EVENT ALERT: June 25 – What’s happening with Broadband in St Louis County?

I will be there and hope to livestream!

Learn about current broadband initiatives and available resources for broadband development in St Louis County.

Poor broadband services hurt quality of life, hinder economic developemnt and lower property values. Do not let your community or township be left behind! Local leadership matters!

June 25
1-3:30 pm
Mountain Iron Community Center

Agenda:

Welcome

St Louis County/Blandin Overview

IRRR/St Louis County/Blandin Foundation Broadband Partnership

Update on Area Broadband Feasibility Studies

Provider Partnership Strategies

Broadband funding Resources

Prospective broadband project updates

Refreshments, informal discussion and networking

Adjourn

Illinois Congressional Delegation To FCC: Improve Rural Broadband Maps

Having just spent the last few days looking at maps and data from the Office of Broadband Development, I can tell you how important it is to have good benchmarking. It tells us where we need to bring better service but also historically we can look to see which areas are doing well, when they started to do well and perhaps figure out a why. Same for areas that are doing less well.

If we are going to spend federal, state and local money of broadband (and to reach the high cost areas, we probably need to) we should know where we need to go and what’s happened to areas where we have invested. So it was interesting to see the entire Illinois Congressional Delegation tell the FCC, we need better maps…

Today, the entire Illinois Congressional Delegation sent a letter to Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai and the four FCC Commissioners urging the FCC to improve the nation’s broadband maps by reforming the mapping process for broadband services. The members noted that currently the mapping process lacks detail, accuracy, and granularity, meaning many underserved areas, including many rural communities in Illinois, could go without critical funding to improve broadband services.  The Commission’s recently released 2019 annual Broadband Deployment Report found that more than 21 million Americans still lack access to high-speed internet service, though this number may be much higher due to inaccuracies in broadband maps.  According to the FCC, only about 61 percent of rural areas in Illinois have access to fixed broadband at speeds of 25 Mbps/3 Mbps.

“As we work to repair and rebuild our nation’s infrastructure, we must ensure that those in rural America have access to high-quality and reliable fixed or mobile broadband.  In addition to developing our nation’s rural economy, broadband helps expand educational horizons for students and allows rural health providers to offer more flexible and cost-effective delivery approaches,” the members wrote in a letter to Chairman Pai.

Today’s letter was signed by the entire Illinois Congressional Delegation: U.S. Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), and U.S. Representatives Bobby Rush (D-IL-01), Robin Kelly (D-IL-02), Dan Lipinski (D-IL-03), Chuy Garcia (D-IL-04), Mike Quigley (D-IL-05), Sean Casten (D-IL-06), Danny Davis (D-IL-07), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL-08), Jan Schakowsky (D-IL-09), Brad Schneider (D-IL-10), Bill Foster (D-IL-11), Mike Bost (R-IL-12), Rodney Davis (R-IL-13), Lauren Underwood (D-IL-14), John Shimkus (R-IL-15), Adam Kinzinger (R-IL-16), Cheri Bustos (D-IL-17), and Darin LaHood (R-IL-18).

Full text of today’s letter is available here and below:

June 17, 2019

Dear Chairman Pai:

We write to urge the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to improve our nation’s broadband maps by reforming the mapping process that illustrates where fixed and mobile broadband services are available within the United States.

What should be of great concern to government, the telecommunications industry, and American consumers is the significant lack of detail, accuracy, and granularity of these broadband maps.  For example, an entire census block may be considered served even though only a single location within the block has access to fixed broadband service.  This misidentification could result in the denial of vital funding which could otherwise bring service to these underserved areas.

Indeed, the Commission’s recently released 2019 annual Broadband Deployment Report found that more than 21 million Americans still lack access to high-speed internet service.  An overwhelming majority of these Americans are living in rural areas.  However, some have called this data into question and argue that broadband connectivity is even worse than the Commission’s data illustrates.  In fact, recent research shows that more than 162 million Americans are not using the internet at broadband speeds of 25 Mbps.

The challenge, in part, lies with the FCC’s current Form 477 process, which is overly reliant upon the data self-reported by service providers.  We urge the Commission to explore developing a process to validate or authenticate the information produced by service providers.  This will lead to more accurate and reliable data collection.  Inaccuracies within the data may currently be translated onto the broadband maps, which are used to allocate important grant funding and federal financing through programs administered by the Commission, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Department of Commerce to bring broadband access to lacking areas.  A failure to allocate federal investment to where it is needed the most ultimately falls on constituents.  Without sufficient broadband access, small businesses struggle to operate and students are forced to complete their homework in library parking lots just to use WiFi.

