Solar storms bring beautiful Northern Lights in MN but disrupt precision agriculture

While most of us were gleefully chasing down the Northern Lights last weekend, the New York Times (via Yahoo News) reports on another side…

The powerful geomagnetic storm that cast the northern lights’ vivid colors across the Northern Hemisphere over the weekend also caused some navigational systems in tractors and other farming equipment to break down at the height of planting season, suppliers and farmers said.

Many farmers have come to rely on the equipment, which uses GPS and other navigational technology and helps them to plant more efficiently and precisely by keeping rows straight and avoiding gaps or overlap. But over the weekend, some of those operations in the Midwest, as well as in other parts of the United States and Canada, temporarily ground to a halt.

In Minnesota, some farmers who had planned to spend Friday night sowing seeds were hamstrung by the outages. “I’ve never dealt with anything like this,” said Patrick O’Connor, owner of a farm about 80 miles south of Minneapolis that mainly grows corn and soybean.

O’Connor said that after being rained out for two weeks, he got into his tractor around 5 p.m., hoping to spend the night planting corn. When he received a warning about his GPS system, he called a technical help line and was directed to a message saying there was an outage and nothing could be done to fix it.

Ag Web talked about what it means for farmers…

It’s all happening right as farmers are rushing to get the 2024 crop planted.

“The good news is those radio blackouts for GPS may only last for a few hours or half a day,” says Dr. Terry Griffin a Professor & Cropping Systems Economist at Kansas State University. “My message is: if this is a radio blackout then patience is your best bet. Go check the NOAA website and if the planetary K-Index is red instead of green then go have an early lunch.”

Beyond the inconvenience of delayed field work, there could be real dollars lost to such an extended outage.

From an agricultural perspective, Dr. Griffin has been studying the economic impacts of GPS outages for several years. He’s found that even a few hours to half a day of lost GPS signal can come with a cost for farmers. That’s especially true for farmers who miss an optimum planting or harvesting window. Pushing field work later into the season can ultimately cost them yield and performance during the season.

“There are there are some real penalties and real dollars that come into effect when we’re not able to do field work,” Dr. Griffin said.

That said, it depends on the time of year and the regions impacted. A January disruption would likely have less impact than one during planting or harvest.

Dr. Griffin says while GPS satellites have been in use and in orbit for many years – the first launched in 1978 – civilian use of GPS is relatively new.
He believes these new space weather events will come with a learning curve.

“This was the first solar cycle maximum we’ve had that’s going to be big with satellite communications,” Dr. Griffin said. “So, we’re going to find out some things.”

It’s not yet archived but an hour ago, I heard on MPR an interview with the MN farmer from the NY Times article. He talked about how it isn’t just a matter of using the GPS to make sure the rows in the field are straight. The GPS helps keep track of the soil quality, historical needs of the plants and more and distributes seeds and nutrients based location. So it made sense to wait until the solar storm was over rather than forge ahead using “tradition” sowing practices.

Also when asked if he thought this might happen again, the farmer said yes – if it’s happened once, it will likely happen again.

Interesting both in terms of the things the engineers and scientists need to learn about all aspects of precision agriculture and the value that the farmers put on using precision ag tools!

 

 

 

Turns out seniors are pretty tech savvy and will want broadband

Connectivity Trends for Senior Living in the United States (2024-2029), a report by Maravedit, reports…

The U.S. population continues to age rapidly, and this aging boom has a multifold impact on the senior housing industry. Baby Boomers make up an increasingly large share of the senior population and they are living longer and healthier lives than the generations before them. After the heavy drop experienced during the pandemic, senior housing occupancy rates are back to healthier levels. The National Investment Center estimates over 600,000
additional units will be needed by 2029 to maintain the current penetration rate.
Contrary to popular belief, seniors have become increasingly technology-savvy and are enthusiastic internet users. While senior residents continue to consume mainly
linear/cable television, online streaming is on the rise. Seniors also increasingly use mobile applications for banking, video chatting, gaming and engaging with their local community.
As active seniors move around their apartments and common areas, Wi-Fi roaming becomes important to maintain connectivity throughout the property, whether it be independent or assisted living. In short, senior residents’ expectations are rapidly changing.
The senior living industry has its share of challenges. It is marked by staff shortages, increased medical costs and low digitalization. The staff shortages create a domino effect,
leading to an overly taxed workforce and an increase in labor costs. Senior housing leaders are continuously asked to do more with less. This state of affairs represents an opportunity for technology and connectivity to play a vital role in improving operational efficiency through automation and better integration of legacy systems and facility IoT.
For caregivers and administrative staff, managed Wi-Fi is the foundational layer that enables them to serve the residents and better accomplish their duties. Wi-Fi makes it
possible to reduce residents’ isolation while facilitating the staff’s work in senior living.
Video calls, telemedicine, home automation systems — the list of innovations that improve the well-being of senior residents while optimizing the working conditions of care staff is growing.
On March 5, 2024, during the production of this report, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) made a statement that may negatively impact bulk-managed Wi-Fi.
This is causing concern and uncertainty among the stakeholders, but it is too early to know the impact.
No matter what the FCC decides, it only makes sense for property operators to invest in a better connectivity experience for their residents and outsource their IT operations and WiFi to specialized managed service providers. We remain bullish that we are only at the
dawn of this emerging sector.

