on the MN Public Broadband Alliance meeting in Le Sueur County last week…

After years of broken promises from Washington, Gigi Sohn urged Minnesota leaders last week to take the state’s broadband future into their own hands.

“While Washington has failed you, Minnesota has the power – and the track record – to build its own broadband future,” she said. Sohn, executive director of the American Association for Public Broadband and a former Biden FCC nominee, delivered her remarks Sept. 10 in New Prague at What’s Next for Broadband in Minnesota, a forum hosted by the Minnesota Public Broadband Alliance.

Sohn pointed to the federal Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, launched in 2020, where providers defaulted on 80 percent of more than $400 million in Minnesota awards. “These numbers are nothing less than tragic,” she said.

Gigi Sohn: From Crumbs to Connections: Minnesota’s Broadband Future

Yesterday I attended, livestreamed and posted about the MN Public Broadband Alliance meeting in Le Sueur County. Today Benton Institute for Broadband & Society has published the text of the speech from Gigi Sohn…

Thank you, Barbara. Good morning! It’s wonderful to be here in Minnesota, a state that has always prided itself on strong communities and local problem-solving.  I’m honored to be speaking alongside my friends Ry Marcatillio and Bree Maki.

Before I begin, I want to introduce you to AAPB – the American Association for Public Broadband. We promote community networks by showcasing success stories and resources. We protect them from monopoly attacks. And we ignite new growth by linking communities with the mentors and expertise they need. Together, we’re building broadband by the people, for the people.  AAPB is a membership organization, so please join us as we work to empower communities across the country.

I want to start with a truth many of us already know; when it comes to federal efforts to close the digital divide, Minnesota has been left behind. Program after program has promised transformational change—yet time and again, your communities are still waiting.

Today, I want to offer both an honest assessment and a hopeful path forward. Because while Washington has failed you, Minnesota has the power—and the track record—to build its own broadband future.

Federal Program Failures

Let’s talk first about the federal record.

Launched in 2020, the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund—RDOF—was supposed to be a $6 billion game-changer. But nearly one-third of RDOF projects defaulted nationwide. That means hundreds of thousands of families were promised service and got nothing. Here in Minnesota, the story is far worse.  ISPs defaulted on 80% of  more than $400,000,000 in state RDOF funds and on 78% of the over 142,000 RDOF locations. These numbers are nothing less than tragic.

Then came BEAD, the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program, part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. $42.5 billion. A once-in-a-generation opportunity. Congress made clear that states should prioritize infrastructure that could scale, last for decades, and support the technologies of tomorrow. The Biden Commerce Department determined that only fiber networks met that definition.

But the Biden Administration didn’t finish the job, and on June 6 of this year, the rules were rewritten by the new Administration. Technology neutrality replaced fiber-first. Cost took precedence over performance. Low-earth orbit satellite companies swooped in with bids as low as $700 a location—numbers no fiber provider could match. The result? In Minnesota, 22,000 out of 76,000 eligible locations received no bids at all, because ten fiber providers dropped out rather than play a rigged game.

Of the remaining locations in the state, just 58% will get fiber, while approximately 25% will get satellite and 17% fixed wireless. Let’s be clear: the latter two aren’t long-term solutions. Satellite is expensive, congested, and limited. Fixed wireless can’t keep up with the demands of advanced applications. And for nearly a third of BEAD-eligible Minnesota households, there is no solution.

But that’s not all. Congress didn’t just fund deployment—it also envisioned a future where leftover BEAD dollars could be reinvested in the things that make networks work for people: workforce development, digital literacy, adoption programs, streamlined permitting, public safety and new applications like AI.  These aren’t luxuries; they’re the essential supports that get networks built faster and ensure they’re actually used.

Yet instead of empowering states to stretch their deployment dollars and then redirect the savings to these critical efforts, the Commerce Department has made clear it will claw back the money. Whether through a rescission like Congress passed in July or by simply withholding funds—just like it’s doing with the $3 billion Digital Equity Act—these resources are being locked away in Washington rather than put to work in Minnesota communities. Once again, promises made in the Infrastructure bill are being broken, and the people paying the price are the very families still waiting for a connection.

So, let’s be honest. The federal government has shown itself—again and again—incapable of implementing broadband programs that deliver robust, affordable networks for all Americans. Minnesota cannot keep waiting.

The Case For Self-Help

The good news is that Minnesota has a long history of self-help. When Washington has failed, when the market has failed, your communities have stepped up.  You’ve built cooperatives, power systems, and water systems. Broadband should be no different.