Specifically, in Illinois, we’ve seen a variety of cases that may reflect a nationwide problem.  For example, some Rural Local Exchange Carriers (RLECs) have been unable to apply for or receive funding due to inaccurate maps.  These RLECs have provided detailed engineering studies, collected and prepared customer “testimonial” documents, and submitted an extensive FCC petition for reconsideration regarding competitive overlap.  They also have filed comments and documents with the FCC requesting a review of these core issues.  Despite these efforts, inaccurate mapping has continued to hurt the ability of affected companies to expand broadband to rural communities.  In one case, a small Illinois RLEC was initially declared as one hundred percent competitively overlapped due to inaccurate 477 reporting by another broadband service provider; and as a result, was deemed ineligible to receive funding.  Many other small RLEC companies have attempted to secure loan and grant funding to serve our constituents, only to be denied.  As a result, many rural areas, which cannot realistically be served without federal support, remain unserved.  Both rural providers and consumers would benefit from a validation and challenge process to more accurately depict broadband availability and quality standards.

Therefore, as the country looks to close the digital divide between rural and urban communities through the deployment of and robust investment in fixed and mobile broadband infrastructure, the capacity to accurately depict which communities are the least connected is vital.  We ask that the Commission double their efforts to improve the broadband mapping process through three specific proposals.  First, develop more standardized granular reporting of broadband availability – while also balancing the burdens of reporting especially for smaller operators.  Second, establish a suitable validation process by which the self-reported data from service providers can be verified by the FCC.  And third, develop a process through which state and local governments, as well as other interested parties, can challenge the data displayed in the maps for accuracy while not adding unnecessary costs or delays.  These three common-sense reforms would work to collectively improve the accuracy of the data being used to make decisions on billions of dollars in federal funding and financing.

As we work to repair and rebuild our nation’s infrastructure, we must ensure that those in rural America have access to high-quality and reliable fixed or mobile broadband.  In addition to developing our nation’s rural economy, broadband helps expand educational horizons for students and allows rural health providers to offer more flexible and cost-effective delivery approaches.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.  We look forward to working with you as the Commission works to ensure that every American has access to dependable broadband service.

EVENT ALERT: 2019 Connecting Entrepreneurial Communities conference Sep 6

Looks like an interesting conference…

Join us for our inaugural Connecting Entrepreneurial Communities (CEC) conference in Minnesota. Strengthen and broaden your regional networks as you connect with fellow:

  • Entrepreneurs
  • Business leaders
  • Economic development professionals
  • Decision makers
  • Community champions
  • And more

Come to share ideas, learn best practices and find tools and resources to support your entrepreneurial work. You’ll also hear from keynote speakers Amanda Brinkman, chief brand and communications officer at Deluxe Corporation, and Tom Smude, owner of Smude Enterprises.

Thursday, September 5 – Friday, September 6
8:30 a.m. – 7:30 p.m.
Waseca City Hall

Learn more

MN Broadband Coalition meeting – celebrating success and planning for more

On Tuesday, 16 people met for the MN Broadband Coalition. It started with a congrats to everyone for $40 million for broadband grants in the legislature. It was nice to see in the introductions how members are planning and preparing to apply for grants (state and other) to extend broadband in the state. On the one hand, it’s great to see the interest and enthusiasm; on the other hand, it’s clear that communities need even more support to get broadband to everyone.

It was nice to see an array of members including many communities or association of communities and providers. People mentioned upcoming events (will post details when I get them) and/or mentioned that broadband has a place at the various annual meetings.

They did well with the legislature because we all worked from the same fact sheet. They had a unified voice. The work they did in 2018 built up a momentum and that helped. They had broadband bipartisan support. We got early media coverage. Getting letters to the editors of local papers was helpful.

Outside of the Coalition, the legislation passed Telecommute Forward, which is a great opportunity for communities. It’s a reason for many communities to talk to the Office of Broadband. For communities with broadband, it’s a chance to promote themselves. For communities without broadband, it’s a reason to rally.

Right now Minnesota is known as a leader for our broadband situation. It would be nice to build on that.