Is AI a golden goose for mobile broadband providers?

So much is happening in the world of broadband these days – most of it related to the federal funding (IIJA/BEAD) coming into the states. Yet inherent in the funding are moments of waiting as the NTIA gets back to States at various parts of the application process. These are times when I think it’s helpful to step back and think broadly about what’s about to happen with this huge investment. The article from Light Reading on AI (artificial intelligence) and mobile broadband providers caught my eye…

During America’s Gilded Age, a handful of scrappy entrepreneurs built the nation’s railway system and in the process created huge piles of money by controlling shipping and travel lanes across the country.

Today, as AI hype begins consuming everything in sight, some are hinting that mobile network operators – and their equipment vendors – may be sitting in a similar position thanks to the data they own.

After all, AI models are only as good as the data they’re trained on. That’s why Google is reportedly paying Reddit $60 million every year.

And the telecom industry has an enormous amount of data.

“I think it’s extremely valuable,” said Jonathan Davidson, in discussing the amount of data owned by telecom companies. Davidson is the EVP and GM of Cisco Networking, and he made his comments during a media event here on the sidelines of the MWC Barcelona trade show. “We are doing billions of [network] measurements every single day… We have a view into all of these networks that no one else has.”

 

OPPORTUNITY: FCC seeks public comment on broadband data collection challenge process

The FCC is seeking public comment on broadband data collection challenge process…

Comment Date: February 19, 2024

Reply Comment Date: March 5, 2024

 By this Public Notice, the Broadband Data Task Force, in coordination with the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB), Wireline Competition Bureau, and Office of Economics and Analytics (OEA) (collectively BDTF), seeks public comment on its Broadband Data Collection (BDC) challenge processes.  The BDC is the most granular, detailed collection of broadband availability data the FCC has ever gathered or released, depicting location-level information on mass-market fixed broadband internet access services available across the United States as well as standardized coverage maps of 3G, 4G, and 5G mobile wireless services.  Importantly, the BDC—for the first time ever—also provides opportunities for consumers, State, local, and Tribal governmental entities, and other stakeholders to challenge the coverage and broadband availability information reported to the FCC and depicted in the new maps.

Pursuant to section 802(b)(5)(D) of the Communications Act, as amended by Pub. L. No. 116-130, the Commission is required to submit a report to Congress that evaluates the challenge processes and considers whether the Commission should commence an inquiry on the need for other tools to help identify potential inaccuracies in BDC data and improve the accuracy of those data.[1]  Comments received in response to this Public Notice will inform this report.  To this end, we request input on the extent to which stakeholders are participating in the challenge processes, whether they find the challenge processes to be “user-friendly”, and, if not, what improvements the Commission can make to its processes to make participation more user-friendly, and the effectiveness of the challenge processes in improving the quality and accuracy of our broadband availability data.

[1] See 47 U.S.C. § 642(b)(5)(D);  Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability Act, Pub. L. No. 116-130, 134 Stat. 228 (2020) (codified at 47 U.S.C. §§ 641-646) (Broadband DATA Act or BDA), 47 U.S.C. § 642(a)(1)(A).  The report must be submitted to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce.  47 U.S.C. § 642(b)(5)(D).

Farmington MN is getting free WiFi in the city parks (Dakota County)

The Minneapolis Star Tribune reports

Most of Farmington’s city parks will have free Wi-Fi once Hiawatha Broadband Communications finishes building its fiber optic network infrastructure across the city, according to Mayor Joshua Hoyt.

