Sherburne County to expands Arvig Elk River and Haven/Clear Lake Broadband Grant Program

The Patriot News reports on Sherburne County business

The board approved amendments to Arvig Elk River and Haven/Clear Lake Broadband Grant Program agreements

Arvig received ARPA Broadband Access Program grants for several projects in 2023. The Elk River Round #1, Elk River Round #2, and the Clear Lake/Haven Round #2 projects were completed (or are very near to completion) under budget.

Staff recommended utilizing the remaining funds ($453,300) to expand the original scope of each project. The revised project scope would serve an additional 71 passings, which include 10 unserved and 61 underserved properties in Elk River, Haven, and Clear Lake.

Minnesota Public Broadband Alliance Meeting: Federal look at BEAD from Gigi Sohn

The Minnesota Public Broadband Alliance is an interesting group of community leaders who are interested in broadband in their areas. The group includes folks who are technical and folks who understand the need. We get some examples of how broadband is making municipal life easier – such a remote meter reading, which means no more meter reader knocking on the door. And we learn about the ins and outs with partnering with different types of organizations to build better networks. Very creative!

Gigi Sohn often joins the call, which is a fantastic glimpse at what’s happening at the national level and often a sneak peek into some of the inner workings. I have high level notes from the meeting below.

Notes from Gigi Sohn

  • 18 BEAD plans are OK’ed but only one has NIST approval
  • NTIA is tinkering with benefit of the bargain, then best and final offer – where lowest wins no matter what. Apparently, NTIA is making folks do a second “best and final offer” round.
  • NTIA has sights out for public broadband and cooperatives
  • On Friday Executive Order that will require all states to pre-empt all local AI regulations before getting fed funding. This may be a stopper.
  • Nondeployment money could be used for adoption et al when first introduced but now – seems like the states will have to give back all or most of the unused (nondeployment) funds
  • Some in congress is writing bills to give the money back to the federal government
  • Benton is working on a letter (125 legislators have signed) to let states keep their designated funds
  • Recommended reading: From Promises to Performance: BEAD Enforcement Tools States Need Now
  • Recommended webinar: Building Smarter Cities and the Cost of Doing Nothing

Questions:

How can we support Gigi?
Get MN policymakers to sign the Benton letter

Are here any community networks interested in private funding?
Sounds like a disaster

Notes from OBD

  • MN did not accept non-use of waivers. We think we have support on some of the waivers.
  • There is more than $200 million in nondeployment
  • There is support in Congress to let states keep their money
  • It seems like NTIA wants to push too far – get to a point where providers won’t sign a contract
  • Minnesota’s proposal is close – but the slow down is likely the waivers
  • NIST is an issue.
  • LEO is a hiccup when you want to build to the future
  • Line Extension is due next week (Nov 25)

Questions:

Is there a template or model we can create for counties to show what BEAD can look like?
Yes, very close

What could the unintended consequences be on border to border program?
We need to do education on what federal funding means versus state funding. Providers are also looking at the cost of federal funding.

Next Meeting Dec 17 – and that could be a very important meeting.

Lismore Coop talking to Nobles County about extending FTTH to Rushmore and Ellsworth

The Worthington Globe reports

Travis Halbur of Lismore Cooperative Telephone Company met with the Nobles County Board of Commissioners Tuesday morning to discuss a new project endeavor with intent to request funding assistance from the county.

Carter Grupp, consulting project manager at Finley Engineering Company, was also present to offer more information on the project, which is intended to bring a fiber line into Rushmore, Ellsworth and other non-grant subscribers throughout the county.

Some specifics on the proposal…

The total cost of the project is estimated at $682,000. Nobles County was asked to provide 20%, or $136,400, as a local commitment toward an application to secure more funding through the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Broadband Line Extension Connection program . The program awards grants for the extension of existing broadband infrastructure to unserved locations, which includes Ellsworth, Rushmore, Worthington and Fulda. …

With the line extension grant application due Nov. 25, there isn’t much time to gather funds. Though, the project is not meant to be a large-scale investment.

The proposed project would include about 18.74 miles of mainline cable, serving about 55 passings, which is an umbrella term to define an end user, such as a home, business, school, library or farm. Of those, 53 would be in Nobles County, while two would be in Murray County.