Plan for the future

April and May revenues for the State have been ahead of forecast. If there is a surplus, they will go for it. Even if they don’t get the funding, they build a momentum.

There were bills that were introduced related to policies. They consulted with people and decided not to pursue broadband policy changes:

  • The challenge process
  • Helping tribal areas and places without the tax base to raise 50 percent match

The new broadband Task Force might be a good forum to introduce policy. There are lots of events that the coalition could attend – for example the fall broadband conference. The hope is to keep the buzz going.

Strut Your Stuff Tour in Swift County – hybrid welding classes, 4H app, STEM for kids and more!

We ended the Blandin Broadband tour this week in Kerkhoven, in Swift County. It was fun to hear about new projects such as a free, 4-week welding class. The class is half online and half in person but they graduated 13 people, who are likely to have better jobs soon. Another project that caught my eye was a 4H App that they will be using at the county fair. Parents in the room nearly cheered to hear that there will be one organized place for schedules and updates and winning announcements. I foresee more 4H groups adopting that app as soon as it’s available.

You can learn all about those projects below. Unfortunately the video I took didn’t save. (Using Facebook Live to archive works about 90 percent of the time in my experience.)

4H App

We have Facebook and email to reach out to families. It’s OK but not great so we thought an App that’s a one-stop-shop at the Fair would be helpful. It’s a great way to connect and maybe save on printing.

We reached out to Iowa Extension to help. We are piloting the app for the U of M.

The response from 4H parents in the crowd indicates that this will be well used!! And folks are excited in the easier cleanup and knowing that there will “be enough copies” since apparently they run out. They can push our notifications.

There should be sufficient broadband on the county fairground to work. About 300 kids in Swift County are in 4H.

The cost to use the app software is $600 every 2 years. Then there’s the cost to be in Apple/Windows App stores.

CNH Weld Training

Used Tooling U via Ridgewater to offer free classes over 4 weekends. CNH donated welding equipment.

We got 20 applicants- 14 were certified. The students found it easy to use. We had PCs for People computers for people to use; but we didn’t need them. The hardest part was timing – it ended on prom weekend. The instructor was great.

We didn’t have firm requirements for students. We need to be on the same page with requirements. Age range was about 19-55.

There are a lot of companies in the area that need welders.

We would do this program again – but we’d need grant support because it is expensive. Final budget was about $40,000 – or $3000/graduate.

A traveling welder can make $60-70 an hour!

Community Websites

6 communities that previously didn’t have adequate websites.

All sites will be a part of a County website but can use their own URL.

It’s a wizard developed site but includes community calendar and e-commerce options. We can do reports using ESRI access.

We have encouraged community champions – often the mayor. SO we can customize based on any special ideas that make sense for an individual community.

Working on community marketing plans based on storytelling.

Digital Marketing for Business

Matching businesses with a consultant to help with all aspects of tech needs.
Currently working with the newspaper. The program is going well so far. She asks questions that we wouldn’t know to ask. We plan to work with the consultant for 4 hours.

There isn’t an hourly limit on consulting but they worked on a list of deliverables.
There are so many businesses that would benefit from this type of service, we just need to know how to convince them.

PCs for People

We have 28 families signed up for computers. We were going to align the computers with girls who had gone through horse training program that works on self improvement.

So now we might work on home empowerment program to match computers with new homeowners/renter and help new owners use the computers to access county pages and census.

We are still hoping to get something done this summer – but it’s difficult to work with schools in the summer.

STEM Camp for Kids

Camp is happening now. Partnered with Community Ed. Working with National Investors Hall of Fame. Kids love it. We surpassed the expectation for students.

There was a fee to use the curriculum. Teachers are paid. Everyone loves it! School opened up free space and we had some volunteers.

Total cost was about $5000

The challenge moving forward with broadband adoption programs is keeping the momentum. The key is creating programs that interest people.

MN Broadband County Maps: Data, Ranking and comparing for 100/20 speeds

The Office of Broadband Development maps and county data are out! I am looking a percentage covered at various speeds, comparing county speeds and ranking for 25/3 speeds and comparing 100/20 rates and ranking (below). I’m doing this in three posts because the I think the data is valuable but best in small bites.

The MN State broadband speed goals are 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up by 2002 and 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps by 2026.