Hiawatha Broadband began building the network in April; once it is complete, residents can choose the company as their internet provider. The company plans to bring Wi-Fi access to 20 of the city’s 29 parks by 2025.

The parks were chosen based on factors like foot traffic, size, cost, amenities and frequency of vandalism, said Peter Gilbertson, Farmington’s information technology director.

The city will use about $522,000 in American Rescue Plan Act funds to provide power, poles and security cameras in parks.

Partnering with Hiawatha Broadband “saved the city an incredible amount of money, which will be repurposed to other initiatives,” Gilbertson said.

What is Li-Fi? How is it difference from Wi-Fi? And is it better

In 2016, the MN Broadband Task Force learned about Li-Fi and I haven’t seen much about it since until a recent article in IEEE Spectrum

The recent adoption of IEEE 802.11bb has launched light fidelity, or Li-Fi, which opened the door into an era of wireless communication for advanced Wi-Fi technologies. Li-Fi enables Wi-Fi to use light waves instead of radio waves to transmit and receive data.

IEEE 802.11bb defines the rules for how Li-Fi devices will communicate with each other and how fast they can transfer data. According to the standard, such devices should be able to send and receive data at speeds between 10 megabits per second and 9.6 gigabits per second.

The standard introduces a new realm of fast, reliable wireless communication that promises to revolutionize the way we connect and communicate.

Here are some of the comparisons to Wi-Fi…

Li-Fi enables high-speed wireless connectivity with data rates of up to 100 Mb/s per square meter, making it ideal for densely populated areas, i.e., conference rooms and classrooms. The technology operates in additional unregulated spectrum, where it has no interference with RF-based wireless technologies.

Enhanced security is another advantage, as Li-Fi communication is confined to the physical boundaries of the light signal, such as the inside of a room, making it difficult to intercept.

However, Li-Fi has limitations. Its range is relatively short—typically limited to a few meters in a single room—which means that it requires a dense network of access points for broader coverage.

Additionally, the available bandwidth can be constrained by the capabilities of light sources and detectors. Implementing Li-Fi infrastructure can also be more expensive compared with Wi-Fi.

Because I find it easy to get confused, I’ll point out that this isn’t a way to reach remote locations, it’s a way to make sure everyone at the Vikings game can post on the social media.

Library hotspots a boon to people experiencing homelessness

Colin Rhinesmith recently published a report on how library hotspot checkout programs can support people experiencing homelessness. The report is behind a pay wall but the abstract gets to the gist…

Previous studies have examined the benefits and challenges of using mobile phones to support people experiencing homelessness. However, few studies have considered how mobile Wi-Fi hotspots support unhoused individuals and couples through public library lending programs. This paper seeks to address a gap in mobile communication scholarship by contributing insights from a qualitative study of library patrons who checked out mobile hotspots from the Boston Public Library in Massachusetts, USA. The findings show that although mobile hotspots provided many benefits for public library patrons in general, these devices facilitated mobile communication with a different sense of urgency for six people experiencing homelessness who also happened to be in romantic relationships. More concretely, the study found that mobile Wi-Fi hotspots reduced stress and anxiety for unhoused patrons because without the devices, patrons without fixed residences worried they could not be found; that hotspots kept unhoused patrons more connected, and therefore safer, in their tents despite the cold weather and a lack of electricity; and that unhoused patrons were concerned about their devices getting stolen because of their precarious situation. Although the unhoused patrons who participated in this study also shared their recommendations regarding how mobile hotspot lending programs in public libraries could be improved, they also mentioned that the benefits of hotspot availability far outweighed their challenges. The findings have implications for those working to address homelessness, including community-based organizations, government agencies, and policymakers who seek further insights into the positive role that mobile hotspot devices can play in supporting positive health outcomes for individuals and couples experiencing homelessness.

Midco sells tower portfolio to K2 Towers and will rent access to keep CAFII commitments

Fierce Telecom reports

Midco is a midwestern service provider that offers broadband via hybrid fiber coax (HFC) cable, fiber-to-the-home, and fixed wireless access (FWA). It serves 490,000 homes and businesses in 400 communities in Kansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.

This week, Midco announced that it sold its tower portfolio to K2 Towers. The two companies did not reveal the monetary amount of the transaction nor how many towers were involved.

