Local Estimates of Internet Adoption (Project LEIA) percent and ranking by County in MN

In early December 2024, the NTIA unveiled their Local Estimates of Internet Adoption (Project LEIA) Interactive Map…

This map uses Project LEIA experimental estimates to depict household wired Internet adoption for every county in the United States in 2022. Counties with relatively higher adoption rates are filled with a darker shade of purple, while lighter shades indicate lower adoption rates. The interactive tool supports zooming and panning around the map to focus on areas of interest. Tapping or clicking on a county will open a pop-up box with more information, including the name of the county, the estimated percent of households with wired Internet service, and the margin of error for that estimate. On browsers that support it, a button to toggle full screen mode will also appear under the zoom buttons in the upper left corner.

The first question is – how is this different from the MN ranking I used for the 2024 MN Broadband County Profiles? Two big ways:

  • This map looks at adoption, not access, it looks at how many households subscribe to broadband – not how many have access to subscribe.
  • This map is uses data from 2022.

While having access is required to subscribing, people choose not to subscribe because it’s too expensive (that may include cost of device) for them and/or they don’t see a need for broadband. So looking at adoption rates in your county, consider how adoption compares to access and think about what roadblocks are likely for your neighbors. What could help – access, more community education classes, free computer distribution opportunities or monthly broadband subsidies?

Counties by Rank (download spreadsheet)

county LEIA percentage Rank
Dakota 84.1 1
Washington 82.8 2
Scott 82.3 3
Stevens 82.2 4
Hennepin 82.1 5
Anoka 81.7 6
Carver 81.2 7
Ramsey 80.1 8
Sherburne 79.8 9
Olmsted 79.7 10
Big Stone 79.4 11
Dodge 78.9 12
Winona 77.2 13
Hubbard 77 14
Nicollet 77 15
Houston 76.7 16
Wilkin 76.6 17
Douglas 76.4 18
Pennington 76.4 19
Grant 76.4 20
Beltrami 76.3 21
Cook 76.3 22
Blue Earth 76 23
Lac qui Parle 75.8 24
Stearns 75.6 25
Chisago 75.5 26
Red Lake 75.5 27
Wabasha 75.4 28
Wright 75.4 29
Clearwater 75.3 30
Rock 75.3 31
Lincoln 74.8 32
Crow Wing 74.6 33
Nobles 74.5 34
Lyon 74.3 35
Steele 74.3 36
Clay 74.2 37
Itasca 73.7 38
Faribault 73.6 39
Rice 73.3 40
Mower 73.1 41
Swift 72.6 42
Waseca 72.6 43
Benton 72.5 44
Traverse 71.3 45
Brown 71.1 46
Koochiching 71 47
McLeod 70.9 48
Le Sueur 70.8 49
Roseau 70.5 50
Watonwan 70.5 51
Becker 70.2 52
Polk 69.9 53
Isanti 69.8 54
Cass 69 55
Marshall 69 56
Meeker 69 57
Otter Tail 68.9 58
St. Louis 68.9 59
Pope 68.3 60
Freeborn 67.9 61
Jackson 67.8 62
Fillmore 67.7 63
Kandiyohi 67 64
Pipestone 66.8 65
Lake 66.3 66
Wadena 66.3 67
Cottonwood 66 68
Chippewa 65.8 69
Mille Lacs 65.6 70
Norman 65.6 71
Goodhue 65.5 72
Martin 65.4 73
Morrison 65.4 74
Yellow Medicine 65.2 75
Murray 64.8 76
Lake of the Woods 64.5 77
Redwood 64.4 78
Sibley 64.1 79
Renville 63 80
Carlton 62.3 81
Aitkin 61.9 82
Kittson 59.3 83
Mahnomen 56.7 84
Kanabec 52.7 85
Pine 52.2 86
Todd 47.4 87
This entry was posted in Digital Divide, MN, Research and tagged by Ann Treacy. Bookmark the permalink.

About Ann Treacy

Librarian who follows rural broadband in MN and good uses of new technology (blandinonbroadband.org), hosts a radio show on MN music (mostlyminnesota.com), supports people experiencing homelessness in Minnesota (elimstrongtowershelters.org) and helps with social justice issues through Women’s March MN.

Leave a Reply