For the most part the change in rankings for 25/3 was pretty incremental. That is not the case for 100/20. Some counties ranking moved up as much as 55 places; some counties dipped 20+ places.

My observations at this point are only hypotheses, but if your ranking went down there are probably two factors. If your ranking went down and the reported percentage covered also went down, it likely reflects a correction in previous reporting. Some providers gave more granular data in 2019 and that changed the data. If your ranking dropped and your percentage covered increased, you’re just not deploying as fast as other counties. Perhaps you need to revitalize local interest to get the rest of the county covered.

If your ranking improved you might want to look at why, just to make sure to keep it up. Maybe you got a MN state grant, maybe particular providers are blasting away.

Here are the most improved counties:

  • Benton County – moved up 55 places –part of MN Broadband grant
  • Olmsted County – moved up 47 places –part of MN Broadband grant
  • Chippewa County – moved up 46 places
  • Freeborn County – moved up 46 places -part of MN Broadband grant
  • Rice County – moved up 46 places – part of MN Broadband grant
  • Blue Earth County – moved up 44 places
  • Mower County – – moved up 43 places – part of a Mediacom upgrade
  • Crow Wing County – moved up 40 places – Mille Lacs Energy part of USDA grant

I’ve noted where I know they received grants. I will be working on County Profiles to take a deeper dive, but thought it was interesting to get a high level peek. Happy to hear from folks why they think counties have improved or not.

The best way to get the info on the 100/20 percentage cover and ranking comparison between 2018 and 2019 is download the spreadsheet. I’m including it below too

≥ 100 Mbps Download/20 Mbps Upload Speeds 2019 Ranking 2019 Percentage Households Served 2018 Ranking 2018 Difference in ranking
Aitkin 37.74 80 17.55 82 2
Anoka 97.45 8 97.86 5 -3
Becker 6.22 87 12.95 85 -2
Beltrami 98.79 6 96.30 8 2
Benton 88.18 20 25.83 75 55
Big Stone 98.91 5 98.91 4 -1
Blue Earth 77.91 39 14.13 83 44
Brown 74.50 44 73.76 27 -17
Carlton 47.57 73 58.22 44 -29
Carver 86.51 23 85.09 17 -6
Cass 51.61 68 35.92 70 2
Chippewa 81.70 31 24.80 77 46
Chisago 71.26 51 69.53 32 -19
Clay 82.32 29 82.52 19 -10
Clearwater 89.30 17 89.30 13 -4
Cook 94.50 13 94.50 10 -3
Cottonwood 66.67 59 66.34 38 -21
Crow Wing 88.04 21 41.66 61 40
Dakota 97.56 7 64.89 40 33
Dodge 77.08 41 74.59 26 -15
Douglas 68.82 56 25.56 76 20
Faribault 39.20 77 42.28 60 -17
Fillmore 50.30 70 44.19 58 -12
Freeborn 83.88 25 34.18 71 46
Goodhue 71.84 50 55.99 47 -3
Grant 43.02 75 39.93 65 -10
Hennepin 98.94 4 98.97 3 -1
Houston 67.81 57 66.63 37 -20
Hubbard 74.21 45 46.61 55 10
Isanti 48.05 72 56.62 45 -27
Itasca 83.06 27 79.44 23 -4
Jackson 68.84 55 68.79 33 -22
Kanabec 26.93 84 38.54 67 -17
Kandiyohi 72.89 47 10.64 86 39
Kittson 74.99 43 71.38 30 -13
Koochiching 73.41 46 73.44 28 -18
Lac qui Parle 97.35 9 97.35 6 -3
Lake 93.40 14 94.30 11 -3
Lake of the Woods 53.93 65 50.47 52 -13
Le Sueur 70.33 52 70.65 31 -21
Lincoln 39.21 76 39.21 66 -10
Lyon 81.89 30 72.77 29 -1
Mahnomen 17.31 86 13.53 84 -2
Marshall 53.08 66 48.20 54 -12
Martin 55.22 64 54.80 48 -16
McLeod 58.59 63 58.57 43 -20
Meeker 45.08 74 45.08 57 -17
Mille Lacs 52.77 67 54.42 49 -18
Morrison 69.64 53 42.74 59 6
Mower 78.56 36 23.31 79 43
Murray 51.59 69 50.78 51 -18
Nicollet 78.42 37 33.29 73 36
Nobles 77.66 40 77.18 24 -16
Norman 20.62 85 20.55 80 -5
Olmsted 92.66 15 41.29 62 47
Otter Tail 35.34 82 2.36 87 5
Pennington 96.18 11 90.75 12 1
Pine 37.26 81 38.18 68 -13
Pipestone 79.73 35 79.73 22 -13
Polk 88.35 19 85.39 16 -3
Pope 68.92 54 23.67 78 24
Ramsey 99.84 2 99.82 2 0
Red Lake 83.17 26 83.17 18 -8
Redwood 33.56 83 33.56 72 -11
Renville 59.06 62 51.78 50 -12
Rice 82.43 28 32.63 74 46
Rock 99.93 1 99.93 1 0
Roseau 72.59 48 67.30 35 -13
Scott 89.15 18 88.61 14 -4
Sherburne 72.36 49 67.11 36 -13
Sibley 62.87 61 62.84 42 -19
St. Louis 78.20 38 41.20 63 25
Stearns 81.07 32 40.17 64 32
Steele 86.86 22 56.16 46 24
Stevens 96.74 10 96.74 7 -3
Swift 99.60 3 64.15 41 38
Todd 38.68 79 17.58 81 2
Traverse 49.39 71 45.62 56 -15
Wabasha 66.31 60 66.17 39 -21
Wadena 91.07 16 49.91 53 37
Waseca 75.20 42 75.06 25 -17
Washington 95.80 12 96.10 9 -3
Watonwan 67.75 58 68.42 34 -24
Wilkin 80.84 34 82.08 20 -14
Winona 86.43 24 86.31 15 -9
Wright 81.02 33 80.61 21 -12
Yellow Medicine 38.86 78 37.72 69 -9