Sounds like Midco wants to focus on broadband service…

Bruch said, “We want to make sure that we, as a company, focus on our core business which is broadband, providing the best broadband experience and video and phone. And towers were adjacent to that.”

Midco also sold the towers for financial reasons. The sale allows it to reduce its general debt, which is attractive given the currently high interest rates.

But the towers are still important in their CAFII commitments…

Instead of owning the towers, Midco will lease them from K2 Towers, a company based out of Ohio. The towers are located in Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.

Midco still needs access to the towers to provide FWA [fixed wireless access] service — part of its commitments when it won $39 million in Connect America Funds (CAF II) from the government in 2018.

FCC broadband maps might not capture reality of cellular fixed wireless access degradation

Borrowing from my smart friend Doug Dawson as he writes about cellular fixed wireless access (FWA) networks. The super quick version is that cellular FWA broadband speeds degrade much like the old DSL technology does. The farther you are from the tower, the greater degradation. The FCC doesn’t reflect the degradation accurately, which could have a unintended consequences when maps are used to distribute federal funding…

The map below shows a lot of speed tests from Verizon tower in a suburban county. The yellow dots on the map are the locations of actual speed tests. The colored circles on the map show the distance from a cell tower – with purple showing locations within a mile of the tower, red showing locations between 1 and 2 miles, blue/greed showing speed tests within 2 and 3 miles, and the surrounding white areas at more than 3 miles. I didn’t cherry-pick this particular tower as the best example – there are more than a dozen other Verizon towers in the same county that show similar speed test results. I must note that speed tests are not a prefect indicator of broadband performance, and there might be explanations behind some of the slower readings. But I have to think that seeing this same speed pattern around multiple tower sites is a good indication that this is how the technology works.

This map demonstrates what the farmer told me to a tee. There are some locations close to the tower getting 300 Mbps. Customers just over a mile from the tower are getting slower speeds, with the highlighted ones around 75 Mbps. By the third mile band, speeds have dropped a lot closer to 25 Mbps download, and outside the three-mile circle, speeds drop significantly. There is no easy way to tell if the customers with slower speeds are buying FWA wireless, which uses the spectrum that Verizon labels as 5G, or the older Verizon hotspots that use traditional LTE spectrum.

On the FCC map in this county, Verizon reports two speeds – 300 Mbps or 50 Mbps. It’s not easy to understand how Verizon makes the distinction, but it seems like locations for a fairly good distance around towers are claimed at 300 Mbps.

Somebody who doesn’t understand the FCC mapping rules might think that Verizon is breaking the rules by reporting 300 Mbps speeds in places where actual speeds are a lot lower. But the FCC allows ISPs to report marketing speeds for the FCC maps as long as Verizon is advertising the claimed speeds. But that doesn’t mean that the Verizon FCC reporting is ethical. Customers who might refer to the FCC map when looking for an ISP, or customers that see Verizon advertising are hoping to get something close to the 300 Mbps speed – and many will not.

I have some major concerns about cellular FWA technology related to the upcoming BEAD grants. First, any state broadband grant offices that accept the claimed Verizon speeds in the FCC mapping might not award any grants where a fast FWA speed is claimed. That would be a travesty if folks who can’t get speeds of at least 100/20 Mbps with FWA are denied another broadband option.

MinnPost looks deep into Le Sueur’s broadband to see how policies matter

Turns out I wasn’t the only one driving a long distance for the Le Sueur County Fair over the weekend, Walker Orenstein from MinnPost was there too and he used the opportunity to take a deep dive into the broadband situation in Le Sueur County.

Le Sueur has been working on getting better broadband for many years. They have had some successes and some roadblocks. Walker outlines the current barriers. It demonstrates the importance of good maps and engaged communities.

There is opportunity…

As the federal government prepares to hand out an unprecedented flood of cash in Minnesota for improving access to broadband – including a whopping $652 million from the 2021 infrastructure bill – decisions on how to direct money to connect rural areas might be influenced by small conversations like these.

There are challenges…

The fair is one way to spread information to people in Le Sueur County, like what internet providers serve certain areas. It’s also a way for county officials to gather intel, especially as they prepare to contest the service claims of a controversial telecom company in hopes of getting a share of broadband money.

And now is a good time to look for challenges in your community…

As those programs get up and running – state officials are still devising a plan with the federal government for using the $652 million – it’s too soon to say which providers and what parts of the state could get money.

