Some folks in Faribault question timing of data center vote so close to Midterm Elections (Rice County)

Faribault Daily News reports

With at least two new faces guaranteed on Faribault’s next city council, Councilor John Rowan says City Hall is ‘making a bet’ that data center regulations proposed by the planning commission will be easier to pass with the current council — and he doesn’t think the city should be fast‑tracking the vote before new members are seated.

Here’s their timeline…

The planning commission revealed its timeline on bringing its recommendations for data center standards to the Faribault City council on Sept. 1. The plan will see its recommendations finalized in October, a public hearing on the standards on Nov. 2, and finally will be presented to the council Nov. 24. The council previously voted to extend Archer datacenter’s timeline to present an updated environmental assessment worksheet to March, an effective moratorium on its development. If the council votes on the plan before January, councilors elected on Nov. 2 will not be able to vote on it.

The article goes on to give points of views from different folks and roles in the community.

 

Albertville City Council reviews data center concept in Sep 8 meeting (Wright County)

Hometown Source Press & News reports

The Albertville City Council reviewed a concept for a data center and approved a 7.49% preliminary tax levy increase for 2027 at a meeting on Sept. 8.

City Planner TJ Hofer presented the council with a concept for a data center from Nodiac Oakwood. A concept review allows for a city council to give feedback on an item without making a formal decision.

Hofer said Nodiac proposed to construct a modular data center at the intersection of 70th Street and Karment Avenue northeast, immediately adjacent to a Wright-Hennepin electrical substation. The data center would be located on a newly-created 3.66-acre parcel on a larger lot.

Hofer said that Nodiac’s data center would not be considered a “hyperscale” data center.

More details on the proposed building…

Nordic’s proposal included 20 “modular data center” modules, 10 electrical transformers, 30 concrete equipment pads for cooling units and other equipment, parking and security fencing.

The building would not be permanent, but “factory built enclosures on concrete pads or similar foundations,” per the narrative. Nodiac estimated that the site would operate for 30 years or more.

Hofer said Nodiac would not use municipal water or sewer and it would truck in its own water and propylene glycol mixture that had a five to eight year cycle. Nodiac would then truck the old water to a wastewater facility.

Nodiac believes 20 megawatts of energy will power the center, and did not detail the impact that would have to local electrical users. While dependent on usage and other factors, one megawatt generally can power 400-900 homes, according to a worksheet published by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission via energy research group UtiliPoint.

Worth noting…

The City Council did not take any formal action on the concept review.

But…

The next Albertville City Council meeting is at 7 p.m. Monday, Sept. 21, at Albertville City Hall.

Inver Grove Heights City Council approves a change to its one-year data center moratorium to exclude a company that threatened to sue (Dakota County)

KSTP TV reports

Taxpayers in Inver Grove Heights won’t have to foot the bill for a multi-million-dollar lawsuit but will likely still get the data center at the core of the issue, much to many residents’ chagrin.

On Monday night, the Inver Grove Heights City Council approved a change to its one-year data center moratorium that now excludes a company that sued the city because of it.

That company, Qlevr — which wants to build a 54,000-square-foot facility at the former Travel Tags building along Carmen Avenue East — says it was in the development process and in good standing with the city for its proposed data center project before that moratorium was passed, so it sued.

After Monday…

The city shared the following about the next steps:

  • The City Council will consider the major site plan application at its Sept. 28 meeting;
  • If the major site plan application is approved at that meeting, the developer would need to have an approved development contract with the City. That is a standard requirement for all developments in Inver Grove Heights;
  • Once that is approved, the speed at which the project can move forward depends on how quickly the developer applies for and is issued a building permit from the City.

That major site plan application process has already been addressed, where the council set when generators can be used and sound testing done by the city.

More Minneapolis neighborhoods have data centers on the radar and may attend the Minneapolis Planning Commission meeting on October 13, 2026 (Hennepin County)

KARE11 reports

Less than a week after a data center developer from Virginia backed out of a plan to build one in Minneapolis’ North Loop neighborhood, other residents are preparing for any future proposals.

“I really hope to see a momentum established and committed to concrete action in ensuring the safety and livability of our community,” said Marshall Terrace Neighborhood Organization (MTNO) Greenspace & Ecology Coordinator Amy Pond.

Pond and MTNO Board Chair Lexi Clendenen hosted a data center discussion in the northeast part of the city Monday night for people to learn, ask questions and be part of a united community, according to a press release.

While I learned in an earlier post that the rules are not always the same for folks in and outside of the seven-county metro area, this still may be a topic that connects rural, urban and suburban communities. For folks in Minneapolis…

Some representatives of varying groups will likely be at the Minneapolis Planning Commission meeting on October 13. Public comment is expected as the city shapes new zoning ordinances for possible future data centers.