MN Broadband County Maps: Data, Ranking and comparing for 25/3 speeds

The Office of Broadband Development maps and county data are out! I am looking a percentage covered at various speeds, comparing 100/20 rates and ranking and (here) comparing county speeds and ranking for 25/3 speeds. I’m doing this in three posts because the I think the data is valuable but best in small bites.

The MN State broadband speed goals are 25 Mbps down and 3 Mbps up by 2002 and 100 Mbps down and 20 Mbps by 2026. The 2022 goal ought to be a benchmark toward the 2026 goals, but having looked at these number for a few years now I can see that while some counties take that to heart, others are in danger of plateauing with 25/3.

I look at this info as a call to help for two groups of counties. First there are the counties that rank near the bottom. They need to expand and upgrade broadband. Second, are the counties that have been hovering around the same percent covered (where that’s not 99+ percent) and are losing ground in the ranking. The exception would be if those counties are seeing a steep growth in the 100/20 percentage and ranking – which might indicate a slower but more future-forward plan.

For the most part the rankings were similar from 2018 to 2019. A few folks moved up or down a few places – based as much as growth round them as lack/burst of local growth. However, it’s probably worth looking at how your county stands compared to last year and why. Are you on the right trajectory to meet the 2022 and 2026 goals?

The one outlier was Brown County. They went from 96 percentage covered in 2018 to 84 percent coverage in 2019. It sounds like that is due to a provider supplying the Office of Broadband with more granular data that resulted in better data and reduced coverage. Few counties saw the decrease in coverage for the others that did, the reason is probably similar but in what I’d call a margin of error.

The best way to use this data is to download the spreadsheet. I am going to post an abridged version below (with fewer columns).