The cost per subscriber comes in at around $12,400, with the cost per mile at $36,000, which is pretty standard according to Grupp.

“We’re looking to leverage existing state funding to not only build last mile fiber, but also feed potentially four communities in Nobles County that don’t have access to fiber,” Grupp said.

 

More details on the Golden Valley’s upcoming FTTH deployment

I wrote about Golden Valley’s broadband expansion last week, but MinneapoliMedia has more information…

Residents of Golden Valley could see fiber internet installation begin in many neighborhoods as early as Spring 2026, as multiple companies prepare to lay high-speed fiber optic cables throughout the city. The project will bring advanced broadband connectivity to both local residences and businesses, marking a significant step in the city’s digital infrastructure development.

City Engineer Michael Ryan confirmed that the city has already received plans and permit applications for more than 15 miles of fiber optic cable. “Golden Valley is behind other neighboring cities in fiber installation due to our undergrounding policy for new utility installations, which prohibits the use of existing overhead utility poles,” Ryan explained. “Despite this, we are confident that significant construction will begin in 2026.”

Fiber internet is considered a private utility, similar to gas or electric service. Its installation is managed by multiple private providers, with the City of Golden Valley facilitating permits and right-of-way access. The city does not select a single provider and cannot deny a permit if a company meets City Code requirements.

Key details for residents include:

  • Timeline: Construction is expected to start in Spring 2026.
  • Disruption: Active construction in a neighborhood typically lasts one to two weeks.
  • Installation Process: Utility marking via Gopher State One Call (GSOC), directional drilling to install underground conduit, fiber cable pulling, and splicing.
  • Restoration: Installing companies are responsible for restoring affected property, including lawns, sprinkler systems, and pavement.

Willmar Council approves next step in Willmar Connect in split 5-3 vote

The West Central Tribune reports…

The Willmar City Council on Monday in a split 5-3 vote approved moving forward with the Willmar Connect project, a city-owned, open-access broadband network.

After more than three years of planning, the Willmar City Council on Monday in a split 5-3 vote approved moving forward with the city-owned, open-access broadband network now known as Willmar Connect.

Councilor Tom Gilbertson made a motion to approve the plans and specifications for the first phase of the project, as well as to solicit bids, which Councilor Vicki Davis seconded. Both voted in favor of the motion, along with councilors Carl Shuldes, Audrey Nelsen and Justin Ask.

Voting against the motion were councilors Stephen Gardner, Rick Fagerlie and Tom Butterfield, who all questioned the financial viability of the project to pay for itself without affecting property taxes.

Phase one of the project involves constructing the network operations center and installing fiber throughout all the neighborhoods west of First Street South, between U.S. Highway 12 and Willmar Avenue. Phase one may expand into areas within phase two of the project if there are clusters of residents and businesses who have completed the pre-sign-up for the service.

The infrastructure will be owned by the city and the network will be managed by Hometown Fiber. Multiple internet service providers can contract with the city to offer services on the network for a fee, which will be used to pay the principal and interest on the bonds that will fund the construction of the project. Eventually, those fees are expected to generate revenue for the city, as well.

Construction of phase one is estimated to cost approximately $7.8 million and phases two and three are estimated to cost just under $7 million each. The total estimated cost of the project is approximately $24.5 million, excluding interest on the bonds that will be used to fund it.

The city has already invested more than $1.1 million in planning the project, which has been funded by the city’s Industrial Park fund.

 

Golden Valley MN attracts fiber installation in City right-of-way and easements

CCX Media reports on Golden Valley’s adventures with a local fiber build…

 Over the next few years, several companies will be working throughout Golden Valley to install fiber optic cables in City right-of-way and easements. Fiber internet, also known as broadband, is a private utility similar to gas and electric. High-speed fiber optic internet offers a new service option for residents and businesses throughout the community. …

The city has set up a website to offer information and, when construction begins, an interactive map so residents know where the construction will be taking place.