And in fact, it already isn’t.

Willmar

Take Willmar. Years ago, when private providers refused to invest, the city built its own network. That took courage. And today, Willmar has doubled down—planning a new $24.5 million open-access fiber project. This means that not just one provider, but many, will be able to serve homes and businesses over a shared city-owned fiber system.

What does that mean in practice? It means families whose kids struggled through COVID with buffering Zoom classes, will finally have reliable service. It means entrepreneurs can now reach clients nationwide without worrying about upload speeds. And it means residents have choice—true competition—instead of the take-it-or-leave-it monopolies we’ve come to expect.

Southwest Broadband

Now let’s move to Southwest Minnesota.  Nine small towns realized they couldn’t solve the broadband problem alone. So, they came together to create Southwest Broadband, a regional cooperative network.

The impact has been extraordinary. Students in Worthington can attend virtual classes seamlessly. Farmers outside Jackson can use precision agriculture tools—tracking soil health, applying fertilizer efficiently, saving money, and protecting the environment. Local clinics are expanding telehealth, so patients don’t have to drive hours for routine appointments.

Southwest Broadband is more than a network. It’s a lifeline, built because communities refused to wait for someone else to save them.

Dakota County

Closer to the Twin Cities, Dakota County built one of the nation’s first countywide fiber backbones. That backbone connects schools, libraries, city halls, and public safety facilities. The result? Students in Apple Valley can get online at their libraries. Police officers and firefighters can share lifesaving data in real time. And taxpayers save money because the county no longer pays private carriers year after year to lease lines.

Scott County

And then there’s Scott County. Their countywide network didn’t just make government more efficient—it extended opportunity into neighborhoods that private carriers ignored. Small businesses now have the bandwidth to grow. Families have access to telehealth. Local government can deliver services faster, better, and at lower cost.

These are not isolated experiments. They are part of a movement: over 700 communities nationwide have chosen to own their broadband infrastructure. They are all living proof: community-owned broadband works.

The Broader Benefits of Community Networks

And remember— community broadband is not just about fast internet. It’s about transformation.

When a community builds its own fiber network, the benefits ripple outward in powerful and measurable ways.

First, economic development. Businesses today make decisions about where to locate based on infrastructure. Roads, water, and power still matter—but high-capacity broadband is now at the top of the list. A manufacturer deciding between two towns will choose the one with reliable fiber that can support automation, logistics, and global communication. Hospitals expand services where fiber makes telehealth possible. Entrepreneurs launch startups in places they might otherwise overlook, because they can now serve customers anywhere in the world.

Second, population growth and retention. Families want to live where opportunity is abundant, and quality of life is high. In rural Minnesota, young people are more likely to stay—or move back—if they know they can work remotely, take online classes, and build a life with the same digital resources they’d have in the city. Broadband has become a cornerstone of livability, as critical as good schools and safe streets. Communities with fiber don’t just keep their residents—they attract new ones.

Third, housing and real estate values. Studies show that fiber broadband can increase home values by 3–5 percent, sometimes more. Realtors will tell you that buyers now ask about internet speed as often as they ask about property taxes. A community with fiber is a community where homes sell faster and at higher prices—strengthening the tax base and fueling local growth.

Last, but not least, cost savings and new revenue streams. When a city leases lines from private telecom companies, it pays year after year with no equity to show for it. But when a city owns its network, those dollars stay local. Instead of sending profits to shareholders in another state, communities can reinvest savings into teachers, firefighters, and other public priorities. Utilities use fiber to detect water leaks and power outages before they become disasters, saving millions. Public safety agencies share data instantly, reducing response times and saving lives.

A community-owned fiber broadband network can also be a source of new revenue. Local governments can lease excess fiber capacity to private providers, anchor institutions, or wireless companies, producing steady wholesale revenue. In addition, community networks can support smart-city applications—such as traffic management, utility monitoring, or public safety systems—that save money while opening opportunities for service contracts and partnerships. Over time, these revenue streams can reduce reliance on outside funding, lower taxes, and ensure that the economic benefits of broadband stay local.  A community network isn’t just a cost—it’s an investment that pays dividends across the community.

And fiber doesn’t just connect—it protects. With new fiber sensing technology, those same strands of glass can act as thousands of tiny guardians—detecting accidents on roadways, warning crews before a backhoe cuts a line, even picking up the tremors of an earthquake or the sound of a gunshot. Fiber doesn’t just carry data. It carries peace of mind.

