Martin County broadband profile: half of the county has access to broadband

martinAbout half of Martin County has access to broadband at speeds of 25/3 (Mbps down/up) and 100/20. It indicates that the broadband available in Martin County is good but only have of the county doesn’t have access. They need to find a way to extend the broadband they have. Unfortunately they have been in that position for a while. In 2014, 59 percent of the county had access to broadband (broadband was defined at a slower speed) not it’s 55 percent.

They were Blandin Broadband Community, a program that helped them work on increasing broadband adoption. Part of the work, included a feasibility study

Martin County is in a challenging position. The two largest cities – Fairmont and Sherburn, along with the community Granada and its surrounding rural area, are relatively well connected. However, the remaining rural areas and communities throughout the county in some cases have no access to any broadband options at all. The digital divide challenges any provider to build a business case for expanding service offerings in the rural areas.

Incumbent providers have plans to improve some areas of Martin County, but the specifics have not been determined. Since Frontier will be receiving CAF II funding for Martin County, one consideration is a partnership to provide them additional funding for upgrading their networks beyond CAF II requirements and plans. CAF II broadband speed requirements (10/1) are lesser than those of the state grant program.

Similarly, BEVCOMM, operating the Granada Exchange, has share its intent to apply for grant funds to more of less upgrade the remainder of its unserved areas. Any grant application that the County pursues ought to factor in these plans by BEVCOMM so as to coordinate  and avoid any overlapping plans.

Martin County is also in line to receive $1,618,420 in CAF 2 funding to upgrade 2076 locations. CAF 2 recipients are only required to upgrade to 10/1 access. Many may choose to upgrade to better speeds but there are no requirements.

Numbers:

The Office of Broadband Development released data on broadband covered in fall of 2016, based on information gathered in July 2016. Here’s how they ranked:

  • Percentage served with 25/3 or better: 55.64
  • Percentage served with 100/20 or better: 54.06

kan-to-mow

Mississippi State University Extension have come up with a ranking system to gauge the digital divide index (DDI) by county. (The lower the number the better – the state average is 40.66.) Here’s how they ranked:

DDI score of 50.22 out of 100.

More info:

I plan to profile each county in Minnesota – tracking broadband access, digital divide and annotated links to news of what’s happening with broadband in the county. I’m keeping it high level because there are 87 counties!

This entry was posted in County Profiles 2017, MN by Ann Treacy. Bookmark the permalink.

About Ann Treacy

I have a Master’s Degree in Library and Information Science. I have been interested or involved in providing access to information through the Internet since 1994, when I worked for Minnesota’s first Internet service provider. I am pleased to be a part of the Blandin on Broadband Team. I also work with MN Coalition on Government Information, Minnesota Rural Partners, and the American Society for Information Science and Technology.

2 thoughts on “Martin County broadband profile: half of the county has access to broadband

  1. Martin County recently received a large Border to Border broadband grant, the matching funds provided by Frontier Communications. Similarly, BEVCOMM also received a broadband grant to upgrade the rural areas of its Granada service territory. Progress is being made, in spite of the density and distance challenges faced in Martin County.

  2. What’s the line? Slow but steady wins the race. Looking at the various counties, it really is true that the folks who plan for the future – like BEVCOMM are making a difference!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s