[12/29/2011 note from Ann: Sorry! It turns out this link to the report below is wrong. You can get the updated data here: http://www.connectmn.org/planning Then this is a hyperlink that says “This initial report” and that is a link to a report from January 2011 unfortunately that’s the link I initially used. I think they may be working on rewording that.]
This week Connect Minnesota published their latest report from a summer of surveying Minnesotans about broadband adoption. It also estimates availability and speed. I think it’s a precursor to the Task Force report due at the end of the month, which will probably highlight much of the same information. So if you want a sneak preview of what’s to come – this is it.
Here’s the speed synopsis for anyone looking for facts and figures
- 93.76% of households have access to broadband of at least 3 Mbps download speeds (50 up. The National Broadband Plan strives to get
- 100 million people access to 100 Mbps by 2020; 4 Mbps to the rest.
- 84.10% of households have access to broadband of at least 10 Mbps download speed. The Minnesota Bill strives for 10-20 Mbps download speeds (5-10 up) by 2015.
- 55.13% of households have access to broadband of at least 25 Mbps download speed.
- 46.86% of households have access to broadband of at least 100 Mbps download speed.
- 3.98% of households have access to fiber
One factor stressed in the report is that these numbers would be very different if you were looking at availability by location. About 60 percent of Minnesota’s population lives in the Twin Cities and the Twin Cities generally have pretty good access. Access across rural parts of the state is not as good and very uneven.
- 72% of Minnesota residents have a broadband connection in the home
- 15% of Minnesota residents do not own a home computer.
91% report accessing the Internet from either the home or someplace else
- 81% of surveyed adults report accessing the Internet from home; 44% from work; and 16% from a library
- 26% access the Internet via a cell phone or mobile device
- 9% don’t access the Internet
FCC national data indicate that non-adopters are generally senior citizens, members of ethnic minorities, rural dwellers, people with disabilities, people of low income, and/or people with less education.
Uses of Broadband
37% communicate with their health insurance company
31% interact with doctors or healthcare professionals online
52% report that they search online for information about government services or policies.
48% conduct online transactions with government offices (such as e-filing taxes or filling out forms),
37% interact with Minnesota state government offices,
28% interact with local government offices, and
25% interact with elected officials or candidates online.
46% conduct research for schoolwork online,
39% interact with teachers online,
22% take classes online
46% go online to search for jobs or employment,
37% report that they go online to work from home at least occasionally.
20% of employed adults report that they telework
17% of retirees, nearly three out of five unemployed adults, and almost one-third of homemakers say they would likely join the workforce if empowered to do so by teleworking
The report includes a list of strategies to address the broadband availability gap:
- Research the impact of recent policy changes Universal Service Funds and Intercarrier Compensation (USF/ICC);
- Encourage statewide coordination and planning;
- Create planning activities across the state;
- Streamline local/state rules for wireless deployment
- Encourage smartgrids
- Streamline local/state rules for rights-of-way, access to poles…
- Promote public-private partnership
- Measure and map
They also have suggestions to address the broadband adoption gap
- Promote/coordinate local efforts
- Promote public-private partnerships to promote adoption and warn of risks
- Expand digital literacy programs
- Use national portal of digital literacy tools
- Measure and map
- Work with tribal communities
*Several specific grant/funding opportunities were mentioned such as getting funds through E-rate (education), Institute of Museum and Library Services and State Broadband Data and Development grant program (SBDD) funded by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
My favorite part of the report
The report includes some statistics at the county level too I know in the past these county maps and data have spurred some action at the local level. I think that’s very valuable because at the end of the day I think it takes a local champion to get traction for local broadband. The case is made that broadband is most sparse and most expensive to deploy where the household density is low. So it’s difficult for national providers to create a business plan that makes it attractive to come into an area. Local folks have the “advantage” of a broader view; they can’t just focus on cost to deploy – they need to recognize the cost of not deploying too. That cost comes in added expense to reach healthcare to seniors, reduced access to education for local kids, loss of business certainly in persuading business to come into the area but even retention.
County folks may also be interested in section on FCC Availability Gap (starting on page 47). The FCC assumes that 95 percent of the country will have its broadband needs met by market solutions; they figure it will cost $23.5 billion to help the remaining five percent. If you are in that five percent, you want to make sure the numbers are right to improve your chances at receiving your support. The FCC has used a statistical model to estimate broadband coverage, but recognize that their model is imperfect. The chart on page 49 highlights discrepancies between the FCC model and Connect Minnesota research.
One thing I’d like to change
The report still provides information on access and adoption to slow connection (768 Kbps to 3 Mbps). This came up at the last Task Force meeting. I think once you list those speeds in a broadband report it elevates that speeds to broadband status and gives folks an opportunity to misinterpret them. It would be nice to eliminate them. Right now these speeds of 768 Kbps to 3 Mbps seem to represent the underserved. (This goes beyond the scope of this report but) I’d love to see the 4-100 Mbps represent the underserved. Really if the rest of the country is striving for 100 Mbps – how can we thin 4 Mbps for some is adequately served?
Also it would be nice if the speeds matched up with goals. We have speeds up to 3 Mbps when the National Broadband Plan goal for second tier service is 4 Mbps. We also have speeds measured at 10 and 25 Mbps when the state goal is 10-20 Mbps.
Again I think this is a decent sneak peek at the upcoming Task Force report. (I got a very tiny sneak peek at the report earlier this week – but not enough to know how much would be overlapped and enveloped from this Connect MN report.) This report is 143 pages; I think the Task Force was fewer than 30.
“Local folks have the “advantage” of a broader view; they can’t just focus on cost to deploy – they need to recognize the cost of not deploying too. That cost comes in added expense to reach healthcare to seniors, reduced access to education for local kids, loss of business certainly in persuading business to come into the area but even retention.”
that says it all!