 

Bois Forte-CTC extends NECS middle mile broadband to 2,000 locations around Lake Vermilion (St Louis and Koochiching Counties)

The Timberjay has a nice article on the history of broadband in parts of St Louis and Koochiching Counties – from NESC middle mile in 2015 to the Bois Forte-CTC extensions today. It’s proof that, like Rome, FTTH was not built in a day. I’m going to share an abridged version below, but I strongly suggested checking out the original.

Roughly a decade ago, the Northeast Service Cooperative strung a massive web of fiber across northeastern Minnesota. But what you’re seeing today isn’t a duplication of that work. It’s the follow-through. Thanks to a partnership between NESC, the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa and the broadband company CTC, more than 2,000 homes and businesses around Lake Vermilion’s south shore, Pelican Lake, and Nett Lake are finally getting high-speed broadband service.   

NESC’s “freeway” network was completed in 2015 after four years of construction and $43.5 million in federal investment. The goal wasn’t to wire every house. It was to build a middle mile, essential infrastructure that future projects could plug into.

Joe Weber, divisional director for the NESC middle mile system, said the project was originally built to serve schools, libraries, governments, and other public entities in places where private providers couldn’t justify the cost of running fiber.   

The original network spanned eight counties and connected about 320 public facilities. Since then, it has grown to over 1,300 miles of fiber stretching from Cambridge to Grand Portage.
The Bois Forte–CTC project wouldn’t have been feasible without the NESC backbone. Without it, CTC would have faced the enormous expense of building long stretches of new fiber just to link the project area to the larger internet. By tapping into NESC’s existing system, those costs were avoided. 

A common question that’s cropped up in recent months is whether a network built in 2011 to 2015 can keep up with the skyrocketing internet demands of 2025 and beyond. Both Weber and Buttweiler say that’s not a concern with fiber optics.
“The fiber itself has not changed at all,” Weber said. “The same investment 12 or 13 years ago is still working with new technology.”

ConnectSuperior sees 10 percent uptake in the first 2 months of service

Wisconsin Public Radio reports about our neighbors to the East.

This summer, after five years of planning, the city of Superior launched a new city-owned fiber optic network called ConnectSuperior.

ConnectSuperior works kind of like a highway, where the city supplies the infrastructure, and businesses can use that network to provide high-speed internet service to residents.

Stephanie Becken, the city’s broadband manager, told WPR’s “Wisconsin Today” that the new network has been a game-changer for Superior. Before, residents were limited to a handful of existing internet service providers in the area, and connectivity could be spotty because those companies hadn’t invested in updated infrastructure.

“Now, with this system, we’re able to really (welcome) as many internet service providers as the market can bear,” Becken said.

For some households, this means parents can work, kids can do schoolwork and other family members can play games or stream movies together, all at the same time — something that was inconceivable with the older internet speeds.

Woodstock Communications Deploys FTTP in Hatfield (Pipestone County) with MN State Grant

The Pipestone Star reports

Woodstock Communications has begun construction of a fiber optic internet network in the Hatfield area.

Work started east of Pipestone along State Highway 30 earlier this month. Woodstock Communications General Manager Terry Nelson said the project includes installing about 45 miles of fiber that will pass 116 homes in the project area. He said the fiber will be installed this fall and internet service is expected to be ready by the end of the year.

There will be no charge to residents in the project area to connect their residences. Projected pricing for broadband service is $44.95 for 100 megabits per second (Mbps) uploading and downloading speed, $54.95 for 250 Mbps, $74.95 for 500 Mbps and $104.95 for 1 gigabit per second. Nelson said that pricing is consistent with what Woodstock Communications charges in the rest of its service areas.

The project is estimated to cost $2,150,576. Woodstock Communications received a $1,612,932 grant from the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) last year to help pay for it. The Pipestone County Commissioners voted in 2023 to provide $268,822 for the project, which would cover half of the local match for the grant. Woodstock Communications will pay the other half.

The project in the Hatfield area is phase one of a four-phase project to provide fiber internet access to all the rural parts of Pipestone County for an estimated $15,733,299. Woodstock Communications plans to seek other grants in the future to help fund the projects.

