<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Municipal Telecommunications Referendum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blandinonbroadband.org/2009/12/08/municipal-telecommunications-referendum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2009/12/08/municipal-telecommunications-referendum/</link>
	<description>News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super-majority issues in the Legislature &#171; Blandin on Broadband</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2009/12/08/municipal-telecommunications-referendum/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Super-majority issues in the Legislature &#171; Blandin on Broadband]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.org/?p=2615#comment-6792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Super-majority issues in the&#160;Legislature    Thanks to Chris Mitchell for the heads up on activity related to S.F. No. 2532: Municipal Telecommunications Services. The big deal is allowing local governments to provide telecommunications services with a simple majority of public support, rather than the super-majority that is currently required. (I wrote more about the issue last December.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Super-majority issues in the&nbsp;Legislature    Thanks to Chris Mitchell for the heads up on activity related to S.F. No. 2532: Municipal Telecommunications Services. The big deal is allowing local governments to provide telecommunications services with a simple majority of public support, rather than the super-majority that is currently required. (I wrote more about the issue last December.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