But maps of existing coverage published by the FCC are a critical starting point, and have sparked jockeying among telecom and broadband advocates for a slice of the pie. A look at those maps shows wide coverage by LTD Broadband in southern Minnesota, at download and upload speeds of 250 megabits per second (mbps).

That is fast enough to exceed state and federal standards, which considers 100/20 mbps service – which also can match or beat typical speeds in big urban areas – to be adequate.

Critics, however, argue the FCC maps aren’t accurate. And they hope to erase at least parts of LTD’s territory from the map. One survey of 120 LTD customers in Le Sueur County found average speeds of 9/1 mbps, according to a letter sent to state regulators by county officials.

(I have been following the situation with LTD Broadband and the MN PUC. Concerns for losing the opportunity to get better broadband in places like Le Sueur fuels the organizations that have filed the original issue with the MN PUC.)

Another issue is the definition of broadband…

The money from the infrastructure bill is a bit more complicated. It appears that federal regulators overseeing that particular pot of cash don’t count technology used by LTD Broadband. That means the LTD coverage area would still be considered “unserved,” opening the door for grants that would subsidize other providers.

LTD mainly offers what’s known as “fixed wireless,” which distributes a signal from a transmitter placed on a tall structure like a water tower. The feds prefer fiber cable to the home for the infrastructure program. Minnesota officials also believe fiber is faster and more reliable. The performance of fiber compared to fixed wireless has long been a source of debate in the industry.

Hauer [LTD Broadband SEO] told MinnPost he doesn’t think their existing services would block anyone from the cash earmarked for broadband in the infrastructure bill. And he hopes to actually compete for grants from the infrastructure money through building fiber.

What can the communities do? Find a local champion, such as Barbara Dröher Kline, and get people engaged…

For a county-wide challenge, Dröher Kline said she hopes to gather more specific information than from the county’s survey. And she needs enough people to make a case.

That means finding residents who have service from LTD Broadband and running speed tests. It also means working with people to sign up for internet and ask the company for speeds advertised to the FCC to see if the company can deliver them.

The fair booth had detailed maps showing what parts of the county have coverage from any broadband provider. Raffle winners got coffee mugs advertising the county’s broadband initiative. Free coffee was available to all. “But I interrogate them about who their broadband provider is,” Dröher Kline said.

AT&T Announces New Internet Service Available Today in Minneapolis-St. Paul

An announcement from AT&T for folks in the Twin Cities…

We’re excited to announce our newest service, AT&T Internet Air, is available beginning today in parts of Minneapolis and St. Paul. This is a new fixed wireless home internet service – home Wi-Fi delivered over the reliable AT&T wireless network.

After signing up (online or in-store) and the equipment arriving at your door, customers can self-install AT&T Internet Air in five steps and be up and running in less than 15 minutes. It just takes a smartphone camera and a QR code to set it up.

AT&T Internet Air is also eligible for the Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP). The ACP is a federal government program that provides a benefit for eligible households toward their internet or wireless service of up to $30 a month (up to $75 a month on qualifying Tribal lands5) to reduce the cost of broadband service.

More information about the service is available here:

Comcast offers storm-ready WiFi

Telecompetitor reports

A new device from Comcast, dubbed Storm-Ready, combines LTE-based cellular backup and a four-hour rechargeable battery to keep broadband connectivity alive during storms. The WiFi 6-capable device doubles as a line extender when the sun is shining.

Comcast says that Storm-Ready WiFi is easy to set up and has no activation fees. It automatically integrates with the Xfinity Gateway and the Xfinity 10G Network. When the network goes down and the connectivity switches to cellular, customers get a notification and reassurance that they have not lost connectivity, Comcast said.

Goodhue County to invest ARPA funds on broadband in Welch Township

The Republican Eagle reports

The Goodhue County Board of Commissioners approved the use of American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds for broadband and website development.

During the July 18 meeting, the commissioners heard from Outreach and Communications Specialist Briggs Tople about how the website needed improvements to comply with ADA.

“Our website is our biggest communication tool, it receives roughly 400,000 hits per year and it is an extremely important tool for us,” Tople said. “As of right now it has a couple of faults, some of which staff can control, some we are going to need additional resources to address.”

More on the broadband…

During the same meeting the board approved a proposal for project from Southeast MN Wifi LLC in Welch Township.

