<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minnesota Senate Broadband Inventory Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blandinonbroadband.org/2008/03/28/minnesota-senate-broadband-inventory-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2008/03/28/minnesota-senate-broadband-inventory-project/</link>
	<description>News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:18:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: House Passes Broadband Study Bill &#171; Blandin on Broadband</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2008/03/28/minnesota-senate-broadband-inventory-project/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[House Passes Broadband Study Bill &#171; Blandin on Broadband]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 09:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-3318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] House Passes Broadband Study&#160;Bill  Thanks to The Bemidji Pioneer Press for keeping me up to the minute this week on the progress of the broadband study bill. I’m going to paste their info below. I wasn’t able to find much on the Legislative web site yet, but it can take a while. I have been following the story in earlier blog posts. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] House Passes Broadband Study&nbsp;Bill  Thanks to The Bemidji Pioneer Press for keeping me up to the minute this week on the progress of the broadband study bill. I’m going to paste their info below. I wasn’t able to find much on the Legislative web site yet, but it can take a while. I have been following the story in earlier blog posts. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann Treacy</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2008/03/28/minnesota-senate-broadband-inventory-project/#comment-3252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann Treacy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-3252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zach,

I think that’s a great question. I know that there have been complaints about how the FCC tracks data – but what little I know about the State’s method, it doesn’t seem significantly different.

One of the first things I learned in library school was to be wary of any reference book that gets the information straight from the horse’s mouth. I think of my own driver’s license, which may or may not bear an exact resemblance to the truth. And in fairness, the information I provided two years ago may have been true then but that was several cookies ago. 

The same is true to getting info from the provider. Their situations change too. The answers will defer depending on whom in the office gets the survey. And you’re right – providers can be spending all of their time on surveys.

So, I’m afraid I don’t have a good response except to say again – that’s a great question.

Thanks!   Ann]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zach,</p>
<p>I think that’s a great question. I know that there have been complaints about how the FCC tracks data – but what little I know about the State’s method, it doesn’t seem significantly different.</p>
<p>One of the first things I learned in library school was to be wary of any reference book that gets the information straight from the horse’s mouth. I think of my own driver’s license, which may or may not bear an exact resemblance to the truth. And in fairness, the information I provided two years ago may have been true then but that was several cookies ago. </p>
<p>The same is true to getting info from the provider. Their situations change too. The answers will defer depending on whom in the office gets the survey. And you’re right – providers can be spending all of their time on surveys.</p>
<p>So, I’m afraid I don’t have a good response except to say again – that’s a great question.</p>
<p>Thanks!   Ann</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach Raskovich</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2008/03/28/minnesota-senate-broadband-inventory-project/#comment-3251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Raskovich]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.wordpress.com/?p=622#comment-3251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps I&#039;m wrong here, but can&#039;t the state get that information from the FCC?

I have had to file the dreaded FCC Form 477 - Local Telephone Competition &amp; Broadband Reporting - for several years running now.  It sounds like a perfect match for the information required to map broadband deployments.

I&#039;m commenting here if only to plead for non-duplication of paperwork at the federal and state levels.  I can&#039;t help but imagine yet another endless spreadsheet that will ask for data that already exists (assuming other providers were filing as already required).  As a provider it was always my opinion that the time spent reporting, and filing for our government could be better spent planning, researching, and mapping out our own future offerings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m wrong here, but can&#8217;t the state get that information from the FCC?</p>
<p>I have had to file the dreaded FCC Form 477 &#8211; Local Telephone Competition &amp; Broadband Reporting &#8211; for several years running now.  It sounds like a perfect match for the information required to map broadband deployments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m commenting here if only to plead for non-duplication of paperwork at the federal and state levels.  I can&#8217;t help but imagine yet another endless spreadsheet that will ask for data that already exists (assuming other providers were filing as already required).  As a provider it was always my opinion that the time spent reporting, and filing for our government could be better spent planning, researching, and mapping out our own future offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