Benton looks at Achieving Affordability: State Strategies for Getting Everyone Online

The Benton Institute for Broadband & Society has a new publication that looks at Achieving Affordability: State Strategies for Getting Everyone Online

In the absence of federal leadership, state governments are working to ensure that every household can afford to get and stay connected

They looked at…

Some state governments have long prioritized broadband affordability, while others are only now stepping in to fill the vacuum left by Washington. Across their strategic plans, all states cite affordability as one of the chief barriers to achieving universal connectivity. This report examines how states are working to make high-speed internet more affordable for their residents, offering a menu of policy
options explored by states around the country. These approaches fall into six broad categories:
1. LOW-COST PLANS: New York’s Affordable Broadband Act caps the cost of internet plans for low-income households at $20 per month or less. Connecticut will soon require low-cost plans for qualifying low-income residents.
2. STATE LIFELINE REFORM: State Lifeline programs collect mandatory fees from telecommunications companies, which are generally passed on to consumer bills, to fund discounts on eligible low-income residents’ phone and internet bills. State programs supplement a similar Lifeline program at the federal level, which provides a $9.25-per-month discount. Oregon recently passed legislation to expand its Lifeline subsidy and offer discounts on devices to low-income residents.
3. ONE-TIME SUBSIDIES: States, including Maryland and South Carolina, have used or plan to use federal funding for short-term affordability programs. These efforts are inherently time-limited and rely on one-off funding streams.

4. LOW-INCOME HOUSING INCENTIVES: States like Pennsylvania and Indiana are using the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) to encourage developers to offer free or subsidized internet in affordable housing units.
5. CONSUMER PROTECTIONS and TRANSPARENCY MEASURES: States such as Arkansas, Virginia, and Tennessee have passed laws to improve pricing transparency and billing practices. These policies aim to empower consumers
to better understand the costs of internet service and avoid excess charges.
This approach may lower costs indirectly.
6. ENHANCED COMPETITION and CONSUMER CHOICE: Some states are fostering competition and affordability by permitting the market participation of municipal broadband providers and cooperatives, as well as investing in open-access, middle-mile infrastructure. Others offer deployment subsidies or regulatory relief to lower provider costs and encourage new entrants

They found…

States pursuing broadband affordability must consider key factors:
• Available state resources, such as fiscal and institutional capacity
• Local market landscape, including providers and their offerings
• The time horizon of affordability needs
• Positions of key political, industry, and consumer groups
• Implementation strategies for enrolling households and managing program
outreach

Broadband Breakfast reports on Gigi Sohn’s visit to Minnesota

Broadband Breakfast reports on the MN Public Broadband Alliance meeting in Le Sueur County last week…

After years of broken promises from Washington, Gigi Sohn urged Minnesota leaders last week to take the state’s broadband future into their own hands.

“While Washington has failed you, Minnesota has the power – and the track record – to build its own broadband future,” she said. Sohn, executive director of the American Association for Public Broadband and a former Biden FCC nominee, delivered her remarks Sept. 10 in New Prague at What’s Next for Broadband in Minnesota, a forum hosted by the Minnesota Public Broadband Alliance.

Sohn pointed to the federal Rural Digital Opportunity Fund, launched in 2020, where providers defaulted on 80 percent of more than $400 million in Minnesota awards. “These numbers are nothing less than tragic,” she said.

Gigi Sohn: From Crumbs to Connections: Minnesota’s Broadband Future

Yesterday I attended, livestreamed and posted about the MN Public Broadband Alliance meeting in Le Sueur County. Today Benton Institute for Broadband & Society has published the text of the speech from Gigi Sohn…

Thank you, Barbara. Good morning! It’s wonderful to be here in Minnesota, a state that has always prided itself on strong communities and local problem-solving.  I’m honored to be speaking alongside my friends Ry Marcatillio and Bree Maki.

Before I begin, I want to introduce you to AAPB – the American Association for Public Broadband. We promote community networks by showcasing success stories and resources. We protect them from monopoly attacks. And we ignite new growth by linking communities with the mentors and expertise they need. Together, we’re building broadband by the people, for the people.  AAPB is a membership organization, so please join us as we work to empower communities across the country.

I want to start with a truth many of us already know; when it comes to federal efforts to close the digital divide, Minnesota has been left behind. Program after program has promised transformational change—yet time and again, your communities are still waiting.