“The project would serve 18 unserved passings, and they are requesting $112,138 from the county, or 48% of the total project which is $236,080,” County Finance Director Brian Anderson said.

According to agenda materials, Goodhue County Board had earmarked $1,600,000 for the expansion of broadband service to unserved or underserved communities within the county.

“The funds initially came from the Federal program American Rescue Plan Act and Goodhue County established this Broadband program to be used by established companies through the use of qualifying grants,” the agenda packet stated. “At this time four grants have been approved for a total amount of $986,329, leaving $613,671 remaining to be distributed.”

The board unanimously approved the proposal for the broadband project in Welch Township.

Free apartment wifi could help spread affordable broadband

The Education Superhighway reports

The IIJA designates the installation of Free Apartment Wi-Fi networks in substantially unserved affordable multifamily housing as a priority broadband deployment. This creates an unprecedented opportunity to bring affordable high-speed internet to historically marginalized communities and those living on lower incomes. Improvements in Wi-Fi technology have made it possible to connect affordable MDUs to reliable broadband service simply by deploying Wi-Fi access points throughout the property and then connecting the Wi-Fi network to a fiber connection to the building.4 Free Apartment Wi-Fi is modeled after the way Wi-Fi is delivered in most hotels today (see Appendix 1). Rather than buy a separate internet connection for each room, the hotel buys a single internet connection for the building and then installs a building-wide Wi-Fi network. The hotel then makes it easy for guests to use the Wi-Fi by giving them the network name (SSID) and password when they check in. There are no complicated forms to fill out, and the demand from guests has now made Wi-Fi a standard, free amenity in virtually every hotel.

In Minnesota there are 72,000 who could be connected through apartment wifi.

Cell coverage can be at least as bad as broadband in rural areas

Doug Dawson reports

Over the last few years, I have helped dozens of counties get ready for the upcoming giant broadband grants. We’ve been very successful in helping counties identify the places in their County that don’t have broadband today – which is often drastically different than what is shown by the FCC maps. We then help county governments reach out to the ISPs in the region and open up a dialog with the goal of making sure that all rural locations get better broadband. This takes a lot of work – but it’s satisfying to see counties that are on the way to finding a total broadband solution.

In working with these counties, one thing has become clear to me. Some of these counties have a bigger cellular coverage problem than they do a broadband problem. There are often a much larger number of homes in a county that don’t have adequate cellular coverage than those who can’t buy broadband.

I remember doing work in Western Minnesota, where often my dad would drive me to a meeting. He learned to park on the top of any hill (a tough find in parts of MN) or come right to the location of the meeting around the time he though I’d be done because he got no service in the area. So no way for me to contact him. Sometimes I got no service even from my meeting, which was likely in the courthouse.

Apparently there is a way to challenge the cell maps, but Doug doesn’t seem too optimistic about them…

Now the cellular carriers are required to produce maps every six months at the same time as ISPs report broadband coverage. If you haven’t noticed, you can see claimed cellular coverage on the same dashboard that shows the broadband map results. I haven’t spent much time digesting the new cellular maps since all of my clients are so focused on broadband. But I checked the maps in the region around where I live, and the maps still seem to exaggerate coverage. This is supposed to get better when wireless carriers are supposed to file heat maps for the coverage around each transmitter – we’ll have to see what that does to the coverage. It’s going to get harder for a wireless carrier to claim to cover large swaths of a county when it’s only on a tiny handful of towers.

There is a supposed way for folks to help fix the cellular maps. The FCC has a challenge process that requires taking a speed test using the FCC cellular speed test app. Unfortunately, this app requires a lot of speed tests in a given neighborhood before the FCC will even consider the results. I’m doubtful that most rural folks know of this app or are motivated enough to stop along the side of the road and repeatedly take the speed tests. And frankly, who knows if it will make any real difference even if they do?

The big cellular companies have clearly not invested in many new rural cell towers over the last decade because they’d rather have the FCC fork out the funding. I haven’t the slightest idea if $9 billion is enough money to solve the problem or even put a dent in it. No doubt, the FCC will saddle the program with rules that will add to the cost and result in fewer towers being built. But whatever is going to happen, it needs to start happening soon. We are not a mobile society, and it’s outrageous that a lot of people can’t make a call to 911, let alone use all of the features that are now controlled by our cell phones.

If your summer holiday plans include a road trip, you can check cell coverage yourself. Just track how many times your call drops of the kids in the back seat complain about service.