Thanks to Mike O’Connor for passing on this study to Bernadine Joselyn who passed it on to me…
Nemertes Research recently released a study on Internet infrastructure. Here’s the executive summary:
Our findings indicate that although core fiber and switching/routing resources will scale nicely to support virtually any conceivable user demand, Internet access infrastructure, specifically in North America, will likely cease to be adequate for supporting demand within the next three to five years. We estimate the financial investment required by access providers to “bridge the gap” between demand and capacity ranges from $42 billion to $55 billion, or roughly 60%-70% more than service providers currently plan to invest.
It’s important to stress that failing to make that investment will not cause the Internet to collapse. Instead, the primary impact of the lack of investment will be to throttle innovation-both the technical innovation that leads to increasingly newer and better applications, and the business innovation that relies on those technical innovations and applications to generate value. The next Google, YouTube, or Amazon might not arise, not because of a lack of demand, but due to an inability to fulfill that demand. Rather like osteoporosis, the underinvestment in infrastructure will painlessly and invisibly leach competitiveness out of the economy.
Perhaps the most interesting point of the study (as Mike pointed out) is the funders, which includes in Nemertes’ words “users, makers of, and investors in, technology”. In other words telephone companies and other interested parties may have funded this resource.
Reading the reaction to the article on the report is actually more fun that reading the report itself. (Comments found here.) It reminded me of librarianship 101 classes on information literacy. It also reminded me of Rep Al Juhnke’s astute comments at the Blandin Broadband Conference last month when he mentioned that so much of the info legislators get on technology comes from vendors.
We can require such information be disclosed in FCC reports by telecommunications companies.
That’s a good thought – but so many people question the FCC and their data collection already that I’m not sure it would help answer a lot of questions.
On a completely unrelated issue – here’s another article that talk about this study: http://community.livejournal.com/ontd_political/85657.html – the picture makes the article if you have a minute to waste.
Hi, thanks for blogging about our study. I would like to correct one statement you made, the study was not funded by any organization. We have issued a FAQ about the study, which is freely available at http://www.nemertes.com/studies/internet_infrastructure_study_frequently_asked_questions_faq
thanks,
Irwin Lazar, Nemertes Research
Thanks a million for the link. It’s included in the article too.
I think one of the important messages from the report is the need to look realistically at the costs to support and deploy broadband. I feel those costs are necessary but only by being realistic can we prepare adequately for them.
Well ann our financial advisers have advised us to take wildcom wildmax public .This is being done to attract top knotch people into the firm that will match up with our services.Our initial before sec is 10,000 shares for every 5000 invested .We only have 400,000 shares available for this so we are looking for 40 investors .
Wow – that’s great. I suspect you’ll have no trouble finding them.
well this offering will allow us to do more in more regions