Today, I want to offer both an honest assessment and a hopeful path forward. Because while Washington has failed you, Minnesota has the power—and the track record—to build its own broadband future.

Federal Program Failures

Let’s talk first about the federal record.

Launched in 2020, the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund—RDOF—was supposed to be a $6 billion game-changer. But nearly one-third of RDOF projects defaulted nationwide. That means hundreds of thousands of families were promised service and got nothing. Here in Minnesota, the story is far worse.  ISPs defaulted on 80% of  more than $400,000,000 in state RDOF funds and on 78% of the over 142,000 RDOF locations. These numbers are nothing less than tragic.

Then came BEAD, the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program, part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. $42.5 billion. A once-in-a-generation opportunity. Congress made clear that states should prioritize infrastructure that could scale, last for decades, and support the technologies of tomorrow. The Biden Commerce Department determined that only fiber networks met that definition.

But the Biden Administration didn’t finish the job, and on June 6 of this year, the rules were rewritten by the new Administration. Technology neutrality replaced fiber-first. Cost took precedence over performance. Low-earth orbit satellite companies swooped in with bids as low as $700 a location—numbers no fiber provider could match. The result? In Minnesota, 22,000 out of 76,000 eligible locations received no bids at all, because ten fiber providers dropped out rather than play a rigged game.

Of the remaining locations in the state, just 58% will get fiber, while approximately 25% will get satellite and 17% fixed wireless. Let’s be clear: the latter two aren’t long-term solutions. Satellite is expensive, congested, and limited. Fixed wireless can’t keep up with the demands of advanced applications. And for nearly a third of BEAD-eligible Minnesota households, there is no solution.

But that’s not all. Congress didn’t just fund deployment—it also envisioned a future where leftover BEAD dollars could be reinvested in the things that make networks work for people: workforce development, digital literacy, adoption programs, streamlined permitting, public safety and new applications like AI.  These aren’t luxuries; they’re the essential supports that get networks built faster and ensure they’re actually used.

Yet instead of empowering states to stretch their deployment dollars and then redirect the savings to these critical efforts, the Commerce Department has made clear it will claw back the money. Whether through a rescission like Congress passed in July or by simply withholding funds—just like it’s doing with the $3 billion Digital Equity Act—these resources are being locked away in Washington rather than put to work in Minnesota communities. Once again, promises made in the Infrastructure bill are being broken, and the people paying the price are the very families still waiting for a connection.

So, let’s be honest. The federal government has shown itself—again and again—incapable of implementing broadband programs that deliver robust, affordable networks for all Americans. Minnesota cannot keep waiting.

The Case For Self-Help

The good news is that Minnesota has a long history of self-help. When Washington has failed, when the market has failed, your communities have stepped up.  You’ve built cooperatives, power systems, and water systems. Broadband should be no different.

And in fact, it already isn’t.

Willmar

Take Willmar. Years ago, when private providers refused to invest, the city built its own network. That took courage. And today, Willmar has doubled down—planning a new $24.5 million open-access fiber project. This means that not just one provider, but many, will be able to serve homes and businesses over a shared city-owned fiber system.

What does that mean in practice? It means families whose kids struggled through COVID with buffering Zoom classes, will finally have reliable service. It means entrepreneurs can now reach clients nationwide without worrying about upload speeds. And it means residents have choice—true competition—instead of the take-it-or-leave-it monopolies we’ve come to expect.

Southwest Broadband

Now let’s move to Southwest Minnesota.  Nine small towns realized they couldn’t solve the broadband problem alone. So, they came together to create Southwest Broadband, a regional cooperative network.

The impact has been extraordinary. Students in Worthington can attend virtual classes seamlessly. Farmers outside Jackson can use precision agriculture tools—tracking soil health, applying fertilizer efficiently, saving money, and protecting the environment. Local clinics are expanding telehealth, so patients don’t have to drive hours for routine appointments.

Southwest Broadband is more than a network. It’s a lifeline, built because communities refused to wait for someone else to save them.

