Comments on: Ultra High-Speed Broadband Task Force February 20, 2009

By: Speed bumps in Moorhead « Blandin on Broadband

Speed bumps in Moorhead « Blandin on Broadband — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:58:08 +0000

[...] an interesting perspective. I remember Geoff Daily’s comments at a MN Ultra High Speed Task Force meeting that commercial providers should be supportive of municipal networks – because they can [...]

By: Send your national Broadband ideas to the FCC now « Blandin on Broadband

Send your national Broadband ideas to the FCC now « Blandin on Broadband — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:34:12 +0000

[...] of some innovative local providers who have done a great job for their community; we have heard frustration from communities who don’t have local control. To that end, the Group promotes “meaningful [...]

By: March 20 Minnesota Ultra High-Speed Task Force Meeting Minutes « Blandin on Broadband

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:32:56 +0000

[...] That’s the issue in Cook County – as opposed to Scott County where they are been busy building redundancy. (Alluding to last month’s TF presentations.) [...]

By: Value Statement from the Minnesota Broadband Task Force « Blandin on Broadband

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 03:11:52 +0000

[...] funding. (You can get a list of potential projects on the Urban Users’ blog.) This too was an interesting conversation last month; I think because the underlying basis for the criteria relates so directly to the value [...]

By: Rural Areas: from dialup to fiber? « Blandin on Broadband

Rural Areas: from dialup to fiber? « Blandin on Broadband — Sun, 22 Feb 2009 06:37:31 +0000

[...] I got to listen to Danna MacKenzie from Cook County (for those outside MN, that borders Canada and Lake Superior – it’s *beautiful* and remote). [...]