County Percentage Households Served 2019 Ranking 2019 Percentage Households Served 2018 Ranking 2018 Change in Rank
Aitkin 60.17 82 45.68 85 -3
Anoka 98.80 10 98.87 10 0
Becker 91.36 32 88.94 31 1
Beltrami 99.41 7 99.40 6 1
Benton 91.47 31 87.49 35 -4
Big Stone 99.58 6 98.91 9 -3
Blue Earth 78.33 61 77.95 49 -12
Brown 83.66 48 96.31 15 -33
Carlton 71.71 74 67.29 72 -2
Carver 92.14 28 89.81 27 -1
Cass 88.02 37 77.58 50 13
Chippewa 83.23 49 72.33 61 12
Chisago 83.85 47 73.27 59 12
Clay 95.82 18 95.45 17 -1
Clearwater 99.74 4 99.58 5 1
Cook 94.50 20 94.50 18 -2
Cottonwood 74.17 68 67.89 70 2
Crow Wing 92.84 26 92.29 25 -1
Dakota 98.46 11 97.54 12 1
Dodge 82.78 50 76.40 54 4
Douglas 88.25 36 82.96 43 7
Faribault 78.31 62 78.17 48 -14
Fillmore 57.89 85 45.02 86 1
Freeborn 87.92 39 84.31 39 0
Goodhue 79.44 59 77.10 52 -7
Grant 87.85 40 87.85 33 -7
Hennepin 99.39 8 99.18 8 0
Houston 72.94 71 71.29 65 -6
Hubbard 97.97 14 95.65 16 2
Isanti 73.50 70 73.67 57 -13
Itasca 93.12 22 86.15 38 16
Jackson 70.42 76 68.83 68 -8
Kanabec 66.05 79 67.07 73 -6
Kandiyohi 86.23 42 77.20 51 9
Kittson 74.99 67 71.38 64 -3
Koochiching 81.22 53 73.50 58 5
Lac qui Parle 97.35 15 97.35 13 -2
Lake 93.86 21 94.30 20 -1
Lake of the Woods 57.42 86 50.47 83 -3
Le Sueur 79.91 58 72.68 60 2
Lincoln 59.70 83 53.44 80 -3
Lyon 85.80 44 80.71 44 0
Mahnomen 89.87 34 76.93 53 19
Marshall 56.11 87 50.84 82 -5
Martin 80.29 57 56.38 78 21
McLeod 81.01 55 83.53 41 -14
Meeker 71.72 73 71.45 63 -10
Mille Lacs 83.86 46 62.00 76 30
Morrison 76.00 65 71.08 66 1
Mower 85.22 45 78.47 47 2
Murray 65.37 80 51.00 81 1
Nicollet 82.68 51 83.91 40 -11
Nobles 80.89 56 79.24 46 -10
Norman 98.45 12 98.02 11 -1
Olmsted 94.63 19 93.70 21 2
Otter Tail 92.93 25 89.56 28 3
Pennington 97.21 16 91.78 26 10
Pine 58.28 84 42.84 87 3
Pipestone 81.10 54 79.73 45 -9
Polk 93.11 23 93.00 23 0
Pope 76.99 64 61.27 77 13
Ramsey 99.86 3 99.84 3 0
Red Lake 99.99 1 99.99 1 0
Redwood 70.94 75 72.07 62 -13
Renville 61.90 81 55.06 79 -2
Rice 92.46 27 93.20 22 -5
Rock 99.93 2 99.93 2 0
Roseau 75.88 66 67.30 71 -5
Scott 96.43 17 94.50 19 2
Sherburne 91.63 30 89.23 29 -1
Sibley 73.59 69 63.47 75 6
St. Louis 86.23 43 83.47 42 -1
Stearns 91.72 29 88.96 30 1
Steele 88.44 35 87.79 34 -1
Stevens 99.22 9 99.22 7 -2
Swift 99.64 5 99.64 4 -1
Todd 71.91 72 67.96 69 -3
Traverse 67.25 78 66.14 74 -4
Wabasha 77.61 63 74.35 56 -7
Wadena 93.01 24 92.37 24 0
Waseca 82.19 52 75.30 55 3
Washington 98.44 13 97.21 14 1
Watonwan 79.21 60 70.70 67 7
Wilkin 88.01 38 86.53 36 -2
Winona 86.58 41 86.48 37 -4
Wright 91.07 33 87.89 32 -1
Yellow Medicine 68.31 77 46.91 84 7

The new MN Broadband County Maps are out!!

I always feel a little bit like The Jerk when the phone books come out when the Office of Broadband Development publishes the updated county broadband maps and info. And this week I’m jumping up and down.

I am going to do three separate posts on the data because I think it’s easier to take them on in smaller bites. This post I want to share the fact that the info is there. You can access the maps, data or a spreadsheet that include the following info for each county:

  • Household density
  • Number of households
  • Percent of households with wireline access to 25/3
  • Percent of households with wireline access to 100/20
  • Percent of households with wireline access to Gig up and down

And of course you can see a map of coverage in your county.

I’ll paste an abridged portion of the table – and I’ll focus on the Gig access. I’m working on posts that focus on 25/3 and 100/20 that will rank access and compare speeds and ranking to 2018. I will use this data to do the annual County Profiles – but with 87 counties that will take a while. (Download full spreadsheet for best access to data; I know the layout may be wonky here.)

