MRBC Update: Broadband Line Extension Bill Heard by Senate Committee

From the MN Broadband Coalition

Broadband Line Extension Bill Heard by Senate Committee
The Senate Agriculture and Rural Development Committee heard SF 3476, a bill sponsored by the MN Cable Communications Association, on March 2. After adopting an amendment to improve the language in the bill (see letter below for details), the committee voted unanimously to move the bill to the Civil Law and Data Practices committee, its next stop in the committee process. The bill’s House companion, HF3605, has not had a hearing in the House yet.
You can read our summary of the bill here if you are not familiar with the bill.
The Coalition submitted a letter to the Agriculture Committee members outlining our thoughts on the bill. As always, we welcome your feedback on the bill and appreciate the many of you that have already reached out to express your opinions.

***********************Dear Chair Westrom and Committee Members,
On behalf of our member organizations, we write to you today to share our thoughts on SF 3476. The Minnesota Cable Communications Association has worked with the Coalition to incorporate suggestions from our member organizations that are reflected in an amendment before you today. These include confirmatory language that grants would only be issued for projects that are scalable to speed requirements of 100mbps download and 100mbps upload. This language assures that potential projects would not be built to standards below those of the existing Border-to-Border grant program. Additionally, MCCA included language that would preclude grants from being issued to households that are part of a grant already issued by the Office of Broadband Development for the Border-to-Border grant program.
Despite these changes, the Coalition maintains some reservations about SF 3476. The Coalition is concerned that, with limited funds currently available, pilot project grants would compete against larger, community-based projects in the Border-to-Border grant program. Any grants for this new pilot program would use the same funding source as the Border-to-Border grant program. There is currently $35 million for FY22 and $35 million for FY23 from the American Rescue Plan Act’s Capital Projects Fund that was allocated by the Legislature during the last legislative session.
The Coalition would strongly prefer that the Legislature use state general fund money from the $9.3 billion surplus to fund SF 3476. This would ensure that communities that have worked hard to partner with internet service providers for a Border-to-Border grant do not miss out because there isn’t enough money in the bank.
The Coalition supports Section 3 of the bill related to broadband easements. This language would streamline the process of rolling out service to households in rural Minnesota.
The Coalition would like to thank MCCA for graciously incorporating the changes listed above. We will continue to work with them as SF 3476 moves through the legislative process.  
Respectfully yours,
Jay Trusty
Chair
Minnesota Rural Broadband Coalition

This entry was posted in MN, Policy by Ann Treacy. Bookmark the permalink.

About Ann Treacy

Librarian who follows rural broadband in MN and good uses of new technology (blandinonbroadband.org), hosts a radio show on MN music (mostlyminnesota.com), supports people experiencing homelessness in Minnesota (elimstrongtowershelters.org) and helps with social justice issues through Women’s March MN.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s