And perhaps most importantly for the future, fiber is the foundation for artificial intelligence. AI applications—from precision agriculture to advanced manufacturing, from autonomous vehicles to telemedicine—depend on moving massive amounts of data with speed and reliability. Only fiber has the bandwidth, low latency, and symmetrical speeds to power real-time decision-making at scale. Without robust fiber networks, the promise of AI will remain out of reach for most communities. With fiber, Minnesota communities can lead in deploying and benefiting from these transformative technologies.

Community-owned fiber networks build stronger economies, more vibrant neighborhoods, healthier families, and more resilient communities. It creates places where people can live, work, and thrive.

Conclusion

So, let’s return to where we began. Federal broadband programs have failed the state. They promised a feast and delivered crumbs. But Minnesota doesn’t need to wait. Minnesota knows how to help itself.

The path forward is community broadband. Cities like Willmar. Coalitions like Southwest Broadband. Counties like Dakota and Scott. These aren’t dreams. They are models, ready to be replicated across the state.

Because broadband is not just infrastructure—it’s opportunity. It’s fairness. It’s security. And it’s the foundation for the communities we dare to imagine.

If Minnesota communities want to close its digital divide once and for all, they can’t wait for Washington. They have to do it for themselves. And the good news is— they can.

Thank you.

Broadband Expansion Continues in Itasca and St. Louis Counties

Paul Bunyan Communicaitons sent me an update and press release, for folks outside of Minnesota, I want to share the email intro to the press release sent during the first week or September!

The weather has turned quickly, a sure sign that the end of construction season is on the horizon.   We continue to make great progress on our broadband network expansion construction and, if mother nature cooperates, we anticipate each project will be built before freeze-out.

And today does feel like winter is coming, even in the Twin Cities, three hours from Paul Bunyan…

As the end of construction season approaches, Paul Bunyan Communications is on track to complete its planned broadband expansion projects across parts of Itasca and St. Louis Counties before freeze out.
Status of Paul Bunyan Communications Broadband Expansion projects:
• Itasca County:
City of Coleraine- Construction is completed with fiber splicing taking place. Services should become available in October
City of Bovey- Construction has started and is over 50% completed. Services should become available this winter.
Bearville(s) Township- Construction is done. Fiber splicing is in progress. Services should become available this winter.
• St. Louis County:
Sandy, Pike, & Wuori Township- Construction is done, fiber splicing is 75% done. Services should be available by the end of September
Alango & Owens Township- Construction is done and fiber splicing has started. Services should become available this winter.
Angora Township- Construction is done and fiber splicing has started. Services should become available this winter.
Balkan Township- Construction has started and is expected to be completed by mid-October. Services should become available this winter.
French Township- Construction is done. Fiber splicing has started. Services should become available this winter.
Great Scott Township & unorganized township north of Great Scott- Construction will start later this month and is expected to be completed by mid-November. Services should be available by end of winter.
Once the network is operational in an area, customers who signed up will be contacted to schedule service installations.
Sign Up Now to Ensure Fiber Optic Connection Residents and businesses in these expansion areas are encouraged to sign up for service now, before construction crews move on to ensure the fiber optic connection is brought up to the location. That can be done online at http://www.gigazone.com, by phone, or in person at our Grand Rapids Customer Service & Technology Center.
Services Available Upon Completion Once the network is live, customers will have access to Paul Bunyan’s GigaZone® services, including high-speed fiber-optic Internet with speeds up to 10 Gig and dependable, low-cost unlimited local and long-distance GigaZone® voice services.

EVENT Sep 3: ILSR and AAPB Community Broadband Film Series II – Rocketeers: The UTOPIA Fiber Story

From ILSR and AAPB…

Slated for Tomorrow, September 3rd from 4 to 5:00 pm ET, the livestream event will feature the film “Rocketeers: The UTOPIA Fiber Story” – an eye-opening documentary about how a publicly-owned fiber network has ignited local Internet choice and competition across dozens of cities, delivering connectivity at the speed of light.

Registration is free here.

Fairmont County Commission looks at 2026 budget – budget is discussed as an investment

The Fairmont Sentinel reports

The Martin County Board of Commissioners on Monday held a 2026 preliminary budget work session. As it stands, the county is looking at a 9.87 percent levy increase. It needs to adopt a preliminary budget and levy next month but won’t set the official amount until December.