Earlier this year, the city council approved a temporary moratorium on data centers in most of the city to give councilors time to create these new standards. To learn more about their goals and next steps, click here.

 

Harmony resident speaks out against data center at City Council meeting (Fillmore County)

The Fillmore County Journal reports

During the public forum portion of the September 8 Harmony City Council meeting, Harmony resident Ann Lyons spoke about the recent joint planning session at which community feedback was discussed in regards to the proposed data center ordinance. “I find it very disingenuous that residents were not able to speak at the meeting,” Lyons stated. She noted that a lifelong friend of hers, who works on the regulatory side of data centers, cautions the city not to sign anything as the proper regulations aren’t in place yet for data centers since they’re so new.

EVENT Sep 29: Future Data Center Zoning Ordinance Options in Farmington (Dakota County)

Sun This Week reports…

Farmington residents can attend a special meeting “Future Data Center Zoning Ordinance Options” at 6-8 p.m. on Tuesday, Sept. 29 in the banquet room at the Rambling River Center, 325 Oak St., in downtown Farmington.

Farmington Mayor Nick Lien requested this special Farmington City Council work session that will serve as a listening session and  informational meeting.

“As the large zoning update project which started in 2024 begins to wrap up, the City of Farmington is now looking to address potential changes for an independent section of zoning code around data centers,” according to a city news release.

City staff will provide an update on how the city ordinance is currently written and residents can share their thoughts.

The work session will also provide residents information about the data center zoning ordinance update and what it could look like, the city said.

If residents are unable to attend the Sept. 29 public meeting, an online feedback form will be available after the city meeting.

Community survey in Pine Island shows 75 percent oppose data center (Goodhue County)

The Post Bulletin reports

Now a community survey conducted by an area resident has landed like a hand grenade in the middle of the fray — and may shed light on that question. The survey suggests broad opposition to the data center with 75.8% of respondents opposing it and 19.2% supporting it.

“Do residents of Pine Island city and nearby townships support the proposal to build a hyperscale data center in Pine Island. The majority answer is: No,” concludes the summary of the 73-page “Pine Island Sentiment Survey” authored by Susanne Blazek.

Blazek has a doctorate in social psychology with a minor in statistics from the University of Minnesota. More to the point, she has spent the last 15 years of her career conducting sentiment polls and large-scale public research, she says. Blazek makes no bones that she opposes the data center.

More on the survey…

One reason Blazek thinks the survey’s conclusions are valid is that the findings are in line with national polls, which show a strong backlash toward data centers. Surveys from organizations like Gallup, NBC News, and YouGov show roughly 65% to 70% of Americans opposing constructing a data center in their local area.

Blazek said the survey’s findings are based on 656 verified responses from people in the Pine Island city and surrounding areas. The survey reached 4,000 people through flyers and online messages for a 16% response rate, “which is considered OK.”

Minneapolis’ North Loop residents respond to proposed data center bowing out

CBS News TV reports

The future of a property in Minneapolis’ North Loop is suddenly wide open. A data center developer is walking away from a deal to purchase the old Star Tribune printing facility. Ubah Ali heard reactions from residents in the neighborhood.

Plymouth City Council Approves One-Year Moratorium on New Data Centers (Hennepin County)

CCX Media reports...

The Plymouth City Council unanimously approved a moratorium on new data centers, which have come under increasing scrutiny in cities across the country.

The approval came at its Sept. 8 council meeting.

Grant Fernelius, the city’s community and economic development director, acknowledged a company recently contacted the city about building a data center of “fairly significant” size.

No official proposal has come forward, but the incident led city leaders to take action.

Plymouth’s moratorium will last one year and impacts data center proposals of at least 50,000 square feet.

The city council initially considered starting with at least 75,000 square feet, which is approximately the size of a Cub grocery store in Plymouth, but opted for the smaller building footprint.

The moratorium would not apply to existing businesses.

Data center developers withdraws deal proposed for Star Tribune building in Minneapolis (Hennepin County)

MPR reports

A Virginia-based developer has withdrawn from a deal to transform the former Star Tribune printing facility in Minneapolis into a data center. The proposal drew heavy criticism from residents of the city’s North Loop neighborhood.

Minneapolis spokesperson Jess Olstad confirmed that Legacy Investing withdrew a land use application for the proposed facility, which would have included a 20-megawatt data center as well as other developments at nearby parcels.

More info…

Legacy did not respond to requests for comment. Emails to the company bounced back. Legacy previously developed a slightly larger data center in the Sleep Number building in downtown Minneapolis.

The proposed data center drew strong opposition at neighborhood forums last month from hundreds of city residents, who questioned the environmental impacts of the facility. Residents also doubted the facility would bring lasting jobs to the city.