Top 10 Counties for Gig Access

County ≥ 1 Gbps Download/1 Gbps Upload Speeds Ranking
Beltrami 98.78 1
Stevens 96.74 2
Cook 94.50 3
Lake 93.23 4
Clearwater 89.30 5
Red Lake 83.17 6
Winona 75.12 7
Kittson 74.99 8
Lac qui Parle 74.61 9
Wilkin 72.21 10

Bottom 10 Counties

County ≥ 1 Gbps Download/1 Gbps Upload Speeds Ranking
Faribault 0.09 78
Benton 0.00 79
Carlton 0.00 80
Kanabec 0.00 81
Kandiyohi 0.00 82
Martin 0.00 83
Mille Lacs 0.00 84
Pine 0.00 85
Redwood 0.00 86
Yellow Medicine 0.00 87

Kandiyohi County moves forward with broadband engineering study

West Central Tribune reports…

Kandiyohi County is taking fresh aim at a long-sought goal of widening the availability of high-speed internet service, especially to neighborhoods that remain unserved or underserved.

The County Board voted Tuesday to help fund an engineering study that will examine the feasibility of bringing broadband to rural homes and businesses in Dovre, Mamre and St. Johns townships.

The ultimate goal is another shot at grant dollars from the border-to-border program of the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development.

The article also give a little history…

The county and the Economic Development Commission had high hopes two years ago when the state Office of Broadband Technology awarded a $4.9 million grant to help develop broadband in rural northern Kandiyohi County. But the project struggled to reach fruition and was abandoned in the summer of 2017 after the county’s broadband partner, Consolidated Telecommunications Co., withdrew its participation, forcing the county to forfeit the grant money.

“It was so close and it didn’t happen,” said Larry Kleindl, county administrator.

It was a setback but advocates for local broadband never gave up, he said. “We agreed we weren’t going to quit. … We’re trying to find the tool and the mechanism to do this.”

What’s different this time is that the proposed project has multiple partners — the three townships, Kandiyohi County and telecommunications provider Arvig — willing to take the lead. The proposed service area is also more geographically compact.

Strut Your Stuff Tour in Rock County – Hotspots in libraries, buses and camping sites as well as programming

Yesterday I joined the Blandin crew in Rock County (Luverne, MN) to hear about fun activities happening in the area related to Rock County’s participation in the BBC (Blandin Broadband Communities) initiative. What’s interesting is the budgets that Rock County has been able to provide to us; some budgets are actual and some are planned. You can probably figure out which is which by context.

It’s been great to hear what’s going on in terms of getting everyone access where they need it. It’s funny to think of broadband on the campgrounds and parks but the age of wanting to go off the grid are gone. People want/need broadband for weather reports, safety into and in parks to allow vendors to sell items (for example at an art festival.) You can watch the meeting as it happened or read my notes below.

Library Hotspots (Total Budget $3,240) Continue reading

Strut Your Stuff Tour in Cannon Falls – using technology to build a food brand and more!

’m out with the Blandin crew talking to communities that are part of the BBC (Blandin Broadband Communities) initiative to hear about the great stuff they are going in their town. Today we visited with Cannon Falls. You can watch the meeting in its entirely or read the notes below.

Local Food Market – Cannon Roots Continue reading

AcenTek Improves Time to Revenue for New Services by Simplifying Operations with Calix AXOS

For the most technical in the crowd, or folks on the very front lines, Calix reports…

Calix, Inc. (CALX) today announced that AcenTek has deployed AXOS GPON as it expands gigabit broadband throughout its service area spanning Michigan, Minnesota, and Iowa. With AXOS, AcenTek has radically accelerated its deployment capabilities of next generation services while automating and simplifying operations to enable its network to scale. The AXOS E7-2 Intelligent Modular System and SMx Services Management Connector enable AcenTek to use a common operational service model, regardless of the physical technology layer supported or access network deployment location. AXOS SMx allows AcenTek to dynamically drive operational process automation, decreasing time to market for new service introductions, shortening OSS integration timelines and markedly improving subscriber experience. Additionally, with the real-time network troubleshooting capabilities of the AXOS Diagnostics Toolbox, AcenTek can maintain an always on network at a dramatically reduced operational cost.