They discussed a number of topics included in the budget and changes in the commission. Broadband was part of the discussion…

To close, Higgins asked the board what it wanted to see done next. Loughmiller said he was happy to leave the budget and levy it as is for now, though he did say he would like to see more done for broadband.

The board discussed using money from the reserves or the CIP.

“I’d like to continue to build the infrastructure and make Martin County a destination place. Western Martin County is where the broadband gap is,” Loughmiller said. “If we can do it, I’d rather invest in that kind of stuff.”

Koons said there was money set aside. However, he said if the $1.8 million, set aside for the justice center, was taken out completely, it would be about a 2.47 percent increase to the levy.

As it is, in 2026, the board is looking to utilize $1.453 of the $1.8 million, originally levied for the justice center project, to put toward broadband.

Publicly-owned ConnectSuperior now open for business in Superior WI

WDIO reports...

The City of Superior now has the first publicly-owned, open-access broadband network in the state of Wisconsin. ConnectSuperior went live this week and is currently available to residents and businesses in the Central Superior neighborhood.

Superior’s open-access network is like a highway. The city owns and maintains the infrastructure, in this case fiber optic cables and lines. Then different companies, internet service providers, can use that to transport internet access to customers.

How can residents plug into new internet options? ConnectSuperior offers two different internet service providers: Advance Stream and Superion. The city expected to have 80 customers make the switch within the first year. But they have already surpassed that with close to 100 people joining just this first week.

The FCC is looking for comments about Cottage Grove’s rights of way contract with one provider

I’m offering two chapters of an ongoing story of Cottage Grove working for better broadband. The FCC is looking for comments on Cottage Grove, Minnesota’s contact that allows exclusive access to rights of way for broadband deployment for a period of time…

Comments Due: September 12, 2025

Reply Comments Due: October 14, 2025

The Wireline Competition Bureau seeks comment on a petition for preemption and declaratory ruling filed pursuant to section 253(d) of the Communications Act (Act).1 The petition was filed on August 6, 2025 by BIF IV Intrepid OpCo LLC (Intrepid)2 and asks the Commission to preempt a contract that the city of Cottage Grove, Minnesota (the City) has entered with another provider to deploy fiber optic infrastructure in the City.3 The petition states that the City entered the contract after issuing a Request for Proposal4 stating that “the City will not issue future right of way permits for broadband projects for at least five years” after reaching an agreement, thereby providing “the chosen broadband partner(s) exclusive rights to access the assigned rights of way for broadband services to serve the City of Cottage Grove until at least 2030.”5 Intrepid states that, due to the award of an exclusive contract to another provider, permit applications that it submitted to expand its fiber optic telecommunications network to the City are now being denied.6

Interested parties may file comments or oppositions to the Intrepid Petition on or before September 12, 2025 and reply comments on or before October 14, 2025. All filings addressing the Intrepid Petition must reference WC Docket No. 25-248.

  • Electronic Filers: Comments and oppositions may be filed electronically using the Internet by accessing the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS): www.fcc.gov/ecfs.
  • Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an original and one copy of each filing.

o Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial courier, or by the U.S. Postal Service. All filings must be addressed to the Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.

o Hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings for the Commission’s Secretary are accepted between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. by the FCC’s mailing contractor at 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. All hand deliveries must be held together with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be disposed of before entering the building.

o Commercial courier deliveries (any deliveries not by the U.S. Postal Service) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.

o Filings sent by U.S. Postal Service First-Class Mail, Priority Mail, and Priority Mail Express must be sent to 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.

People with Disabilities. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530.

Ex Parte Rules. The proceeding this Notice initiates shall be treated as “permit-but-disclose” proceeding in accordance with the Commission’s ex parte rules.8 Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was made and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the presenter’s written comments, memoranda or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in these proceedings should familiarize themselves with the Commission’s ex parte rules.

For further information, please contact Elizabeth Drogula, Competition Policy Division, Wireline Competition Bureau, at (202) 418-1591 or via e-mail at Elizabeth.Drogula@fcc.gov

For background, Cottage Grove is working with Gateway Fiber to deploy in their community. (I shared that announcement in July.) They posted an RFP. In March 2025, they answered clarifying questions concerning the RFP, including questions on the rights of way…

Question: With respect to 47 U.S. Code § 253 – Removal of barriers to entry – No State or local statute or regulation, or other State or local legal requirement, may prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting the ability of any entity to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service – and Minnesota State Statute 237.163 – USE AND REGULATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY, Subdivisions 1-4 – this RFP seems to be in conflict with both. Can you clarify the guidance you are following that deems this RFP in compliance with both regulations?

