<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greater Minnesota Telehealth Broadband Initiative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blandinonbroadband.org/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/</link>
	<description>News and information on broadband use, policy, and trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:33:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Blandin Broadband Stimulus Pre-Planning Meeting Notes &#171; Blandin on Broadband</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/#comment-5273</link>
		<dc:creator>Blandin Broadband Stimulus Pre-Planning Meeting Notes &#171; Blandin on Broadband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/#comment-5273</guid>
		<description>[...] Greater Minnesota Telehealth Collaboration went through a process a bit like this a couple of years ago. They collaborated quickly (whoever [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Greater Minnesota Telehealth Collaboration went through a process a bit like this a couple of years ago. They collaborated quickly (whoever [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report of State Broadband Initiatives &#171; Blandin on Broadband</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/#comment-3778</link>
		<dc:creator>Report of State Broadband Initiatives &#171; Blandin on Broadband</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 21:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/#comment-3778</guid>
		<description>[...] Minnesota Telehealth Network (MTN) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Minnesota Telehealth Network (MTN) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff Daily</title>
		<link>http://blandinonbroadband.org/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blandinonbroadband.wordpress.com/2007/12/27/greater-minnesota-telehealth-broadband-initiative/#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Fascinating post, Ann! I&#039;m increasingly realizing the need for more scrutiny of government efforts to get more broadband out there and get people using it more.

That&#039;s not to say efforts like the FCC&#039;s $400 million aren&#039;t well-intentioned, it just seems like sometimes they&#039;re a little shortsighted, and in being so end up not allocating the resources available to them in a way that can maximize the return on investment. 

I wrote up some thoughts in response to your post that can be found here: http://www.app-rising.com/gdblog/2007/12/questions_raised_about_efficac.html

The gist of these is that perhaps instead of forcing matching funds to be spent on networks, perhaps they could instead be refocused on the adoption and use of these networks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating post, Ann! I&#8217;m increasingly realizing the need for more scrutiny of government efforts to get more broadband out there and get people using it more.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say efforts like the FCC&#8217;s $400 million aren&#8217;t well-intentioned, it just seems like sometimes they&#8217;re a little shortsighted, and in being so end up not allocating the resources available to them in a way that can maximize the return on investment. </p>
<p>I wrote up some thoughts in response to your post that can be found here: <a href="http://www.app-rising.com/gdblog/2007/12/questions_raised_about_efficac.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.app-rising.com/gdblog/2007/12/questions_raised_about_efficac.html</a></p>
<p>The gist of these is that perhaps instead of forcing matching funds to be spent on networks, perhaps they could instead be refocused on the adoption and use of these networks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