Senator Westrom celebrates agriculture, rural development, and housing budget bill

The Minnesota Senate Republican Caucus reports…

Senator Torrey Westrom (R-Elbow Lake) joined Governor Tim Walz (DFL) as he signed into law, SF 1, the comprehensive agriculture, rural development, and affordable housing budget bill chief-authored by Westrom. The bipartisan budget legislation, a component of the overall state budget agreement, places an emphasis on rural broadband expansion, invests in affordable manufactured housing and home ownership, prioritizes value-added agriculture opportunities that directly impact farmers, and increases resources for farmer mental health services.

And the details on broadband…

Further, the bill funds the Minnesota Border-to-Border Rural Broadband expansion program at $40 million over the next two years million, a significant increase in the legislature’s appropriation over the last biennium.

“From health care, to education, to small businesses, broadband access is essential to our way of life in the twenty-first century,” added Westrom. “Communities that lack access to broadband cannot flourish. This significant investment addresses this issue head-on.”

FCC Chairman Pai Forms Precision Agriculture Task Force – apply before July 17

Oh please let there be some Minnesotans on the Precision Ag Task Force. And if you get on the Task Force please meet me for lunch after the meetings to tell me all about it…

The Federal Communications Commission announces the formation of a new federal advisory committee, the Task Force for Reviewing Connectivity and Technology Needs of Precision Agriculture in the United States (Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force or Task Force), upon approval by the General Services Administration (GSA). The Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force will perform duties and will submit reports. The FCC seeks nominations for membership on and a Chairperson to the Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force. The FCC intends to establish the Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force for an initial period of two (2) years. Nominations for membership to the Precision Ag Connectivity Task Force should be submitted to the FCC no later than July 17, 2019.

In consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, or a designee of the Secretary, and in collaboration with public and private stakeholders in the agriculture and technology fields, the Task Force will:

  • identify and measure current gaps in the availability of broadband Internet access service on agricultural land;
  • develop policy recommendations to promote the rapid, expanded deployment of broadband Internet access service on unserved agricultural land, with a goal of achieving reliable capabilities on 95 percent of agricultural land in the United States by 2025;
  • promote effective policy and regulatory solutions that encourage the adoption of broadband Internet access service on farms and ranches and promote precision agriculture;
  • recommend specific new rules or amendments to existing rules of the Commission that the Commission should issue to achieve the goals and purposes of the policy recommendations described in the second bullet in this list;
  • recommend specific steps that the Commission should take to obtain reliable and standardized data measurements of the availability of broadband Internet access service as may be necessary to target funding support, from future programs of the FCC dedicated to the deployment of broadband Internet access service, to unserved agricultural land in need of broadband Internet access service; and
  • recommend specific steps that the Commission should consider to ensure that the expertise of the Secretary and available farm data are reflected in future programs of the Commission dedicated to the infrastructure deployment of broadband Internet access service and to direct available funding to unserved agricultural land where needed.

In addition, not later than one (1) year after the date on which the FCC officially establishes the Task Force, and annually thereafter, the Task Force will submit to the FCC Chairman a report, which shall be made public, that details:

  • the status of fixed and mobile broadband Internet access service coverage of agricultural land;
  • the projected future connectivity needs of agricultural operations, farmers, and ranchers; and
  • the steps being taken to accurately measure the availability of broadband Internet access service on agricultural land and the limitations of current, as of the date of the report, measurement processes.

“It could be up to five years before customers in smaller cities like Fargo and Bismarck can expect to see 5G”

The Grand Forks Herald looks at wireless broadband in rural areas, recognizing that it may be five years before smaller cities like Bismark will get 5G. If we’re looking at five years for Bismark, it will likely be longer for the area two miles outside Bismark…

The telecommunications world is racing to deploy the next generation of wireless technology, called 5G, shorthand for fifth generation. The service is now available in some major cities, including Minneapolis.

The next-generation mobile network will provide dazzlingly fast internet access — with speeds of 300 mps or higher.

But experts say it could be up to five years before customers in smaller cities like Fargo and Bismarck can expect to see 5G wireless, and it likely will be available only in densely populated areas, such as the downtowns, the campus of North Dakota State University or state capitol complex.

That’s because 5G uses very high-frequency radio waves that travel very short distances, requiring a dense — and very expensive — network of transmitters that are cost-effective only in very urban environments.