Dakota County

Closer to the Twin Cities, Dakota County built one of the nation’s first countywide fiber backbones. That backbone connects schools, libraries, city halls, and public safety facilities. The result? Students in Apple Valley can get online at their libraries. Police officers and firefighters can share lifesaving data in real time. And taxpayers save money because the county no longer pays private carriers year after year to lease lines.

Scott County

And then there’s Scott County. Their countywide network didn’t just make government more efficient—it extended opportunity into neighborhoods that private carriers ignored. Small businesses now have the bandwidth to grow. Families have access to telehealth. Local government can deliver services faster, better, and at lower cost.

These are not isolated experiments. They are part of a movement: over 700 communities nationwide have chosen to own their broadband infrastructure. They are all living proof: community-owned broadband works.

The Broader Benefits of Community Networks

And remember— community broadband is not just about fast internet. It’s about transformation.

When a community builds its own fiber network, the benefits ripple outward in powerful and measurable ways.

First, economic development. Businesses today make decisions about where to locate based on infrastructure. Roads, water, and power still matter—but high-capacity broadband is now at the top of the list. A manufacturer deciding between two towns will choose the one with reliable fiber that can support automation, logistics, and global communication. Hospitals expand services where fiber makes telehealth possible. Entrepreneurs launch startups in places they might otherwise overlook, because they can now serve customers anywhere in the world.

Second, population growth and retention. Families want to live where opportunity is abundant, and quality of life is high. In rural Minnesota, young people are more likely to stay—or move back—if they know they can work remotely, take online classes, and build a life with the same digital resources they’d have in the city. Broadband has become a cornerstone of livability, as critical as good schools and safe streets. Communities with fiber don’t just keep their residents—they attract new ones.

Third, housing and real estate values. Studies show that fiber broadband can increase home values by 3–5 percent, sometimes more. Realtors will tell you that buyers now ask about internet speed as often as they ask about property taxes. A community with fiber is a community where homes sell faster and at higher prices—strengthening the tax base and fueling local growth.

Last, but not least, cost savings and new revenue streams. When a city leases lines from private telecom companies, it pays year after year with no equity to show for it. But when a city owns its network, those dollars stay local. Instead of sending profits to shareholders in another state, communities can reinvest savings into teachers, firefighters, and other public priorities. Utilities use fiber to detect water leaks and power outages before they become disasters, saving millions. Public safety agencies share data instantly, reducing response times and saving lives.

A community-owned fiber broadband network can also be a source of new revenue. Local governments can lease excess fiber capacity to private providers, anchor institutions, or wireless companies, producing steady wholesale revenue. In addition, community networks can support smart-city applications—such as traffic management, utility monitoring, or public safety systems—that save money while opening opportunities for service contracts and partnerships. Over time, these revenue streams can reduce reliance on outside funding, lower taxes, and ensure that the economic benefits of broadband stay local.  A community network isn’t just a cost—it’s an investment that pays dividends across the community.

And fiber doesn’t just connect—it protects. With new fiber sensing technology, those same strands of glass can act as thousands of tiny guardians—detecting accidents on roadways, warning crews before a backhoe cuts a line, even picking up the tremors of an earthquake or the sound of a gunshot. Fiber doesn’t just carry data. It carries peace of mind.

And perhaps most importantly for the future, fiber is the foundation for artificial intelligence. AI applications—from precision agriculture to advanced manufacturing, from autonomous vehicles to telemedicine—depend on moving massive amounts of data with speed and reliability. Only fiber has the bandwidth, low latency, and symmetrical speeds to power real-time decision-making at scale. Without robust fiber networks, the promise of AI will remain out of reach for most communities. With fiber, Minnesota communities can lead in deploying and benefiting from these transformative technologies.

Community-owned fiber networks build stronger economies, more vibrant neighborhoods, healthier families, and more resilient communities. It creates places where people can live, work, and thrive.

Conclusion

So, let’s return to where we began. Federal broadband programs have failed the state. They promised a feast and delivered crumbs. But Minnesota doesn’t need to wait. Minnesota knows how to help itself.

The path forward is community broadband. Cities like Willmar. Coalitions like Southwest Broadband. Counties like Dakota and Scott. These aren’t dreams. They are models, ready to be replicated across the state.