Answer: 47 U.S. Code § 253, or Chapter 5 of Title 47: Telecommunications, is not applicable here as it applies to wire or radio communications. Broadband is governed under Chapter 12 of Title 47 (47 U.S. Code § 1301-1308). The federal regulations governing broadband to do not prohibit the City from regulating their public rights-of-way.

Municipalities have several legal rights when it comes to managing or restricting access to public rights-of-way (ROW) for broadband companies. These rights are typically established under federal, state, and local laws.

The City of Cottage Grove is not attempting to restrict or prohibit access to public rights-of-way for broadband companies. The City has simply implemented a fair and efficient manner in which to regulate and manage the installation and maintenance of broadband services through their Request for Proposals. The City’s primary goal is to provide sufficient broadband to each area of the City in an efficient and orderly manner – taking into account the limited space within the public rights-of-ways and the access needs of the community during construction.

Under Minn. Stat. 237.163, a local government is specifically authorized to manage and regulate the use of public rights of way. The legislature found it necessary to give local governments this authority because of the potential for installation by broadband companies of multiple and competing facilities within the public rights-of-way. Therefore, a local government may exercise the option to regulate the use of public rights-of-way so long as the regulation is carried out in a fair, efficient, competitively neutral, and substantially uniform manner. The City of Cottage Grove has chosen to exercise this option and manage the public rights-of-way pursuant to Cottage Grove City Code § 7-6-2.

The City’s authority to regulate the use of public rights-of-way is further iterated in Minn. Stat. § 116J.399, Subd. 8 which states “the placement of broadband infrastructure to provide broadband service . . . is subject to local government permitting the right-of-way management authority under section 237.163, and must be coordinated with the relevant local government unit . . .”

In summary, Minnesota municipalities have well-defined rights and responsibilities authorizing them to manage public rights-of-way concerning broadband companies. This authority is balanced with obligations to ensure non-discriminatory practices and to facilitate the deployment of broadband services for the public benefit.

EVENT SEP 10: What’s Next for Broadband in MN with Gigi Sohn and Christopher Mitchell

From Minnesota Public Broadband Alliance MPBA

WHAT’S NEXT FOR BROADBAND IN MINNESOTA

Featured Speakers:
Gigi Sohn, American Association of Public Broadband
Christopher Mitchell, Institute for Local Self-Reliance
Bree Maki, Director, MN Office of Broadband Development

There’s

✅ No cost to attend
✅ Registration required – space is limited

The details:

NEXT CHAPTER WINERY – NEW PRAGUE, MN

🗓 SEPTEMBER 10, 2025
🕘 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM
☕ COFFEE & PASTRIES PROVIDED

💬 SOCIAL + Q&A TO FOLLOW

Register online.

Sign up now in Breitung MN for FTHH for free installation (St Louis County)

The Timberjay reports

At their July 15 meeting, the Breitung Town Board emphasized the importance for residents to sign up for broadband internet service where it will soon be available, including the areas around Hoodoo Point, Puncher Point, and Mallard Drive.
Chairman Matt Tuchel said this is everyone’s “opportunity to get this installed free, under the grant. If they do not do that and wait, they will have to pay that installation fee which could be as much as $5,000-$10,000, depending on terrain and how they have to run the line. It can be a significant savings when it’s covered under the grant but they need to sign up.”
Tuchel asked that residents get in touch with their neighbors to make sure they’ve signed up. Almost 200 residences have signed up so far.
Every household in the eligible neighborhoods should have been contacted to sign up by now. If you haven’t been contacted or are unsure if your home is in the service area, call the town hall. Construction to lay the fiber lines will begin on July 28.
In the project’s next phase, the board hopes to get broadband to Echo Point and McKinley Park Acres. These areas were previously planned to get broadband but installing fiber through these areas, which has extensive bedrock, proved too expensive. The board, along with other municipalities, CTC and Lake Country Power are exploring the possibility of having fiber internet brought in on power lines.
To complete the project, a study is required which will cost $175,000. The money will come from Breitung Township, Beatty Township, Greenwood Township, Vermilion Lake Township, the new Goodwill Township, and the city of Tower. Breitung’s share would be 10.65-percent, serving 108 addresses.
Breitung estimated their cost of the study would be $18,637.