Representatives for Legacy argued that the facility would only use as much water as two residential homes and that the facility would kickstart other nearby developments.

Iron Range’s Aaron Brown offers perspectives on data centers

Iron Range’s Aaron Brown offers perspectives on data centers

The Star Tribune publishes a column from Iron Range journalist, Aaron Brown, on data centers. He talks about many aspects of the issue and gets to some conclusions…

Opposition to data centers contains nuances. Gallup shows that people generally see the economic benefits of data centers, and many of us have begun using AI — some begrudgingly, some with enthusiasm.

What if we right-sized the data center debate? What if we acknowledge the need for computing power without giving a blank check to companies who consume resources with reckless abandon?

Minnesota already has more than 73 enterprise data centers, mostly housed in government and corporate facilities. The controversy surrounds so-called hyperscale data centers of 10,000 square feet or more. Only one such facility, a 715,000-square foot campus in Rosemount, is currently under construction in this state. Several more, including Google proposals in Hermantown and Pine Island, are navigating the regulatory process and growing local opposition.

Brown offers a recommendation…

Building up existing infrastructure with sustainability in mind should be our public priority. We must establish goals for the public good, not just for those investing billions in the most expensive technology that most people still don’t want.

Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce responds to losing members over support of data center (St Louis County)

FOX21 Duluth reports

The Duluth Area Chamber of Commerce is responding to backlash – and the loss of multiple business memberships – after they announced their support of the proposed data center in Hermantown.

In a letter sent to members of the Chamber, they reiterated their reasoning behind their support.

They also restated that two of the main concerns being expressed locally come from other projects across the country and they are negated by the specifics of this project.

This letter comes after Zenith Bookstore, Townline Farms, and Loban Dental announced they have ended their membership as a result of this decision.

6 questions (and answers) on the IronGate data centers in Woodbury (Washington County)

Woddbury News Net reports

IronGate Data Centers runs two data centers along Bielenberg Drive in Woodbury. Data Center Map places IronGate Twin Cities East at 401 Bielenberg Drive and IronGate Twin Cities West at 500 Bielenberg Drive. On its website, IronGate calls them MSP 01 and MSP 02, respectively.

Though data centers operate outside public view, their electricity, cooling and backup systems can raise questions about power use, city water and future expansion.

The publication asks and answers a series of pragmatic questions about the data centers:

  1. What Is A Data Center?
  2. What Do The Listings Say About Each Facility?
  3. How Are The Facilities Cooled?
  4. How Much Electricity Could The Facilities Use?
  5. What Does This Mean For Woodbury’s Water?
  6. What About Noise And Backup Power?

While the article will be of most interest to folks in Woodbury, there are some nuggets for everyone. For example…

Under Minnesota law, the Public Utilities Commission must consider making very large electric customers cover the costs that utilities incur to serve them while protecting other customers from stranded costs.

Map of 81 data centers operating (or in planning stage) in Minnesota

Y105FK out of Rochester reports

According to Data Center Map, Minnesota already has 81 data centers operating or in the planning phase across the state. The majority of the data centers are in the Minneapolis Market. The next biggest market for Data Centers is Duluth, with 6.

Others (KADOA, Aterio and others) have done counts and Data Center Map count falls the same ballpark.

  • Minneapolis – 63 Data Centers (Hennepin County
  • Duluth – 6 Data Centers (St Louis County)
  • St. Paul – 3 Data Centers (Ramsey County)
  • St. Cloud – 1 Data Center (Stearns County)
  • Braham – 1 Data Center (Isanti and Kanabec Counties)
  • Rochester – 1 Data Center (Olmsted County)
  • Bemidji – 1 Data Center (Beltrami County)
  • Cambridge – 1 Data Center (Isanti County)
  • Alexandria – 1 Data Center (Douglas County)
  • Mankato – 1 Data Center (Blue Earth, Nicollet, and Le Sueur Counties)
  • Blue Earth – 1 Data Center (Faribault County
  • Cannon Falls – 1 Data Center (Goodhue County)

Local poll on Pine Island data center project funds 76 percent did not support it (Goodhue and Olmsted Counties)

KAAL TV reports

A new poll is looking to answer the question of how much support there is in the Pine Island community for the data center project.

The person behind the poll, who shared the results with ABC 6 News, said it only counted people who have addresses within 55963 area code. It should also be noted that the author has publicly pushed back on the data center project.

Of the over 650 people who responded to the poll, just over 19% said they support the project while nearly 76% said they did not support it. 4.4% said they were not sure.

These numbers track with broader results, including a recent KSTP/SurveyUSA poll that found 60% of Minnesotans oppose data centers in their area, 27% are in favor, and the remainder were uncertain.

The article includes the full report.