Because broadband is not just infrastructure—it’s opportunity. It’s fairness. It’s security. And it’s the foundation for the communities we dare to imagine.

If Minnesota communities want to close its digital divide once and for all, they can’t wait for Washington. They have to do it for themselves. And the good news is— they can.

Thank you.

Broadband Expansion Continues in Itasca and St. Louis Counties

Paul Bunyan Communicaitons sent me an update and press release, for folks outside of Minnesota, I want to share the email intro to the press release sent during the first week or September!

The weather has turned quickly, a sure sign that the end of construction season is on the horizon.   We continue to make great progress on our broadband network expansion construction and, if mother nature cooperates, we anticipate each project will be built before freeze-out.

And today does feel like winter is coming, even in the Twin Cities, three hours from Paul Bunyan…

As the end of construction season approaches, Paul Bunyan Communications is on track to complete its planned broadband expansion projects across parts of Itasca and St. Louis Counties before freeze out.
Status of Paul Bunyan Communications Broadband Expansion projects:
• Itasca County:
City of Coleraine- Construction is completed with fiber splicing taking place. Services should become available in October
City of Bovey- Construction has started and is over 50% completed. Services should become available this winter.
Bearville(s) Township- Construction is done. Fiber splicing is in progress. Services should become available this winter.
• St. Louis County:
Sandy, Pike, & Wuori Township- Construction is done, fiber splicing is 75% done. Services should be available by the end of September
Alango & Owens Township- Construction is done and fiber splicing has started. Services should become available this winter.
Angora Township- Construction is done and fiber splicing has started. Services should become available this winter.
Balkan Township- Construction has started and is expected to be completed by mid-October. Services should become available this winter.
French Township- Construction is done. Fiber splicing has started. Services should become available this winter.
Great Scott Township & unorganized township north of Great Scott- Construction will start later this month and is expected to be completed by mid-November. Services should be available by end of winter.
Once the network is operational in an area, customers who signed up will be contacted to schedule service installations.
Sign Up Now to Ensure Fiber Optic Connection Residents and businesses in these expansion areas are encouraged to sign up for service now, before construction crews move on to ensure the fiber optic connection is brought up to the location. That can be done online at http://www.gigazone.com, by phone, or in person at our Grand Rapids Customer Service & Technology Center.
Services Available Upon Completion Once the network is live, customers will have access to Paul Bunyan’s GigaZone® services, including high-speed fiber-optic Internet with speeds up to 10 Gig and dependable, low-cost unlimited local and long-distance GigaZone® voice services.

EVENT Sep 3: ILSR and AAPB Community Broadband Film Series II – Rocketeers: The UTOPIA Fiber Story

From ILSR and AAPB…

Slated for Tomorrow, September 3rd from 4 to 5:00 pm ET, the livestream event will feature the film “Rocketeers: The UTOPIA Fiber Story” – an eye-opening documentary about how a publicly-owned fiber network has ignited local Internet choice and competition across dozens of cities, delivering connectivity at the speed of light.

Registration is free here.

Fairmont County Commission looks at 2026 budget – budget is discussed as an investment

The Fairmont Sentinel reports

The Martin County Board of Commissioners on Monday held a 2026 preliminary budget work session. As it stands, the county is looking at a 9.87 percent levy increase. It needs to adopt a preliminary budget and levy next month but won’t set the official amount until December.

They discussed a number of topics included in the budget and changes in the commission. Broadband was part of the discussion…

To close, Higgins asked the board what it wanted to see done next. Loughmiller said he was happy to leave the budget and levy it as is for now, though he did say he would like to see more done for broadband.

The board discussed using money from the reserves or the CIP.

“I’d like to continue to build the infrastructure and make Martin County a destination place. Western Martin County is where the broadband gap is,” Loughmiller said. “If we can do it, I’d rather invest in that kind of stuff.”

Koons said there was money set aside. However, he said if the $1.8 million, set aside for the justice center, was taken out completely, it would be about a 2.47 percent increase to the levy.

As it is, in 2026, the board is looking to utilize $1.453 of the $1.8 million, originally levied for the justice center project, to put toward broadband.